The Analysis between Clinicopathological Aspect of Early-Onset vs Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer and Mortality Rate

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2413981/v1

Abstract

Objective: Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) has different clinical and pathological characteristics compared to late-onset CRC (LOCRC). Mortality rate as a post-operative outcome is a patient's postoperative outcome considered based on the state of life or death. The objective of this research is to analyze the comparison between clinicopathological aspect of early-onset vs late-onset CRC as well as their correlation with the mortality rate in Indonesia to support global data. We performed a case-control study on 170 subjects with CRC from November 2021- November 2022 in Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital. Data were extracted from electronic medical records Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Registry. Bivariate and correlation analyses were used to analyse the difference between variables using IBM SPSS 24.0. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Result: Anemia and tumor location variables were significantly different in the early-onset group compared to the late-onset group (P<0.001). It was also found that anemia (P<0.001), pathological features (P<0.001), and tumor location (P=0.013) had significantly low correlation with onset of CRC (r=0.325; r=0.397; r=0.342, respectively). There is no statistically significant correlation between the clinicopathological features of CRC in both onset and mortality rates in this study.

Introduction

Based on the patient's age at the first time diagnosed, colorectal cancer (CRC) is divided into two groups, which are early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) and late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC).1 Amsterdam criteria stated that EOCRC refers to subjects diagnosed at < 50 years of age while LOCRC refers to subjects diagnosed at the age of ≥ 50. While most common cases of CRC represent in older subjects, the incidence of EOCRC tends to rise globally.1,2

EOCRC has different clinical characteristics compared to LOCRC. The majority of early-onset subjects have red flags such as unexplained anemia, rectal bleeding, and changes in bowel habits.3 LOCRC has a more diverse range of symptoms including rectal bleeding/haematochezia, melena, constipation, nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, presence of an abdominal mass, anemia, unexplained fatigue, and weight loss. In LOCRC, the subjects come to see the physician earlier since the symptoms felt to be more disturbing. Thus, LOCRC tends to be diagnosed at an early stage.35 In many cases, EOCRC is diagnosed with metachronous cancer, showing more advanced stages such as stage III and stage IV. EOCRC is more likely to cause metastases during the course of the disease compared to LOCRC.68

EOCRC has different histopathological characteristics compared to LOCRC. EOCRC tends not to have precursor adenomatous lesions and more signet ring cells are found, whereas in late-onset there is no signet ring cell at all. A study in Indonesia showed that the histopathological features of CRC were different from previous studies abroad. In Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung, the most frequent histopathological features of subjects aged less than 40 years are well-differentiated, moderately differentiated, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and signet ring cells.9 The majority of the histopathological features were similar to those of LOCRC, namely adenocarcinoma (89.8%).10

For both onsets, surgery is the main modality for early stage cancer with curative goals. In surgical therapy, many factors determine the success rate such as clinical conditions, histopathological features, patient comorbidities, and post-operative complications. Comorbidities in subjects can increase the risk of postoperative mortality rate.1,11 Mortality rate as a postoperative outcome is a patient's postoperative outcome based on the condition of life or death.12 Nowadays, there have only been studies abroad that have compared the clinicopathological characteristics of early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC vs LOCRC)1315, but there is a lack of data that analyse the correlation between these clinicopathological aspects and post-operative outcomes such as mortality rates, especially in developing countries like Indonesia. Therefore, this study aimed to analyse the comparison of clinicopathological features between early-onset and late-onset CRC as well as the correlation between CRC onset and mortality rate in Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung as local data that can be used to support global data.

Materials And Methods

Design of the Study and Subject Recruitment

This was a cross-sectional study designed to examine the comparison between the clinicopathological aspect of early-onset vs late-onset CRC as well as their correlation with the mortality rate in CRC subjects as the primary outcomes. The data used were secondary data extracted from the medical records of subjects at CRC Registry, Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung, starting from November 2021- November 2022 until the minimum number of samples was fulfilled using a consecutive sampling method.

