A rare coracobrachialis muscle bilateral variant with supernumerary heads in coexistence with a variant brachial plexus and axillary artery branching pattern

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2431129/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

A rare coracobrachialis muscle bilateral variant with supernumerary heads in coexistence with a variant brachial plexus and axillary artery branching pattern

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2431129/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 24 Jan, 2023

Read the published version in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Purpose The study-report describes a rare bilateral variant of a six- and five-headed coracobrachialis muscle (CB). The musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) (bilaterally) and the median nerve (MN) lateral root (unilaterally) pierced CB heads, separating superficial from deep heads.

Methods The variant bilateral CB was identified in a 78-year-old formalin-embalmed male cadaver, derived from a body donation program after a signed informed consent.

Results At the right side: The 6-headed CB was pierced by the MCN, while the MN lateral root pierced the one superficial and deep head. CB was supplied by the lateral cord and the MCN. At the left side: A 5-headed CBM was identified with three superficial distinct origins that fused into a common superficial head coursing anterior to MCN. The variant CB bilaterally (with 11 heads in total) coexisted with a MN variant formation, an atypical course of the MN lateral root through CB (right side), a connection of the MN lateral root with the MCN (left side) and a variant axillary artery branching pattern (bilaterally).

Conclusions Course and direction of the accessory CB heads may occasionally entrap the MCN and/or adjacent structures (brachial artery and MN). The MCN compression results in problems in the glenohumeral joint flexion and adduction, and tingling or numbness of the elbow joint, the forearm lateral parts and the hand.

accessory head

coracobrachialis

variation

musculocutaneous nerve

axillary artery

nerve compression

Coracobrachialis muscle (CB), the smallest flexor of the anterior arm compartment, originates from the coracoid process and inserts medially, into the middle third of the humeral shaft. It is innervated by the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN), piercing the muscle (between superficial and deep head course) [19], and is supplied by the brachial artery (BA) [20]. Koizumi [8, 9] demonstrated that the CB is composed by a superficial belly supplied by the lateral cord and a deep belly supplied by the MCN. The CB commonest morphological variant is the presence of one accessory head, while multiple accessory heads are quite unusual [19]. Occasional CB descriptions are referred to four [18] or even six [21] heads and different distal attachments [19]. The CB may also have accessory bundles inserting into the medial intermuscular septum, the medial epicondyle, the flexor carpi radialis, the brachialis, the brachioradialis or the pronator teres muscle [15]. Other variants include the coracobrachialis longus and brevis [16] and the coraco-capsularis muscle [20]. Course and direction of these accessory structures may occasionally entrap the median nerve (MN) and/or the BA [5]. The MCN may be compressed between CB heads [17, 19] leading to weakness of the anterior arm muscles and problems in the glenohumeral joint flexion and adduction. Tingling or numbness may occur, as the MCN provides sensory innervation to the elbow joint, the forearm lateral part, and the hand [18]. The current report describes a rare bilateral variant of a six- and five-headed CB originated from the coracoid process and the tendon of the biceps brachii (BB) short head. All heads inserted into the medial surface of the humerus middle third. The MCN (bilaterally) and the MN lateral root (unilaterally) were piercing the CB heads, separating superficial from deep heads. Coexisted variants were also described. The systematic knowledge on the potential clinical consequences of such a rare bilateral finding is also discussed.

