Exosomal miR-216a-5p targeting TLR-4 alleviates liver ischemia-reperfusion injury by regulating M2 macrophage polarization and neutrophil inflammation

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2439073/v1

Download PDF

Article

Exosomal miR-216a-5p targeting TLR-4 alleviates liver ischemia-reperfusion injury by regulating M2 macrophage polarization and neutrophil inflammation

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2439073/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Macrophages and neutrophil play a key role in the initiation and recovery of liver ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) through transitions in the phenotype and induces inflammation, However, the mechanisms governing these damages have yet to be fully elucidated. Exosomes have emerged as an important mediator of cellular crosstalk in various physiological and pathological processes. This study explored the role of exosomal miRNA in macrophage polarization and liver IRI. Through high-throughput sequencing of small RNAs in exosomes, we identified the negative regulator miR-216a-5p in liver IRI. Mechanistically, miR-216a-5p skewed M2 macrophage polarization and inhibited neutrophil infiltration by targeting TLR4. In conclusion, we demonstrated that exosome-derived miR-216a-5p favors an anti-inflammatory environment by promoting the M2 polarization of macrophages and inhibiting the neutrophil inflammatory response by targeting the TLR4/NF-κB and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways, revealing the endogenous protective mechanism in liver IRI.

Biological sciences/Immunology/Gene regulation in immune cells/miRNA in immune cells

Biological sciences/Immunology/Immunotherapy

During liver transplantation or hepatic resection, the liver inevitably suffers from ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI), which is a major risk factor for organ dysfunction and can result in acute and chronic rejection after transplantation, especially when using grafts from donors after circulatory death[1]. Alleviating liver IRI not only improves clinical outcomes but also expands the donor organ pool by using marginal liver grafts[2]. Despite its clinical importance, however, the mechanisms underlying liver IRI and effective prevention and treatment strategies remain unclear.

Liver IRI is a biphasic response that includes an acute phase of injury caused by oxidative stress from Kupffer cells and a later phase caused by an intense inflammatory response resulting from inflammatory cell infiltration and subsequent neutrophil-dependent liver parenchymal injury[3].

Kupffer cells, the major population of resident tissue macrophages in the body, play an important part in the innate immune response [4]. The activation of Kupffer cells and infiltration of bone marrow-derived macrophages are considered key events in the initiation and propagation of liver IRI, which has two modes: classical activation (M1) and alternative activation (M2)[5]. M1 macrophages, marked by TNFα, IL6, and iNOS, promote inflammation and tissue injury, whereas M2 macrophages, marked by CD206, IL10, and Arg1, resolve inflammation and promote tissue regeneration[4].

In hepatic IRI, multiple signaling mechanisms play key roles in the polarization of macrophages[6]. Our previous study found that the hepatocyte-derived exosomal miR-122-5p was able to induce Kupffer cell M1 polarization via PPARδ down-regulation and NF-κB pathway activation to mediate liver injury. Macrophages switching phenotypes from M1 to M2 reflects the functional change from tissue injury to eventual repair/recovery[7]. However, the mechanisms governing this switch have yet to be fully elucidated.

During IRI, the liver undergoes an intense inflammatory process in which neutrophils play an important role, characterized by the initial activation of neutrophils by chemokines and their recruitment to the liver[8, 9]. Neutrophils then induce the activation of resident hepatocytes, leukocytes, and Kupffer cells through the release of cytokines and chemokines and the production of danger signals[10, 11]. Inhibition of neutrophil infiltration then protects hepatocytes from damage after IR.

Exosomes are tiny vesicles, 30–150 nm in diameter, secreted by cells[12]. Recent studies have shown that exosomes play an important role in mediating communication between cells, especially in liver diseases, for example, hepatocellular carcinoma cell-derived exosome miR-934 induces macrophage M2 polarization and promoted liver metastasis[13]. Lipotoxic hepatocyte-derived exosomal MicroRNA 192-5p activates macrophages associated inflammatory response in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease[14]. However, the role of exosomes in hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury has not been clearly reported.

The present study therefore screened for the anti-inflammatory exosomal miR-216a-5p, and evaluated whether exosomal miR-216a-5p skewed M2 macrophage polarization and the neutrophil inflammatory response by targeting TLR4, which might suggest a promising strategy for protecting against IRI.

1. Mouse and patient samples

Male C57Bl/6 mice (6–8 weeks old) were purchased from Shanghai Slac Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd,and housed under specific-pathogen-free conditions. Animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee. The model of partial liver ischemia reperfusion injury was established as described previously[15]. The animals were randomly divided into four groups: Sham group (Sham), miR-216a-5p agomir group (agomir), miR-216a-5p antagomir group (antagomir), and miR-216a-5p negative control group (NC). miR-216a-5p agomir (20 nmol) or antagomir (200 nmol) was administrated by intravenous injection 1 h before the induction of liver IRI. The mice were sacrificed 24 h after reperfusion, and serum and liver tissues were collected for subsequent analyses.

