T. erytreae poses a major threat to citrus plantations around the world, especially in areas in which it has already been introduced to, with clear signs of expansion of the species’ distribution under current climatic conditions. A prime example of this rapid expansion of the species’ distribution can be observed, as previously stated, in the Iberian Peninsula, with the rapid spread of the species through the western portion of Portugal and north-western and south-western Spain in the last years (Arenas-Arenas et al. 2019). Our results point to niche conservatism throughout this invasion process, with the species occupying areas relatively similar in climate to those of native populations. Furthermore, our findings show that many areas around the globe are potentially suitable for the establishment of the species.
The comparison of the niches in the native and invaded ranges provides useful information of the extent to which realized niches of this species are maintained during its invasion (Guisan et al. 2014). Although most of the available climatic space in the invaded range (European populations) fall inside the environmental conditions of the native distribution, our results indicate that the median of both the invaded niche of the species and its environmental background tend to occupy areas with lower precipitation, stronger seasonality and higher temperature relative to the native ones (Fig. 2). Nevertheless, this niche shift could be just reflecting the difference in the availability of climatic conditions in both geographical areas (Warren et al. 2008; Broennimann et al. 2012). In fact, we found that the native and invaded realized niches of T. erytreae are statistically more similar that expected by chance given the available conditions in both ranges, suggesting niche conservatism. In the same sense, niche stability is moderate to high, indicating that a considerable proportion of the exotic niche overlaps with the native niche, also pointing to niche conservatism (see Callen and Miller 2015; Strubbe et al. 2015; Hu et al. 2016). That is, native niche characteristics of T. erytreae are at least partially conserved during the invasion process in Europe. Because niche conservatism is an assumption of SDM approaches (i.e. niches are assumed to remain conserved when models are transferred in space or time; Wiens et al. 2009), these results provide confidence to the potential distributions obtained for this species (see below).
The moderate degree of niche expansion in the exotic European populations indicates the occurrence of the species within the invaded range in analog environmental conditions that are not occupied in the native range (Guisan et al. 2014). The absence of T. erytreae in areas with lower precipitation, stronger seasonality and slightly lower temperature within the native range seem to indicate the presence of other factors that impede the species colonization; whether this is due to biotic factors (such as predation, competition or lack of host plants), abiotic factors (such as topography and presence of natural barriers), or both, is unknown. Furthermore, because the sampling is relatively incomplete within the native area of distribution for this species, the effects of biased and incomplete data on the obtained values of range expansion cannot be ruled out. On the other hand, niche unfilling is low in the intersection of the native and exotic environmental conditions, suggesting that the species has colonized most of its native realized niche in its invaded range. The suitable climate spaces that remain unoccupied within the invaded range, which represent mainly higher temperatures, are likely related to the fact that this is a relatively recent invasion and the species has not had enough time to colonize the full extent of its native realized niche (see e.g. Strubbe et al. 2013; Polidori et al. 2018; Poursanidis et al. 2020).
The species appears to be particularly suited to temperate climates with moderate temperatures and moderate to high levels of humidity (Moran and Blowers 1967; Catling 1969; Cocuzza et al. 2017), though our model projections indicate that mean temperature is the most relevant variable in predicting the suitability of the species. The potential distribution of T. erytreae at global scale seems to support this, since the species’ potential distribution is mainly restricted to coastal areas of western Europe, western and southeastern North America, eastern and western South America, eastern Asia, southeastern and southern Australia and its native continent of Africa, as well as particularly high suitability in subtropical and temperate island territories (as is the case for the Canary islands, the Azores islands, Polynesian islands, the Mascarene islands, etc.). It is interesting to note that some of the continental areas occupied by the species in the native range, such as in the Great Rift Valley, have mild temperatures below 28 º C appropriate for the species in the continent, further supporting our results of suitability of the species in temperate regions (Kassie et al. 2013) as these areas share the same climatic conditions of the previously mentioned coastal areas in which the species may expand its range.
Interestingly, while under current climatic conditions T. erytreae could, in fact, expand its current distribution significantly, future predictions for 2050 and 2070 under a context of climate change suggest a significant decrease of potentially suitable areas in the two different scenarios presented (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5); a steady increase of carbon emissions and its subsequent effects on the climate negatively affecting the global suitability of the species, with the latter scenario having an even more significant reduction of current potential areas. This is likely due to the fact that the species is not well-adapted to higher temperatures (Aidoo et al. 2018, 2019), restricting even further its potential distribution to coastal areas that maintain more temperate climates worldwide. Nevertheless, its distribution under future climatic conditions, as is expected, also would expand to areas closer to the poles that would become more temperate, with milder temperatures suitable for the species, this event being even more accentuated in the latter scenario.
Predictions on the potential distribution of the studied species may give insights on areas in which the species is more likely to expand its distribution, but may not be powerful enough in assessing areas in which the species could not establish (Polidori and Sánchez-Fernandez 2020), since these are only based on recorded presence of individuals of this species. The limited sampling of the species’ native distribution may be contributing to this potential issue, therefore altering the species’ actual potential distribution, as sampling effort appears to be higher in the species’ exotic range than in its native distribution. Other limitations intrinsic to the process of SDMs exist, since only climatic variables were used, though many other variables may affect the species’ distribution, such as biotic variables including competition, predation and availability of biotic resources, as well as the dispersion potential of the species (Jiménez-Valverde et al. 2008). SDMs also assume that the species is at equilibrium with its environment, which may or may not be the case for this particular species within its invaded range (Gallien et al. 2012), therefore limiting our model’s prediction capabilities. Though these limitations are intrinsic to the modelling process, the use of SDMs’ predictive capabilities proves useful in predicting climatic suitability for the studied species and largely fit with empirical data obtained from the species’ occurrences (Peterson et al. 2008).
