2.1. Study design
This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent the soft tissue release procedure throughout the indicated time period and were willing to undergo MRI examination before and after surgery. The preoperative MRI examinations were performed within 30 days before surgery date. The study involved 40 subjects who underwent capsule release for mild to moderate stages of knee OA including Kellgren–Lawrence (K/L) grades 2 and 3, between January 2019 and January 2021. MRI was performed pre- and postoperatively (6 months).
2.2. Study population and selection criteria
All aspects of the study and the consent form were approved by the institutional review board prior to implementation. All participants were required to provide full informed consent, and were willing and able to comply with all study requirements according to the following criteria. The operation included medial release, plicectomy, lateral release and excision of impingement of infrapatellar fat pad.
2.3. Inclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria included the presence of OA of the medial compartment of the knee with a tibiofemoral angle of varus < 10°, intact knee ligaments, normal range of motion (minimum of 120° of flexion) and a body mass index (BMI) < 35, grade 2 and grade 3 K/L OA and the presence of medial plica on arthroscopic examination.
2.4. Exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria included a history of inflammatory or septic arthritis, inability to undergo MRI examination, the presence of osteoarthritis of the lateral tibiofemoral compartments, unstable meniscal fragments, instability owing to previous ligament injury or post-traumatic OA.
2.4. Medial release and plicaectomy
With the arthroscope inserted through the inferolateral portal, an electronic shaver was inserted through the superolateral and inferomedial portals to remove fibrotic medial plica (Fig. 1a). A No.11 scalpel was inserted through the inferomedial portal with the blade facing medially to cut through medial joint capsule at locations which were approximately 1 cm superior to the knee joint line, and extended far beyond the medial margin of femoral medical condyle (Fig. 1b). A straight longitudinal medial capsular release was achieved with the use of straight basket forceps (Fig. 1c); this began with the previously cut end, and extended proximally until the instant at which the muscle fibres of the vastus medialis were exposed; these completed the entire medial release. The tight and obliterated medial facet of the patellofemoral joint was then widely open. This was verified by easily passing the arthroscope beneath the patella with the knee in the full extension position (Fig. 1).
2.5. Lateral release and excision of impingement of infrapatellar fat pad
With the arthroscope inserted through the inferolateral portal, an electronic shaver was inserted through the inferomedial portal to remove inflammatory and fibrotic portion of the infrapatellar fat pad. For the knees with lateral compression syndrome, lateral release was performed by inserting the No.11 scalpel into the inferolateral portal and by cutting the lateral retinaculum percutaneously. The extent and adequacy of the release could be evaluated directly by visual inspection through the arthroscope.
The whole procedure included eradicating the inflammatory synovium and medial plica occupying the space over the inferomedial region of the patella and medial gutter, the tight and obliterated medial facet of the patellofemoral joint was released. After medial release, the patella was always deviated laterally, tightened lateral retinaculum could be felt by moving the patella medially, then lateral release was performed. The extent and adequacy of the release was evaluated by direct vision through arthroscope.
2.6. Clinical outcome measurements
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score was initially developed in 1982, and has undergone multiple revisions. The WOMAC is a psychometrically valid and responsive 24-item, disease-specific, outcome measure for knee OA that assesses pain, stiffness and physical function using visual analogue or five-point Likert scales. Likert scale scores for each domain of the Likert scale WOMAC were calculated by summing item scores and by dividing by the number of items in each domain to obtain scores in the range of 0 to 4, with higher scores reflecting more pain, stiffness and poorer physical function. At each dimension, there were question designs which were used to assess the clinical severity of the disease (5 questions for pain, 2 questions for stiffness and 17 questions for physical function). It is available in 5-point Likert. In the Likert version, each item offers five responses: ‘none’ equivalent to a score of 0, ‘mild’ with a score of 1, ‘moderate’ with a score of 2, ‘severe’ with a score of 3 and ‘extreme’ with a score of 4 [22]. In 1994, a consensus meeting recommended the use of WOMAC as a primary measure of efficacy in OA [23]. The WOMAC score was measured by the patient with assistance from M-J Chen on admission for surgery and 6 months after operation.
2.7. Knee MRI acquisitions
MRI scans were performed at baseline and 6 months after surgery using 1.5 Tesla Magnetom Avanto scanners (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) with a dedicated eight-channel knee coil.