Human serum samples were obtained from patients undergoing liver transplantation within the 6 h prior to transplantation and at 2 6, 24, and 48 h postoperatively with their written informed consent. This approach was approved by the ethics committees.

2. Exosome extraction and identification

Serum samples collected from liver transplant patients and mice were used to purify exosomes thought ultracentrifugation[16]. Serum was centrifuged at 2,000 g and 13,500 g for 20 minutes to eliminate cell debris and large vesicles. Pellets were then washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and purified by centrifugation at 200,000 g for 2 h. Exosome samples were diluted 5-fold with PBS, stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid at room temperature, and examined by transmission electron microscopy (Hitachi, HT7700, Japan). The size and concentration of exosomes were measured by a nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) at 80 kV using a ZetaView PMX 110 (Particle Metrix, Meerbusch, Germany).

3. Cell isolation, extraction, and culture

Bone marrow macrophages (BMMs) isolated from femurs and tibias of C57BL/6 mice (8–9 weeks old) were cultured for 6 days in a medium containing 10% FBS, penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and 10 ng/mL mouse M-CSF (Peprotech-In, Suzhou, China). All cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO₂, and the medium was changed every 2 days. The human promyelocytic leukemia cell line HL-60 was cultured in RPMI medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin and streptomycin. Dimethyl sulfoxide at 12.7 µL/ml/million cells was added for 5 days to induce HL-60 cells to differentiate into neutrophils (dHL-60).

4. Western blotting

Pretreated liver tissue and cells were added to ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) with 1 mM PMSF. Protein concentrations were then determined with a BCA assay kit. Approximately 20 µg of protein samples was loaded onto 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gels and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Massachusetts, USA). After blocking with 5% skimmed milk for 2 h, the membranes were incubated at 4°C with INOS (1:1000; Abcam, Waltham, USA), GAPDH (1:5000; Bioss, Suzhou, China), CD206 (1:1000; Proteintech, Wuhan, China), p-Akt (1:1000; Proteintech), p-PI3K (1:1000; Servicebio, Wuhan, China), P-p65 (1:1000; Cell Signaling, Massachusetts, USA), and TLR-4 (1:1000; Proteintech), followed by 3 washes in tris buffered saline with tween20 (TBST) and incubation with the corresponding secondary antibodies for 2 h at 4°C. Specific proteins were visualized by applying the ECL kit to specific protein bands.

5. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from cells or liver tissue using the RNAiso plus reagent (Takara, Kyoto, Japan). miRNA was extracted from serum and exosomes using the miRNeasy Mini Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). cDNA was then synthesized using the PrimeScript RT kit. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using a 7300plus (Applied Biosystems, California, USA) real-time PCR instrument. GAPDH (mRNA) and miRNA external reference (TIANGEN) (miRNA in serum and exosomes), U6 (miRNA in tissues) were used to normalize the expression of target genes calculated relative to normal controls. All primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

6. Sequencing and enrichment analyses

Serum exosomes were isolated from sham control (n = 3) and IRI (n = 3) mice, and total RNA was extracted using the miRNeasy Micro Kit (217084; Qiagen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany). The miRNA sequencing analysis was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 system (Ribo Bio, Guangzhou, China). Differentially expressed miRNAs between the two groups were identified by the fold change and P-value. Hierarchies were clustered to show samples with distinguishable miRNA expression profiles between samples. Metascape was used to identify the functional and interaction networks of the miR-216a-5p target genes (Table S2).

7. Immunofluorescence staining of liver tissue sections

Frozen sections of liver were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies (F4/80, LY6G, MPO; Abcam). The next day, the nuclei were stained with DAPI after incubation with the corresponding secondary antibodies conjugated with Cy3 or FITC (Servicebio, Wuhan, China). They were then observed with a confocal laser microscope.

8. Histology

Liver tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and then embedded in paraffin wax, and paraffin sections were soaked in 100% xylene and a mixture of xylene and alcohol (1:1) for 15 minutes and dewaxed. After soaking in 100%, 95%, and 75% alcohol solutions for 1 minute, the sections were washed with 0.1 saline. Hematoxylin/eosin (HE) staining was used to assess pathological liver damage according to Suzuki's criteria[18].

9. Flow cytometry

Macrophage polarization was detected by flow cytometry. Macrophages were centrifuged and resuspended cells in cold PBS and then incubated with antibodies against anti-CD86-PE (#105106, BioLegend, California, USA), anti-CD206-APC (#141706, BioLegend, california, USA) and anti-F4/80-PerCP (#123116, BioLegend, alifornia, USA) for fluorescent staining for 30 minutes at 4°C. A FACS analysis was performed after washing, and data were obtained using a BD Accuri™ C6 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).