Several recent studies have also modeled the potential distribution of T. erytreae at smaller spatial scales (Richard et al. 2018; Benhadi-Marín et al. 2020; Espinosa-Zaragoza et al. 2021), the results of which are not fully congruent with our predictions, likely due to some methodological limitations of these previous papers. SDMs should be performed using all of the species’ occurrences, that is, its global coverage, and not only those occurring in either exotic populations or native ones, in order to obtain more reliable results and models which ensure prediction of the future spread of the species, as proposed by Broennimann & Guisan (2008). Omitting native occurrences (e.g. Benhadi-Marín et al. 2020) may yield biased results in regards to the species’ suitable conditions, that is, greatly restricting the species’ potential distribution to conditions only occupied in invaded areas, likely not yet in equilibrium, and omitting possible conditions which are only occupied in its native range. This is particularly important in the case of T. erytreae, since the species occupy a broader range of environmental conditions in the species’ native range than in its invaded range, as can be observed through our analysis of niche dynamics. Similarly, using only native occurrences (e.g. Richard et al. 2018; Espinosa-Zaragoza et al. 2021) can omit parts of the fundamental niche only present in the invaded range, for example due to biotic constraints acting in the native distribution but not in the invaded one (Broennimann and Guisan 2008). Our results, based on data from both native and invaded ranges, therefore yield a more realistic potential distribution for the species.
Overall, our results indicate that T. erytreae may occupy areas far beyond its current exotic distribution in Europe, particularly expanding further throughout coastal areas of western Europe, and having potentially highly suitable areas in temperate climates of all other continents, as well as high suitability in island environments these often constituting major citrus growing regions due to the favorable climatic conditions for said fruit crop (Liu et al. 2012). While the causative agent of HBL, the gram-negative bacteria Candidatus Liberibacter spp., is currently not present in introduced European populations of the psyllid (Arenas-Arenas et al. 2019), an expansion of the species’ distribution could further increase the probability of accidental introduction of the pathogen in these and other potentially suitable areas around the globe. The exposure to the bacterium can implicate a rapid spread of it and the disease, as only a few infected individuals are needed to transmit the causal agent of the disease (Van Vuuren and Van Der Merwe 1992; Cocuzza et al. 2017). Thus, an introduction of this pathogen in the invaded populations would likely transmit the disease throughout the current established populations of the psyllid and essentially through projected areas in which the species may establish if invasive populations continue to expand beyond their current range, severely hindering citrus production in affected areas (Gottwald 2010). Nevertheless, while large areas of the Americas, Africa, Asia and Australia show high suitability for the disease, in Europe only the Iberian Peninsula and the United Kingdom seems to be suitable, although marginally (Ajene et al. 2020). It is also important to note that T. erytreae is a polyphagous psyllid (Catling and Atkinson 1974; Aidoo et al. 2018), meaning that it feeds on representatives of the Rutaceae family as a whole, and though perhaps not of economic significance, the possibility of it spreading and affecting native species where the species may potentially establish populations is also to be taken into account.
Several other issues arrive if the species occupies other areas suitable for its establishment, particularly when taking into account areas shared by another psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Lallemand et al. 1986), which carries an Asian variant of the bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus. This form of the bacterium is, in contrast to the form usually transmitted by T. erytreae, Candidatus Liberibacter africanum, heat tolerant, which may pose further threats to citrus orchards and other genera in the family Rutaceae in areas in which the African form of the bacterium may not grow (Garnier et al. 1984; Jagoueix et al. 1996; Sagaram et al. 2009; Pelz-Stelinski et al. 2010), as T. erytreae is also capable of transmitting the Asian form of the bacterium (Lallemand et al. 1986; Ajene et al. 2019). This event would require an overlap between T. erytreae and D. citri populations, which has yet to be documented.
While it is currently unknown how the species first arrived to Europe, it is highly likely that it was transported by shipping of citrus saplings and fruits, particularly through galls present on the leaves of these commercially imported products (Catling 1969). This is particularly the case for most introduced species of gall producing hemipterans, as the small size and position of these galls on the leaves allow them to pass undetected. The accidental introduction of T. erytreae has in fact occurred independently on at least three different occasions (Macaronesia, the Mascarene Islands and the Iberian Peninsula) (Cocuzza et al. 2017); whether this introduction occurred directly from native African populations or already introduced populations (such as introduction to the Iberian Peninsula from populations present in the Canary Islands) is currently unknown.
Our findings through the use of the analysis of niche dynamics and predictive efforts regarding T. erytreae’s potential distribution provide useful information for anticipating the potential colonization of the African citrus psyllid and the spread of the HBL disease, contributing to the early alert o and the implementation of preventive measures, especially in areas that they have not been reported, in order to mitigate economic loss in the citrus industry.