See the published version of this preprint at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
Research article
Jung-Pan Wang
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: Ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is an effective treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome. However, there have been reports of osteoarthritis (OA) at the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) when USO was performed on patients with a reverse oblique sigmoid notch. This study aimed to evaluate the radiographic and functional outcomes following USO in patients with a reverse oblique sigmoid notch.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients having a reverse oblique sigmoid notch who underwent USO for ulnar impaction syndrome between 2002 and 2013. We evaluated radiographic changes of the DRUJ and functional outcomes of patients.
Results: We enrolled 22 patients (22 wrists) with an average age of 49.6 years and a mean follow-up of 93.2 (range, 36–179; standard deviation [SD], 38.2) months. We found that there were changes in the inclination angle of the sigmoid notch, from an average reverse oblique of 14.9o (range, 11o–23o; SD, 3.4o) preoperatively to a more parallel 5.1o (range, 0o–11o; SD, 3.2o) at the final follow-up. The functional results at the final follow-up were good, with a mean visual analogue scale for pain of 0.2 (range, 0–1; SD, 0.4) at rest and 1.3 (range, 0–3; SD, 0.9) during activity, QuickDASH of 15.1 (range, 2.3–34.1; SD, 8.8), and modified Mayo Wrist Score of 91.6 (range, 70–100; SD, 6.4). Seven wrists (31.8%) had changes compatible with OA, but the wrists did not exhibit a significantly worse function when compared to wrists without OA changes, except for supination motion and grip strength.
Conclusions: For patients with a reverse oblique sigmoid inclination following USO, we observed that the inclination angle had a tendency to become parallel and some patients developed OA at the DRUJ. However, long-term functional outcomes could still be good. The reverse oblique sigmoid inclination does not seem to be an absolute contraindication for USO.
Keywords
ulnar impaction, oblique, reverse, sigmoid notch, ulnar shortening
Figure 1
Figure 2
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
- Additionalfile1.doc
Additional file 1: Checklist of STROBE criteria.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
Version 5
Posted 19 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 27 Jan, 2021
Editor assigned
On 10 Jan, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 10 Jan, 2021
Editor invited
On 10 Jan, 2021
No comments provided
Editor assigned
On 30 Nov, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 30 Nov, 2020
Editor invited
On 30 Nov, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 24 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned
On 18 Nov, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 18 Nov, 2020
Editor invited
On 18 Nov, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 09 Nov, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 21 Oct, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 20 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #3 agreed
On 05 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 03 Oct, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 02 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 02 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned
On 29 Sep, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 28 Sep, 2020
Editor invited
On 28 Sep, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 01 Sep, 2020
Review #3 received
Received 25 Aug, 2020
Reviewer #3 agreed
On 07 Aug, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 05 Aug, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 05 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 03 Jun, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 16 May, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 13 May, 2020
Editor assigned
On 21 Apr, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 20 Apr, 2020
Editor invited
On 20 Apr, 2020
First submitted
On 19 Apr, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Orthopedic Surgery
Learn more about our company.
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
See the published version of this preprint at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Jung-Pan Wang
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
Version 5
Posted 19 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 27 Jan, 2021
Editor assigned
On 10 Jan, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 10 Jan, 2021
Editor invited
On 10 Jan, 2021
No comments provided
Editor assigned
On 30 Nov, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 30 Nov, 2020
Editor invited
On 30 Nov, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 24 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned
On 18 Nov, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 18 Nov, 2020
Editor invited
On 18 Nov, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 09 Nov, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 21 Oct, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 20 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #3 agreed
On 05 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 03 Oct, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 02 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 02 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned
On 29 Sep, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 28 Sep, 2020
Editor invited
On 28 Sep, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 01 Sep, 2020
Review #3 received
Received 25 Aug, 2020
Reviewer #3 agreed
On 07 Aug, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 05 Aug, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 05 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 03 Jun, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 16 May, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 13 May, 2020
Editor assigned
On 21 Apr, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 20 Apr, 2020
Editor invited
On 20 Apr, 2020
First submitted
On 19 Apr, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Orthopedic Surgery
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
Background: Ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is an effective treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome. However, there have been reports of osteoarthritis (OA) at the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) when USO was performed on patients with a reverse oblique sigmoid notch. This study aimed to evaluate the radiographic and functional outcomes following USO in patients with a reverse oblique sigmoid notch.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients having a reverse oblique sigmoid notch who underwent USO for ulnar impaction syndrome between 2002 and 2013. We evaluated radiographic changes of the DRUJ and functional outcomes of patients.
Results: We enrolled 22 patients (22 wrists) with an average age of 49.6 years and a mean follow-up of 93.2 (range, 36–179; standard deviation [SD], 38.2) months. We found that there were changes in the inclination angle of the sigmoid notch, from an average reverse oblique of 14.9o (range, 11o–23o; SD, 3.4o) preoperatively to a more parallel 5.1o (range, 0o–11o; SD, 3.2o) at the final follow-up. The functional results at the final follow-up were good, with a mean visual analogue scale for pain of 0.2 (range, 0–1; SD, 0.4) at rest and 1.3 (range, 0–3; SD, 0.9) during activity, QuickDASH of 15.1 (range, 2.3–34.1; SD, 8.8), and modified Mayo Wrist Score of 91.6 (range, 70–100; SD, 6.4). Seven wrists (31.8%) had changes compatible with OA, but the wrists did not exhibit a significantly worse function when compared to wrists without OA changes, except for supination motion and grip strength.
Conclusions: For patients with a reverse oblique sigmoid inclination following USO, we observed that the inclination angle had a tendency to become parallel and some patients developed OA at the DRUJ. However, long-term functional outcomes could still be good. The reverse oblique sigmoid inclination does not seem to be an absolute contraindication for USO.
Figure 1
Figure 2
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
- Additionalfile1.doc
Additional file 1: Checklist of STROBE criteria.
Loading...