(1) CRC subjects who had been diagnosed clinically, radiologically and, pathologically at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung and (2) the subjects that had definitive therapies only at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung were included in this study. The subjects with incomplete medical record data were excluded from this study.

Ethical Aspect and Research Approval

The data collection from CRC Registry was categorized as low-risk as it was conducted using electronic medical record data. After receiving approval and recommendations from the Ethics Committee Review Board of Hasan Sadikin General Hospital - Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, all procedures were performed in accordance with applicable guidelines and regulations, with reference number LB.02.01/X.6.5/328/2022.

Data Analysis

Comparison analysis would be carried out using the independent T-test, Chi-Square, Fisher's Exact, Mann-Whitney, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test depending on the distribution of data. Correlation analysis would be utilized as the analysis between variables. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Subject Characteristics

As shown in Table 1, this study involved 170 subjects aged 20–89 years with a mean age of 52.35 ± 14.31 years. In this study, there were more female subjects (57.06%) than male subjects (42.94%). Of all subjects, the majority of subjects (134 subjects) complained of difficult bowel movements or constipation (78.82%). In addition, in general, subjects also experienced hematochezia (48.82%), anemia based on clinical symptoms and laboratory results (34.71%), abdominal pain (23.53%), and diarrhea in 14.12% patients.

Table 1. Subject Characteristics

Variables

Total Subjects (n=170)

Percentage (%)

Age (Years) 

Mean ± SD

Median (Min – Max)

 

52.35 ± 14.31

51.5 (20 – 89)

Sex

Male

Female

 

73

97

 

42.94

57.06

Clinical Features

Hematochezia

Melena

Abdominal Pain

Constipation

Abdominal Mass

Diarrhea

Anemia

 

83

1

40

134

3

24

59

 

48.82

0.59

23.53

78.82

1.76

14.12

34.71

Pathological Features

Adenocarcinoma

Mucinous Adenocarcinoma

Signet Ring Cells

Others

 

124

4

20

22

 

72.94

2.35

11.76

12.94

Stages

Stage 0

Stage I

Stage IIA

Stage IIB

Stage IIC

Stage IIIA

Stage IIIB

Stage IIIC

Stage IV

 

1

17

6

14

0

32

36

3

61

 

0.59

10.00

3.53

8.24

0.00

18.82

21.18

1.76

35.88

Tumor Locations

Iliocecal

Caecum

Ascenden Colon

Transverse Colon

Descenden Colon

Sigmoid Colon

Rectosigmoid

Rectum

Anorectal

Colon

Cervical

Combination

 

1

0

21

10

14

23

17

75

1

1

1

6

 

0.59

0.00

12.35

5.88

8.24

13.53

10.00

44.12

0.59

0.59

0.59

3.53

Outcome

Life

Death

 

159

11

 

93.53

6.47

Onset

Early

Late

 

72

98

 

42.35

57.65

Note: In descriptive data, nominal-categoric data (age) is presented in the form of mean ± SD and median (min-max) while the others are presented in the form of percentages.

Based on pathological features, 124 subjects (72.94%) had adenocarcinoma features and 20 subjects (26.67%) had signet ring cell carcinoma. Twenty-two subjects (12.94%) had other pathological features (benign (10), unspecified carcinoma (9), malignant melanoma (2), and mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (1)). Based on the clinical stage, the majority of subjects were in stage IV (35.88%) and stage IIIB (21.18%). As for the tumor locations, most of the patient's tumors (75 subjects) were located in the rectum (44.12%), then 23 subjects in the sigmoid colon (13.53%), 21 subjects in the ascending colon (12.35%), 17 subjects (10.00%) in the rectosigmoid, 14 subjects in the descending colon (8.24%), 10 subjects (5.88%) in the transverse colon, six subjects (3.53%) had mixed tumor locations. Of the 170 subjects, 159 survived (93.53%) survived after surgery and 11 subjects died (6.47%). The study subjects also consisted of 72 EOCRC subjects and 98 LOCRC subjects.

