Effects of MYO6 knock-out on synaptic transmission in developing mice IHCs
We studied synaptic transmission in IHCs of MYO6 knock-out developing mice using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. IHCs depolarization leads to Ca2+ entry, triggering an increase in the overall Ca2+ inflow and instantaneous Cm increments, which is controlled by activation of the voltage - dependent Ca2+ current.
Three groups of wild (Myo6WT/WT), heterozygous (Myo6+/-) and homozygous (Myo6-/-) mice for experiments to analyze the genetic characteristics of different functional indicators. The acutely isolated mice basement membranes were infiltrated in the external fluid of calcium currents. IHCs were hold at -90 mV and then applied a slow-rising ramp voltage stimulation from -90 mV to +70 mV to induce whole-cell calcium currents at different voltages, and further analyzing the calcium currents at different voltages can obtain the I-V curve (Fig. 1A). We found that there was no significant difference in the peak amplitude of ICa in IHCs from three genotypes developing mice (Myo6WT/WT: 369.5 ± 20.89 pA, n = 20; Myo6+/-: 372.9 ± 13.86 pA, n = 21, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT; Myo6-/-: 353.5 ± 36.48 pA, n = 15, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT) (Fig. 1B).Then we use Boltzmann function fitting the current - voltage curve to obtain Vhalf and k, which depict the steepness of voltage dependence in Ca2+ channels activation in order to characterize the functional properties of IHCs from the three different genotypes mice more comprehensively. Vhalf describes the membrane potential where the conductance is half activated, while k reveals the voltage sensitivity of the activation. Noticing ICa in Myo6-/- mice has a less negative Vhalf than Myo6WT/WT (Myo6WT/WT: -33.89 ± 0.524 mV,n = 20; Myo6-/-: -30.39 ± 0.5002 mV, n = 15, P < 0.05) and a bigger activation slope(kslope)than Myo6WT/WT and Myo6+/- (Myo6WT/WT: 4.817 ± 0.1977 mV, n = 20; Myo6+/-: 4.726 ± 0.1597 mV, n = 21; Myo6-/-: 6.050 ± 0.185 mV , n = 15, P < 0.01 vs. Myo6WT/WT and Myo6+/-) (Fig. 1C and 1D).
Given that Cm is generally interpreted as a signal for synaptic release of neurotransmitters, whole-cell voltage clamp recordings were used to closely measure ΔCm associated with increased cell surface area when synaptic vesicles fuse with the plasma membrane.14 Therefore, while recording the voltage - gated calcium current, whole cell membrane capacitance change (ΔCm) was monitored to quantify the synaptic vesicle release of IHCs. Fig. 2A shows a representative diagram of ICa and the corresponding ΔCm in Myo6WT/WT, Myo6+/- and Myo6-/- developing mice IHCs of duration 500 ms. We found that there was no significant difference of Ca2+ influx (QCa) in IHCs from the three genotypes developing mice when pooled data for Ca2+ charge over all stimulation durations were evaluated (n=10 in three groups, P > 0.05, Fig. 2B). Additionally, IHCs from Myo6-/- (51.54 ± 8.258 fF, n = 10) released fewer synaptic vesicles for long stimulation compared with the Myo6WT/WT (60.82 ± 7.798 fF,n = 10,P < 0.05; Fig. 2C). However,no observable difference was found in the Ca2+ efficiency of exocytosis (qualitatively defined as ΔCm /QCa) for any three groups comparison of the mean values in response to all stimulations from 2 to 500 ms (Fig. 2D), suggesting that Ca2+ influx had similar efficiency in triggering Myo6WT/WT, Myo6+/- and Myo6-/- mice IHCs exocytosis.
Then we traced vesicles release through capacitance changes and identified two dynamic components of the vesicle pool. The initial small component of ΔCm increases in response to a short stimulation, representing exocytosis of the RRP of synaptic vesicles located in the active region. Immediately afterward, ΔCm continues to improve at a slower rate during the stimulation duration of up to 500 ms, indicating vesicles are released from the refilling-pool located farther away from the Ca2+ channel. Further analysis showed that the MYO6 knock-out had no effects on the RRP (Myo6WT/WT: 418.7 ± 74.99 SVs, n = 10; Myo6+/-: 428.3 ± 37.83 SVs, n = 14; Myo6-/-: 402.7 ± 120.9 mV , n = 9; P > 0.05), but obviously increased the time constants (τ) to deplete RRP (Myo6WT/WT: 11.23 ± 1.185 ms, n = 10; Myo6+/-: 13.50 ± 1.471 ms, n = 14; Myo6-/-: 22.24 ± 2.144 ms, n = 9, P < 0.001 vs. Myo6WT/WT) and effectively suppressed the sustained release rate (SRR) (Myo6WT/WT: 6 517 ± 1 263 SVs/s, n = 10; Myo6+/-: 3 041 ± 250.1 SVs/s, n = 14, P < 0.001 vs. Myo6WT/WT; Myo6-/-: 2 596 ± 642.5 SVs/s, n = 9, P < 0.001 vs. Myo6WT/WT) (Fig. 2E - 2G), suggesting that MYO6 knock-out developing mice replenish synaptic vesicles less efficiently.
