Nuclear Complement C3b Promotes Paclitaxel Resistance by assembling the SIN3A/HDAC1/2 complex in non-small cell lung cancer

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2456148/v1

Download PDF

Article

Nuclear Complement C3b Promotes Paclitaxel Resistance by assembling the SIN3A/HDAC1/2 complex in non-small cell lung cancer

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2456148/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

In addition to the classical role as a serum effector system of innate immunity, accumulating evidence suggests that intracellular complement components have indispensable functions in immune defense, T cell homeostasis, and tumor cell proliferation and metastasis. Here, we revealed that complement component 3 (C3) is remarkably upregulated in paclitaxel (PTX)-resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells and that knockdown of C3 promoted PTX-induced cell apoptosis, sensitizing resistant cells to PTX therapy. Ectopic C3 decreased PTX-induced apoptosis and induced resistance to PTX treatment in original NSCLC cells. Interestingly, C3b, the activated fragment of C3, was found to translocate into the nucleus and physically associate with the HDAC1/2-containing SIN3A complex to repress the expression of GADD45A, which plays an important role in cell growth inhibition and apoptosis induction. Importantly, C3 downregulated GADD45A by enhancing the binding of the SIN3A complex with the promoter of GADD45A, thus decreasing the H3Ac level to compress chromatin around the GADD45A locus. Subsequently, ectopic GADD45A promoted PTX-induced cell apoptosis, sensitizing resistant cells to PTX therapy, and insufficiency of GADD45A in original cancer cells induced resistance to PTX treatment. These findings identify a previously unknown nucleus location and oncogenic property for C3 in chemotherapy and provide a potential therapeutic opportunity to overcome PTX resistance.

Chemotherapy is still the most commonly used strategy for treating a wide variety of cancers. In chemotherapy regimens, paclitaxel (PTX) has become one of the most common integrants for treating different types of cancer. It may arrest exposed cancer cells in the G2/M-phase by stabilizing the microtubule polymer, eventually leading to cell apoptosis. Unfortunately, PTX resistance is commonly observed as with other chemotherapeutic agents and is a major obstacle for the success of cancer therapy. Although diverse PTX resistance mechanisms have been reported, including the upregulation of ABC transporters, structural alterations to drug target β-tubulin, and the involvement of cytokines, miRNAs, glucose and lipid metabolism, kinase signaling pathways, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition, the resultant strategies to reverse PTX resistance are still unsatisfactory (1, 2).

Lung cancer is the 2nd most common cancer type and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and in the United States (3). Among all lung cancer cases, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80%~85%, and nearly 70% of NSCLC patients present with an advanced stage at the time of diagnosis (4, 5), leaving chemotherapy as the principal treatment strategy, in which PTX is a commonly used drug for late-stage NSCLC patients without benefit from targeted therapy or immunotherapy. However, most patients invariably develop resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs, including PTX, upon prolonged treatment, and the 5-year survival rate remains 20%~30% (6, 7). Therefore, exploring the molecular mechanism of chemoresistance is of great significance to improve the survival rate and quality of life for NSCLC patients.