10. The dual luciferase assay

The potential binding sites for miR-216a-5p and TLR-4 were predicted by TargetScan. To verify the direct binding of miR-216a-5p to TLR-4, miR-216a-5p and wild-type TLR-4 3'UTR or mutant TLR-4 3'UTR were reconstructed with pmirGLO plasmid in 293T cells, using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Massachusetts, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. After 48 h, the luciferase activity was measured using a dual luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, Wisconsin, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

11. Statistical analyses

Group sizes are indicated in the figure legends. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise noted. Statistical analyses were performed by either an analysis of variance or t-test. A difference of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

1. miRNA expression profiles of serum-derived exosomes from mice with liver IRI

Representative HE staining images of liver tissue sham, liver ischemia and reperfusion at 6h and 24h. We could observe that after the liver suffers from ischemia in perfusion, different degrees of damage to the liver tissue occur (Fig. 1A/B). To explore the miRNA expression profiles in serum-derived exosomes after reperfusion, we constructed a mouse model of liver IRI and isolated serum exosomes, which were then analyzed by transmission electron microscopy, NTA and Western blotting. Transmission electron microscopy displayed a typical size and round cup-shaped morphology (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, exosome-specific markers CD9 and CD63 were easily detected by Western blotting (Fig. 1D) and the mean particle size of exosomes was about 100 nm as determined by an NTA (Fig. 1E). To identify the miRNAs involved in liver IRI, we performed RNA-seq of exosomes and identified the miRNAs with the most significant abundance difference (> 2-fold, p < 0.05) illustrated in a volcano map (Fig. 1F); the top miRNAs are shown in the heat map in (Fig. 1G). miRNAs regulate biological functions primarily through interference with downstream target genes. The target genes of the top 10 miRNAs were thus predicted by TargetScan, and GO and KEGG analyses were then performed, showing that the downstream genes of miR-216a-5p were primarily enriched in the inflammation relevant pathways that exacerbated liver IRI (Fig. 1H). Based on this target regulation by miRNA, we hypothesized that miR-216a-5p might play a protective role during liver IRI and may be a potential target for alleviating liver IRI. Therefore, we selected it for further study.

To confirm the expression of miR-216a-5p in serum-derived exosomes, we performed qRT-PCR analysis with serum samples from mice and human. The results showed a change in miR-216a-5p level after reperfusion at different time points of perfusion (Fig. 1I-J), And to further explore the origin of exosomal miR-216a-5p in the liver, we designed a probe for pre-miR-216a-5p-cy3. In fluorescent situ hybridization experiments on liver tissue showed that pre-miR-216a-5p was mainly localized in hepatocytes (Figure. S1).

2. Role of miR-216a-5p in liver IRI

To investigate the functional role of miR-216a-5p in liver IRI, miR-216a-5p agomir were transfected before liver IRI. Tissue damage was then evaluated according to Suzuki's criteria by HE staining of liver tissue sections (Fig. 2A). The results showed that miR-216a-5p agomir significantly improved liver injury to determine the cell type responsible for the miR-216a-5p-mediated hepatoprotection, miR-216a-5p tracing was performed, resulting in the detection of internalization by Kupffer cells and neutrophils (Fig. 2B/E).

As the largest immune cell population in the liver, Kupffer cells and infiltrating macrophages play an important role in the initiation of IRI in the liver. Macrophages can polarize to different phenotypes and perform different functions, we therefore explored whether or not miR-216a-5p (agomir) could polarize macrophages from the M1 to the M2 phenotype. We analyzed the characteristic polarization of macrophages by immunofluorescence staining with F4/80 and M2-associated CD206. We observed a significant decrease in the number of M2 macrophages after reperfusion compared to the Sham group. Interestingly, miR-216a-5p (agomir) increased the number of CD206-positive macrophages compared to the NC group (Fig. 2D/G). We also detected a reduction in M1 macrophages (F4/80 + INOS-positive cells) in mouse liver tissue sections injected with miRNA-agomir prior to IRI compared to the control group injected with miRNA (NC) (Fig. S2).

In addition, decreased mRNA levels of pro-inflammatory factors (iNOS, TNF-α, IL-6) and anti-inflammatory factors (Arg1, CD206) were detected compared to the NC group (Fig. 2H), which was consistent with the Western blotting results (Fig. 2I-J).

As a major player among circulating leukocytes, neutrophils are recruited to the site of injury, leading to sterile inflammation and amplifying hepatocellular injury. Consistent with previous studies[19], the number of LY6G + MPO + neutrophils were significantly increased after reperfusion, and miR-216a-5p (agomir) decreased the number of LY6G + MPO-positive macrophages compared to the NC group (Fig. 2F/G). These results indicate that miR-216a-5p alleviated liver IRI by inducing the polarization of macrophages to the M2 phenotype and inhibiting the neutrophil inflammation response.

