The skin has the ability to synthesize steroid hormones that may exert autocrine or paracrine effects. These locally produced glucocorticoids, estrogens and androgens affect epidermal homeostasis and local immune functions, which suggests association between disrupted cutaneous steroid biosynthesis and skin inflammation [30]. Prior art already suggested links between changes in endogenous steroid biosynthesis and psoriasis. Namely, glucocorticoid production is suppressed in psoriatic skin [31]. Furthermore, the course of psoriasis changes in women during pregnancy, postpartum and with menopause, which indicates that estrogen influences psoriasis (review in [32]). Still, little is known about the regulation of local steroidogenesis in the skin and its implication in psoriasis development.
PARP2 has been associated with several aspects of steroid synthesis and steroid mechanism of actions mostly in metabolic tissues (review in [33]). In skeletal muscle of PARP2-/- mice induced expression was found of 17β-dehydrogenase 11 (HSD17B11), an enzyme involved in androsterone biosynthesis, and 5α-reductases (SRD5A1, 2) that catalyze the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) [20]. As a consequence, muscular levels of DHT increased in the skeletal muscle of PARP2-/- mice, without changing systemic levels of DHT [20]. In addition, PARP2 was identified as a contributor to androgen receptor signaling in prostate [34]. In this study, we demonstrate that the genetic deletion or depletion of PARP2 has a protective effect against psoriasis-like inflammation in the IMQ-induced murine model and in human keratinocyte cultures, and that this protection is dependent on aromatase function and estradiol synthesis, and estradiol-mediated suppression of NF-κB activity in keratinocytes.
The therapeutic potential of estrogens in psoriasis has been suggested [32, 35], but long-term systemic estrogen therapy is not considered suitable due to negative side effects, and exogenous estrogen treatment has never been attempted in psoriasis. With our results, we propose the stimulation of keratinocytes’ innate estrogen production by targeting PARP2 as a potential approach in psoriasis management. However, several questions remain unanswered in our study that may raise concerns with the feasibility of this concept.
In fact, the role of estrogens in immune modulation is not straightforward. Although psoriasis tends to improve during pregnancy and exacerbate in menopause, a minority of patients experienced worsening of symptoms during pregnancy [36-38]. The positive effects of estrogens on psoriasis may be explained by the apparent ability of estrogens to create a shift from a primarily Th1 and Th17-mediated immunity to a primarily Th2-mediated immunity [35]. In contrast to that, the activity of estrogen receptors (ER) display profound dose and cell type dependency, and therefore ER activity may lead to either induction or suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokine production as a function of estrogen concentrations [39]. The estradiol level necessary for the inhibition of NF-κB was actually determined in human cells [40], and according to the study the minimum concentration of estradiol needed to achieve anti-inflammatory effect is in the 10-10 M range, which approximately corresponds to pregnancy level of serum estradiol. The estradiol level in the skin may show strong intra- and interpersonal variability that requires further investigations to determine the potentially therapeutic concentration of estrogens in psoriasis.
PARP2 may also have a complex role in inflammatory regulation. PARP2 deletion does not seem to influence Th2-mediated inflammatory processes, whereas the deletion or inhibition of PARP1 was anti-inflammatory in mouse models of contact hypersensitivity reaction [15-17], asthma [41], acute pancreatitis [42], allergic airway inflammation [43] and experimental colitis [44]. In sharp contrast, we previously reported exacerbation of the Th17-mediated IMQ-induced psoriasis-like dermatitis in PARP1-/- mice [18], while the present study shows the beneficial effect of PARP2 deletion in the IMQ model. Of note, the IMQ-induced psoriasis model is not the first Th17-mediated process where PARP1-/- and PARP2-/- mice displayed opposing phenotypes. In experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a murine model of multiple sclerosis, PARP1 deletion increased [45], while PARP2 deletion reduced EAE-associated neuroinflammation [46]. Interestingly, multiple studies reported that estrogens protect from neuroinflammation in EAE [47-49] that aligns well with our findings. We might as well assume that PARP2 is related to estrogen action in Th17-mediated inflammatory processes. Based on our findings we hypothesize that during the progression of psoriasis, Th1 and Th17-derived cytokines (such as TNFα and IL17A) may induce PARP2 in keratinocytes, which may turn down aromatase activity and estrogen synthesis in keratinocytes that may trigger NF-κB activation. However, the mechanistic details of such regulatory cascade remain to be determined.
A limitation of our study is the utilization of whole-body knock-out mice instead of knock-out mice with conditional deletion of PARP2 in keratinocytes or immune cells. Indeed, we cannot exclude the contribution of distinct skin cells or distant organs to the observed skin phenotype of PARP2-/- mice, however, the mechanism we demonstrate in keratinocytes might be an important piece in the pathomechanism of psoriasis.
Currently, the most successful therapies against psoriasis are biologic agents targeting IL17A or TNFα, but there are several safety concerns about the usage of such therapies, and there is a constant search for better-tolerated solutions. Several PARP inhibitors are in clinical use for systemic application in tumor therapy, involving veliparib (Abbvie), rucaparib (Pfizer/Clovis), olaparib (KuDOS/AstraZeneca), niraparib (Merck/Tesaro), talazoparib (Lead/Biomarin/Medivation/Pfizer), as well as fluzoparib and pamibarib approved by the Chinese NMPA. With our data we raise the potential of repurposing PARP inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis. True, these are pan-PARP inhibitors that equally target PARP1, PARP2 and even PARP3. Hence, selective targeting of PARP2 cannot be done by these inhibitors as their effects may be affected by the concurrent inhibition of PARP1 and PARP3. Therefore, the applicability of PARP inhibitors will have to be assessed in subsequent studies.
In summary, we highlighted a yet unknown mechanism by which PARP2 may be involved in inflammatory regulation and identified a potential targetable player in psoriasis. Our study may promote the development of PARP2 specific inhibitors and encourage that more studies be conducted on the elucidation of the role of PARP2 in inflammation and immune regulation.