Our study found a new mutation affecting splicing in the HMBS gene in a pregnant woman with AIP and her fetus, which was located at the junction of exon 13 and intron 13. In most human genes, the coding regions are discontinuous and contain multiple exons. mRNA precursors are produced after transcription of the gene. Splicing of mRNA precursor transcripts occurs when introns are cut from the transcripts, and then exons are spliced together to create functional gene molecules. In order to initiate the splicing reaction, the splice body must identify the splice site at the exon-intron junction, including the splice donor located at intron 5’ and the splice receptor located at intron 3’ [14, 15]. Almost all introns contain GT and AG boundary sequences, which are crucial for splice recognition [16, 17]. As shown in our study, c.912 + 1G > C caused damage to the 5' splice donor in intron 13 by damaging its 5' splice. As a result of the misrecognition of the GT position of exon 13, 87 nucleotides were cleaved at the end of exon 13. Because the splice misread the GT position of exon 13, 87 nucleotides were cleaved leaving a HMBS protein lacking 276–304 amino acids. A second finding in the study was that c.912 + 1G > C interferes with splice recognition, resulting in production of a HMBS protein that retains intron 13. The HMBS truncated protein contains 304 normal amino acids and 30 abnormal amino acids because of a premature termination codon tag inserted at nucleotide 88 downstream of exon 13 of the HMBS gene. In principle, introducing a mutation to the stop codon early in protein synthesis will result in a truncated protein, thereby affecting protein folding and stability. In Swedish patients, the most common HMBS gene mutation (Trp198Term) results in proteins that are severely truncated, possibly inactive, and easily degradable. AIP has a low penetrance (8%), so patients with this mutation have the highest incidence rate. In our study, p.H305Vfs*31 caused the HMBS protein to shift from the 305th amino acid, and halted translation early. It is estimated that the sequence change in domain 3 of p.H305Vfs*31 exceeds 40%, which will interfere with the folding of the enzyme during biosynthesis and destroy its stability. We can, however, observe normal splicing of HMBS gene mRNA in the peripheral blood of pregnant women, and the normal subtype bands are much stronger than the abnormal subtype bands. As a result, we suggest wild-type HMBS protein possesses a dominant role in pregnant women, which may be a direct indication that the symptoms aren't very serious.
There are three domains in the HMBS protein. The residues 1-116 and 216–239 of domain 1 constitute a discontinuous domain. Domain 2 consists of residues 117–215, while domain 3 consists of residues 240–361 [18]. By way of the flexure hinge region, the three domains are connected. The active site of DPM cofactor is located at the interface between domains 1 and 2 [19]. By combining HMBS with DPM cofactor, in the same catalytic position, four repeated reactions are performed to catalyze the formation of porphyrin. The domain 3 consists of an antiparallel β-sheet with three chains, one of which is covered by three α-helixes. Domain 3 interacts equally with domains 1 and 2, contributing to overall protein stability [20]. In contrast to Escherichia coli (EcHMBS) and Arabidopsis thaliana (AtHMBS), domain 3 of hHMBS contains 29-residue (residues 296–324) on the interface between domain 1 and 3. The 29-residue inserts are far away from the active site, and their functions are still unknown. Since these 29-residue inserts are sandwiched between domain 1 and domain 3, they may push domain 3 towards domain 2 and prevent them from interacting massively. Accordingly, we speculate that hHMBS has a lesser movement of the domain compared to EcHMBS because of the 29-residue present [19]. Moreover, we speculate that the interaction between 29-residue and domain 1 may regulate conformational fluctuations related to enzyme interactions, resulting in weak dimerization of the crystal. As seen in our study, defects in domain 3 of p.276_304del and p.H305Vfs*31 adversely affect the integrity of the 29-residue region of hHMBS, thus affecting the overall stability of hHMBS. Overall, we speculate that the defects in residues 296–324 of p.276_304del and p.H305Vfs*31 may indirectly affect hHMBS catalyzed porphyrinogen formation rate.
Catalyzed by HMBS using the same catalytic site four times, the extension of polypyrrole can be achieved. It is important that the intermediate of the reaction be transferred from the active site on time, which is closely related to the flexible sliding ring E250-C261 [21]. We emphasize the importance of the flexible sliding ring, which is critical to reaction extension. There are seven residues (E250, A252, L254, H256, E258, G260 and C261) in the slip ring. When these residues are mutated, they could lead to AIP, which could limit the fluidity of the ring, limiting reaction efficiency. As a result of our present study, it is evident from RMSF analysis that residue fluctuations in p.276_304del and p.H305Vfs*31 within the 250–270 region are significantly greater than in WT. There is a possibility that this could be due to damage to the 29-residue insert in p.276_304del and p.H305Vfs*31. If the 29-residue insert is impaired, its restrictions on the movement of domain 3 are reduced, resulting in an increased degree of freedom for flexible sliding ring, which may reduce the reaction's efficiency. Furthermore, the RMSF analysis of the active site loops (residues 56–76) of WT, p.276_304del and p.H305Vfs*31 showed more significant differences between them. The RMSF values of p.276_304del and p.H305Vfs*31 were significantly lower than those of WT, and the difference between p.H305Vfs*31 and WT was the greatest. In light of this, we speculate that our analysis may be corroborated in further detail. When 29-residue insert is damaged, flexible sliding ring is left more free to react during polypyrrole extension, reducing the efficiency of the response of the active site loops to respond, which in turn reduces enzyme activity indirectly.