Complement was originally recognized as a circulating effector system of innate immunity, with hepatocytes producing the majority of soluble complement proteins (8, 9). Complement activation has long been considered to take place almost exclusively in the blood, resulting in the generation of C3 and C5 convertases, which cleave C3 into C3a and C3b and C5 into C5a and C5b, respectively. C3a and especially C5a induce mobilization of innate immune cells and induction of inflammation; C3b leads to opsonization and removal of invading microbes (10–12), while deposition of C5b onto a target initiates membrane attack complex (MAC) formation and then target lysis. Thus, complement has been assumed to have a beneficial role in the destruction of tumor cells(13). In contrast to this dogma, it has been reported that C5a generated in the tumor microenvironment may foster tumor initiation and progression by recruiting MDSCs to impair the local T-cell response(14, 15). In addition, evidence is accumulating that almost all cell types can produce complement components and process complement activation intracellularly, including myeloid, lymphocytic, fibroblastic, epithelial and cancer cells (16, 17). Moreover, it is now becoming clear that locally activated complement has different functions from systemic serum complement. For example, intracellular C3a is involved in T-cell homeostasis and adaptive immune responses (18, 19). Autocrine C3 of CD8⁺ T cells may suppress local CD8⁺ T-cell function by inhibiting C3a/C3aR-induced IL-10 production, thus impairing antitumor activity (20). While B cells, which express little endogenous C3, have been demonstrated to endocytose serum-derived complement C3, the engulfed C3 may enter the nucleus to regulate gene transcription, likely by binding to histones (21). In addition, tumor cell-derived C3a was reported to promote ovarian cell proliferation via the C3a/C3aR/PI3K/AKT signaling axis (22), EMT of breast cancer cells(23), and leptomeningeal metastasis of lung cancer(24). In addition, we recently reported a tumorigenic role for intracellular C5a/C5aR1 in colon cancer cells (17). Cathepsin D cleaves C5 in lysosomes and endosomes, leading to the production of C5a and the assembly of the β-catenin stabilization complex C5a/C5aR1/KCTD5/cullin3/Roc-1, which potentiates β-catenin stability and promotes colorectal tumorigenesis (17). However, whether intracellular complement components are involved in chemoresistance remains unknown.

Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of histones, which are the main epigenetic aberrations, have been demonstrated to be involved in tumorigenesis and acquired cancer chemoresistance (25). The two most common types of modification, acetylation and methylation, occur at either histone H3 or H4 moieties and are orchestrated to regulate gene transcriptional activation or silencing(26, 27). These PTMs are initiated by histone acetyl transferases and histone methyl transferases. Similarly, these modifications can be reversed by histone deacetylases and histone demethylases(28–30). SIN3A is a core component of the histone deacetylation activity-associated transcriptional repressor complex, playing an important role in governing cell cycle control and apoptosis throughout tumorigenesis and development (31, 32). Previous studies have indicated that the multi-subunit nature of SIN3A provides unique contact surfaces for interaction with particular accessory proteins to regulate the transcription of specific genes(33). For example, the association of the SIN3A-HDAC complex with Fam60a decreases histone acetylation at the cyclin D1 promoter and thus represses the expression of cyclin D1(34). The actions of SIN3A and STAT3 at the promoter of the tumor suppressor gene (TSG) can regulate cell survival by decreasing the expression of TSG(35). The ZNF704/SIN3A complex represses a panel of genes, including PER2, resulting in the proliferation and invasion of breast cancer (36). The SIN3A-HDAC complex is recruited to the promoter of GATA3 by FOXN3 to repress GATA3 expression, thus repressing breast cancer metastasis (37). Moreover, LSD1 coordinates with the SIN3A/HDAC complex to maintain sensitivity to chemotherapy in breast cancer (38). However, whether other proteins can bind to the SIN3A complex needs further investigation.

In this study, we found that the intracellular activated complement fragment C3b entered the nucleus to induce lung cancer resistance to PTX by repressing cell apoptosis. Mechanistically, nuclear C3b physically interacts with the SIN3A/HDAC complex to repress the expression of GADD45A by enhancing the association between SIN3A/HDAC and the GADD45A promoter.

Cell culture and treatment

HEK-293T, HepG2C3a, Hep1, Huh7, H97 L, A549 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). HEK-293T, HepG2C3a, Hep1, Huh7 and H97 L were cultured in DMEM and the A549 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium. All cell media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2.

To establish A549 cells resistant to PTX (A549-PTX), A549 cells were exposed to escalating concentrations of PTX from 5 ng/mL to 320 ng/mL. The established A549-PTX cells were cultured in whole RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with PTX (100 ng/ mL).

Animal model

Animal care was performed with approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University. Six-week-old male nude mice were housed in laminar flow cabinets under specific pathogen-free conditions with food and water provided ad libitum. A total of 5 × 10⁶ A549-PTX cells were subcutaneously seeded in the left or right flank of the axilla of each mouse. When the tumors reached to 150mm³ in volume, PTX (10mg/kg) dissolved in buffer (5% DMSO + 40% PEG 400 + 5% Tween 80 + ddH₂O) or blank buffer was intraperitoneally injected twice per week. When the tumors reached to ~ 1000mm³ in volume, these mice were sacrificed, and all subcutaneous tumors were collected and weighed.