During the axillae and arms dissection of a formalin-fixed 78-year-old Greek male donated cadaver, a quite rare CB bilateral variant was detected. The cadaver was donated to the Department of Anatomy of the Medical School of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, through the “Anatomical Gift Program” after a written informed consent. The atypical CB had multiple accessory heads, bilaterally. The right-sided six-headed CB had three superficial (1, 2, and 3) and three deep heads (4, 5, and 6). The heads were pierced by the MCN, while the MN lateral root pierced the heads 1, 4, 5, and 6. It seems that the CB was triplicated. The head 1 arose from the coracoid process tip, the heads 2 and 3, as well as the heads 4, 5, and 6 originated from the tendon of the BB short head. The heads 4 and 5 joined and before their insertion were fused with the head 1. The head 2 inserted into the middle third of the humeral shaft, after receiving a bundle from the head 3. The whole complex inserted into the middle third of the humeral shaft. The six-headed CB was supplied by four direct branches of the lateral cord and from the MCN. The lateral cord penetrated CB and gave off the MCN and the MN lateral root, more distally than usual. The MCN passed between CB superficial and deep heads (Fig. 1). At the contralateral side, a five-headed CB was identified. The CB had three superficial distinct origins that fused into a common superficial head coursing anterior to the MCN. The superficial heads 1 and 2 emanated from the coracoid process and joined. The superficial head 3 that originated from the tendon of the BB short head joined the superficial heads (1 and 2) complex and in common inserted medially, into the middle humeral third. The deep head 4 originated from the coracoid process base and joined the deep head, originating from the shoulder joint capsule. The deep heads 4 and 5 in common inserted into the medial humeral shaft, just above the common insertion of superficial heads (1, 2 and 3) (Fig. 2). The variant CB coexisted with a MN variant formation, an atypical course of the MN lateral root through CB (right side), a connection of the MN lateral root with the MCN (left side) and a variant axillary artery (AA) branching pattern (bilaterally).

Brachial plexus branches’ atypical formation, course, and other variants

At the right side, the MN was formed distally, at the lower border of the latissimus dorsi muscle tendon, after the asymmetrical union of the lateral and medial roots (Fig. 3A). The medial cord was subdivided at a proximal level in relation to the lateral cord division. The four intercostobrachial nerves (branches of the 2nd, 3rd, 4^th, and 5th intercostal nerves) coursed anterior to the long thoracic nerve. At the left side, a connecting branch of the MCN to the MN lateral root was identified (Fig. 3B).

The axillary artery atypical branching pattern

At the right side, three lateral thoracic arteries (LTA1, LTA2 and LTA3) and an abnormal trunk were identified. The LTA1 emanated from the AA 1st part. The abnormal trunk, posterior to pectoralis minor muscle, gave off the LTA2, the thoracoacromial trunk (TAT) and the subscapular trunk that, 23.82mm distally, divided into the LTA3, a branch for the upper portion of the subscapularis muscle, and the thoracodorsal artery. The circumflex scapular artery and a trunk for the teres major and minor supply emanated from the AA 3rd part, 4.1cm distally (Fig. 3A).

At the left side, a symmetrical LTA triplication and an abnormal trunk were identified. Superior thoracic artery was absent, and at the 3rd rib inferior border, the AA gave off the LTA1 and 0.5 cm below, the common trunk [TAT-2nd LTA and 3 pectoral branches (two thin and a thick for the pectoralis major and minor supply)]. The subscapular artery arose medial to the TAT and gave off an upper branch for the subscapularis superior portion supply, the LTA3, the circumflex scapular artery, a branch for the teres major and the thoracodorsal artery (Fig. 3B). Overall cadaver status was without obesity or muscle atrophy. No signs of pathological conditions, trauma, or earlier surgery in the cadaver’s upper limbs were identified.

The cadaveric report describes a bilateral quite rare variant of a six- and five- headed CB with attachment on the medial surface of the humeral shaft. Szewczyk et al. [19] recorded two accessory CB heads in 7.9% and Olewnik et al. [18] found three accessory heads innervated by the MCN. Occasional CB descriptions with four [18] or even six [21] heads and different distal attachments [19] exist.

The occurrence of such a bilateral complex structure is associated with alterations during embryological development. The aberrant muscle formations may be remnants of muscle primordia from different layers that failed to disappear or fuse to form a single muscle [3, 10]. Some of the brachial plexus fibers may follow an aberrant course, due to failure in differentiation. In the first stage, the flexor arm muscles are tightly connected in a pre-muscle mass. The three muscles become distinct structures when the embryo reaches a length of 14-16mm. Probably, the CB additional heads are formed during this stage or later (at an embryonal length 11-19mm) when the single mass divides into smaller parts recognized as CB supernumerary heads [1].

Due to CB high morphological variability, there is a possibility to identify new variants not previously described in the literature. CB accessory heads have also been associated with MCN variants. The MCN atypical course shows a wide variability [4, 14]. The MCN may not pierce CB in 16.67% [7]. The CB accessory heads may be combined with multiple neurovascular variants, as in the current case where triple LTAs were bilaterally and four intercostobrachial nerves were unilaterally detected. The rare occurrence of multiple LTAs (3.09%) is significant in clinical and surgical practice [13]. Particularly the LTA and thoracodorsal artery points of origin [12] are important since the arteries should remain intact during neck and breast surgery [13]. Concerning the intercostobrachial nerve, double, triple, and multiple nerves with their possible interconnections have been reported. The intercostobrachial nerve should be preserved during radical mastectomy to prevent sensory loss or dysesthesia in the upper arm area [11].

