DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2291382/v1
AimTo understand the overall levels of stress perception, self-efficacy, and emotional intelligence among Chinese rehabilitation therapy students and to explore the relationship between the three.
Methods From October to November 2022, a questionnaire survey was conducted on 145 cases of rehabilitation therapy students at a medical school in Gansu, China, using the Stress Perception Scale, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Emotional Intelligence Scale.
Results The total score of perceived stress was (44.33±7.05), the total score of emotional intelligence was (48.06±6.40), and the total score of general self-efficacy was (25.8±6.04), and there was a significant positive correlation between all three (r>0.490,P<0.01). Emotional intelligence had a significant mediating effect phenomenon between stress perception and general self-efficacy.
Conclusion Students in rehabilitation therapy had moderate levels of stress perception, emotional intelligence, and general self-efficacy, and emotional intelligence partially mediated the effect between general self-efficacy and stress perception. It is suggested that educators should actively assess the level of stress in rehabilitation therapy majors, pay more attention to students' emotional intelligence, improve self-efficacy, and prepare for the development of targeted intervention programs later.
Modern rehabilitation medicine was introduced to China in the mid-1980s. Compared with clinical medicine, rehabilitation therapy has the characteristics of late start, rapid development and weak cultural background[1]. With the continuous development of China's social economy and the aging of the population, there are more and more patients with cerebrovascular diseases [2], and the number of people who need rehabilitation services must be increasing, and the demand for rehabilitation medical services in society is also increasing [3]. The professionals in rehabilitation therapy obviously cannot meet the growing social demand. Therefore, after the introduction of modern rehabilitation medicine in the early 1980s, the career of rehabilitation medicine developed rapidly[4]. Rehabilitation therapy is one of the branches of rehabilitation medicine and one of the most important branches, which is the most important means for patients to return to society from functional impairment to self-care eventually. Therefore, rehabilitation medicine and rehabilitation therapy occupy a pivotal position in the modern medical system. In China, the undergraduate program in rehabilitation therapy was first established in 2002 and has existed for less than 20 years and is an emerging specialty [5].
Stress perception refers to the confusion or danger to the psyche that arises when individuals face stressful events and adverse factors, causing physical discomfort and tension. Studies have shown that urban residents in China are currently psychologically stressed, with age and gender showing differences in stress levels, and a greater proportion of those with lower education and poorer economic status belonging to high-pressure groups [6]. University students, as a representative group of those receiving higher education, have a higher level of education and psychological problems are increasingly valued, and university students are a group with a high prevalence of psychological problems and coping styles are closely related to mental health [7].
Self-efficacy and refers to the degree to which a person assesses or trusts his or her expectations of his or her level of competence, and is an explanation of behavior by the interaction between the environment, behavior, and the individual. Self-efficacy, as proposed by Bandura, is the result of an individual's ability to measure and assess their own abilities, which in turn has an impact on people's behavioral choices, their level of commitment to things, their expressed interests, and determines their ability to accomplish particular things[8]. It follows that self-efficacy is largely concerned with the assessment of self-efficacy and is an important emotional manifestation of self-awareness. The moderating role of emotional intelligence has been found by numerous scholars, but less so in the variables of this study. Combined with theories related to emotional intelligence, individuals with high emotional intelligence are better able to use, regulate, and identify their own emotions and those of others. Therefore, this study analyzed the relationship between perceived stress, self-efficacy, and emotional intelligence among rehabilitation therapy students through a cross-sectional survey to improve the mental health of rehabilitation therapy students and provide more talents for China's rehabilitation career based on the findings.
1.1 Study population
From October to November 2022, a total of 200 questionnaires were distributed and 145 valid questionnaires were recovered using a combination of stratified and random sampling among rehabilitation therapy students at a medical school in Gansu, China. Inclusion criteria: students of rehabilitation therapy; informed consent and voluntary participation. Exclusion criteria: students who were on leave during the survey; those who were unable to understand and answer the questionnaire.
1.2 Methods
An anonymous questionnaire test was used. Before the survey, the investigator explained the significance of this research study and the precautions related to questionnaire completion. The respondents were instructed to complete the questionnaire online and submit it to the system immediately, and the link to the questionnaire was sent to the students on internship by WeChat.
1.3 Survey tools
1.3.1 General information questionnaire
Self-designed general information questionnaire, including grade, gender, ethnicity, age, major selection method, from, whether they are only child, whether they are class leaders, and per capita monthly family income.
