Cell line and cell culture
The insect cell line Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC CRL-1711, Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were grown in a 5 mL serum-containing (SC) medium that consisted of Grace’s insect medium, 10% (v/v) FBS, 3.3 g/L lactalbumin, and 3.3 g/L yeast extract in a 25 cm2 tissue culture flask at 28°C for 4 days. After that, the cells were dislodged from the flasks using a cell scraper (SPL Life Science, Gyeonggi-do, Korea). For cell counting, 10 µL of cell culture sample was diluted by adding 10 µL of a 04 % trypan blue dye solution and then loaded into a counting chamber. Total cells, live or viable cell concentrations, and death cell concentration were measured by using a Countess™ II FL automated cell counter (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). For subcultivation, the viable cell concentration of 4 x 104 cells/cm2 obtained from a previous culture was inoculated into a new 25 cm2 tissue culture flask containing a 5 mL SC medium and then incubated in the same conditions as mentioned above. Cells were passaged every 4 days to a cell density of 1.2 x 105–1.6 x 105 cells/cm2 and maintained in SC medium for 5 passages before use.
Media and supplements
Grace’s insect medium (plus, L-glutamine, minus, sodium bicarbonate, lot #1970718) was purchased from Gibco (USA). Yeast extract (YE, lot #9070604) and Soytone (ST, lot #8338681) were purchased from Becton, Dickinson and Company (USA). Chemically defined lipid concentrate (CDLC lot #1439293), MEM vitamin solution (100x, lot #982533), L-glutamine (lot #2075257), D-glucose (lot #SLCD3109), vitamin B12 (cobalamin, lot #SLBD0573V), Sodium hydrogen carbonate were purchased from Merck (Germany, lot #K40431429 943). YE and ST stock solutions were prepared by dissolving either YE or ST powder in distilled water, followed by ultrafiltration through a membrane cassette with a 10-kDa molecular weight cut-off (Pall Corporation, USA) before sterile filtration through a 0.22 µm membrane filter (Sartorius, Germany). The stock solution of methylcellulose of 1% (w/v) was made by dissolving in distilled water followed by autoclaving at 121 o C for 20 min.
The basal medium used in all experiments was modified from Grace’s insect medium by adding other supplements. The basal medium had the following compositions: Grace’s insect medium, 45.7 g/L; sodium hydrogen carbonate, 0.35 g/L; D-glucose, 9 g/L; vitamin B12, 0.00015 g/L; methyl cellulose, 0.1% (w/v); MEM vitamin solution (100x), 0.5% (v/v); and L-glutamine, 0.876 g/L. Pluronic F68 (0.1% w/v) was added to the basal medium for suspension culture. The basal medium was filtered sterile using a 0.22 µm membrane filter before use. For the experiments, the three independent variables to be studied (CDLC, YE, ST) were separately added to the basal medium according to the specified concentration in the design of experiments.
Experimental design
The software Minitab R16 (Minitab Inc., USA) was used for designing the experiments and the statistical analysis of the data. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to determine the influence of the supplements (CDLC, YE, ST) on the response (viable cell yields). A circumscribed central composite design (CCD) for three independent variables at five levels each was constructed as shown in Table 1. The independent variable coding regions were − α (− 1.682, lowest level), − 1, 0 (middle level), + 1, and + α (+ 1.682, highest level). The experiments were simultaneously done in triplicate for 4 days. The treatment combinations of the three independent variables on the responses (Y) were presented in Table 2.