The presence of additional CB heads may have clinical implications, since the supernumerary head (s) may compress the MCN, especially when this nerve courses between two bellies [17, 19]. The MCN entrapment may complicate the glenohumeral joint flexion and adduction and cause tingling or numbness, as the MCN provides sensory innervation to the elbow joint, the forearm lateral parts and hand [17]. Entrapment in this level is extremely rare but it may arise as major issue, since both the anterior arm compartment and the forearm muscles may be affected leading to disabilities. Detailed imaging of the area with magnetic resonance imaging should be performed prior to surgery, to evaluate the area variants, since such cases are extremely rare. Furthermore, shoulder surgery including osteotomy and coracoid process transfer in Bristow- Latarjet procedure, subcoracoid loops and muscle transfers requires muscles’ mobilization that are attached to the coracoid process [2]. Therefore, data concerning the level of MCN penetration into the CB will shed light on such surgical procedures, thus avoiding the MCN iatrogenic lesions [4]. Intraoperative blunt trauma or elongation of MCN may lead to neurapraxia, therefore detailed planning of the procedure and the variants through preoperative imaging are of utmost importance for avoiding such complications.

CB has a definite clinical significance. During brachial plexus blockade, the CB serves as guide for the AA identification [7]. It is well vascularized and represents a good choice as transplant for treating long-standing facial palsy [3], as a graft for post-mastectomy reconstruction, and in both axillary and infraclavicular deformities [3]. In some cases, an accessory CB can lead to subcoracoid impingement and MCN, MN, or ulnar nerve palsy due to hypertrophy, injury, or brachial artery compression. Variant CB could also cause confusion during surgery and imaging evaluation [6]. The MCN atypical course would be of considerable value during axillary blocks and flap dissections, as well as in identifying and treating post-traumatic peripheral neuropathies and reconstructive nerve grafting following brachial plexus injury, coracoid process grafting and shoulder arthroplasty. Knowledge of the morphological variants of the shoulder area, prior to surgery, is crucial since many variants have also been reported at the acromion and the scapula. Thorough preoperative planning may minimize intraoperative “surprises” and, hence, complications.

Study limitations

As the medical history of the dead man was unknown, the clinical impact of the identified variants could not be estimated. However, we believe that physicians and surgeons should be alert for the possible presence of such variants, because their occurrence may have clinical significance, as it was previously highlighted.

To the best of our knowledge, such a combination of muscular and neurovascular variants has not been reported. The quite rare CB variant with multiple heads (11 in the number, 6 at the right and 5 at the left side) was identified bilaterally. The superficial heads were separated from the deep heads of the muscle complex by the MCN course. The six-headed CB was supplied by the lateral cord and the MCN. The variant CB coexisted with a MN variant formation, an atypical course of the MN lateral root through CB (right side), a connection of the lateral root with the MCN (left side) and a variant AA branching pattern (bilaterally) (with focus on LTA triplication and abnormal arterial trunks formation) and an intercostobrachial nerve quadrupling.

Acknowledgements The authors would like to express their gratitude to body donors and their families for their highest contribution to the medical education and anatomy research.

Author contributions Conceptualization: MP; cadaver’s dissection: MP, GT, and DF methodology: DF, MP, GT, VK; data collection: GK, GT, EK; analysis and interpretation of results: MP, GT, CK; writing—original draft: DF, MP, GT; writing—review and editing: TT, KN, MS; critical revision of the manuscript: CK, DC; approval of the final version of the manuscript: all authors.

Funding None.

Data availability Data and material related to the report will be available with the corresponding author for further reference.

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval as this is a case report that is completely on a cadaver, no ethical clearance was required as cadaver is used for teaching and research purpose.

Consent for publication All the authors gave consent for the publication of the report.