1.3.2 General self-efficacy scale(GSES)
It was developed by Professor Schwarzer [9], a leading German clinical and health psychologist, and his colleagues in 1981. The scale has now been translated into at least 25 languages and is widely used internationally. The Chinese version was translated and revised by Wang Cai Kang [10] et al. The scale has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 and has relatively good validity. There are 10 items related to the individual's self-efficacy when encountering frustration or difficulties, using a 4-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 1 to 4 on a scale of "not at all correct" to "completely correct", with a total score of 10 to 40. The higher the score, the higher the sense of self-efficacy.
1.3.3 perception Stress scale(PSS)
Cohen et al [11] developed the Perceived Stress Scale in 1983 to measure the stress level of individuals. The scale consists of 14 questions that require the respondent to answer questions based on their own feelings of tension and loss of control under stress. It is a widely used stress measurement tool with good reliability and validity. It is divided into 6 areas: stress related to patient care, faculty and staff, tasks and workload, peers and daily life, lack of professional knowledge and skills, and environmental factors.
1.3.4 Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale(WLEIS)
Emotional intelligence was measured using the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale(WLEIS) developed by Chi-Sum Wong and Kenneth.S.Law (2002).
The reliability and validity of this scale were good. The Likert 4-point scale was used, ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating higher emotional intelligence [12].
1.4 Statistical analysis
SPSS 24.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data. Count data were described by frequency and percentage; measurement data were expressed by mean and standard deviation. Pearson was used for correlation analysis. The Process plug-in in SPSS developed by Hayes was used to perform the mediated effects test and analysis. The test level was α=0.05.
2.1 Stress perception, general self-efficacy, and emotional intelligence levels
2.1.1 Stress perception
There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in the levels of stress perception among students of different modalities of choosing rehabilitation therapy program and different ethnic groups. See Table 1.
Table 1. Comparison of stress perceptions among rehabilitation therapy students(M±SD)
|
|
N |
Sense of loss of control |
Sense of tension |
Total score |
t/F |
P |
Education |
Specialized students |
53 |
22.23±3.92 |
21.83±4.01 |
44.06±6.86 |
0.713 |
0.723 |
|
Undergraduates |
92 |
22.67±4.45 |
21.82±4.35 |
44.49±7.20 |
|
|
Age |
16~18 |
16 |
22.69±5.93 |
23.19±5.49 |
45.88±9.28 |
0.933 |
0.427 |
|
19~21 |
90 |
22.38±3.82 |
21.92±3.8 |
44.3±6.08 |
|
|
|
22~24 |
36 |
22.53±4.51 |
20.81±4.22 |
43.33±7.83 |
|
|
|
>25 |
3 |
25.33±4.62 |
23.67±7.51 |
49±12.12 |
|
|
Grade |
Freshman |
24 |
22.54±4.15 |
21±3.88 |
43.54±6.19 |
1.007 |
0.392 |
|
Sophomore |
44 |
23.59±4.98 |
22.27±5.33 |
45.86±8.44 |
|
|
|
Junior |
50 |
21.6±3.33 |
22±3.16 |
43.6±5.56 |
|
|
|
Senior |
27 |
22.41±4.44 |
21.48±4.24 |
43.89±7.74 |
|
|
Gender |
Female |
89 |
22.25±4.29 |
21.97±4.6 |
44.21±7.59 |
0.364 |
0.801 |
|
male |
56 |
22.93±4.2 |
21.59±3.55 |
44.52±6.16 |
|
|
Ethnicity |
Han Chinese |
119 |
22.8±4.27 |
22.06±4.29 |
44.86±7.24 |
0.17 |
0.054 |
|
others |
26 |
21.19±4 |
20.73±3.69 |
41.92±5.64 |
|
|
Are you an only child |
Yes |
22 |
21.36±3.55 |
21±3.85 |
42.36±4.94 |
0.139 |
0.156 |
|
No |
123 |
22.72±4.35 |
21.97±4.27 |
44.68±7.33 |
|
|
Are you a class officer |
Yes |
33 |
22.42±4.02 |
22.52±4.37 |
44.94±6.50 |
0.838 |
0.575 |
|
No |
112 |
22.54±4.34 |
21.62±4.16 |
44.15±7.23 |
|
|
Ways of choosing rehabilitation profession
|
Voluntary selection |
69 |
23.86±5.05 |
22.35±4.94 |
46.20±8.47 |
5.145 |
0.007 |
|
Transfer |
54 |
21.48±2.75 |
21.5±3.3 |
42.98±4.76 |
|
|
|
Influenced by others |
22 |
20.82±3.29 |
20.95±3.64 |
41.77±5.35 |
|
|
Where are you from |
Urban |
28 |
22.54±4.43 |
21.64±4.16 |
44.19±7.16 |
0.374 |
0.899 |
|
Rural |
117 |
22.50±4.23 |
21.86±4.24 |
44.37±7.06 |
|
|
Monthly per capita family income |
<1000 |
41 |
23.76±4.01 |
22.41±4.74 |
46.17±7.70 |
2.012 |
0.115 |
|
1000-2000 |
63 |
21.79±4.21 |
22.38±4.17 |
44.17±7.01 |
|
|
|
2000-3000 |
27 |
22.63±4.5 |
20.89±3 |
43.52±5.49 |
|
|
|
>3000 |
14 |
21.86±4.26 |
19.36±3.93 |
41.21±7.15 |
|
|
2.1.2 General self-efficacy
There were significant differences (p<0.05) in the general self-efficacy of the students by the way they chose to specialize in rehabilitation therapy and by gender. See Table 2.