Comparative Analysis of Clinicopathological Features between Onset

A comparative analysis (bivariate analysis) was performed as shown in Table 2. It was found that anemia and tumor location were significantly different in the early-onset group compared to the late-onset group (P < 0.001) while the other variables were not.

Table 2. Comparative Analysis of Clinicopathological Features between Onset  

Variabel

Early Onset

Late Onset

P-Value

Subjects (n=72)

Percentage (%)

Subjects (n=98)

Percentage (%)

Sex

Male

Female

 

36

36

 

50.00

50.00

 

37

61

 

37.76

62.24

0.111

Clinical Features

Hematochezia

Melena

Abdominal Pain

Constipation

Abdominal Mass

Diarrhea

Anemia

 

39

0

16

55

0

12

34

 

54.17

0.00

22.22

76.39

0.00

16.67

47.96

 

44

1

24

79

3

12

17

 

44.90

1.02

24.49

80.61

3.06

12.24

16.67

 

0.232

1.000

0.731

0.505

0.263

0.413

*<0.001

Pathological Features

Adenocarcinoma

Mucinous Adenocarcinoma

Signet Ring Cells

Others

 

44

2

20

6

 

61.11

2.78

27.78

8.33

 

80

2

0

16

 

81.63

2.04

0.00

16.33

0.061

Stages

Stage 0

Stage I

Stage IIA

Stage IIB

Stage IIC

Stage IIIA

Stage IIIB

Stage IIIC

Stage IV

 

0

7

2

8

0

8

18

1

28

 

0.00

9.72

2.78

11.11

0.00

11.11

25.00

1.39

38.89

 

1

10

4

6

0

24

18

2

33

 

1.02

10.20

4.08

6.12

0.00

24.49

18.37

2.04

33.67

0.386

Tumor Locations

Iliocecal

Caecum

Ascenden Colon

Transvers Colon

Descenden Colon

Sigmoid Colon

Rectosigmoid

Rectum

Anorectal

Colon

Cervical

Combination

 

0

0

13

6

11

12

5

22

0

0

0

3

 

0.00

0.00

18.06

8.33

15.28

16.67

6.94

30.56

0.00

0.00

0.00

4.17

 

1

0

8

4

3

11

12

53

1

1

0

4

 

1.02

0.00

8.16

4.08

3.06

11.22

12.24

54.08

1.02

1.02

0.00

4.08

*0.001

Outcome

Life

Death

 

66

6

 

91.67

8.33

 

93

5

 

94.90

5.10

0.531

Notes: Comparative analysis between clinicopathology and onset was carried out using the Independent T-Test method for numerical variables, Fisher's Exact for nominal categories and Mann-Whitney for ordinal categories if the data were normally distributed. For data that was not normally distributed, analysis was carried out using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov. The data was stated to be significant if the P-value *<0.05

Correlation Analysis between Variables

It was found that anemia (P < 0.001), histopathological features (P < 0.001), and tumor location (P = 0.013) had significantly low correlation (respectively r = 0.325; r = 0.397; respectively). r = 0.342 respectively) for early-onset and late-onset CRC as shown in Table 3. There is no statistically significant correlation between the clinicopathological features of CRC in both onset and mortality rates in this study.

Table 3

Correlation between Variables and Onset

Variable

Correlation

r

P Value

Sex

Phi

0.122

0.111

Hematochezia

Phi

-0.092

0.232

Melena

Phi

0.066

0.390

Abdominal Pain

Phi

0.026

0.731

Constipation

Phi

0.051

0.505

Abdominal Mass

Phi

0.115

0.134

Diarrhea

Phi

-0.063

0.413

Anemia

Phi

0.325

*<0.001

Pathological Features

Contingency Coefficient

0.397

*<0.001

Stages

Theta

0.075

0.386

Tumor Locations

Contingency Coefficient

0.342

*0.013

Mortality Rate (Outcome)