Table 1
Actual factor levels corresponding to coded factor levels
Variables
|
Symbols (Unit)
|
Coded factor levels
|
-1.682
|
-1
|
0
|
1
|
+ 1.682
|
CDLC
|
X1 (%)
|
0.33
|
0.50
|
0.75
|
1.00
|
1.17
|
YE
|
X2 (g/L)
|
0.27
|
3.00
|
7.00
|
11.00
|
13.73
|
ST
|
X3 (g/L)
|
0.27
|
3.00
|
7.00
|
11.00
|
13.73
|
Table 2
The treatment combinations of variables in coded values, the values of responses (Y) obtained from the experiments and prediction
Run
|
Factors
|
Viable cell yield (cells/mL)
|
X1
|
X2
|
X3
|
Experimental value
|
Predicted value
|
1
|
-1
|
-1
|
-1
|
9.33E + 4
|
1.04E + 5
|
2
|
+ 1
|
-1
|
-1
|
2.66E + 4
|
4.33E + 4
|
3
|
-1
|
+ 1
|
-1
|
2.06E + 5
|
1.98E + 5
|
4
|
+ 1
|
+ 1
|
-1
|
4.00E + 4
|
4.37E + 4
|
5
|
-1
|
-1
|
+ 1
|
1.06E + 5
|
9.88E + 4
|
6
|
+ 1
|
-1
|
+ 1
|
3.33E + 4
|
3.78E + 4
|
7
|
-1
|
+ 1
|
+ 1
|
1.73E + 5
|
1.52E + 5
|
8
|
+ 1
|
+ 1
|
+ 1
|
1.33E + 4
|
-1.83E + 3
|
9
|
-1.682
|
0
|
0
|
1.80E + 5
|
1.93E + 5
|
10
|
+ 1.682
|
0
|
0
|
2.00E + 4
|
1.26E + 4
|
11
|
0
|
-1.682
|
0
|
4.00E + 4
|
2.34E + 4
|
12
|
0
|
+ 1.682
|
0
|
4.66E + 4
|
6.89E + 4
|
13
|
0
|
0
|
-1.682
|
1.40E + 5
|
1.24E + 5
|
14
|
0
|
0
|
+ 1.682
|
6.00E + 4
|
8.13E + 4
|
15
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
7.33E + 4
|
7.30E + 4
|
16
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6.66E + 4
|
7.30E + 4
|
17
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
8.00E + 4
|
7.30E + 4
|
Note. Coded variable levels are − α = −1.682, +α = +1.682, − 1, 0, + 1; response (Y) = the average value of viable cell concentration obtained from each run (n = 3) on day 4 of culturing. Symbols X1, X2, and X3 are CDLC, YE, and ST, respectively. |
Cell culture
The starter cells obtained were scrapped and washed three times in phosphate buffer saline (Ca2+, Mg2+-free PBS, pH 7.4) by centrifugation at 110 x g for 10 min. After that, the cell pellets were resuspended in PBS obtaining the cell concentration of 106-107 cells/mL. The initial cell density of 4 x 104 cells/cm2 was placed in each 6-well plate containing 3 mL of a tested medium, then the plates were incubated at 28 o C for 4 days. The experiment for each tested medium was carried out in triplicate for 4 days. A small volume of suspended Sf9 cells was taken into 1.5 ml microtube, then the concentration of viable cells was counted by using a Countess™ II FL automated cell counter as mentioned above.
Statistical analysis
The responses (Y) were first plotted according to the Anderson–Darling statistic in Minitab software (Minitab Inc., USA) for statistical analysis. The probability plot of the responses (as residues) on a specified day of the cultures is constructed. If the p-value of the Anderson–Darling statistic ≥ 0.05, indicating the normal distribution of the data. Next, the regression analysis was performed using the analyze response surface design function, and terms including linear, linear + squares, linear + interactions, and full quadratic were selected. The value of the coefficient of determination (R2) was used to evaluate the sufficiency of the model. The selected model depended on the selected terms that always gave a p-value ≤ 0.05. The reduced model based on the condition t-test in the function was evaluated using the R2 value. A second-order or higher-order polynomial regression model was fitted as described in Eq. (1) using the data presented in Table 2.
$$\text{Y}\text{ }\text{=}\text{ }{\text{b}}_{\text{0}}\text{ }\text{+}\sum _{\text{i=}}^{\text{k}}{{\text{b}}_{\text{i }}\text{X}}_{\text{i }}\text{+}\sum _{\text{j=}}^{\text{k}}{\text{b}}_{\text{i}\text{i}}\text{X}{\text{i}}^{\text{2}}\text{ }\text{+}\sum \sum {\text{b}}_{\text{ij}}{\text{X}}_{\text{ij }}\text{+}\text{ }\text{ε}$$
1
where
Y = Viable cell yield, b0 = Intercept value
X = Factors (X1 = CDLC, X2 = YE, X3 = ST)
b z = Regression coefficient (z = i, ii or ij, where i < j)
ε = Residual error, k = 1, 2, 3…
The p-value of the lack-of-fit for the selected model should be ≥ 0.05. A pair sample Student’s t-test was used to determine the significance of differences among the groups in the experiments.
Verification study
The optimum concentrations of the three independents in the basal medium (named “OSF9-ADCFM”) were validated. Cell inoculums were cultivated in an SC medium. The initial viable cell density of 4 x 104 cells/cm2 was used to inoculate to a 25 cm2 tissue culture flask, and then a volume of the culture medium was added up to 5 mL. The cultured flasks were carried out in triplicate. The cells in the cultured flasks were incubated at 28°C for 3–5 h until cells were attached to the flasks. After cell attachment, the spent medium was carefully removed and gently replaced with 5 mL OSF9-ADCFM. The cultured flasks were continuously incubated at 28°C for 4 days. Subsequently, the cells were mildly harvested using a cell scraper. The concentration of viable cells was measured as mentioned above. The cells obtained from this first optimized culture were named passage 0 (P0). To subculture in the next passage, the P0 cell were centrifuged at 110 x g for 5 min, and then the cell pellets were resuspended in OSF9-ADCFM at a specified volume. After that, the initial viable cell density used for the experiments was equal to that used above, and 5 mL OSF9-ADCFM was used instead of SC media. The efficiency of OSF9-ADCFM in maintaining and supporting the growth of cultured cells was recorded as the viable cell yield, and the cultured cells were continuously subcultured for 5 passages.