Table 2 Comparison of general self-efficacy of rehabilitation therapy students (M±SD)
|
|
N |
Total score |
t/F |
P |
Education |
Specialized degree |
53 |
25.85±6.44 |
0.493 |
0.943 |
|
Undergraduate degree |
92 |
25.77±5.84 |
|
|
Age |
16~18 |
16 |
48.06±6.40 |
1.191 |
0.316 |
|
19~21 |
90 |
25.4±5.92 |
|
|
|
22~24 |
36 |
26.92±5.76 |
|
|
|
>25 |
3 |
30±9.54 |
|
|
Grade |
Freshman |
24 |
27.08±5.24 |
1,66 |
0.178 |
|
Sophomore |
44 |
26.66±5.66 |
|
|
|
Junior |
50 |
24.34±5.95 |
|
|
|
Senior |
27 |
25.96±7.15 |
|
|
Gender |
Female |
89 |
25.24±6.15 |
0.76 |
0.157 |
|
male |
56 |
26.70±5.80 |
|
|
Ethnicity |
Han Chinese |
119 |
26.04±6.18 |
0.349 |
0.304 |
|
others |
26 |
24.69±5.33 |
|
|
Are you the only child in your family |
Yes |
22 |
24.59±5.17 |
0.313 |
0.31 |
|
No |
123 |
26.02±6.18 |
|
|
Are class leaders |
Yes |
33 |
26.33±6.51 |
0.907 |
0.566 |
|
No |
112 |
25.64±5.92 |
|
|
How to choose the rehabilitation profession |
Voluntary selection |
69 |
27.09±6.52 |
3.106 |
0.048 |
|
Transfer |
54 |
24.74±5.33 |
|
|
|
Influenced by others |
22 |
24.36±5.53 |
|
|
Where are you from |
Urban |
28 |
26.54±7.23 |
0.16 |
0.475 |
|
Rural |
117 |
25.62±5.74 |
|
|
Monthly per capita family income |
<1000 |
41 |
26.83±5.70 |
0.911 |
0.437 |
|
1000-2000 |
63 |
24.94±6.64 |
|
|
|
2000-3000 |
27 |
26.37±5.46 |
|
|
|
>3000 |
14 |
25.57±5.14 |
|
|
1.1.3 Emotional Intelligence
There were significant differences (p<0.05) in the general self-efficacy of students with different ways of choosing a rehabilitation therapy program and different per capita monthly family income. See Table 3.