Cell proliferation and colony formation assay

For the cell proliferation assay, cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 5000 cells/well and treated with DMSO or PTX (100 ng/ml). The cell proliferation curves were constructed according to the OD450 value tested by the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8, Yeasen Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). For the colony formation assay, cells were seeded into six-well plates at a density of 500 cells/well and treated with DMSO or PTX (100 ng/ml) on the twelfth day. After two days, the medium was discarded, and the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature and stained with 0.5% crystal violet. After washing with ddH₂O for several times. Colonies were counted, and the colony formation ratio was calculated as follows: colony formation ratio = (colonies formed/cells seeded) × 100%.

Apoptosis assay

Apoptotic stress after PTX treatment was measured by Annexin V/propidium iodide staining using an Annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis kit (MultiSciences Biotech, Hangzhou, China). Annexin V-FITC was detected as green fluorescence, and propidium iodide staining was detected as red fluorescence.

GST-pull down

GST-tagged HDAC1, HDAC2, SAP18 and ING2 were induced to be expressed in Rosetta (DE3) cells (Yeasen, Shanghai, China), and competent cells were lysed by an ultrasonic instrument. Then, the supernatant or the purified GST-RBBP4 (cat#Ag6110, PROTEINTECH, Chicago, USA) /His-Sumo-RBBP7 (cat#CSB-EP621959HU, CUSABIO, Wuhan, China) was incubated with GSTSep Glutathione Agarose Resin (Yeasen, Shanghai, China) for 3 h at 4°C. Subsequently, purified complement component 3b (Complement Technology, USA) was incubated with the above mixture for 4 h at 4°C. Wash the above Glutathione Agarose Resin After with PBST (0.02% Tween-20 in PBS), the protein complex was denatured with reducing SDS-loading buffer and heated at 100°C for 10 min. The IB assay was then performed to detect the relevant proteins.

Statistical analysis

The quantitative data of qRT‒PCR assays are shown as the mean ± SD and were analyzed with Student’s t test (two-tailed, unpaired). P < 0.05 was defined as significant.

C3 is upregulated in PTX-resistant lung cancer cells

Paclitaxel has been widely used for the treatment of NSCLC. It arrests exposed cells in the G2/M-phase by stabilizing the microtubule polymer, eventually leading to cell apoptosis. To study PTX resistance, we first treated original NSCLC A549 cells (A549-ORI) with increasing doses of PTX to establish PTX-resistant cells (A549-PTX) (Fig. S1A). RNA-sequencing analysis was then performed to identify the dysregulated genes in PTX-resistant cells. The results showed that 2,914 genes were upregulated and 1,974 genes were downregulated in A549-PTX cells (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, the gene enrichment analysis for these dysregulated genes showed that the complement and coagulation pathway was the most upregulated pathway in PTX-resistant cells (Fig. 1B), in which the core complement component C3 displayed the abundant and most upregulated expression level (Fig. 1C). The results of qRT‒PCR and immunoblotting assays for C3 further supported this finding at both the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 1D). In addition, KM-plot survival analysis revealed that a higher C3 level indicated shorter survival in lung cancer patients who received chemotherapy, while a higher C3 level indicated longer survival in lung cancer patients who did not receive chemotherapy (Fig. 1E), suggesting the dual role of complement in different contexts of cancer (39). Therefore, these results suggest that the C3 expression level is highly correlated with PTX resistance in lung cancer.

