DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.11578/v1
Stigma related to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is prevalent and has been identified to be a major barrier for HIV prevention and treatment [1]. Researchers suggest that HIV-related stigma is also still a barrier for people living with HIV (PLWH) to disclose their HIV status and to seek and adhere to treatments; consequently, this barrier has an adverse impact on their health[2-4]. HIV-related stigma exists in nursing care worldwide and has large impact on the health outcomes of PLWH [5-9].
Herek [10] defined HIV-related stigma as “prejudice, discounting, discrediting, and discrimination directed at people perceived to have acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) or HIV’’ (p.1107). Manifestations of HIV-related stigma within the healthcare system include neglecting and avoidance of nursing care, exaggerated precautions, judgmental remarks and behavior, labelling patients and viewing them as attention seekers and breaches of confidentiality [9, 10][11-14]. Empirical evidence shows that the main causes of HIV-related stigma among healthcare providers are their lack of awareness of the stigma perceived by PLWH and the negative impact of stigma on PLWH, fear of casual contact due to poor knowledge about HIV transmission and the association of HIV with improper or immoral behavior [15].
Researchers have found that certain sociodemographic characteristics of nurses, such as age, gender, race, marital status, educational level and certain religious belief are associated with HIV-related stigma toward PWLH [16-21]. Furthermore, longer working experience, lower levels of HIV knowledge and nurses working at Islamic hospitals have also been associated with higher levels of stigmatizing attitudes [5,17,20,22].
Findings about the relationship of working at HIV clinics with the level of HIV-related stigma among healthcare providers are mixed in the literature [11,19,23]. Structural and policy support in HIV clinics have been found to reduce HIV-related stigma toward PLWH in healthcare providers, including HIV-related training, resources for universal precaution and available access to post-exposure prophylaxis [11,15].
Due to the rapid increase of HIV epidemic in China, Chinese government announced a national AIDS control policy—“Four Frees and One Care”—in 2003. This national policy refers to free antiretroviral drugs treatment to AIDS patients living in rural areas or individuals without insurance living in urban areas, free voluntary counseling and testing (VCT), free drugs treatment to HIV-infected pregnant women to prevent mother-to-child transmission (PMCT) and HIV testing of newborns, free schooling for AIDS orphans, and care and financial assistance to PLWH [24]. Under this national policy, a growing number of PLWH have received free tests, consultations, and treatments, and the associated mortality rate has been reduced [24].
In China, the HIV epidemic is charaterized as low national prevalence (0.055%) [25]. By the end of 2017, the reported number of PLWH in China was 758,610 [25]. However, China has the second distribution of new HIV infections in Asia and the Pacific region [26]. The Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture is unique; it has the largest concentration of Yi (彝族), one of the largest minority groups in China, and has one of the most serious epidemics of HIV in China [27]. In fact, nearly 50% of PLWH in Liangshan were infected through injecting drugs [28]. Its special cultural background, extreme poverty, low level of education, and prevalent substance use through shared needles in this geographic area have made Yi people particularly vulnerable to HIV infection [29]. As a shortage of human resources and financial burden, nurses have expanding roles in providing HIV-related care,such as providing consultaion, education and follow-up visits [30]. However, there is a very little understanding of nurses’ HIV-related stigma toward PLWH and factors associated with the stigma in Liangshan. To address this gap, our study aimed to answer the following research questions: (a) what is the status of HIV-related stigma toward PLWH among nurses in Liangshan, and (b) what are the factors associated with HIV-related stigma toward PLWH in nurses in Liangshan?
Study design and participants
We conducted a cross-sectional study from September to November 2017 in Liangshan. Hospitals in China are designated as primary, secondary and tertiary hospitals based on a hospital’s capacity of providing medical care, education and research. Primary hospitals have less than 100 beds and focus on focus on health education, disease prevention and health care, rehabilitation, family planning, and common and frequent disease management. Secondary hospitals usually have beds between 100 and 500 and provide comprehensive health care, medical education and research. Tertiary hospitals typically have more than 500 beds and provide comprehensive health services at the city, provincial or national level and carry a more important role in medical education and research [31].
Using a stratified, random cluster sampling method, our study sites included 3 primary, 5 secondary and 2 tertiary hospitals in Liangshan. Our target participants were registered nurses aged 18 or older who had worked in the selected hospitals for at least 6 months and consented to participate.
Data Collection
In each hospital, we first contacted the head nurse of its nursing department for approval and assistance in recruiting nurses. Once we received approval, we sent eligible nurses an online survey link, including a consent form describing the purpose, procedures, the potential risks and benefits of the study. Nurses who consented to participate received a link to access the online anonymous survey.