3. Effects of blocking miR-216a-5p

Contrary to the above results, when mice were transfected with antagomir to block miR-216a-5p before suffering IRI, there was a significant increase in liver injury in mice, as demonstrated by HE staining (Fig. 3A), Suzuki's criteria (Fig. 3B), and liver inflammation (Fig. 3H-J). miR-216a-5p (antagomir) decreased the number of CD206-positive macrophages compared to the NC group (Fig. 3C), which reversed the effect of agomir. Consistently, M1(F4/80 + INOS) macrophage numbers were elevated in the miR-216a-5p (antagomir) group (Fig. S2). Similarly, the number of LY6G⁺MPO⁺ neutrophils was markedly increased after being transfected with miR-216a-5p antagomir before liver IRI reperfusion (Fig. 3E). These results suggest that miR-216a-5p was associated with a reduced neutrophil infiltration and inflammatory response. This may be another important mechanism involved in the protective effect of miR-216a-5p during liver IRI.

4. Effects of miR-216a-5p on BMMs and dHL-60 inflammation

To further verify whether or not miR-216a-5p mediated the polarization of macrophages to the M2 type and regulated the neutrophil inflammatory response, we co-cultured miR-216a-5p (agomir) + LPS with BMMs and dHL-60. The level of miR-216a-5p was significantly elevated in BMMs and dHL-60 (Fig. 4C). miR-216a-5p (agomir) treatment significantly attenuated the LPS-induced inflammatory response in BMMs and dHL-60 compared to the control group. Inflammatory markers (iNOS, TNF-α, IL-6) were downregulated, and M2 (Arg1, CD206) markers were increased at the mRNA (Fig. 4D-E) and protein levels (Fig. 4A-B). In addition, Flow cytometric detection of miR-216a-5p-agomir found that promoted the polarization of BMMs toward M2 and alleviated the polarization of BMMs cells toward M1 induced by LPS (Fig. 4F). In addition, After we blocked the levels of miR-216a-5p in BMMs and dHL-60 with antagomir (Fig. 4I), we found that pro-inflammatory factors (iNOS, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1) were elevated, the expression of M2 markers (Arg1, CD206) was inhibited at the mRNA (Fig. 4J-K) and protein levels (Fig. 4G-H). These results suggest that miR-216a-5p promoted macrophage polarization to the M2 type and alleviated the neutrophil inflammatory response.

5. Effects of miR-216a-5p on M2 macrophage polarization and the neutrophil inflammatory response through targeting TLR4

Next, we further investigated the mechanisms underlying the miR-216a-5p-regulated inflammatory response. TLR-4 was predicted to be a downstream target gene of miR-216a-5p from the TargetScan database (Fig. 5A). To test whether or not miR-216a-5p could directly bind to TLR-4 and regulate its expression, we performed a dual luciferase gene reporter assay and showed that the activity of the luciferase reporter was significantly reduced by the overexpression of miR-216a-5p, whereas the activity of the 3'UTR-mutant luciferase reporter of TLR-4 was not affected (Fig. 5B). This demonstrated that TLR-4 was a direct target gene of miR-216a-5p. Both the mRNA and protein expression of TLR4 were simultaneously inhibited in BMMs and dHL-60 after the overexpression of miR-216a-5p (Fig. 5C). Conversely, knockdown of miR-216a-5p in BMMs and dHL-60 by antagomir resulted in increased TLR-4 levels compared to the control at the mRNA level (Fig. 5D). In addition, we also constructed siRNA against TLR-4 and transfected siTLR-4 into BMMs and HL-60 cells, and we could find that the mRNA and protein levels of TLR-4 were significantly inhibited (Fig. 5E-G). As shown in (Fig. 5H-I), knockdown of TLR4 suppressed the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines (INOS, IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1) and promoted the levels of CD206 and Arg-1. Subsequently, we found that the detrimental effects of antagomir were counteracted by knockdown of TLR4 in BMMs and dHL-60. TLR-4 knockdown reversed the pro-inflammatory effect of antagomir knockdown of miR-216a-5p on BMMs and dHL-60 (Fig. 5J-O). These findings are consistent with our hypothesis and confirmed that exosomal miR-216a-5p regulates M2 macrophage polarization and the neutrophil inflammatory response by targeting TLR4.

6. Effects of miR-216a-5p on M2 macrophage polarization and the neutrophil inflammatory response through the TLR4/NF-κB and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways

TLR-4 positively regulates the NF-κB signaling pathway [20–22], which is a critical transcription factor regulating the M1 polarization of macrophage and inducing the neutrophil inflammatory response. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that there is a mutual regulation of TLR4/NF-κB and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways in several kinds of IRI[23–25].

