Characterizations
FTIR Analysis
Figure 1(a) presents the findings of the FTIR investigation of the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel. The peak at 3442 cm− 1 in the FTIR spectra is related to the OH. The -CH stretch bond is related to the peaks at 2927 cm− 1 and 2855 cm− 1 (Jiang et al. 2015, Liu et al. 2021). Additionally, the stretching C = O vibration reached its peak at 1625 cm− 1. Bending vibration connected the Fe-O band in Fe3O4 to the peak at 775 cm− 1 (Duru et al. 2016). The N-H bond peak at 1457 cm− 1 illustrates the amidation reaction between the carboxyl groups of polyacrylic acid and the amine groups of chitosan (Xiang et al. 2017). The FTIR spectra after Ni2+ ions adsorption is shown in Fig. 1(b). When Ni2+ ions were adsorbed on the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel, the broad peak of the adsorbent that was attributed to NH or OH at 3442 cm− 1 was altered to 3446 and 3780 cm− 1, proving that NH or OH may interact with Ni2+ ions.
X-ray Diffraction Analysis
Only two significant peaks, positioned at 8° and 21°, in the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel XRD pattern demonstrate acrylamide's amorphous nature. The presence of chitosan was shown by a peak at 2θ = 10° in Fig. 2(a) (Yuan et al. 2015). Peaks at 2θ = 35.5°, 57.15°, and 62.77°, respectively, correlate to magnetic particles and support the presence of Fe3O4 particles (Chen et al. 2014). The peak has emerged at 2θ = 12° following the sorption of Ni2+ ions and may indicate the interaction between the amine group of chitosan and the Ni2+ ions (Fig. 2(b)).
SEM Analysis
According to the SEM findings in Fig. 3(a), the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel is made with nanometer particles that are placed on it and can be related to iron nanoparticles. Also, after the adsorption of Ni2+ ions by the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel, it can be seen that the morphology of the adsorbent has changed (Fig. 3b). The EDS analysis showed the constituent components of the adsorbent (Fig. 3a), and also EDS represented the Ni2+ ions adsorption was successfully by the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel (Fig. 3b).
Effective parameters on the adsorption of Ni2+ ions
pH Optimization
The pH of Ni2+ ions solution affect the main feature of their adsorption by Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide nano hydrogel. In fact, the Ni2+ ions adsorption is associated mostly with the protonation and deprotonation of binding sites from ligand posited on the surface of nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel (Salehi et al. 2022).The results obtained from pH changes in Ni2+ ions adsorption percentage showed that with the increase of solution pH to pH = 5, the Ni2+ adsorption percentage reached the maximum(Figura 4). This is because at pHs below 4, nitrogen atoms of the ligand are protonated in an acidic environment and Ni2+ ions can be completely inhibited (Navarro et al. 2003). While at pH values above 6 Ni2+ ions react with hydroxide ions to produce Ni(OH)2.
Time Effect
To know the sorption behaviors of nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel towards Ni2+ spices, the adsorption percentage of Ni2+ ions at different contact times was investigated. The results of Fig. 5. showed that with the increased time to 20 min, the adsorption percentage increases because the Ni2+ ions in the solution have more opportunity to be adsorbed on the adsorbent functional groups.
Effect Of Adsorbent Amount
The amount of nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel has a great effect on adsorption. The results of Fig. 6 showed that by increasing the amount of nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide to 6 mg, the adsorption percentage increased and then the changes were insignificant, so 5 mg of nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide was chosen as the optimal adsorbent amount.
Temperature Effect
According to the results of Fig. 7, the Ni2+ ions adsorption was changed in proportion to temperature, which is due to the changed diffusion rate and mobility of reactive species. The adsorption yield of Ni2+ ions onto nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel was favorable at high temperatures because the mobility rate of reactive species was increased (Peer et al. 2018).
Sample Volume Effect
Figure 8 illustrates the effect of sample volume on Ni2+ ions adsorption by nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel. The results were indicated the Ni2+ ions were adsorbed up to 200 mL of sample volume on the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel, after which the Ni2+ ions were appeared in the sample solution. According to the definition of limit volume, the limit volume in this experiment is 200 mL, and if the volume of the sample solution containing Ni2+ ions is more than 200 mL, ions are not completely adsorbed.
Effect Of Interferences
In the current research, the effect of ions interference was studied on Ni2+ ions adsorption by nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel. According to the results showed in Table 1, the adsorption percentage of Ni2+ ions in the presence of foreign ions was well done and foreign ions had little effect on the determination of Ni2+ ions.