Variables and Instruments
Our survey consisted of variables shown in the literature to be related to HIV-related stigma in healthcare providers. It included questions about individual and workplace characteristics, HIV-related stigma scale for health care workers [32], and HIV knowledge scale[33]. Both the stigma and knowledge scales have been tested in Chinese population [32,33].
Individual and workplace characteristics
Individual characteristics included age, gender, ethnicity, educational level, years of experience working as a nurse, experience of providing care to PLWH, prior experience of HIV-related training, and willingness to receive HIV-related training. Workplace characteristics consisted of questions regarding level of hospital s/he worked, HIV prevalence area (high vs. low; high prevalence was defined as an area with >1% HIV prevalence), prior experience working in AIDS specialized hospitals, universal precaution supplies and policies in workplace that protect PLWH from stigma.
HIV-related stigma
We used a 17-item “HIV-related stigma scale for health care workers” developed by Stein and Li [32] to assess the HIV-related stigma among nurses. This multidimensional scale includes 5 subscales: Discrimination Intent at Work (4 items; e.g., you would be willing to work with HIV positive patients), Opinion about Health Care for HIV-infected Patients (3 items; e.g., people who got infected with HIV/AIDS through drug use deserve good quality medical care), Prejudiced Attitudes (4 items; e.g., people who got HIV/AIDS through sex and drug use got what they deserved), Internalized Shame (3 items; e.g., if you worked with HIV positive patients, you would feel embarrassed to tell other people about it), and Fear of PLWHA (3 items; e.g., you feel afraid of PLWH). Scores for each item ranges from 1(strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Some items were reverse-scored (e.g., the Opinion about Health Care for HIV-infected Patients subscale) when appropriate, and a higher total score suggested higher levels of HIV-related stigma toward PLWH. Stein and Li [32] reported adequate internal consistency (alpha = 0.68-0.82) and construct validity of the scale.
HIV knowledge
We measured HIV knowledge using a Chinese version HIV knowledge scale [33] adapted from Jemmott and colleagues’ work [34]. It is a 24-item scale assessing nurses’ knowledge of basic characteristic and transmission routes of HIV. Responses of each scale item were: “true”, “false” or “not sure”. Participants received 1 point if their answers were correct, and they received 0 points if their answers were incorrect or “not sure.” A higher total score indicated higher levels of HIV knowledge.
Statistical analyses
We used IBM SPSS 22.0 [35] to manage and analyze data. We used the mean, standard deviation (SD), frequency and percentage to describe distributions of variables. Pearson's r correlations, t-tests and one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) were used to examine relationships between key variables and HIV-related stigma toward PWLH. We further conducted multiple stepwise regression analysis to investigate factors associated with HIV-related stigma toward PLWH. A p-value less than 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance.
Power estimate: We calculated the required sample size based on the formula below [36] The required study size was 1,225 (S = 8.92; effective sizeδ= 0.50; a= 0.05).
A total of 1,256 registered nurses participated in this study. Eight of them were excluded because they were younger than 18 years old or had less than 6 months of work experience. Thus, a final sample of 1,248 participants was included in the analysis.
Individual and workplace characteristics
As shown in Table 1, the mean age of nurses was 30.2 years old (SD=7.2), with a range of 19-55. Most (98.4%) of them were females; 72.2% (n= 902) were Han ethnicity; 62.8% (n=784) had an associated degree; and 90.4%(n=1,128) worked in low prevalence areas. In terms of working experience, the mean year was 8.8 (SD=7.8). Regarding HIV-related experience and training, although only 12.7% (n = 158) of the participants had prior experience working in AIDS specialized hospitals, 84.2% (n = 1,051) of them had provided care for PLWH. While 90.1% (n = 1,124) of the participants were willing to receive HIV-related training, only 63.1% (n = 787) of them had received the training in the past. Majority (95.5%) of the participants reported that the hospitals where they worked provided sufficient universal precaution supplies, and 86.9% (n = 1,084) reported that the hospitals had policies to protect PLWH from stigma.
As for HIV knowledge, the mean total score was 16.3 (SD=2.9). The mean total score for HIV-related stigma among registered nurses was 50.7 (SD = 8.3). Among the 5 subscales, “prejudiced attitudes” had the highest scores (M = 3.7, SD = 0.7) while “discrimination intent at work” had the lowest scores (M = 2.3, SD = 0.6).
