Study Setting and Design
This case-control cross-sectional study assessed some haematological and immunological parameters in HBV-negatives as control and compared them with acute and chronic HBV patients. This study was conducted between April 2021 and July, 2022 at the antiretroviral therapy (ART) Laboratory of the Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital (ABUTH), Zaria, Nigeria.
Study Participants
A total of three hundred (300) adults aged 18-80 years who were chosen by convenience sampling participated in this study. The breakdown of the study participants includes one hundred (100) confirmed HBV-negative individuals as controls, one hundred (100) confirmed acute HBV-infected and one hundred (100) chronic HBV-infected patients.
Sociodemographic and clinical data
Relevant sociodemographic characteristics and clinical data were obtained using a structured questionnaire and a review of the patient’s clinical records.
Specimens Collection and Laboratory Analyses
Ten millilitres (10 mL) of venous blood were collected from each participant into EDTA and plain bottles using aseptic techniques. All blood samples collected in the EDTA tubes were immediately analyzed for Haematological profile, CD4+ cell count and HBV-DNA viral load. Samples for HBV-DNA assays that could not be processed immediately were stored at -800C until analysis. The sera harvested from the plain tubes were used for serology and ALT Assay.
Detection of HBsAg by ELISA
The surface antigen for hepatitis B was tested by the ELISA technique on all specimens using the method of Burtis et al. [10]. Fortress Diagnostics’ 4th generation ELISA kit (Ireland, UK) was used. The manufacturer’s instructions on testing were strictly followed.
HBcAb-total and HBcAb-IgM test
HBV-infected (HBsAg positive) subjects were tested for HBcAb-total, while those positive for HBcAb-total were further tested for HBcAb-IgM, which is a marker of acute HBV infection. Subjects who tested positive for HBcAb-IgM were classified as having an acute infection. However, subjects who tested negative for HBcAb-IgM were classified as having a chronic infection. The Advance Quality TM One Step HBcAb-total and HBcAb-IgM test kits (InTec Products China) were used for these tests.
Estimation of Absolute CD4+ T Cells Count
The CD4+ T-cell count estimation was performed using the Cyflow counter machine (Partec, Germany) that uses the principle of flow cytometry [11]. All testing protocols were conducted based on the manufacturer’s instructions.
Estimation of Full Blood Count, Red Cell Indices and Platelet Count
Full blood counts of all participants in this study were carried out using the Mindray BC – 5000 5-part differential Auto haematology analyzer. The measurement methods used in this analyzer are; the Electrical Impedance method for determining the Red Blood Cell (RBC) and Platelet (PLT) data, the colorimetric method for determining the haemoglobin, flow Cytometry by laser for determining the white blood cell data. Other parameter results including the Red Blood Cell indices (MCV, MCH, MCHC) were obtained through automated calculation.
Determination of Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)
Alanine Aminotransferase was determined by a standard method as described by Reitman and Frankel [12] using Randox reagents and Stax Fax 1904 Spectrophotometer. Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) determination was measured by monitoring the concentration of pyruvate hydrazone formed with 2, 4- dinitrophenylhydrazine. The kit manufacturer instructions and procedures were strictly followed.
HBV-DNA plasma RNA Isolation, Amplification and Quantification
HBV viral load was performed using the COBAS® Ampliprep/ COBAS® Taqman® HBV DNA Test, version 2 (Roche Diagnostics, USA). This automated amplification and quantification have a detection limit of between 20–170,000,000 IU/mL. Sample preparations and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification were performed according to the method described by Osuji et al. [9]. The Standard Operating procedures were strictly followed to ensure accurate laboratory findings following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analyses
Data obtained were presented in tables as percentages and median (interquartile range [IQR] after failing the normality check. Comparison among groups was analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) while comparison between groups was done using post Hoc analysis. Pearson’s correlation was used to determine the relationship and association between parameters using Graphpad prism software (v 6) respectively. Significance level was set at P ≤0.05 and 95% confidence interval