We therefore explored whether or not miR-216a-5p exerted an inhibitory effect on the crosstalk between the NF-κB and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways by targeting TLR-4 in macrophages and neutrophils. Western blotting revealed that the levels of TLR4, p-P65, and iNOS were significantly downregulated, while those of p-PI3K, p-AKT, and CD206 were markedly upregulated following agomir treatment in BMMs (Fig. 6A) and dHL-60 (Fig. 6B). However, the effects of the administration of antagomir in BMMs (Fig. 6C) and dHL-60 (Fig. 6D) on the expression of TLR4, p-P65, iNOS, p-PI3K, p-AKT, and CD206 were the opposite. This demonstrates that miR-216a-5p affects macrophage polarization and the inflammatory response through the regulation of the NF-κB and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways.

Hepatic IRI is a complex, multifactorial process involving multiple cells, such as liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, neutrophils, and a complicated intracellular signaling network[1]. This process includes damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) activating signals through Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and subsequently recruiting and activating innate immune cells[2]. It has been well recognized that Kupffer cells and infiltrating macrophages are key contributors to the initial inflammation and later reparative process following liver IRI[26]. In our previous study, we found that exosomes after reperfusion function as DAMPs, exacerbating liver injury by inducing Kupffer cell polarization toward the M1 type. We also identified miR-122-5p as a key molecule mediating the pro-inflammatory effect of exosomes.

Early M2 polarization in KCs/macrophages is essential for inflammation resolution and hepatic repair[27]. However, the mechanisms and molecular cues regulating the phenotypic transitions of macrophages remain poorly defined. If Kupffer cells trigger IRI in the liver, neutrophils represent the main actor in causing injury.[2] Accumulated neutrophils release oxidants and proteases, directly damaging hepatocytes and endothelial cells.

Upon inflammatory stimulation, the organism initiates a stress response to help prevent uncontrolled inflammation. Several anti-inflammatory mediators have been shown to be expressed after IR and to play key roles in the resolution of the injury response[28]. In our study, we presented the first evidence that significantly increased exosomal miR-216a-5p levels after liver IR act as a potent anti-inflammatory mediator to skew M2 macrophage polarization and the neutrophil inflammatory response, negatively affecting the function of multiple pro-inflammatory factors.

Emerging data have highlighted the importance of exosomes as mediators of cellular crosstalk in various physiological and pathological processes by shuttling their bioactive cargo[29]. Almost all types of cells are exosome-releasing and/or exosome-targeting cells, including macrophages, hepatocytes and other cells [30].

The quantity and composition of exosomes released by donor cells are often altered in pathophysiological states. In our previous, we found that the level of exosomes increased by about 5-fold compared to control mice as early as 6 h after reperfusion. Exosome adoptive transfer causes liver injury and interstitial inflammation, suggesting a pathological role for exosome in hepatic IRI. However, exosomes can positively or negatively exert modulatory effects, depending on their origin and cargo. Indeed, emerging evidence has suggested the therapeutic effects of MSC-derived exosomes[31–33]. Furthermore, through high-throughput sequencing of small RNAs in exosomes, we screened for the increased expression of miR-216a-5p, with a gene enrichment analysis revealing the involvement of the target gene of TLR4 in the inflammatory pathways, implying the hepatoprotective effect of miR-216a-5p. By blocking miR-216a-5p, antagomir worsened liver IRI and inflammation, and this effect was reversed by agomir. Taken together, these data reveal an important role of miR-216a-5p in preventing uncontrolled inflammation.

To further investigate the mechanism by which miR-216a-5p attenuates hepatic liver injury and inflammation, Cy3-labeled miR-216a-5p was shown to be taken up by Kupffer cells and neutrophils, triggering M2 polarization, inhibiting the neutrophil inflammatory response and decreasing the inflammatory response. Similar results were also confirmed in the cell model. In agreement with previous reports[24, 34], we also verified the target gene of TLR4 by a luciferase report analysis.

It has been proven that the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway can elicit M1 activation[35]. TLRs, especially TLR4, are a key sentinel system responsive to M1 activation and the neutrophil inflammatory response, triggering cascades of signals to activate the inflammatory response through crosstalk between NF-κB and PI3K/AKT with downstream genes encoding inflammatory cytokines[35]. Inhibiting TLR4/NF-κB and activating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway have been shown to shift the polarization of macrophages to the M2 phenotype from the M1 phenotype and inhabit the neutrophil inflammatory response[36].