Table 1
The adsorption percentage of Ni2+ ions in the presence of foreign ions
Ions
|
Amount added (mg)
|
% Recovery of Ni2+ion
|
Na+
|
15
|
98.3 (1.3)a
|
K+
|
15
|
98.2 (1.2)
|
Ca2+
|
15
|
99.8 (1.3)
|
Mg2+
|
15
|
98.6 (1.4)
|
Fe2+
|
10
|
98.8 (1.8)
|
Cr3+
|
10
|
97.9 (1.2)
|
Co2+
|
7
|
98.5 (1.8)
|
Cl−
|
7
|
96.9 1.2)
|
Br−
|
4.5
|
99.0 (1.0)
|
F−
|
4.5
|
98.8 (1.9)
|
Mn2+
|
6.5
|
99.8 (1.3)
|
Zn2+
|
6.0
|
95.7 (0.5)
|
a Values in parentheses are % RSD based on three individual replicate analyses |
Desorption
Effect Of Elution Solvents On The Recovery Of Ni Ions
Among the parameters affecting the recovery system, the type of elution solvent is one of the main parameters that has a great impact on the recovery system. In this research, elution solvents including HNO3, HCl and NaOH were investigated to recover Ni2+ ions. Considering the maximum recovery for optimal solvent selection, the HNO3 was selected for the extraction of Ni2+ ions from nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel. The results reported in Fig. 9 demonstrated that in the balance created between the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel and the HNO3 (1 M), more H+ is replaced Ni2+ on the adsorbent and as a result, the more Ni2+ is extracted. The decrease in recovery at higher concentration than 1 M can be due to molecular association between nitric acid molecules and a decrease in proton activity resulting in a decrease in the acidity of elution solvent. In this research, the volume of the HNO3 (1 M) was investigated for Ni2+ ions recovery. Different volumes of HNO3 (1 M) were selected for Ni2+ ions extraction and the optimal volume of HNO3 (1 M) was obtained 8 mL. The results in Fig. 10 showed that from the volume of 8 ml onwards, all Ni2+ ions entered the solvent and the balance went slightly towards HNO3 and recycling was complete.The concentration factor (33.3) was obtained as the ratio of the volume of the sample solution (100 mL) to the volume of the recovery solution (6 mL).
Stability And Reusability Evaluation
The cost of the adsorption system has a direct relationship with the potential for nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel reusability. Therefore, the reusability and stability of the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel in the optimal condition of adsorption and desorption were investigated. The results showed that the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel can be reused more than 3 times without a profound loss of adsorption efficiency. After the first adsorbent recycling (adsorption and desorption), the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel retained about 90.2% of the adsorption efficiency retention for Ni2+ ions. Even after recycling the adsorbent 3 times, the adsorption efficiency of the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel was still 83.2% for Ni2+ ions (Fig. 11).
Adsorption isotherms
The survey of the isotherm models represents a good comprehension of the Ni2+ ions adsorption mechanism on nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel. For this purpose, the model of Langmuir and Freundlich was used to fit the Ni2+ ions adsorption isotherms onto the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel. The isotherm of Langmuir is generally applied to qualify the sorption onto a uniform surface of adsorbent supposing the monotony of the sites of adsorption and not interplay among the analyte and adsorbent. The model in the linear form is expressed as (Kouotou et al. 2021):
\({C}_{e}/{q}_{e}\text{=}\left(1/{K}_{L}{q}_{max}\right)+\left({C}_{e}/{q}_{max}\right)\) (2) Where, Ce (mgL− 1) is the concentration in the equilibrium of Ni2+ ions, qe (mgg− 1) is the capacity of equilibrium adsorption and qm (mgg− 1) is the capacity of Langmuir monolayer saturation. The KL (Lmg− 1) is a Langmuir constant related to the adsorption energy. This model can be expressed in other terms called separation coefficient (RL) which is a dimensionless constant, giving data about the feasibility of the process of adsorption (Arvand et al. 2022, Salehi et al. 2022). It can be expressed as:
$${R}_{L=}1/(1+{K}_{L}{C}_{0})$$
3
The Freundlich pattern is appropriate for explaining the adsorption enthalpy on an adsorbent with an uncoordinated surface, supposing the binding tendency reduces with the growth in the degree of adsorption. The linear term of this model is expressed as:
$${ln} {q}_{e}\text{=}{ln}{K}_{F} +1/n({ln}{C}_{e})$$
4
The KF and n terms are Freundlich constants and indicate the adsorption of capacity and intensity, respectively. The isotherm model of Langmuir and Freundlich was applied to test the correlation among the Ni2+ ions sorption on nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel. A parameters comparison among the two isotherms is shown in Table 2. As can be seen, the Langmuir model was displayed a preferable value of correlation (R2) and a premiere compatible with the empirical result than the model of the Freundlich, demonstrating that the Ni2+ ions adsorption onto nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel was based on a unit layer and with chemisorption process on a monotonous surface. In addition, the RL value was in the range of 0–1, which confirmed that the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel was the desired adsorbent of Ni2+ ions.