Phi

-0.065

0.397

Notes: P-value was statistically significant if *< 0.05. r = correlation coefficient (r = 0.20–0.40: low correlation; r = 0,40 − 0.70: moderate correlation; r = 0.70–0.90: high correlation; 0.90-1.00: very high correlation)

Discussion

In this study, EOCRC had the most tumor locations in the rectum and proximal colon while LOCRC had the most tumor locations in the distal colon. This study demonstrated significantly more clinical anemia in EOCRC patients with predominant tumor locations in the proximal colon relative to the distal colon and rectum. These findings confirm the results of several previous studies.5,16 The fecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening has been reported to have high sensitivity for detecting tumors of the colon and rectum, indicating that both colon and rectal cancers frequently bleed into the lumen. The distinction between proximal and distal colorectal cancer may be mechanically related to bleeding, but other effects such as immunological mechanisms need to be considered as well. 5,16,17

Proximal colon tumors often have distinct genetic characteristics (in particular, the BRAF V600E mutation and MMR deficiency/mismatch repair deficiency), which result from the development of serrated precursor lesions via the serrated route of colorectal carcinogenesis. 16,18 Patients with MMR-deficient tumors have a very high prevalence of anemia (72.5%), and both microcytic and normocytic anemia were more common in the MMR-deficient subgroup. However, MMR-deficient tumors were predominantly located in the proximal colon. In addition, MMR deficiency was not a significant predictor of blood hemoglobin levels in multiple linear regression. Further studies are needed to reliably analyze blood haemoglobin levels in MMR deficiency cases at different tumor sites.

Blood haemoglobin levels in colorectal cancer are inversely related to systemic inflammation. High serum IL-8, and low serum albumin, are mainly associated with normocytic anemia. IL-8 is a proinflammatory chemokine associated with the promotion of neutrophil chemotaxis and degranulation. Serum IL-8 levels are elevated in many malignancies and IL-8 is thought to be an important contributor to cancer-associated inflammation. Serum albumin levels reflect systemic inflammation since albumin synthesis decreases in response to IL-6. These findings support the notion that, in particular, normocytic anemia in colorectal cancer is associated with systemic inflammation. These associations may also have therapeutic significance, as modulation of the inflammatory response has shown some potencies of inflammatory anemia treatment.5,16,18

The patient mortality rate increased in advanced stages (stage IV, IIIA, and IIIB) in both the early-onset and late-onset CRC groups. This is in line with previous studies. The 5-year survival rate ranges from 77% in stage I colorectal cancer cases to only 2% in stage IV CRC cases. In developed countries, the five-year life expectancy is over 60%, but it is lower to < 50% in Iran. However, the 5-year survival for all cases of CRC increased from 42.7–44.6%, although not statistically significant (p = 0.76).19 Meanwhile, according to data from other centers in Indonesia, out of 142 CRC patients included in the study, 43% of patients survived during the observation period (five years). By analysis, subjects aged < 45 years showed a better 5-year survival (47.4% vs 41.3%).20 However, the study found no significant difference between age and survival. This finding differs from a study by Chao-Hsien et al which showed age to be a predictor of survival and prognosis in colorectal cancer.20 Early stages show a better prognosis whereas, in those with advanced stages, the cancer develops very progressive and aggressively so that it can reduce survival rates. 5,16−20

Based on the correlation analysis between variables, it was found that anemia, histopathological features, and tumor location significantly had a low correlation with the incidence of CRC onset. Taken together, these findings support the notion that, in particular, normocytic anemia in CRC is associated with systemic inflammation. Anemia is more common in EOCRC with the predominant tumor location in the proximal tumor area. This condition is related to genetic and molecular factors as previously described.

Based on the histopathological aspect, in theory, as many as 90% of CRC cases originate from the glandular mucosa and belong to the type of adenocarcinoma originating from the colorectal mucosal epithelial cells.5,21 Adenocarcinoma is characterized by the formation of glands. EOCRC has different pathological features compared to LOCRC. EOCRC tends not to have precursor adenomatous lesions and signet ring cell is common, whereas in late-onset there is no signet ring cell at all.22,23 This is in line with what was found in this study.