In microglia, knockdown of TLR4 reversed the detrimental effects of the inhibition of miR-216a-5p. In contrast, the overexpression of TLR4 abolished the beneficial effects of miR-216a-5p by shifting microglial polarization. Accordingly, we also found that miR-216a-5p agomir treatment resulted in a significantly inhabited TLR4 expression and PI3K/AKT, while activated NF-κB pathway, thus inducing M2 macrophage polarization.

In septic mice, overexpression of miR-let-7b significantly downregulated the neutrophil TLR4 expression at the post-transcriptional level, targeting the NF-kB pathway, which in turn inhibited the decrease in levels of pro-inflammatory factors (IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α) and suppressed neutrophil recruitment, thereby attenuating liver and lung injury in CLP-induced septic mice[37]. In our current study, miR-216a-5p significantly inhibited neutrophil infiltration, reflected by LY6G + MPO immunofluorescence staining, which suggests another mechanism is involved in hepatoprotection. However, in in vitro experiments, the overexpression of miR-216a-5p in dHL-60 cells alleviated the LPS-induced inflammatory response of dHL-60, as evidenced by the decrease in pro-inflammatory factors, such as IL-6, IL-1, TNF-α, and iNOS.

Therefore, it is interesting to hypothesize that miR-216a-5p might attenuate liver inflammation injury by inducing macrophages towards M2 polarization and inhabiting the neutrophil inflammatory response through the TLR4-NF-κB and PI3K/AKT pathways. Further investigations are warranted to explore the origins of the increased circulating levels of exosomal miR-216a-5p.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that exosome-derived miR-216a-5p favors an anti-inflammatory environment by promoting the M2 polarization of Kupffer cells and the neutrophil inflammatory response targeting the TLR-4, NF-κB, and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways, thus clarifying the endogenous protective mechanism involved in liver IRI. Given these findings, miR-216a-5p is expected to be a new molecular target for mitigating liver IRI.

Data Availability Statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declaration of competing interest

