Distribution of E. coli and Salmonella in salads
A total number of 216 salad samples were collected and analyzed for the presence of Salmonella and E. coli. Salmonella was isolated from 66 (30.56%) samples while E. coli was isolated from 29 (13.43%) samples, out of which 3(10.34%) were found to be E. coli O157: H7.
Association of various variables with the rate of bacterial contamination
A total of 216 salad samples were analyzed for the presence of E. coli and Salmonella. Salads served in Grade C restaurants showed higher contamination of E. coli (20.83%) and Salmonella (41.64%) as compared to Grade A and B types (p≤0.05). Similarly, salads prepared by the illiterate chefs were found more prone to contamination by E. coli (44%) and Salmonella (66.7%) (p≤0.05). The high incidence of contamination by E. coli (16.67%) and Salmonella (32.8%) were observed in the salads prepared by the non-gloved chefs (p≤0.05). Chopping boards and knives washed by water showed higher contaminations of Salmonella (44.4%) in comparison to those washed by detergents and soaps (p≤0.05).
Table 1: Association of various variables with the rate of bacterial contamination
S.No
|
|
Sample from
|
|
Isolates
|
Attributes
|
No. of Sample
|
E. coli
|
Salmonella
|
|
|
|
|
Contaminated sample
|
p-value
|
Contaminated sample
|
p-value
|
|
|
Grade A
|
72
|
4(5.55%)
|
|
14(19.44%)
|
|
1
|
Grades
|
Grade B
|
72
|
10(13.88%)
|
0.015*
|
22(30.55%)
|
0.015*
|
|
|
Grade C
|
72
|
15(20.83%)
|
|
30(41.64%)
|
|
2
|
Literacy
|
Literate
|
207
|
25(12%)
|
0.021*
|
60(29%)
|
0.025*
|
|
|
Illiterate
|
9
|
4(44%)
|
|
6(66.7%)
|
|
3
|
Personal hygiene
|
Gloved
|
54
|
2(3.7%)
|
0.016*
|
1(5.6%)
|
0.015*
|
|
|
Non-gloved
|
162
|
27(16.67%)
|
|
65(32.8%)
|
|
4
|
Cleaning materials
|
Soap/detergent
|
171
|
19(11%)
|
0.052
|
46(26.9%)
|
0.023*
|
|
|
Water
|
45
|
10(22.2%)
|
|
20(44.4%)
|
|
⃰=Significant at 5% level of significance
Antibiotic susceptibility pattern
AST was also performed for all the E. coli and Salmonella isolates against different antibiotics like ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, amoxicillin and gentamicin. More than half of the E. coli isolates (58.60%) were found to be resistant to ampicillin. Gentamicin was the most effective antibiotic as 96.60% of the isolates were found to be sensitive to it followed by cotrimoxazole killing 93.20% of E. coli isolates. The least effective antibiotic was ampicillin which inhibited the growth of 41.40% of E. coli isolates. Out of 29 isolates of E. coli, 4(13.80%) were MDR. Likewise, all Salmonella isolates were found to be resistant to amoxicillin. Cotrimoxazole was the most effective antibiotics as 97% of Salmonella isolates were found to be sensitive to it followed by gentamicin killing 95.5% of Salmonella isolates. The least effective antibiotics was ciprofloxacin which inhibited the growth of only 4% Salmonella isolates followed by amoxicillin to which all the isolates were resistant. Out of 66 isolates of Salmonella subjected to AST, 19(28.78%) were MDR
Table 2. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of isolates
SN
|
Antibiotics
|
Susceptibility pattern
|
|
|
Susceptibility pattern of Salmonella
|
Susceptibility pattern of E. coli
|
|
|
S
|
I
|
R
|
S
|
I
|
R
|
1
|
Azithromycin
|
77.30%
|
0%
|
22.70%
|
NT
|
NT
|
NT
|
2
|
Amoxicillin
|
0%
|
0%
|
100%
|
NT
|
NT
|
NT
|
3
|
Ciprofloxacin
|
6%
|
80.30%
|
13.70%
|
82.80%
|
0%
|
17.20%
|
4
|
Cotrimoxazole
|
97%
|
0%
|
3%
|
93.20%
|
3.40%
|
3.40%
|
5
|
Gentamicin
|
95.50%
|
0%
|
4.50%
|
96.60%
|
3.40%
|
0%
|
6
|
Chloramphenicol
|
NT
|
NT
|
NT
|
62.10%
|
24.10%
|
13.80%
|
7
|
Ampicillin
|
NT
|
NT
|
NT
|
41.40%
|
0%
|
59.60%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S= Sensitive, R= Resistant, I= Intermediate, NT= Not tested
Frequency of ESBL producing E. coli and Salmonella isolates
Out of 95 isolates, 12 isolates gave ESBL screening test positive. Four isolates of E. coli and 5 isolates of Salmonella accounting a total of 9(9.47%) were further confirmed as ESBL producers.
Table 3. ESBL detection by combination disk-method
Organism
|
significant growth
|
Screening test positive
|
Confirmatory test positive (Combination disk method)
|
E. coli
|
29
|
5
|
4(13.8%)
|
Salmonella
|
66
|
7
|
5(7.57%)
|
Total
|
95
|
12
|
9 (9.47%)
|