Signet ring cells show an infiltrative pattern or there is a collection of extracellular mucin and is classified as poorly differentiated.22 In other studies, EOCRC showed a feature of gland formation around 50–95% and was moderately differentiated.9,10 Left colorectal cancer is more common compared to the right and is associated with a worse pathological features and prognosis. On the other hand, the majority of cases of EOCRC are diagnosed as more advanced stages. EOCRC shows a lower survival rate compared to LOCRC patients. In this present study, adenocarcinoma was the dominant pathological feature in both groups as has been reported in other studies. 5,21,22,23 Other studies have also reported a higher prevalence of poorly differentiated histological signet ring cells in young colorectal patients presenting with aggressive tumors. However, in this study, there is no statistically significant correlation between the clinicopathological features of CRC in both onset and mortality rates.

Conclusions

There was a statistically significant difference in clinicopathological features (anemia and tumor location) between subjects EOCRC vs LOCRC. There is no statistically significant correlation between the clinicopathological features of CRC in both onset and mortality rates in this study.

Limitations

Nevertheless, this study also has several limitations, including cross-sectional method derived from electronic medical records, thus only documented details were available for evaluation. Many relevant data such as details about adenoma, family history, and type of surgery were not adequately available. This study is also still monocentric. Nonetheless, this study provides relevant data regarding the clinicopathological features of EOCRC vs LOCRC as well as their correlation with mortality rate and will add to existing world databases to create valid conclusions.

Abbreviations

CRC

:

Colorectal Cancer

EOCRC

:

Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer

FOBT

:

Fecal Occult Blood Test 

LOCRC

:

Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer 

MMR

:

Mismatch Repair

Declarations

Ethics Approval and Informed Consent to Participate 

Ethics Committee Review Board of Hasan Sadikin General Hospital – Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran waived the need for informed consent with reference number LB.02.01/X.6.5/328/2022. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication 

Not Applicable

Availability of data and materials section 

The authors declare that the personal data from any subjects involved in this study will not be shared based on subjects’ confidentialities. 

Competing Interest 

The authors have declared that no competing interest exist. 

Funding 

No funding 

Authors’ contributions 

KL, AM, RR, and EP did the conception of the study and revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. 

AM and ADN did the acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafted the manuscript and revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. 

Acknowledgements 

No applicable. 