The all authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

H. Hirao, K. Nakamura, J.W. Kupiec-Weglinski, Liver ischaemia-reperfusion injury: a new understanding of the role of innate immunity, Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology 19 (2022) 239-256. 10.1038/s41575-021-00549-8.
W.A. Dar, E. Sullivan, J.S. Bynon, H. Eltzschig, C. Ju, Ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver transplantation: Cellular and molecular mechanisms, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 39 (2019) 788-801. 10.1111/liv.14091.
N. Sakai, H.L. Van Sweringen, R. Schuster, J. Blanchard, J.M. Burns, A.D. Tevar, M.J. Edwards, A.B. Lentsch, Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL) protects against hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice, Hepatology 55 (2012) 888-897. 10.1002/hep.24756.
P. Li, K. He, J. Li, Z. Liu, J. Gong, The role of Kupffer cells in hepatic diseases, Mol Immunol 85 (2017) 222-229. 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.02.018.
M. Locati, G. Curtale, A. Mantovani, Diversity, Mechanisms, and Significance of Macrophage Plasticity, Annual review of pathology 15 (2020) 123-147. 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012718.
(!!! INVALID CITATION !!! [6]).
D. van der Heide, R. Weiskirchen, R. Bansal, Therapeutic Targeting of Hepatic Macrophages for the Treatment of Liver Diseases, Frontiers in immunology 10 (2019) 2852. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02852.
T.H.C. Oliveira, P.E. Marques, P. Proost, M.M.M. Teixeira, Neutrophils: a cornerstone of liver ischemia and reperfusion injury, Lab Invest 98 (2018) 51-62. 10.1038/labinvest.2017.90.
G. Datta, B.J. Fuller, B.R. Davidson, Molecular mechanisms of liver ischemia reperfusion injury: insights from transgenic knockout models, World J Gastroenterol 19 (2013) 1683-1698. 10.3748/wjg.v19.i11.1683.
H.O. Yazdani, H.W. Chen, S. Tohme, S. Tai, D.J. van der Windt, P. Loughran, B.R. Rosborough, V. Sud, D. Beer-Stolz, H.R. Turnquist, A. Tsung, H. Huang, IL-33 exacerbates liver sterile inflammation by amplifying neutrophil extracellular trap formation, J Hepatol (2017). 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.09.010.
L. Sun, Q. Wu, Y. Nie, N. Cheng, R. Wang, G. Wang, D. Zhang, H. He, R.D. Ye, F. Qian, A Role for MK2 in Enhancing Neutrophil-Derived ROS Production and Aggravating Liver Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury, Front Immunol 9 (2018) 2610. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02610.
L. Zhang, D. Yu, Exosomes in cancer development, metastasis, and immunity, Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 1871 (2019) 455-468. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.04.004.
S. Zhao, Y. Mi, B. Guan, B. Zheng, P. Wei, Y. Gu, Z. Zhang, S. Cai, Y. Xu, X. Li, X. He, X. Zhong, G. Li, Z. Chen, D. Li, Tumor-derived exosomal miR-934 induces macrophage M2 polarization to promote liver metastasis of colorectal cancer, J Hematol Oncol 13 (2020) 156. 10.1186/s13045-020-00991-2.
X.L. Liu, Q. Pan, H.X. Cao, F.Z. Xin, Z.H. Zhao, R.X. Yang, J. Zeng, H. Zhou, J.G. Fan, Lipotoxic Hepatocyte-Derived Exosomal MicroRNA 192-5p Activates Macrophages Through Rictor/Akt/Forkhead Box Transcription Factor O1 Signaling in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Hepatology 72 (2020) 454-469. 10.1002/hep.31050.
A. Tsung, R.A. Hoffman, K. Izuishi, N.D. Critchlow, A. Nakao, M.H. Chan, M.T. Lotze, D.A. Geller, T.R. Billiar, Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury involves functional TLR4 signaling in nonparenchymal cells, Journal of immunology 175 (2005) 7661-7668. 10.4049/jimmunol.175.11.7661.
C. Thery, S. Amigorena, G. Raposo, A. Clayton, Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids, Current protocols in cell biology Chapter 3 (2006) Unit 3 22. 10.1002/0471143030.cb0322s30.
H.C. Yu, H.Y. Qin, F. He, L. Wang, W. Fu, D. Liu, F.C. Guo, L. Liang, K.F. Dou, H. Han, Canonical notch pathway protects hepatocytes from ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice by repressing reactive oxygen species production through JAK2/STAT3 signaling, Hepatology 54 (2011) 979-988. 10.1002/hep.24469.
S. Suzuki, L.H. Toledo-Pereyra, F.J. Rodriguez, D. Cejalvo, Neutrophil infiltration as an important factor in liver ischemia and reperfusion injury. Modulating effects of FK506 and cyclosporine, Transplantation 55 (1993) 1265-1272. 10.1097/00007890-199306000-00011.
C. Peralta, M.B. Jiménez-Castro, J. Gracia-Sancho, Hepatic ischemia and reperfusion injury: effects on the liver sinusoidal milieu, Journal of hepatology 59 (2013) 1094-1106. 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.06.017.
X. Liu, B. Lu, J. Fu, X. Zhu, E. Song, Y. Song, Amorphous silica nanoparticles induce inflammation via activation of NLRP3 inflammasome and HMGB1/TLR4/MYD88/NF-kb signaling pathway in HUVEC cells, Journal of hazardous materials 404 (2021) 124050. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124050.
S. Mitchell, J. Vargas, A. Hoffmann, Signaling via the NFκB system, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine 8 (2016) 227-241. 10.1002/wsbm.1331.
M. Zusso, V. Lunardi, D. Franceschini, A. Pagetta, R. Lo, S. Stifani, A.C. Frigo, P. Giusti, S. Moro, Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin attenuate microglia inflammatory response via TLR4/NF-kB pathway, Journal of neuroinflammation 16 (2019) 148. 10.1186/s12974-019-1538-9.
E. Vergadi, E. Ieronymaki, K. Lyroni, K. Vaporidi, C. Tsatsanis, Akt Signaling Pathway in Macrophage Activation and M1/M2 Polarization, J Immunol 198 (2017) 1006-1014. 10.4049/jimmunol.1601515.
W. Liu, Y. Rong, J. Wang, Z. Zhou, X. Ge, C. Ji, D. Jiang, F. Gong, L. Li, J. Chen, S. Zhao, F. Kong, C. Gu, J. Fan, W. Cai, Exosome-shuttled miR-216a-5p from hypoxic preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells repair traumatic spinal cord injury by shifting microglial M1/M2 polarization, J Neuroinflammation 17 (2020) 47. 10.1186/s12974-020-1726-7.
F. Hua, T. Ha, J. Ma, Y. Li, J. Kelley, X. Gao, I.W. Browder, R.L. Kao, D.L. Williams, C. Li, Protection against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in TLR4-deficient mice is mediated through a phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent mechanism, J Immunol 178 (2007) 7317-7324. 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7317.
M. Ni, J. Zhang, R. Sosa, H. Zhang, H. Wang, D. Jin, K. Crowley, B. Naini, F.E. Reed, R.W. Busuttil, J.W. Kupiec-Weglinski, X. Wang, Y. Zhai, T-Cell Immunoglobulin and Mucin Domain-Containing Protein-4 Is Critical for Kupffer Cell Homeostatic Function in the Activation and Resolution of Liver Ischemia Reperfusion Injury, Hepatology 74 (2021) 2118-2132. 10.1002/hep.31906.
S. Watanabe, M. Alexander, A.V. Misharin, G.R.S. Budinger, The role of macrophages in the resolution of inflammation, The Journal of clinical investigation 129 (2019) 2619-2628. 10.1172/JCI124615.
C. Pulitano, G. Sitia, L. Aldrighetti, R. Finazzi, M. Arru, M. Catena, L.G. Guidotti, G. Ferla, Reduced severity of liver ischemia/reperfusion injury following hepatic resection in humans is associated with enhanced intrahepatic expression of Th2 cytokines, Hepatol Res 36 (2006) 20-26. 10.1016/j.hepres.2006.05.006.
Q.F. Han, W.J. Li, K.S. Hu, J. Gao, W.L. Zhai, J.H. Yang, S.J. Zhang, Exosome biogenesis: machinery, regulation, and therapeutic implications in cancer, Mol Cancer 21 (2022) 207. 10.1186/s12943-022-01671-0.
Y. Jiao, P. Xu, H. Shi, D. Chen, H. Shi, Advances on liver cell-derived exosomes in liver diseases, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine 25 (2021) 15-26. 10.1111/jcmm.16123.
D. Zhu, S. Liu, K. Huang, Z. Wang, S. Hu, J. Li, Z. Li, K. Cheng, Intrapericardial Exosome Therapy Dampens Cardiac Injury via Activating Foxo3, Circ Res 131 (2022) e135-e150. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.321384.
S. Xu, Y.C. Cheuk, Y. Jia, T. Chen, J. Chen, Y. Luo, Y. Cao, J. Guo, L. Dong, Y. Zhang, Y. Shi, R. Rong, Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal miR-21a-5p alleviates renal fibrosis by attenuating glycolysis by targeting PFKM, Cell death & disease 13 (2022) 876. 10.1038/s41419-022-05305-7.
Y. Ding, Q. Luo, H. Que, N. Wang, P. Gong, J. Gu, Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes: A Promising Therapeutic Agent for the Treatment of Liver Diseases, International journal of molecular sciences 23 (2022). 10.3390/ijms231810972.
F. Ouyang, B. Li, Y. Wang, L. Xu, D. Li, F. Li, D. Sun-Waterhouse, Attenuation of Palmitic Acid-Induced Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Dysfunction by 6-Shogaol in Caco-2 Cells: The Role of MiR-216a-5p/TLR4/NF-kappaB Axis, Metabolites 12 (2022). 10.3390/metabo12111028.
S. Chen, J. Yang, Y. Wei, X. Wei, Epigenetic regulation of macrophages: from homeostasis maintenance to host defense, Cellular & molecular immunology 17 (2020) 36-49. 10.1038/s41423-019-0315-0.
J. Zhao, X. Li, J. Hu, F. Chen, S. Qiao, X. Sun, L. Gao, J. Xie, B. Xu, Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomes attenuate myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury through miR-182-regulated macrophage polarization, Cardiovascular research 115 (2019) 1205-1216. 10.1093/cvr/cvz040.
B. Chen, J. Han, S. Chen, R. Xie, J. Yang, T. Zhou, Q. Zhang, R. Xia, MicroLet-7b Regulates Neutrophil Function and Dampens Neutrophilic Inflammation by Suppressing the Canonical TLR4/NF-κB Pathway, Front Immunol 12 (2021) 653344. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.653344.

