Expression and purification of α-N-Arabinofuranosidase
A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase protein expressed in E. coli BL21 GOLD (DE3) was purified with His-Tag purification by loading cell lysate to HisTrap™ FF crude column (Figure S1). Purified protein fractions were analyzed with SDS-PAGE (Figure 2) with a molecular mass of approximately 56 kDa.
Figure 2
Biochemical Characterization of the A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase Enzyme
For better understanding of the biochemical properties of recombinant A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase, optimum pH, optimum temperature, thermal stability, substrate spectrum, and kinetic parameters were determined.
Effect of Buffer and pH
Asetate, phosphate, and borate buffers with different pH values were tested in order to determine the optimal pH value and buffer system. The recombinant A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase showed the highest activity at pH 6.5 in phosphate buffer (Figure 3). Enzyme activity increased gradually between pH 4.0 to 6.5 and then decreased gradually until pH 9.0. α-N-Arabinofuranosidase showed more than 80 % activity between pH 5.0 to pH 7.0. Additionally, enzyme has around 50 % activity at pH 4.0. A similar pH optima was reported for Bacillus stearothermophilus No. 236 α-L-Arabinofuranosidase enzyme [19]. The A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase enzyme exhibited activity at wide pH range (between 4.0 to 9.0). In the literature there are many arabinofuranosidases, obtained from different bacteria such as Thermobacillus xylanilyticus [20], Geobacillus stearothermophilus [21], Thermotoga thermarum [22] (DOI 10.1007/s10529-014-1493-6), Anoxybacillus kestanbolensis [18] with activity between pH 4.0 to pH 10, were reported.
Figure 3
Effect of Temperature on Activity
The optimal temperature for the A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase was 45 ºC (Figure 4). However, the α-N-Arabinofuranosidase enzyme was highly active at tested all temperatures. α-N-Arabinofuranosidase exhibited ⁓90 % activity between 20-100 ºC which was reported before for only a few identified and characterized arabinofuranosidases from Clostridium stercoarium (temperature range 30-90 ºC) [23] and Bacillus subtilis (temperature range 30-80 ºC) [24]. This wide range temperature profile of the enzyme highlights the thermostability of the enzyme hence increases the industrial potential of the purified enzyme.
Figure 4
Thermal Stability of the α-N-Arabinofuranosidase
To examine the thermal stability of the A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase, enzyme was incubated at various temperatures for 90 min. Figure 5 shows that the enzyme is stable at mild temperatures (30-50 ºC). Stability of the enzyme gradually decreases after 50 ºC. However, it still retains 80 % activity after 90 min. incubation at 60 and 70 ºC. Furthermore, it exhibited more than 40 % residual activity at 90 ºC after 90 min. incubation. Another α-L-arabinofuranosidase from Alicyclobacillus sp. A4, which has 75 % sequence identity with A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase, has 80 % of the initial activity at 70 ºC after 60 min. and 30 % of the initial activity at 80 ºC after 30 min. incubation [25] which is much more less than arabinofuranosidase characterized in this study (>50 % of the initial activity after 90 min. incubation at 80 ºC). Geobacillus stearothermophilus α-L-arabinofuranosidase enzyme has 50 % of the initial activity at 70 ºC after 1-hour incubation, that is also less than A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase [21]. Other arabinofuranosidases from Bacillus pumilus [26], Bacillus subtilis [27], Aureobasidium pullulans [28], Streptomyces sp. [29] have 65 % at 75 ºC, 60 % at 50 ºC, 70 % at 60 ºC, and 45 % at 60 ºC of their initial activity recpectively.
Figure 5
Effect of Chemicals
The effects of chemicals such as NaCl, MgCl2, CaCl2, EDTA, HgCl2 and SDS on enzyme activity were investigated by adding them into reaction medium at 10 mM final concentration. NaCl and SDS did not show any significant effect on enzyme activity. On the other hand, MgCl2, CaCl2, EDTA, and HgCl2 led to significant decrease in A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase activity. While MgCl2 caused to more than 50 % activity loss, HgCl2 caused almost complete inhibition of the enzyme. 10-20 % activity was observed when EDTA and CaCl2 were added into reaction medium.
Figure 6
Computational Biology Analysis of the A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase
The ProtParam tool (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/) was used in order to calculate physicochemical parameters of the 501 amino acid containing A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase (UniProt ID: C8WV61). The ProtParam calculated the molecular weight and theoretical pI of the α-N-Arabinofuranosidase as 56 kDa and 5.40 respectively. Furthermore, aliphatic index which is indicator of thermostability was calculated as 87.56.
Figure 7
The homology model of the 501 aa. A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase enzyme was constructed with SWISS-MODEL server and validated with QMEAN, ProSA-web, and SAVES v6.0. SWISS-MODEL yielded a homohexameric 3D structure (Figure 7) using Geobacillus stearothermophilus α-L-arabinofuranosidase protein as template (PDB ID: 1QW9). The QMEAN value of the generated 3D homology model was 0.85 and ProSA-web tool calculated the Z-score of the model as -11 (Figure S2) which is in the range of of scores typically found for native proteins of similar size. Additionally, Ramachadran Plot (Figure 8) was generated by SAVES and it revealed that 90.7 % of the residues were in the most favoured regions and 8.9 % of the residues were in the allowed regions. The binding site of the A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase enzyme was predicted using FTSite binding site prediction tool [30]. The pink mesh represents the predicted binding site (Figure 8) and the residues within 5 Å of the binding site are F27, E29, R69, G73, N74, F75, W99, N174, E175, W180, S216, Y246, E294, W298, L318, A350, Q351, I356.
Figure 8
The docking analysis of α-N-Arabinofuranosidase with the substrate pNP-α-L-arabinofuranoside was performed with AutoDock within YASARA. 100 runs ware performed and docking poses less than 0.5 Å heavy atom RMSD were superposed and clustered. Hovel et al., reported that the 3.0 Å distance between E175 and glycosidic oxygen of substrate is a hydrogen bonding distance and allows the protonation of the departing aglycon. Additionally, the appropriate distance between E294 and anomeric carbon is 3.2 Å which allows the nuclephilic attack for the Geobacillus stearothermophilus α-L-arabinofuranosidase [31]. The best docking pose was shown in Figure 9 and it revealed that the distances between E294 and anomeric carbon (D1) of the substrate and the distance between E175 and glycosidic oxygen (D2) of substrate and are within the preferred ranges. The docking results showed that the D1 was 3.01 Å and D2 was 2.570 Å with -7.64 kcal/mol binding energy.
Figure 9
The phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA X to analyze phylogenetic relationship between A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase protein with previously characterized arabinofuranosidases. Figure 10 showed that analyzed proteins were classified into two distinct groups according to localization of the enzyme. A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase located into same group with the enzymes named as intracellular arabinofuranosidases. In addition, the characterized enzyme was in the same sub-group with the arabinofuranosidases characterized from Geobacillus stearothermophilus and Bacillus subtilis. Based on this, A. acidocaldarius α-N-Arabinofuranosidase protein sequence was compared with the sequences of Geobacillus stearothermophilus and Bacillus subtilis arabinofuranosidases by multiple sequence alignment using Clustal Omega tool. MSA results (Figure 11) revealed that A. acidocaldarius has 65 % sequence identity with Bacillus subtilis arabinofuranosidase and 67 % sequence identity with Geobacillus stearothermophilus arabinofuranosidase protein. Moreover, the key residues for substrate binding (E29, N74, N174, Y246 and Q351) and catalytic activity (E175 and E294) are conserved in the sequence of A. acidocaldarius.
Figure 10
Figure 11