Effects of MYO6 knock-out on synaptic transmission in mature mice IHCs
We selected three groups of mature mice, Myo6WT/WT, Myo6+/- and Myo6-/- to record the Ca2+ currents of IHCs. Fig. 3A shows that the I-V curve of Ca2+ currents was obtained. We found that the peak amplitude of ICa in IHCs from Myo6+/- (224.0 ± 8.070 pA, n = 19,P > 0.05) and Myo6-/- mice (204.6 ± 30.43 pA, n = 16, P > 0.05) has no significant change compared with that of Myo6WT/WT mice (212.5 ± 8.116 pA, n = 11) (Fig. 3B). Fig. 3C and 3D show that ICa in Myo6-/- mice IHCs has a more negative Vhalf (-31.11 ± 3.688 mV, n = 16, P < 0.01 vs. Myo6WT/WT and Myo6+/-) and a steeper activation slope (5.016 ± 0.7266 mV, n = 16, P < 0.001 vs. Myo6WT/WT and Myo6+/-) than Myo6WT/WT (Vhalf: -21.71 ± 1.513 mV, n = 11; kslope:8.091 ± 0.2885 mV, n = 11) and Myo6+/- (Vhalf: -24.00 ± 0.7672 mV, n = 19; kslope:7.504 ± 0.1932 mV, n = 19), revealing that under physiological conditions calcium channels may cause more Ca2+ to flow into the IHCs of Myo6-/- mice.
A representative diagram of ICa and the corresponding ΔCm in Myo6WT/WT, Myo6+/- and Myo6-/- mature mice IHCs of duration 500 ms is shown in Fig. 4A. Further research showed more Ca2+ influx (QCa) in IHCs from Myo6+/- and Myo6-/- mice (n=12 in three groups, P < 0.05 ~ 0.01 vs. Myo6WT/WT) (Fig. 4B). Moreover, IHCs from Myo6-/- mice (64.94 ± 6.344 fF, n = 12) released fewer synaptic vesicles for 500 ms stimulation compared with the Myo6WT/WT (139.7 ± 21.88 fF, n = 12, P < 0.05; Fig. 4C). Fig. 4D manifests the value of ΔCm/QCa in Myo6+/- and Myo6-/- mice IHCs is less than that of Myo6WT/WT mice for both short and long stimulation (n=12 in three groups, P < 0.05 ~ 0.001), indicating that the Ca2+ efficiency of triggering synaptic vesicles release in mature MYO6 knock-out mice was lower than that in wild-type mice. Then we observed that the RRP and SRR in IHCs from Myo6-/- mice both prominently smaller than that in IHCs from Myo6WT/WT mice (RRP: 570.7 ± 15.78 SVs of Myo6WT/WT mice, n = 11; 184.4 ± 12.30 SVs of Myo6-/- mice, n = 16, P < 0.001; SRR: 6 046 ± 291.4 SVs/s of Myo6WT/WT mice, n = 11; 2 387 ± 255.9 SVs/s of Myo6-/- mice, n = 16, P < 0.001), suggesting that MYO6 knock-out mature mice have a smaller readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles and replenish synaptic vesicles less efficiently which manifesting its poor function of exocytosis (Fig. 4E and 4G).
Effects of Myo6C442Y point mutation on synaptic transmission in developing mice IHCs
Three groups of wild (Myo6WT/WT), heterozygous (Myo6C442Y/WT) and homozygous (Myo6C442Y/C442Y) mice were selected for experiments to analyze the genetic characteristics of different functional indicators. We first investigated developing mice.
Myo6C442Y point mutation had no obvious effects on the Ca2+ currents amplitude (Myo6WT/WT: 300.5 ± 25.32 pA, n = 12; Myo6C442Y/WT: 292.2 ± 26.59 pA, n = 10, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT; Myo6C442Y/C442Y: 338.7 ± 24.37 pA, n = 15, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT), Vhalf (Myo6WT/WT: -30.26 ± 2.337mV, n = 12; Myo6C442Y/WT: -30.79 ± 2.455 mV, n = 10, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT; Myo6C442Y/C442Y: -30.09 ± 2.250 mV, n = 15, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT) and slope factor (kslope) of IHCs (Myo6WT/WT: 3.951 ± 0.4046 mV, n = 12;Myo6C442Y/WT: 4.512 ± 0.4249 mV, n = 10, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT; Myo6C442Y/C442Y: 4.797 ± 0.3895 mV, n = 15, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT) (Fig. 5A-5D).