There is NO Competing Interest.

Table.S1.xlsx
Table S1: The related primer sequences.
Table.S2.xlsx
Table S2: Target genes of miR-216a-5p.
Figure.S1.pdf
Figure.S1: The FISH experiment detects cell localization of pre-miR-216a-5p(Cy3) in liver tissue sections.
Figure.S2.pdf
Figure.S2: Immunofluorescence experiment detected the effect of agomir and antagomir on the number of macrophages in F4/80+INOS+ double-positive in the liver suffered ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Exosomal miR-216a-5p targeting TLR-4 alleviates liver ischemia-reperfusion injury by regulating M2 macrophage polarization and neutrophil inflammation

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Methods & Materials

1. Mouse and patient samples

2. Exosome extraction and identification

3. Cell isolation, extraction, and culture

4. Western blotting

5. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

6. Sequencing and enrichment analyses

7. Immunofluorescence staining of liver tissue sections

8. Histology

9. Flow cytometry

10. The dual luciferase assay

11. Statistical analyses

Results

1. miRNA expression profiles of serum-derived exosomes from mice with liver IRI

2. Role of miR-216a-5p in liver IRI

3. Effects of blocking miR-216a-5p

4. Effects of miR-216a-5p on BMMs and dHL-60 inflammation

5. Effects of miR-216a-5p on M2 macrophage polarization and the neutrophil inflammatory response through targeting TLR4

6. Effects of miR-216a-5p on M2 macrophage polarization and the neutrophil inflammatory response through the TLR4/NF-κB and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways

Discussion

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1