Results of univariate analysis
The relationships between HIV-related stigma and other study variables are shown in Table 2. A higher HIV-related stigma score was significantly related to longer years of work experience, and lower levels of HIV knowledge. The results of group differences in HIV-related stigma score are presented in Table 3. Nurses who were members of the Han ethnic group, were working in low HIV prevalence areas, had higher educational levels (i.e., associate or higher vs. Diploma), had longer years of work experience, worked at a higher hospital level (Tertiary vs. Secondary vs. Primary), and had not worked in specialized AIDS hospitals reported higher HIV-related stigma score. Nurses’ willingness to receive HIV-related training, experience of having received HIV-related training in the past, and working at a hospital where had policies to protect PLWH from stigma reported a lower level of HIV-related stigma toward PLWH.
Findings of multiple stepwise regression analysis
Table 4 presents the multiple stepwise regression analysis results. The findings suggested that a higher HIV-related stigma was associated with nurses who were more educated (associated degree or higher vs. diploma), had longer years of working experience, were working in the tertiary hospitals, did not have prior experience working in specialized AIDS hospitals, were not willing to receive HIV-related training, worked in low HIV prevalence areas, working in a hospital that had policies to protect PLWH from stigma and had higher levels of HIV knowledge.
All the selected variables accounted for 14.0% of the variance (R2). Among the selected variables, HIV knowledge had the strongest effect to explain HIV-related stigma toward PLWH among nurses (Beta=-0.227, P<.001).
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first aimed at examing HIV-related stigma toward PLWH and factors associated with it among nurses in Liangshan, China. The mean score for HIV-related stigma was high, which is similar to findings from research conducted in other regions of China [36,37]. As high levels of HIV-related stigma toward vulnerable PLWH population are related poor nursing care and negative health outcomes [38,39], PLWH may not receive proper nursing care due to nurses’ high levels of HIV-related stigma toward this population in Liangshan.
Individual characteristics. Compared with nurses who had an associate degree or higher level of education, diploma-educated nurses reported a lower level of HIV-related stigma, consistent with prior research [40,41]. Deacon and Boulle [42] suggested that higher-educated nurses might have more prejudicial attitudes due to a greater gap in social status between them and PLWH. Similar to other researchers [9,21,43], we found that nurses with better HIV knowledge reported no matter what the level of education, a lower level of HIV-related stigma toward PWLH overall, and in particularly, less fear of AIDS. This finding suggested the critical role of HIV knowledge in reducing fear-based stigma [44]. Since there was no significant difference of HIV knowledge between nurses with different educational levels, HIV education should target all nurses.
We also found that nurses who had longer years of working experience reported a higher level of HIV-related stigma toward PLWH, a finding similar to that in other studies [17,22]. A possible explanation is that nurses who were more experienced might assign nursing care to nurses with less experience [14]. Thus, junior nurses were more likely to provide care to PLWH and this experience might reduce their levels of HIV-related stigma compared with nurses who were more experienced.
Workplace characteristics. Consistent with Li et al [40], we found that nurses working in the tertiary hospitals had a higher level of HIV-related stigma toward PLWH. In China, tertiary hospitals that provide comprehensive services to a larger patient population are more likely to receive referrals of PLWH with opportunistic infections or other illnesses that might not be able to be cured. The complexities of providing care to terminally ill AIDS patients may make these nurses experience burnout and form avoidance attitudes [5,45].
Our findings supported that nurses working in high HIV prevalence areas and having prior working experience in AIDS specialized hospitals had a lower level of HIV-related stigma, which is also similar to findings in prior research [46,47]. Nurses who worked in high HIV prevalence areas and had prior working experience in AIDS specialized hospitals had more experience in taking care of PLWH. Increasing exposure to and more experience of interacting with PLWH were found to be related to a lower level of HIV-related stigma and higher confidence in taking care of this vulnerable population [23,48]. Moreover, nurses working in high HIV prevalence areas and having prior working experience in AIDS specialized hospitals received more institutional supports and training [46,47], which were found to reduce their anxiety about HIV infection, thereby reducing their stigma toward PLWH [19,38,40].
The significant relationship between nurses’ prior HIV-related training and their HIV-related stigma was indicated in t-test but not in regression analyses when other variables were held constant. This inconsistent finding may be due to the differences in HIV training, such as content, format and frequency, as they have significant impact on the effectiveness of the training. Further, nurses who were willing to receive HIV-related training reported lower levels of HIV-related stigma. Thus, future research should examine characteristics of successful HIV training for nurses to reduce HIV-related stigma toward PWLH and promote PWLH’s optimal health outcomes.