Study of the optimum cell density in the static culture
The optimum cell density was evaluated using various initial cell densities placed in a 25 cm2 tissue culture flask containing 5 mL of OSF9-ADCFM: 2 x 105, 3 x 105, 4 x 105, and 5 x 105 cells/mL (equal to 4 x 104, 6 x 104, 8 x 104 and 1 x 105 cells/cm2, respectively). Each initial cell density was carried out in triplicate. All flasks were incubated at 28°C for 4 days. The viable cells were dislodged from the flasks using a cell scraper and then counted as previously mentioned.
The combined effect of microfiltration and ultrafiltration of YE and ST on Sf9 cell growth
Stock solutions of YE and ST were made by dissolving either YE or ST powder in distilled water. For the experiments, YE and ST were filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane filter (named “Fraction #1ST” and “Fraction#1YE”); then the Fraction #1 was ultrafiltered through a membrane cassette (Pall Corporation, USA) with a molecular weight cut-off of 10 kDa (named “Fraction #2ST” and “Fraction#2YE”). At the lower cut-off, Fraction #2 was ultrafiltered through a membrane cassette with a molecular weight cut-off of 3 kDa (named “Fraction #3ST” and “Fraction#3YE”). The filtered products obtained from Fraction #1, Fraction #2, and Fraction #3 were kept at 2–8°C before use. For the experiments, the combinations of Fractions obtained from both ST and YE (RUN1-9) were shown in Table 3.
Table 3
Experimental design of the combined effect of various filtrated ST and YE
Run no.
|
Combination effect
|
1
|
Fraction #1ST + Fraction #1YE
|
2
|
Fraction #1ST + Fraction #3YE
|
3
|
Fraction #1ST + Fraction #2YE
|
4
|
Fraction #3ST + Fraction #1YE
|
5
|
Fraction #3ST + Fraction #3YE
|
6
|
Fraction #3ST + Fraction #2YE
|
7
|
Fraction #2ST + Fraction #1YE
|
8
|
Fraction #2ST + Fraction #3YE
|
9
|
Fraction #2ST + Fraction #2YE
|
The final concentration of YE and ST were 11 g/L, and 3 g/L, respectively, while the final concentration of CDLC was 0.5% (v/v). Regarding the final concentrations of both YE and ST in terms of protein content, thus the total protein concentrations of YE and ST were measured using NanoDrop (ND-1000) Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). The starter cells were grown in OSF9-ADCFM in 175 cm2 tissue culture flasks, and then the cells were scraped and washed three times in PBS. Cells with a density of 4 x 104 cells/cm2 were placed in 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks containing 5 mL of each fraction combination and carried out in triplicate. All flasks were incubated at 28°C for 4 days. Subsequently, the cells in all flasks were scraped and mixed well before a small volume of cell sample from each tested medium was taken to be counted the viable cell concentration using the method as mentioned above. Osmolality of medium was measured using Cryoscopic Osmometer (OSMOMAT® 030, Gonotec Gesellschaft für Meẞ-und Regeltechnik mbH, Germany)
Adaptation of Sf9 cells to grow in suspension
Suspension cultures of Sf9 cell growth in OSF9-ADCFM was investigated. The initial viable cell concentration of 4 x 104 cells/cm2 was grown in a 175 cm2 tissue culture flask containing 30 mL OSF9-ADCFM medium at 28°C for 4 days. Then, the viable cell density of 3 x 105 cells/mL was inoculated in 250 mL spinner flasks containing 50 mL of medium. The spinner flasks were stirred at 50 rpm and 28°C. Cell culture samples were taken daily to count the viable cells according to the method described above. The subcultivation of cells was carried out, when the concentration of viable cells reached 1–2 x 106 cells/mL, by taking the viable cell density of 3 x 105 cells/mL and placing in a new spinner flask containing 50 mL of fresh medium. The growth of the cells was continuously cultured for 5–7 days. The morphology of cultured Sf9 cells was photographed. The evaluation of cell growth in the spinner flasks was carried out separately for two batches.