A prospective, non-randomised clinical trial was conducted between March 1, 2020, to October 31, 2021 at a tertiary eye care institute. Institutional ethics committee clearance was obtained (No.1/IEC/MAMC/70/05/2019/No511, dated 01/11/2019) and the study was registered with the Clinical trials registry of India (No. CTRI/2020/02/023388, registered on 17/02/2020). The study was carried out in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and a written informed consent was obtained from the study participants prior to enrolment in the study.
The study population comprised of consecutive Graves’ disease patients, euthyroid for the past 6 months, between the ages of 18–65 years age, with moderate-severe inactive TED in at least one orbit. Exclusion criteria comprised of known cases of diabetes, coronary artery disease, dyslipidaemia, atherosclerosis, pregnant or lactating females, hypertension, patients on diuretic medications, orbital space occupying lesions, exposure keratopathy, one eyed patients and optic neuropathy other than DON. Active smokers or patients with history of smoking in the past one year were not included in the study. The TED cases were screened for disorders affecting the blood viscosity like polycythemia vera using hematocrit parameter, and all deranged cases were excluded. The orbit with greater proptosis was selected for surgical decompression. The contralateral orbits, termed as ‘fellow orbits’ were kept under observation without surgical intervention.
A detailed history of ocular and systemic diseases was elicited. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessed and documented in logMAR form, extraocular muscle movement, upper and lower eyelid retraction, pupillary reactions and fundus examination were performed.
Exophthalmometry was done using Hertel’s exophthalmometer (Handaya Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). The measurements were performed at enrolment and repeated three months after intervention. The disease severity was graded as per EUGOGO guidelines.18 Moderate-severe TED was diagnosed based upon the presence of two or more of the signs, proptosis of ≥ 3 mm above the normal for gender and Indian race, lid retraction of ≥ 2 mm, inconstant or constant diplopia (Grade 3 or 4), or moderate to severe soft tissue involvement. The orbits with mild soft tissue involvement, lid retraction < 2 mm, exophthalmos < 3 mm above normal for gender and race, and no or intermittent diplopia, were graded as mild TED.
EOM movements were analysed in the field of action of the superior rectus muscle (elevation) due to inferior rectus restriction, and for the lateral rectus muscle (abduction) due to medial rectus restriction. The movement limitation was graded as 0 (no limitation), 1 (< 25% limitation), 2 (up to 50% limitation), 3 (75% limitation), or 4 (complete absence of eye movement from primary gaze). The scores for elevation and abduction were added to get muscle restriction index (mRI) varying from 0 to 8. The orbits with mRI scores ≤ 2/8 were classified as lipogenic (Type-1) orbitopathy and mRI > 2/8 were labeled as myogenic (Type-2) orbitopathy.19, 20
Disease activity in the TED orbits was defined as per the modified CAS scoring.21 At the initial visit, one point was allotted for each of the signs, resting orbital ache, gaze evoked pain, redness of eyelids, redness of conjunctiva, swelling of caruncle or plica, swelling of eyelids and chemosis. On the follow-up visit at six weeks, one point was awarded for increase in exophthalmos ≥ 2 mm, decrease in eye motility of ≥ 80, and worsening of visual acuity. Orbits with a score of < 3/7 at the initial visit or < 4/10 at the follow-up visit were classified as an inactive disease. Patients with inactive disease at the initial visit were enrolled in the study.