Table 2
Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm parameters for Ni2+ ions adsorption
Langmuir model
|
Freundlich model
|
qm, mgg− 1
|
22.69
|
KF, Lg− 1
|
4.48
|
KL, Lmg− 1
|
3.79
|
n
|
2.85
|
RL
|
0.60
|
R2
|
0.939
|
R2
|
0.987
|
Adsorption kinetics of the Ni2+ ions
The kinetic result was analyzed with three used kinetic adsorption models, including the pseudo-first, second-order, and the Roginsky-Zeldovich models (Fig. 12). The pseudo-first-order model is written as follows:
$$1/{q}_{t}=\left({K}_{1}/{q}_{e}t\right)+\left(1/{q}_{e}\right)$$
5
In Eq, 5 qe and qt terms (mgg− 1) are the adsorption value in equilibrium and t (min), respectively; K1 (min− 1) is the pseudo-first-order rate constant. The linear model of the pseudo-second-order pattern could be displayed as follows :
$$t/{q}_{t}=\left(1/{K}_{2}{q}_{e}^{2}\right)+\left(t/{q}_{e}\right)$$
6
In Eq, 6 K2 (g(mg min)−1) is the constant of the pseudo-second-order rate.
The linear form of the Roginsky-Zeldovich model is given as:
$${q_{\text{t}}}=\frac{1}{\beta }\log (\alpha \times \beta )+\frac{1}{\beta }\log t$$
7
Where 𝛼 (mg(g min)− 1) is the rate of Roginsky-Zeldovich initial sorption. (g mg−1) is a constant of desorption (Kanmaz et al. 2020).
According to R2 in Table 3, the pseudo-second-order model was fitted with a better kinetic result than the pseudo-first-order adsorption model. The Roginsky-Zeldovich model was vastly applied to qualify the pseudo-second-order model and was remarked that the nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel surface was uncoordinated. The kinetic constant values of the Roginsky-Zeldovich equation for Ni2+ ions were deposited in Table 3. According to the R2 value, it could be derived that the Roginsky-Zeldovich model is well adapted to explain the Ni2+ ions sorption onto the Nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel compared with a model of the pseudo-first-order.
Table 3
Estimated parameters of adsorption kinetics for the adsorption of Ni2+ ions on nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel.
Pseudo-first order
|
|
Pseudo-second order
|
|
Roginsky-Zeldovich
|
|
qe (mg g− 1)
|
0.68
|
qe (mg g− 1)
|
4.39
|
α (mg(g min) −1)
|
6.76
|
k1 (min− 1)
|
0.09
|
k2 (g(mg min) −1)
|
0.003
|
β (g mg− 1)
|
1.48
|
R2
|
0.79
|
R2
|
0.998
|
R2
|
0.88
|
Analytical performance
Calibration curve of Ni2+ ions extraction method
After optimizing all the parameters affecting the Ni2+ ions adsorption, the calibration curve was drawn for Ni2+ ions adsorption with the dispersive solid-phase extraction method by nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel. For this purpose, different concentrations of Ni2+ ion solutions were prepared and nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel was added to each of the solutions under optimal conditions.. Then the adsorption steps of Ni2+ ions were performed, and adsorption of these Ni2+ ions solutions were measured by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer. This method provided a very good linear range between 0.5–20 mg/L and a value of correlation (R2 = 0.9994) for Ni2+ ions.
The limit of detection (LOD) for Ni2+ ion adsorption by nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel, achieved according to the slope of the Ni2+ ions concentration curve applying a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 (LOD = 1.25 µgL− 1). The limit of quantification (LOQ) was calculated from 5.15 µgL− 1.
Precisions Of Method
The precisions of this method was obtained from relative standard deviation (RSD) and by measuring the Ni2+ ions adsorption of 5 solutions in intra- and inter-day. To do this, 5 standards solutions of Ni2+ ions with the optimal condition were prepared (Ashrafzadeh and Qomi 2016). By obtaining the maximum adsorption of Ni2+ ions, the RSD based on intra-day and inter-day were achieved in 1.80% and 0.95% (n = 3), respectively.
Repeatability Of The Method
The reproducibility of each method is an important factor in determining reliability. Based on the results, 1.8% was obtained for reproducibility.