Table 3 Comparison of emotional intelligence of students in rehabilitation therapy (M±SD)
|
|
N |
Self-emotional assessment |
Emotional assessment of others |
Emotional utilization |
Emotional regulation |
Total score |
t/F |
P |
Academic Background |
Specialized degree |
53 |
11.94±1.57 |
12.02±1.84 |
11.58±1.99 |
11.45±1.96 |
47±5.86 |
0.511 |
0.123 |
|
Undergraduate degree |
92 |
12.34±1.64 |
12.27±1.96 |
12.01±2.02 |
12.04±1.94 |
48.66±6.64 |
|
|
Age |
16~18 |
16 |
12.06±1.98 |
12±2.10 |
11.5±1.79 |
11.13±1.93 |
46.69±6.85 |
0.811 |
0.49 |
|
19~21 |
90 |
12.13±1.62 |
12.17±1.99 |
11.71±2.09 |
11.86±2.05 |
47.87±6.59 |
|
|
|
22~24 |
36 |
12.33±1.53 |
12.31±1.77 |
12.22±1.88 |
11.94±1.74 |
48.81±5.83 |
|
|
|
>25 |
3 |
13±1 |
12±0 |
13.67±1.53 |
13.33±1.53 |
52±4 |
|
|
Grade |
Freshman |
24 |
12.70±1.73 |
12.75±2.38 |
12.25±2.13 |
12.42±2.10 |
50.13±7.16 |
2.271 |
0.083 |
|
Sophomore |
44 |
12.36±1.59 |
12.27±1.68 |
12.20±1.81 |
12.09±1.70 |
48.93±5.60 |
|
|
|
Junior |
50 |
11.86±1.60 |
11.82±1.90 |
11.38±2.09 |
11.36±2.07 |
46.42±6.51 |
|
|
|
Senior |
27 |
12.07±1.54 |
12.19±1.82 |
11.81±2.02 |
11.74±1.93 |
47.81±6.28 |
|
|
Gender |
Female |
89 |
12.04±1.59 |
12.17±1.99 |
11.66±1.95 |
11.61±2.00 |
47.48±6.47 |
0.921 |
0.176 |
|
male |
56 |
12.43±1.66 |
12.20±1.81 |
12.16±2.10 |
12.18±1.86 |
48.96±6.23 |
|
|
Ethnicity |
Han Chinese |
119 |
12.18±1.70 |
12.13±1.95 |
11.87±2.03 |
11.82±1.98 |
47.98±6.55 |
0.745 |
0.773 |
|
others |
26 |
12.27±1.25 |
12.42±1.79 |
11.81±2.00 |
11.88±1.90 |
48.38±5.76 |
|
|
Are you the only child in your family |
Yes |
22 |
12.05±1.36 |
12.27±1.55 |
12.18±1.68 |
11.82±2.08 |
48.31±4.82 |
0.293 |
0.835 |
|
No |
123 |
12.22±1.67 |
12.16±1.98 |
11.80±2.07 |
11.83±1.95 |
48.01±6.66 |
|
|
Are class leaders |
Yes |
33 |
11.91±1.65 |
12.21±1.82 |
11.48±2.33 |
11.48±2.28 |
47.09±6.77 |
0.249 |
0.326 |
|
No |
112 |
12.28±1.61 |
12.17±1.95 |
11.96±1.91 |
11.93±1.86 |
48.34±6.29 |
|
|
How to choose the rehabilitation profession |
Voluntary selection |
69 |
12.59±1.57 |
12.45±2.08 |
12.41±2.02 |
12.30±1.87 |
49.75±6.51 |
6.572 |
0.002 |
|
Transfer |
54 |
12.07±1.37 |
12±1.77 |
11.59±2 |
11.65±2.05 |
47.31±6.03 |
|
|
|
Influenced by others |
22 |
11.23±1.95 |
11.77±1.66 |
10.77±1.48 |
10.77±1.57 |
44.55±5.29 |
|
|
Where are you from |
Urban |
28 |
12.32±1.68 |
12.46±2.19 |
11.93±2.09 |
11.64±2.02 |
48.36±6.88 |
0.566 |
0.782 |
|
Rural |
117 |
12.16±1.61 |
12.11±1.85 |
11.84±2.01 |
11.87±1.95 |
47.98±6.31 |
|
|
Monthly per capita family income |
<1000 |
41 |
12.76±1.46 |
12.88±1.72 |
12.56±1.66 |
12.51±1.75 |
50.71±5.42 |
0.902 |
0.01 |
|
1000-2000 |
63 |
11.86±1.61 |
11.81±2.10 |
11.41±1.91 |
11.38±1.95 |
46.46±6.47 |
|
|
|
2000-3000 |
27 |
12.19±1.59 |
12.07±1.21 |
11.74±2.28 |
11.70±2.07 |
47.70±6.12 |
|
|
|
>3000 |
14 |
12.07±1.90 |
12±2.32 |
12±2.48 |
12.07±1.98 |
48.14±7.36 |
|
|
2.2 Correlation analysis
There was a significant two-by-two positive correlation (p < 0.01) between stress perception, general self-efficacy, and emotional intelligence. See Table 4
Table 4 Correlation analysis of force perception, general self-efficacy, and emotional intelligence in rehabilitation students
|
WLEIS |
GSES |
PSS |
|
WLEIS |
1 |
|
|
|
GSES |
0.581** |
1 |
|
|
PSS |
0.362** |
0.490** |
1 |
** At the 0.01 level (two-tailed), the correlation is significant.
2.3 Mediating effects between stress perception, general self-efficacy, and emotional intelligence
There was a partial mediating effect between stress perception, general self-efficacy, and emotional intelligence, as shown in Table 5. the model of the mediating effect is shown in Figure 1.