Research has supported the conclusion that stigma-reduction interventions, including policy development, led to positive changes in HIV-related stigma in health care settings [49], which is consistent with our findings. The results indicated that nurses working in the hospitals that implemented policies to protect PLWH from stigma had lower levels of HIV-related stigma toward PLWH. However, we did not find a significant relationship between hospitals that provided sufficient universal precaution supplies and nurses’ HIV-related stigma. This might be explained by a lack of variance in this variable, as the majority (95.5%) of nurses reported that universal precaution supplies were provided in the hospitals where they worked.
Given the high prevalence rate of PLWH in Liangshan, providing nurses with comprehensive HIV-related training and requiring hospitals to have policies to reduce HIV-related stigma toward PWLH are critical to reducing the high prevalence rate of PLWH.
Limitations. Several study limitations should be noted. Given the nature of cross-sectional survey design, it is challenging to draw causal relationships between variables. Further, HIV-related stigma is a sensitive topic in China, and so the validity of self-reported data may not be optimal. With these limitations in mind, our anonymous survey should have minimized the participants’ social desirability and bias. Using the stratified random cluster sampling to obtain a powered sample with sufficient sample size enhanced the representation of our target population and therefore increased the external validity of the findings.
The present study was the first to examine the level of HIV-related sigma toward PWLH and factors associated with the stigma in nurses in Liangshan, an area that has one of the most serious HIV epidemics in China. The findings revealed high levels of HIV-related stigma among nurses in Liangshan. Nurses’ high levels of HIV knowledge, willingness to receive HIV-related training, and working in the hospitals that had anti-stigma policies were significantly related to their lower levels of stigma toward PWLH. Comprehensive HIV-related training that addresses these factors and incorporates the unique economic and cultural contexts of Liangshan will help nurses to reduce associated stigma and, in turn, provide culturally congruent care to PWLH and promote their optimal health outcomes.
HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; PLWH: people living with HIV; AIDS: acquired immune deficiency syndrome; VCT: voluntary counseling and testing; PMCT: prevent mother-to-child transmission; SD: standard deviation; ANOVA: analyses of variance; SEE, standard error of estimation.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
We received approval from the West China Hospital Medical Ethics Committee prior to implementation the study (No. 430[2017]). The electronic version of informed consent was received from all participants.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to policy restriction.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding
They study received no supporting of any funding.
Authors’ contributions
The study was designed by YY, ACC, SW and HC. Data collection was performed by YY, SW and HC. YY and ACC conducted data analysis and data interpretation. YY developed first draft of the article. YY, ACC, SW and HC contributed to revisions of manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the nurse who participated in this research and to hospital administrators who approved and assisted with recruitment.
Table 1 Individual and workplace characteristics, HIV knowledge and HIV-related stigma toward PLWH
Variables |
N |
% |
Mean |
SD |
Range |
Age (years) |
|
|
30.2 |
7.2 |
19-55 |
Gender |
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
20 |
1.6 |
|
|
|
Female |
1228 |
98.4 |
|
|
|
Ethnicity |
|
|
|
|
|
Han |
902 |
72.2 |
|
|
|
Minority |
346 |
27.8 |
|
|
|
Educational level |
|
|
|
|
|
Diploma |
92 |
7.4 |
|
|
|
Associate degree |
784 |
62.8 |
|
|
|
Baccalaureate degree or above |
372 |
29.8 |
|
|
|
Years of working experience |
|
|
8.8 |