Application On Real Samples
After the dispersive extraction technique was completed with nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel and optimal conditions were found for it, several real samples of water and wastewater were analyzed. The real samples included the Jajrood river water, Tehran tap water, synthetic samples, Rang Alvand factory, and Shahre Rey university effluent. These water samples were collected with 10 suitable PET bottles for each sample. The bottles were washed with plain water and a suitable detergent solution. Then they were filled with a nitric acid solution (1 M) and were lefted overnight. The bottles were then washed with plain and distilled water and after that, the bottles were completely dried and labeled. The colloidal and suspended particles were removed with filtration, then their pH was adjusted to 5 for each sample. For the first time, the water samples were injected into the device without any concentration and separation. In the second time, increasing the concentration of Ni2+ ions and separating them was done according to the presented method, and then water samples were injected into the device. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 4. As can be seen, there are more Ni2+ ions in the sample of the Charmshahr factory effluent and Varamin University effluent, respectively, but there was no Ni2+ ions in the tap water sample. There is also a small amount of Ni2+ ions in the water sample of the Varamin. The proposed method has been able to detect the trace amount of Ni2+ ions in the synthetic sample without observing a large difference in the amount of Ni2+ ions.
Table 4
Determination of Ni2+ ions in real samples
Samples
|
Added Ni (II) (µg)
|
Atomic absorption (flame)
|
Atomic absorption
(furnace)
|
Tehran tap water
|
0
|
N.Da
|
N.D
|
|
10.00
|
10.07 (1.3)b
|
10.06 (2.4)
|
Varamin Tap water
|
0
|
5.04 (1.4)
|
5.19 (2.3)
|
|
10.00
|
15.65 (1.6)
|
15.46 (2.5)
|
Charshahr factory effluent
|
0
|
67.06 (2.0)
|
66.31 (2.9)
|
|
10
|
77.09 (1.7)
|
75.89 (2.2)
|
Varamin university effluent
|
0
|
20.03 (1.3)
|
19.87 (2.5)
|
|
10.00
|
30.06 (2.0)
|
29.90 (2.3)
|
synthetic samples
( Co2+, Pb2+, Na+, Al3 +,
Ba2+, Ca2+, Cu2+) 0.02 mg
|
0
|
N.D
|
N.D
|
|
10.00
|
10.66 (2.1)
|
10.40 (1.7)
|
a Not Detected |
b Values in parentheses are % RSD based on three individual replicate analyses |
Paired T-test
The T test was used to compare the value obtained from the furnace atomic absorption method with graphite atomic spectroscopy. Following the values obtained for T and the test results, it was observed that with a 95% confidence interval, there is no significant difference between the values obtained by the atomic absorption method of the flame atomic absorption furnace.Therefore these two methods can be used to determination of Ni2+ ions in water samples.
Comparison Of The Removal Of Ni Ions By Various Adsorbents And Methods
Table 5 showed some parameters such as concentration factor, limit of detection and correlation coefficient removal of Ni2+ ions by for various adsorbents and methods. Results demonstrated the proposed method is more accurate, simpler, and faster because it has a lower value of detection limit and less relative standard deviation [31–35].( Anthemidis et al. 2003, Atsumi et al. 2005, Wang and Hansen 2002, Zhu et al. 2006, Fan and Zhou 2006).
Table 5
Comparison of the removal of Ni2+ ions by various adsorbents and methods.
Methode
|
Adsorbent
type
|
Amount of adsorbent (mg)
|
Concentration factor
|
Relative standard deviation
|
The detection limit (µg/L)
|
Ref
|
On – line solvent extraction – GF AAS
|
Ammonium diethyl dithiophosphate
|
14/0
|
24.6
|
3.2
|
2.8
|
Anthemidis et al. 2003
|
CO-Precipitation-GF AAS
|
Ytterbium hydroxide
|
25.0
|
100
|
3.2
|
2.9
|
Atsumi et al. 2005
|
On – line SPE-GF AAS
|
Diethyldithiophosphate
|
3
|
59.4
|
1.3
|
1.3
|
Wang and Hansen 2002
|
CPE-GF AAS
|
P-octyl polyethyleneglycolphenyether
|
10.0
|
50
|
2.1
|
5.9
|
Zhu et al. 2006
|
SDME-GF AAS
|
Dithizone–chloroform
|
5.0
|
65
|
7.4
|
0.7
|
Fan and Zhou 2006
|
SPE
|
nano Fe3O4/chitosan-acrylamide hydrogel
|
5.0
|
33.3
|
1.8
|
1.25
|
This work
|