References

  1. Lotfollahzadeh S, Recio-Boiles A, Cagir B. Colon Cancer. [Updated 2022 Sep 26]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Jan-.
  2. Virostko J, Capasso A, Yankeelov TE, Goodgame B. Recent trends in the age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer in the US National Cancer Data Base, 2004–2015. Cancer. 2019;125(21):3828–35. doi:10.1002/cncr.32347.
  3. Done JZ, Fang SHJWJoGO. Young-onset colorectal cancer. A review. 2021;13(8):856.
  4. Riaz R, Masood N, Benish A. Red flag symptoms: detailed account of clinicopathological features in young-onset colorectal cancer. Intest Res. 2017;15(2):203–7. doi:10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.203.
  5. Tariq K, Ghias K. Colorectal cancer carcinogenesis: a review of mechanisms. Cancer Biol Med. 2016;13(1):120–35. doi:10.28092/j.issn.2095-3941.2015.0103.
  6. Makmun D, Simadibrata M, Abdullah M, Syam AF, Shatri H, Fauzi A, Renaldi K, Maulahela H, Utari AP, Pribadi RR, Muzellina VN, Nursyirwan SA. Colorectal cancer subjects in a tertiary hospital in Indonesia: Prevalence of the younger population and associated factors. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(32):9804–14.
  7. Himbert C, Figueiredo JC, Shibata D, Ose J, Lin T, Huang LC, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in the ColoCare Study: Differences by Age of Onset. Cancers. 2021;13(15).
  8. Willauer AN, Liu Y, Pereira AA, Lam M, Morris JS, Raghav KP, et al. Clin Mol Charact early-onset colorectal cancer. 2019;125(12):2002–10.
  9. Makmun D, Simadibrata M, Abdullah M, Syam AF, Shatri H, Fauzi A, Renaldi K, Maulahela H, Utari AP, Pribadi RR, Muzellina VN, Nursyirwan SA. Colorectal cancer subjects in a tertiary hospital in Indonesia: Prevalence of the younger population and associated factors. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(32):9804–14.
  10. Johncilla M, Yantiss RKJSPC. Histology of Colorectal Carcinoma. Proven and Purported Prognostic Factors. 2020;13(3):503–20.
  11. Park H, Parys S, Tan J, Entriken F, Hodder R. Post-operative outcomes in the elderly following colorectal cancer surgery. ANZ J ofSurgery. 2020. doi:10.1111/ans.16394.
  12. Van den Bosch T, Warps AK, de Nerée tot Babberich MPM, et al. Predictors of 30-Day Mortality Among Dutch Subjects Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery, 2011–2016. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(4):e217737. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7737.
  13. Trivedi V, Chauhan R, Subham S, Rani R, Singh U. A comparative analysis of the clinicopathological profile of early-onset versus late-onset rectal cancer subjects. Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 Mar 14;16:1365. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1365. PMID: 35685960; PMCID: PMC9085190.
  14. Hoseini B, Rahmatinejad Z, Goshayeshi L, Bergquist R, Golabpour A, Ghaffarzadegan K, Rahmatinejad F, Darrudi R, Eslami S. Colorectal Cancer in North-Eastern Iran: a retrospective, comparative study of early-onset and late-onset cases based on data from the Iranian hereditary colorectal cancer registry. BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 8;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09132-5. PMID: 34998373; PMCID: PMC8742430.
  15. Vasudevan S, Mehta A. Clinical characteristics and survival profile of young versus old colorectal cancer subjects at a tertiary cancer center in North India over a period of 5 years. Indian J Cancer. 2021 Jul-Sep;58(3):355–364. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_246_19. PMID: 33402579.
  16. Väyrynen JP, Tuomisto A, Väyrynen SA, Klintrup K, Karhu T, Mäkelä J, Herzig KH, Karttunen TJ, Mäkinen MJ. Preoperative anemia in colorectal cancer: relationships with tumor characteristics, systemic inflammation, and survival. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 18;8(1):1126. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19572-y. PMID: 29348549; PMCID: PMC5773501.
  17. Väyrynen JP, et al. The relationships between serum cytokine levels and tumor infiltrating immune cells and their clinical significance in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2016;139:112–21. doi:10.1002/ijc.30040.
  18. Lavrijssen BDA, Ruiter R, Fest J, Ikram MA, Stricker BH, van Eijck CHJ. Trends in Staging, Treatment, and Survival in Colorectal Cancer Between 1990 and 2014 in the Rotterdam Study. Front Oncol. 2022;12:849951. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.849951.
  19. Jeo WS, Subrata FH. (2020) "The Survival Rate of Colorectal Cancer in dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital" The New Ropanasuri Journal of Surgery: 5: 2, Article 4. DOI:10.7454/nrjs.v5i2.1081.
  20. Perea J, García JL, Corchete L, Tapial S, Olmedillas-López S, Vivas A, et al. A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2202.
  21. Álvaro E, Cano JM, García JL, et al. Clinical and Molecular Comparative Study of Colorectal Cancer Based on Age-of-onset and Tumor Location: Two Main Criteria for Subclassifying Colorectal Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(4):968. doi:10.3390/ijms20040968. Published 2019 Feb 22.
  22. Glover M, Mansoor E, Panhwar M, Parasa S. Cooper GSJDd, sciences. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer in average risk adults 20–39 years of age: a population-based national study. 2019;64(12):3602–9.
  23. Nitsche U, Stögbauer F, Späth C, Haller B, Wilhelm D, Friess H, et al. Right sided colon cancer as a distinct histopathological subtype with reduced prognosis. 2016;33(2):157–63.