The color vision using Hardy-Rand-Rittler pseudoisochromatic plates and contrast sensitivity with Functional acuity contrast test were also assessed preoperatively. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was performed in relaxed sitting position in the primary gaze using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The visual field analysis was done using standard automated perimetry with 24 − 2 SITA-Standard strategy (Humphrey Field Analyzer, Carl Zeiss Meditech, Dublin, CA, USA) with appropriate near correction wherever required. The diagnosis of DON was based on reduction of BCVA of two or more Snellen lines, color vision defect, presence of optic disc swelling, relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD)22, alteration in contrast sensitivity and visual field defects.23
The TED orbits were imaged using a 128 slice multi-detector computed tomography (CT) scanner (Somatom Definition, Siemens Medical Solutions, PA, USA). The coronal section halfway between the posterior sclera and the orbital apex was chosen. The transverse dimensions of the horizontal and vertical extra-ocular muscles (EOM) were analysed. The horizontal muscle index was expressed as the percentage of the orbital width occupied by the medial and lateral rectus muscles. The vertical index was calculated in a similar way using inferior and superior rectus - levator palpebrae superioris complex. Barret index (BI) was taken as the higher of the two obtained muscle indices.23 Considering the maximum impingement on the optic nerve by EOM, BI > 67% was taken as a high-risk factor for optic neuropathy24, and these orbits were labelled as probable DON orbits.
The orbital blood flow was assessed using color doppler imaging with a 7.5 MHz linear-array transducer on the Philips HD 11 Ultrasound system (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) by a single-blinded experienced radiologist (SG). The patient lay supine with a forward head elevation of 30o. The patient was instructed to close the eye being examined, while fixating straight ahead with the other eye. The probe was placed axially with minimal pressure over the closed eyelids. The central retinal artery (CRA) was localized in the retrolaminar region 1–3 mm behind the optic nerve head. The ophthalmic artery (OA) was imaged around 20 mm behind the globe where it crossed the optic nerve from the lateral to the medial aspect7. The Doppler waveform and the velocity parameters – peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV) and resistivity index (RI) were noted in CRA and OA. The measurements were taken twice, and the average score was considered for the final analysis.
$$Resistivity index \left(RI\right)= \frac{Peak systolic velocity \left(PSV\right)-End diastolic velocity \left(EDV\right)}{Peak systolic velocity \left(PSV\right)}$$
The Doppler velocity measurements were repeated in both orbits three months post-surgical decompression.
The normative values of color doppler imaging were established from 18 age and sex-matched healthy controls who presented to the hospital, for refractive correction, after obtaining informed consent.
Surgical Technique Of Decompression:
Lateral and inferior orbital wall with fat decompression was performed by a single experienced surgeon (RG) under general anesthesia.
The superior lid crease incision was extended to the lateral orbital rim, the periosteum was incised and the lateral canthal tendon was disinserted. The decompression of the lateral and inferior wall was performed using the High-speed micromotor system (Karl Storz company, Tuttlingen, Germany) using the drill handpiece with a conical tip. The fat was removed from superolateral and inferolateral pockets. Hemostasis was achieved and the periosteum was closed with interrupted bites of polygalactin (Vicryl Rapid™ 5/0, Ethicon Inc, Somerville, NJ, USA) suture. The muscle layer and skin were closed with interrupted bites of absorbable, multifilament polygalactin (Vicryl Rapid™ 6/0, Ethicon Inc, Somerville, NJ, USA) and running non-absorbable silk (Mersilk 6/0, Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA) sutures respectively.
Statistical Analysis:
The statistical calculations were done using statistical package for social science software (SPSS v26.0). The data was assessed for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The quantitative data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The quantitative data with skewed distribution was analysed as median (interquartile range, IQR). The Doppler parameters between the TED orbits and healthy controls were compared using ANOVA test and post-hoc analysis. Multiple regression analysis for each doppler parameter at enrolment was performed using step-wise approach to include a parameter for p < 0.05 and exclusion of a parameter for p > 0.1. The t – scores and p–values were then calculated for each parameter. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve with 95% confidence interval was generated for each of the colour doppler indices to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) to distinguish TED orbits from healthy orbits, to predict the severity of TED, and to distinguish probable DON from non-DON orbits. The parameters at enrolment were compared at three-month follow-up using paired t-test. The changes in parameters between the surgical decompression group and fellow orbits were compared using ANCOVA test. The p-value < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.