In addition to forming the main chain connection between domain 1 and domain 2, 29-residue in domain 3 is also involved in filling domain 1, and this interaction is mainly mediated by hydrogen bonds [20]. The residues 312–315 and 318–321 form antiparallel chains. When the chain is bifurcated, the hydrogen bonds of the main chain Leu315NH-Ile318CO and Leu315CO-Ile318NH are interrupted and the main chain-side chain interaction Asp312CO-Arg321NH takes their place [20]. The carbonyl oxygen of Val316 forms a hydrogen bond with the side chain of Arg251. Leu315, Val316, Ile318 and Ala320, the hydrophobic side chains of 29-residues, interact with Leu329, Ile248 and Leu244 of domain 3. Furthermore, hydrogen bonds between Gly317CO-Ile110NH and Thr319NH-Ile110CO, hydrogen bonds between the side chain of Gln314 and the carbonyl group of Phe108, and hydrogen bonds between OG atoms of Thr109 and Thr319 stabilize the interaction between domains 1 and 3 [20]. Our study finds domain 3 of p.H305Vfs*31 to be completely abnormal from the 305th residue, indicating that the interaction between domains 1 and 3 of p.H305Vfs*31 is much weaker than what is found in wild-type.
There are hydrophobic interactions among some residues in the three domains of HMBS [20]. As an example, residues Leu97, Leu244 and Cys247 are between domains 1 and 3, residues Ala152, Met212 and Leu285 are between domains 2 and 3, and residues Trp283 and Gln153 are between domains 2 and 3 [20]. In our study, p.276_304del lost the key sites Leu285 and Trp283 involved in maintaining domain 3 interactions. Because of this, compared with WT, p.276_304del has reduced hydrophobicity, which makes it harder for the protein to fold inward to form secondary structure, and further to form domains and tertiary structures. In addition, the decrease of hydrophobicity does not contribute to the formation of α-helix, which affects the protein's stability. Additionally, Leu245 in domain 3 is a conservative hydrophobic side chain that interacts with Pro241, Pro302 and Pro327 in domain 1. The replacement of Leu245 by Arg245 related to AIP will bury a large positively charged side chain, affecting the stability of domain 3 folding [20]. Our study shows that p.276_304del lacks Pro302, p.H305Vfs*31 lacks Pro327, and both p.276_304del and p.H305Vfs*31 lack the key interaction sites that interact with Leu245, which will adversely affect the folding stability of domain 3.
In the 29-residue insert, far from the active center, the c.912 + 1G > C mutation produces p.276_304del and p.H305Vfs*31 with defective amino acid regions. According to our computer simulations, the PBG small molecule was unable to bind to the DPM active centers of p.276_304del and p.H305Vfs*31 and the catalytic reaction could not proceed. As a result, we predict that p.276_304del and p.H305Vfs*31 will lose their catalytic activity completely. There was previously no clear understanding of the role of the 29-residue insert region of the hHMBS protein. We found that the 29-residue insert plays a crucial role in keeping the conformational stability of the hHMBS protein, so that its failure could result in a complete loss of enzyme activity.
AIP can primarily be diagnosed clinically by the elevation of urinary ALA and PBG, but these levels are not always elevated in the asymptomatic population. Therefore, the importance of genetic testing to diagnose AIP in asymptomatic patients, especially in prenatal diagnosis, cannot be overstated. There is a high level of genetic diversity and familial transmission of the HMBS gene mutation. There is a good chance that other members of the family will have the same mutation site when a family screening is conducted for AIP patients. In order to reduce the acute attack of AIP, these potential AIP patients or their guardians should be advised to avoid various inducements of AIP. In the current literature, AIP cases are mostly reported on their clinical manifestations and treatments, but our study completed prenatal diagnosis of AIP families for the first time. In accordance with ACMG guidelines, we rated the HMBS: c.912 + 1G > C as "pathogenic." The evidence supporting the pathogenicity rating is as follows. PVS1_Strong: functional deletion is one of the pathogenic mechanisms of HMBS gene abnormality, which is a classical splice site variation that may cause functional loss of the gene. PS3_Moderate: in functional experiments, this mutation affects splicing, resulting in HMBS intron 13 retention and exon 13 skipping. PM2_Supporting: the variation is a rare one, and the frequency of the East Asian general population is not included in the gnomAD database. PM4: insertion of a non-repetitive region alters the length of the protein. PP3: bioinformatics software predicts that splicing is affected by variation. PP4: Family history or phenotype of the mutation carrier are highly consistent with AIP. After the follow-up visit, we learned that the pregnant woman had given birth to a baby girl at 36 weeks of pregnancy. The baby girl is in good health at present, but she did have a brief episode of apnea after birth, as we know.