Bardeen C (1905) Studies of the development of the human skeleton. Am J Anat 4: 265–302.
Clavert P, Lutz JC, Wolfram-Gabel R et al (2009) Relationship of musculocutaneous nerve and the coracobrachialis during coracoids abutment procedure (Latarjet procedure). Surg Radiol Anat 31:49–53.
El-Naggar MM, Al-Saggaf S (2004) Variant of the coracobrachialis muscle with a tunnel for the median nerve and brachial artery. Clin Anat 17(2): 139–143
Flatow EL, Bigliani LU, April EW (1989) An anatomic study of the musculocutaneous nerve and its relationship to the coracoid process. Clin Orthop 244:166–171
Garbelotti SA, Marques SR, Rocha PR, et al. (2017) An unusual case of accessory head of coracobrachialis muscle involving lateral cord of brachial plexus and its clinical significance. Folia Morphol 76(4): 762–765
Georgiev GP, Tubbs RS, Landzhov B (2018) Coracobrachialis longus muscle: humeroepitrochlearis. Cureus 10(5): e2615
Ilayperuma I, Nanayakkara BG, Hasan R, Uluwitiya SM, Palahepitiya KN (2016) Coracobrachialis muscle: morphology, morphometry and gender differences. Surg Radiol Anat 38(3):335–340.
Koizumi M (1989) A morphological study on the coracobrachialis muscle. Acta Anat Nippon 64:18–35.
Koizumi M, Sakai T (1995) The nerve supply to coracobrachialis in apes. J Anat 186:395–403.
Kopuz C, Icten N, Yildirim M (2002) A rare accessory coracobrachialis muscle: a review of the literature. Surg Radiol Anat 24:406–410
Kumar PA, Reddy KRD, Bapuji P (2014) Multiple intercostobrachial nerves. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 3(57): 12978–12984.
Natsis K, Totlis T, Tsikaras P, Skandalakis P (2006) Bilateral accessory thoracodorsal artery. Ann Anat. 188(5):447–9.
Loukas M, Louis Jr RG, Wartmann CT (2006) Superficial lateral thoracic artery. Annals of plastic surgery 57(4): 475–476.
Loukas M, Aqueelah H (2005) Musculocutaneous and median nerve connections within, proximal and distal to the coracobrachialis muscle. Folia Morphol 64:101–108
Nakatani T, Tanaka S, Mizukami S (1998) Bilateral four-headed biceps brachii muscles: The median nerve and brachial artery passing through a tunnel formed by a muscle slip from the accessory head. Clin Anat 11(3): 209–212.
Olewnik Ł, Zielinska N, Gołek Ł, Aragonés P, Sanudo JR (2021a) Is it the coracobrachialis superior muscle or is it an unidentified rare variant of coracobrachialis muscle. Surg Radiol Anat 43(10): 1581–1586.
Olewnik Ł, Paulsen F, Tubbs RS, et al. (2021b) Potential compression of the musculocutaneous, median, and ulnar nerves by a very rare variant of the coracobrachialis longus muscle. Folia Morphol 80(3): 707–713.
Olewnik L, Zielinska N, Karauda P, Duparc F, Georgiev GP, Polguj M (2021c) The co-occurrence of a four-headed coracobrachialis muscle, split coracoid process and tunnel for the median and musculocutaneous nerves: the potential clinical relevance of a very rare variation. Surg Radiol Anat 43(5): 661–669.
Szewczyk B, Polguj M, Paulsen F, et al. (2021) A proposal for a new classification of coracobrachialis muscle morphology. Surg Radiol Anat 43(5): 679–688
Wood J (1867) On human muscular variations and their relation to comparative anatomy. J Anat Physiol 1(1): 44–59.
Zielinska N, Olewnik L (2022) Six-headed coracobrachialis muscle. Folia Morphol 81(3): 809–813.

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 24 Jan, 2023

Read the published version in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy →

Editorial decision: Major revision
10 Jan, 2023
Reviews received at journal
10 Jan, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
10 Jan, 2023
Reviewers invited by journal
10 Jan, 2023
Editor assigned by journal
05 Jan, 2023
Submission checks completed at journal
01 Jan, 2023
First submitted to journal
31 Dec, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

A rare coracobrachialis muscle bilateral variant with supernumerary heads in coexistence with a variant brachial plexus and axillary artery branching pattern

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Case Report

Discussion

Conclusions

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1