7.8 |
0.5-37 |
Provide care for PLWH |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
1051 |
84.2 |
|
|
|
No |
197 |
15.8 |
|
|
|
Willingness to receive HIV-related training |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
1124 |
90.1 |
|
|
|
No |
124 |
9.9 |
|
|
|
Prior HIV-related training |
|
||||
Yes |
787 |
63.1 |
|
|
|
No |
461 |
36.9 |
|
|
|
Level of hospital |
|
|
|
|
|
Primary hospital |
102 |
8.2 |
|
|
|
Secondary hospital |
592 |
47.4 |
|
|
|
Tertiary hospital |
554 |
44.4 |
|
|
|
HIV prevalence area |
|
|
|
|
|
High prevalence areas (>1%) |
120 |
9.6 |
|
|
|
Low prevalence areas (<1%) |
1128 |
90.4 |
|
|
|
Prior experience working in AIDS specialized hospitals |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
158 |
12.7 |
|
|
|
No |
1090 |
87.3 |
|
|
|
Sufficient universal precaution supplies |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
1192 |
95.5 |
|
|
|
No |
56 |
4.5 |
|
|
|
Policies to protect PLWH from stigma |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
1084 |
86.9 |
|
|
|
No or doubt |
164 |
13.1 |
|
|
|
HIV knowledge |
|
|
16.3 |
2.9 |
7-23 |
HIV-related stigma scale |
|
|
50.7 |
8.3 |
25-78 |
Prejudiced attitudes subscale |
|
|
3.7 |
0.7 |
1-5 |
Fear of PLWHA subscale |
|
|
3.2 |
0.8 |
1-5 |
Opinion about health care for HIV/AIDS patients subscale |
|
|
3.1 |
0.8 |
1-5 |
Internalized shame subscale |
|
|
2.7 |
0.7 |
1-5 |
Discrimination intent at work subscale |
|
|
2.3 |
0.6 |
1-4.8 |
PLWH people living with HIV; SD standard deviation
Table 2 Correlations between age, years of working experience, HIV knowledge and HIV-related stigma
Variables |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 Age(years) |
1.000 |
- |
- |
- |
2 Years of working experience |
0.951** |
1.000 |
- |
- |
3 HIV knowledge |
0.165** |
0.156** |
1.000 |
- |
4 HIV-related stigma |
0.052 |
0.062* |
-0.228** |
1.000 |
* P< 0.05
** P < 0.01
Table 3 Differences in HIV-related stigma by individual and workplace characteristics a
Variables |
Stigma score |
Statistical test |
|
|
Mean |
SD |
|
Ethnicity |
|
|
t=3.702** |
Han |
51.2 |
8.4 |
|
Minority |
49.3 |
7.9 |
|
Educational level |
|
|
F=5.886* |
Diploma |
48.0 |
7.7 |
|
Associate degree |
50.7 |
8.2 |
|
Baccalaureate degree or above |
51.3 |
8.5 |
|
Willingness to receive HIV-related training |
|
|
t=6.213** |
Yes |
50.2 |
8.2 |
|
No |
55.0 |
8.1 |
|
Prior HIV-related training |
|
t=2.645* |
|
Yes |
50.2 |
8.2 |
|
No |
51.5 |
8.4 |
|
Level of hospital |
|
|
F=11.848** |
Primary hospital |
48.3 |
9.8 |
|
Secondary hospital |
50.0 |
8.1 |
|
Tertiary hospital |
51.8 |
8.1 |
|
HIV prevalence area |
|
|
t=6.058** |
High prevalence areas |
47.0 |
6.9 |
|
Low prevalence areas |
51.1 |
8.3 |
|
Prior experience working in AIDS specialized hospitals |
|
|
t=4.618** |
Yes |
47.8 |
7.4 |
|
No |
51.1 |
8.4 |
|
Policies to protect PLWH from stigma |
|
|
t=-5.695** |
Yes |
50.2 |
8.2 |
|
No or doubt |
54.1 |
8.1 |
|
PLWH people living with HIV; SD standard deviation
a Only significant results have been listed
*P<0 .05
** P< 0.01
Table 4 Multiple stepwise regression analysis of variables in relation to HIV-related stigma
Variables |
B |
SEE |
β |
t |
P-value |
Educational level |
0.951 |
0.402 |
0.065 |
2.367 |
0.018 |
Years of working experience (years) |
0.095 |
0.029 |
0.089 |
3.326 |
0.001 |
Willingness to receive HIV-related training (ref: yes) |
|
|
|
|
|
No |
4.022 |
0.736 |
0.145 |
5.467 |
<0.001 |
Level of hospital (ref: tertiary hospital) |
|
|
|
|
|
Primary hospital |
-2.635 |
0.837 |
-0.087 |
-3.150 |
0.002 |
Secondary hospital |
-1.225 |
0.483 |
-0.074 |
-2.536 |
0.011 |
HIV prevalence area (ref: low prevalence areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
High prevalence areas |
-2.561 |
0.797 |
-0.091 |
-3.211 |
0.001 |
Prior experience working in AIDS specialized hospitals (ref: no) |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
-2.268 |
0.666 |
-0.091 |
-3.404 |
0.001 |
Policy to protect PLWH from stigma (ref: yes) |
|
|
|
|
|
No |
3.028 |
0.651 |
0.123 |
4.649 |
<0.001 |
HIV knowledge |
-0.662 |
0.078 |
-0.227 |
-8.449 |
<0.001 |
SEE standard error of estimation