5.1 Grey Association Analysis
In the large-scale triaxial test in this paper, the influencing factors set are limited, and considering the large sample size, the economic cost and labor cost are high, resulting in a limited number of test samples. The grey correlation analysis method focuses on macro analysis and basic situation between various factors, and does not require complex and rich information. The essence of this method is to analyze the degree of influence of each influencing factor on the affected object, and to find out the main factors and secondary factors from it. In view of the development process of residual deformation of gangue filler under cyclic load, the degree of influence of each influencing factor on the deformation value of gangue filler varies, resulting in a certain impact on the rate of deformation process and the results of residual deformation value. Therefore, the grey correlation analysis of coal gangue dynamic large-scale triaxial test is carried out to analyze the data, and the correlation degree of each factor can be found out, that is, the influence degree on the deformation of gangue filler, so as to put forward guiding opinions for practical engineering.
In terms of mathematical expression, the gray association analysis method adopts the degree of influence of the gray correlation degree characterization factor on the main behavior, and its calculation method is summarized as follows:
There is a system feature number column (main behavior), denoted as Y0, where:
$${Y_0}=\left\{ {\left. {{Y_0}\left( l \right)} \right|l=1,2, \cdots ,n} \right\}$$
9
There is also a series of systematic factors, denoted as Yi, i = 1,2,3, …, m(m is the number of factors in the series of comparisons):
$${Y_i}=\left\{ {\left. {{Y_i}\left( l \right)} \right|l=1,2, \cdots ,n} \right\}$$
10
Then normalize the logarithm according to the formula (3), that is, carry out dimensionless and unified data transformation on the original data:
\({\widehat {Y}_i}\left( l \right)=\frac{{{Y_i}\left( l \right) - {{\overline {Y} }_i}}}{{\Delta {Y_{i\hbox{max} }}}}\) \(i \in \{ 0,1,2,3, \ldots , m\}\) (11)
Wherein, \({\overline {Y} _i}\) and \(\Delta {Y_{i\hbox{max} }}\) are the maximum values of the mean and mutual difference of each series, calculated as follows Eq. (12) and Eq. (13), respectively:
$${\overline {Y} _i}=\frac{1}{l}\sum\limits_{{l=1}}^{n} {{Y_i}\left( l \right)}$$
12
$$\Delta {Y_{i\hbox{max} }}=\hbox{max} \left\{ {\left. {\left| {{Y_i}\left( k \right) - {Y_i}\left( l \right)} \right|} \right|k,l=1,2, \cdots ,n} \right\}$$
13
The correlation coefficient between sequence \({\widehat {Y}_0}\left( l \right)\) and series \({\widehat {Y}_i}\left( l \right)\) is
(Çinici et al.
2022):
$${\xi _i}\left( l \right)=\frac{{{\Delta _{\hbox{min} }}+\rho {\Delta _{\hbox{max} }}}}{{{\Delta _i}l+\rho {\Delta _{\hbox{max} }}}}$$
14
where ξi(l) is the correlation coefficient of Yi to Y0 in l sample;
Δmax is the maximum absolute value of the difference between the total sequence and the corresponding time of the reference sequence at all moments as follows:
$${\Delta _{\hbox{max} }}=\mathop {\hbox{max} }\limits_{i} \mathop {\hbox{max} }\limits_{l} \left| {{{\widehat {Y}}_0}\left( l \right) - {{\widehat {Y}}_i}\left( l \right)} \right|$$
15
Δmin is the minimum absolute value of the difference between the time of all sequences and the reference series at all moments as follows:
$${\Delta _{{\text{min}}}}=\mathop {\hbox{min} }\limits_{i} \mathop {\hbox{min} }\limits_{l} \left| {{{\widehat {Y}}_0}\left( l \right) - {{\widehat {Y}}_i}\left( l \right)} \right|$$
16
Δi(k) is the absolute value of the difference between the k-time and the reference series corresponding to the time is calculated as follows (Luo et al. 2021):
$${\Delta _i}\left( l \right)=\left| {{{\widehat {Y}}_0}\left( l \right) - {{\widehat {Y}}_i}\left( l \right)} \right|$$
17
ρ is the resolution coefficient, usually empirically based on ρ value, take ρ = 0.5 (Rekha et al. 2022).
The correlation coefficient ξi(l) only represents the degree of association between the sample data, because it has the characteristics of dispersion and not easy to compare, therefore, the introduction of the concept of correlation degree, that is, the average of the correlation coefficient, can be most of the correlation coefficients can be pooled into a value for centralized treatment. The correlation degree is calculated as follows:
$${r_i}=\frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{l} {{\xi _i}} \left( l \right)\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {}&{} \end{array}i=1,2,3, \cdots {\text{n}}$$
18
The degree of association ri represents the degree to which factor Yi influences the main behavior Y0, for l,j∈(1,2,3, ......n), when Yl>Yk, then the system factor sequence Yl is considered to be superior to Yk, or has a higher correlation with the main behavior sequence.
5.2 Grey correlation analysis of residual strains
In order to consider the degree of correlation between the influencing factors on the residual deformation of the specimen under large vibration times, this paper sets the values of the final axial residual strain εd and the final volume residual strain εvd as the residual deformation values after 30,000 times of dynamic load loading, and set them as reference sequences, Y0 and Z0, respectively, and set the confining pressure σ3, compaction degree η, graded parameters A and vibration N as factor sequences, including confining pressure series X1, compaction degree series X2, cascading parameter series X3, and vibration degree X4. According to the numerical value of the factor sequence, the corresponding reference sequence is selected, and the following results are obtained through the calculation in section 3.1, as shown in Table 6.
Table 6
All factors are related to final residual strain
| Axial residual deformation Y0 | Volume residual deformation Z0 |
| Relevance | Sort | Relevance | Sort |
Containment pressure X1 | 0.703 | 2 | 0.719 | 2 |
Compaction degree X2 | 0.694 | 3 | 0.712 | 3 |
Gradation parameters X3 | 0.681 | 4 | 0.635 | 4 |
Shock times X4 | 0.852 | 1 | 0.814 | 1 |
According to the basic concept of gray correlation, it can be seen that the reference sequence representing the residual strain in this paper is positively correlated with the degree of correlation between the coefficient sequences, that is, the greater the degree of correlation, the greater the degree of influence, and vice versa.
From Table 6, it can be seen that the three influencing factors all have a certain degree of correlation with the final residual strain of gangue filler, and whether it is for axial residual strain or volume residual strain, the degree of influence is ranked by vibration X4, confining pressure X1, compaction X2, and gradation X3. Considering that the vibration frequency represents the effect of stress history on the soil, the confining pressure and compaction degree both indicate the compactness of the gangue test piece, and the particle gradation indicates the degree of bite between the soil particles. The compactness of the soil reflects the difficulty of rolling the soil particles, and the degree of bite between the soil particles reflects the difficulty of the soil particles breaking during the vibration process. Therefore, under the multi-vibration cycle load, the difficulty of rolling soil particles can affect the residual deformation of soil more than the difficulty of angular fragmentation of soil particles. Reflected in the actual project, considering that the material quality of gangue is general, the quality fluctuation is large, and the natural grading is difficult to achieve good grading, according to the results of the gray correlation analysis, the degree of compaction should be appropriately increased to make the soil more compact, so as to reduce the residual strain under large vibrations.