And under our experimental conditions we found that the Ca2+-induced exocytosis of IHCs in the developing mice was also not affected by the Myo6C442Y point mutation, ΔCm (n = 10 in three groups, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT), RRP (Myo6WT/WT: 337.8 ± 56.66 SVs, n = 12; Myo6C442Y/WT: 312.5 ± 32.50 SVs, n = 14, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT; Myo6C442Y/C442Y: 327.0 ± 25.88 SVs, n = 15, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT), SRR (Myo6WT/WT: 2 961 ± 176.3 SVs/s, n = 12; Myo6C442Y/WT: 2 894 ± 410.7 SVs/s, n = 14, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT; Myo6C442Y/C442Y: 2 755 ± 148.1 SVs/s, n = 15, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT ), and τ to deplete RRP (Myo6WT/WT: 17.73 ± 3.389 ms, n = 12; Myo6C442Y/WT:16.82 ± 3.866 ms, n = 14, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT; Myo6C442Y/C442Y: 17.56 ± 5.322 ms, n = 15, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT ) (Fig. 6A-6E).
Effects of Myo6C442Y point mutation on synaptic transmission in mature mice IHCs
Moreover, Myo6WT/WT, Myo6C442Y/WT and Myo6C442Y/C442Y mature mice were selected to improve our research. We found that the Myo6C442Y mutation resulted in a decrease in ICa amplitude of IHCs (Myo6WT/WT: 229.2 ± 18.65 pA, n = 12; Myo6C442Y/WT:169.0 ± 20.45 pA, n = 11, P < 0.01 vs. Myo6WT/WT; Myo6C442Y/C442Y: 168.1 ± 20.40 pA, n = 12; P < 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT) (Fig. 7A and 7B). But there was no obviously difference in Vhalf of ICa (Myo6WT/WT: -20.96 ± 1.702 mV, n = 12; Myo6C442Y/WT: -19.56 ± 1.903 mV, n = 11, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT; Myo6C442Y/C442Y: -23.83 ± 1.903 mV, n = 12, P > 0.05 vs. Myo6WT/WT) (Fig. 7C). Fig. 7D testifies to the slope factor of Myo6C442Y/C442Y mice IHCs (8.410 ± 0.201 mV, n = 12) is bigger than that of Myo6WT/WT (7.572 ± 0.213 mV, n = 12; P < 0.01), indicative of less Ca2+ influx the IHCs of Myo6C442Y point mutation mice induced by Ca2+ channels.
Then we varied stimulation duration from 2 to 500 ms, founding less QCa in IHCs from Myo6C442Y/WT and Myo6C442Y/C442Y mice (n = 12 in three groups, P < 0.01 vs. Myo6WT/WT) (Fig. 8B). Giving 500 ms stimulation, the induced ΔCm of Myo6C442Y/C442Y mice (47.90 ± 10.96 fF, n = 12) was remarkably less than that of Myo6WT/WT mice (82.95 ± 10.45 fF, n = 12, P < 0.01) and Myo6C442Y/WT mice (85.4 ± 10.96 fF, n = 12, P < 0.01) (Fig. 8C). And the Ca2+ efficiency of triggering synaptic vesicles release in mature Myo6C442Y/C442Y mice (0.899 ± 0.151, n = 12) was lower than that in Myo6C442Y/WT mice (1.172 ± 0.26, n = 12, P < 0.05) and Myo6WT/WT mice (1.636 ± 0.299, n = 12, P < 0.05) (Fig. 8D). Fig. 8E and 8G show that the RRP and SRR in IHCs from Myo6C442Y/C442Y mice both obviously decrease than that in IHCs from Myo6WT/WT mice (RRP: 568.4 ± 56.23 SVs of Myo6WT/WT mice, n = 12; 366.4 ± 36.29 SVs of Myo6C442Y/C442Y mice, n = 12, P < 0.05; SRR: 2 691 ± 332.1 SVs/s of Myo6WT/WT mice, n = 12; 1 658 ± 188.2 SVs/s of Myo6C442Y/C442Y mice, n = 12, P < 0.05), testifying that Myo6C442Y point mutation mature mice IHCs have comparative weak function of exocytosis.