To assess axial, coronal and sagittal alignments and morphology, the following sequences were obtained:
axial: two-dimensional (2D) gradient multiecho, slice thickness: 4 mm, gap: 0 mm, matrix 256 × 256; repetition rate (TR): 564 mm; echo time (TE): 8 ms; flip angle: 30°, number of excitations (NEX): 1;
coronal: longitudinal-relaxation-weighted (T1W) turbo spin-echo (TSE), slice thickness: 3 mm, gap: 0.6 mm, matrix: 256 ×256, TR: 550 mm, TE: 8 ms, flip angle: 30°, NEX: 1; coronal: proton density fat saturation (PD-FS) TSE, slice thickness: 3 mm, gap: 0.6 mm, matrix: 256 × 256, TR: 2000 mm; TE: 19 mm, flip angle: 90°. NEX: 1,
sagittal: T1W TSE, slice thickness: 3 mm, gap: 0.6 mm, matrix: 256 × 256, TR: 510 mm, TE: 810 ms, flip angle: 150°, NEX: 1; sagittal: PD-FS TSE, slice thickness: 3 mm, gap: 0.6 mm, matrix: 256 × 256, TR: 2190 mm, TE: 21 ms, flip angle: 150°, NEX: 1; sagittal PDW_TSE, slice thickness: 3 mm, gap: 0.6 mm, matrix: 256 × 256, TR: 2190 mm, TE: 21 ms, flip angle: 150, NEX: 1; sagittal: transverse relaxation (T2) fast field echo, slice thickness: 1.5 mm, gap: 0 mm, matrix: 256 × 256, TR: 510 mm, TE: 10 ms, flip angle: 150° and NEX: 1.
The examination name and parameters are described in Table 1.
Table 1
MRI acquisition parameters in sequence and views
| sequence | view |
BML (Fig. 3) | PD-FS | Coronal and sagittal |
PT (Fig. 4) | Gradient mutliecho | Axial |
BO (Fig. 5) | Gradient mutliecho | Axial |
TT–TG distance (Fig. 6) | Gradient mutliecho | Axial |
IS ratio (Fig. 7) | T1W | Sagittal |
2.8. Definition of bone marrow lessions(BMLs) on MRI
BMLs were defined as ill-defined areas with high-signal intensities in PD-FS MR images located within 1.0 cm of the articular cartilage, which were present on either ≧ 2 sagittal and/or ≧ 2 coronal images. These were classified in four regions.
2.9. Measurement volume of BMLs on MRI
Cross-sectional areas were determined on coronal images. For each lesion, the linear measurement tool was used to mark the BML edges that defined the largest BML cross-section areas. In the sagittal image, the anterior-posterior (AP) dimension was measured. We defined multiple cross-sectional areas in the AP dimension to represent the approximate volume of each BML (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3).
2.10. Evaluation of patellar instability
There are parameters for patellar instability that include the PT angle, BO, TT–TG distance and IS ratio.
2.11. Patellar tilt (PT) angle
A method was used to assess the patellar tilt which was based on the definition of the angle formed by lines joining the maximum width of the patella (PW) and the posterior femoral condyles (PCL). All tilt measurements will be reported in degrees (°). Normal tilt ranges from 0°–5°, and tilt angles > 10° are abnormal (Fig. 4).[39]
2.12. Bisect offset (BO)
BO measures the patellar width medially and laterally to the deepest part of the trochlear groove [24]. The BO is the % of the patella lateral to midline of the trochlea (the midline is transposed from the slice with the largest posterior condylar line to the slice with the widest patella). A larger valve implies an increased lateral displacement [17]. For BO measurements, we described in caption of (Fig. 5).
2.13. Tibial-tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT–TG) distance
The TT–TG distance was assessed by measuring the distance between the trochlear groove and the tibial tuberosity. We measured it as described in the caption of Fig. 6. The TT–TG distance measured the increase in the lateral position of the tibial tubercle relative to the trochlear groove. We had previously assessed this as the ‘Q’ angle. Lateralization of the tibial tubercle might weaken the vastus medialis muscle and cause lateral retinaculum contraction [25].
2.14. IS (Insall-Salvati) ratio
The IS ratio was measured as described in the caption of Fig. 7. Values of the tendon length/patellar length (LT/LP) < 1.1 were accepted as patella baja, and values > 1.3 were accepted as patella alta (Fig. 7).
2.15 X-ray assessement and KL classification
Bilateral views of the tibiofemoral compartment of the knee joint were obtained using the fixed-flexion technique, and skyline views were obtained of the patellofemoral joint. For the skyline view, each knee was imaged with the participant in a standing position and the limb flexed at 30 degrees during weight bearing.
The radiographic severity of OA was graded according to the K/L criteria, where grade 0 = normal; grade 1 = doubtful narrowing of joint space and possible osteophytic lipping; grade 2 = definite osteophytes and possible narrowing of the joint space; grade 3 = moderate multiple osteophytes, definite narrowing of joint space and grade 4 = severe joint space narrowing with at least small definite osteophytes and deformity, cysts or sclerosis.
All X-ray parameters, including BMLs and intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients, were measured by a senior doctor (C-H C). Interrater intraclass correlation coefficients were assessed by C-H Chou and H-P Lee.
2.16. Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were performed for all variables in the study. Measures of central tendency (mean) and standard deviation were performed for all continuous variables, and a proportion was calculated for categorical variables. The intraobserver and interobserver variability were assessed using interclass and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The paired Student’s t-test and two-sided Wilcoxon test were used to compare the preoperative and postoperative WOMAC scores, BO, TT–TG distance and IS ratio. The volume of the BMLs and PT angles were assessed by the nonparametric two-sided Wilcoxon test.