Table 5 Mediated effect analysis of stress perception, general self-efficacy, and emotional intelligence among recreation and therapy students
Effect |
Independent variable |
Dependent variable |
β |
t |
Boot LLCI |
Boot ULCI
|
P |
Direct effect |
PSS |
GSES |
0.2757 |
4.7274 |
0.1604 |
0.391 |
<0.001 |
Indirect effect |
PSS |
WLEIS |
0.3282 |
4.6401 |
0.1884 |
0.468 |
<0.001 |
|
WLEIS |
GSES |
0.4387 |
6.8259 |
0.3117 |
0.5658 |
<0.001 |
Total effect |
PSS |
GSES |
0.144 |
3.8095 |
According to the mediating effect argument |
<0.001 |
The perception of stress among rehabilitation therapy students is at a moderate level, which is consistent with most studies[13]. As a group receiving higher education, college students have not yet entered society and are subjected to multiple sources of stress, and changes in their environment, economic status, and emotional problems can increase their vulnerability. Some studies have shown that academic stress is the most important source of stress faced by college students in China at present, and is the most important factor threatening their psychological health. [14] Therefore, it is recommended that universities should pay attention to students' psychological care to alleviate their academic stress.
The general self-efficacy of rehabilitation therapy students is at a moderate to high level. Self-efficacy, as the basis for subjective cognition by individuals, can promote self-regulation and self-correction when managing stressors[15]. Related studies have shown that self-efficacy controls an individual's demands on the environment, and students with high self-efficacy are able to use effective learning strategies and successful experiences to overcome the difficulties they face in their environment [16-18]. Medical students with higher levels of academic self-efficacy handle academic stress more easily and have more energy to volunteer.
Emotional intelligence is important for the achievement of academic and social success of college students, which is conducive to maintaining a healthy psychological state and is an influential factor that cannot be ignored in building a good psychological state of college students. The results of this study showed that the emotional intelligence of rehabilitation therapy students was at a moderate level and proportional to stress levels, which is different from previous studies [19,20]. Due to the current demands of society on the development of the rehabilitation therapy profession, medical school education is increasing year by year in terms of both curriculum difficulty and graduation pressure, and rehabilitation therapy students are not only required to complete their studies but also face a series of dilemmas in their future career development in the current situation, which shows the importance of the current emotional intelligence training in medical schools. At the same time, because of this series of external pressures, students' initial enthusiasm for the profession is gradually being consumed, which has the effect of bringing about a negative attitude towards academic life [21-22].
There is a significant "two-by-two correlation" and "sequential positive prediction" effect between stress perception, general self-efficacy and emotional intelligence, and emotional intelligence has a partial mediating effect between general self-efficacy and stress perception. This suggests that emotional intelligence affects self-efficacy in two ways: directly through stress perception and indirectly through emotional intelligence.
Stress perception, emotional intelligence, and general self-efficacy of rehabilitation therapy majors were all at moderate levels, and emotional intelligence had a partially mediating effect between general self-efficacy and stress perception. This suggests that educators should actively assess the stress level of rehabilitation therapy majors, enhance their attention to students' emotional intelligence, and improve their self-efficacy to prepare for the development of targeted intervention programs at a later stage.
Due to the limitation of research resources, only students from one medical school were selected as the subjects of this study, and there is still room for improvement in terms of sample diversity and sample size. The online survey was used to collect data, and individual respondents may not have completed the responses carefully. Future research will be combined with personal interviews and qualitative research to improve the accuracy of the survey study.
General self-efficacy scale
perception Stress scale
Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Ethics Committee of Gansu Medical College approved the study. (approval number: 2022002). All the partici pants provided an informed consent.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
The data sets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are those available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
All authors declare that they have no conficts of interest.
Funding
There is no funding for the study. The corresponding author has full access to all data in the study and is ultimately responsible for the decision to submit for publication.
Acknowledgements
We thank all the students who participated in the study.
Authors' contributions
ZYX designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. HT formally analyzed and surveyed, providing substantial support in the analysis and interpretation of the data. ZYX contributed to key revisions to the report version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Author details
Yan-xue Zheng, Department of Emergency, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China,E-mail: [email protected].
Corresponding author Huan Tao, Huangfumi Acupuncture and Moxibustion College, Gansu Medical College, No. 18, Jinghe Avenue, Kongtong District, Pingliang City, Gansu Province, China.E-mail: [email protected].
Statement
All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.