C3 Is Required For Ptx Resistance In Nsclc

To identify the biological role of C3 in lung cancer resistance to PTX, we knocked down C3 expression in A549-PTX cells (Fig. S1B) and found that the viability and colony formation capabilities of the C3-insufficient cells were dramatically decreased after PTX treatment (Fig. 2A, B and C). Meanwhile, PTX-induced apoptosis significantly increased after knockdown of C3 (Fig. 2D and E). The in vivo data further demonstrated that C3 insufficiency dramatically suppressed tumor growth with PTX treatment but had no effect without PTX treatment (Fig. 2F, G and H). In contrast, ectopic expression of C3 in A549-ORI cells (Fig. S1C) significantly increased cell viability with PTX treatment (Fig. 2I), which was further supported by the significantly decreased apoptotic cells (Fig. 2J and K). Together, these results indicate that C3 is required for NSCLC resistance to PTX.

The C3 cleavage product C3b translocates into the nucleus in PTX-resistant cells

It has been shown that C3 promotes ovarian cancer cell proliferation by activating the C3a-C3aR-PI3K-AKT signaling pathway (22), and the PI3K/AKT pathway is a key link to modulate drug resistance (40). Thus, we tested whether C3a/C3aR may mediate PTX resistance via the PI3K/AKT pathway in NSCLC. However, we found that C3aR was abundantly present only inside cells but not on the cell membrane in both A549-ORI and A549-PTX cells (Fig. S2A). Moreover, we found that the expression level of C3aR in A549-PTX cells was much lower than that in A549-ORI cells (Fig. S2B). Therefore, C3 regulated PTX resistance in NSCLC unlikely via the C3a-C3aR-PI3K-AKT signaling pathway.

To further explore the molecular mechanism whereby C3 regulates PTX resistance in NSCLC, we first examined C3 expression and location in the cytoplasm and nucleus of A549-ORI and A549-PTX cells. C3 was detected only in the cytoplasm in A549-ORI cells but was highly expressed both in the cytoplasm and nucleus of A549-PTX cells (Fig. 3A and B). The ectopic expression of C3 in A549-ORI cells also replicated this finding (Fig. 3C and D). The nuclear location of C3 was also observed in hepatocytes, such as HepG2C3a, Hep1, H97L and Huh7 cell lines, which are the major source for the biosynthesis of complement components, including C3 (Fig. 3E), indicating the potential biological function of C3 in the nucleus. C3 is a macromolecule with a molecular weight of ~ 190 kDa, leading to difficulty in free nuclear transport. It is a typical approach for nucleus-transported proteins using nuclear localization signal (NLS)-dependent and cargo protein-mediated methods. We first predicted the NLS of C3 on an NLS-mappers website (https://nls-mapper.iab.keio.ac.jp/cgi-bin/NLS_Mapper_form.cgi) (Fig. S3A) and mutated this sequence to detect C3 nuclear translocation. The result showed that this mutation could not block C3 nuclear translocation (Fig. S3B), indicating an NLS-independent manner for C3 nuclear transport. To exert biological functions, extracellular intact C3 needs to be proteolytically cleaved into small fragment C3a (~ 8.5 kDa) and large fragment C3b by typical C3 convertases, such as C4bC2a and C3bBb, or by other proteases, such as plasmin and thrombin (10). Next, using purified C3 and C3b as positive controls, we employed an immunoblotting assay to identify which form of C3 was transported into the nucleus. The results showed that the nuclear form was C3b but not C3, and intact C3 was retained in the cytoplasmic fraction of A549-PTX cells (Fig. 3F). Under reduced conditions, C3 and C3b may produce α (115 kDa) or α’ chains in addition to β chains, respectively, since C3a is cleaved from α chains to produce α’ chains (10). Consistently, the α chain and α’ chain were observed in the cytoplasm and nucleus of A549-PTX cells after β-mercaptoethanol treatment, respectively (Fig. 3G). Therefore, the cleaved C3b fragment but not the intact C3 translocated into the nucleus in PTX-resistant NSCLC cells. In addition, to identify the protease responsible for intracellular C3 cleavage in A549-PTX cells, we knocked out the expression of cathepsin L (CTSL) (Fig. S3C), which cleaves C3 to generate C3a inside T cells (16). However, CTSL deficiency failed to inhibit C3b entry into the nucleus (Fig. S3D), indicating that proteases other than CTSL cleaved C3 to produce C3b in A549-PTX cells.

Nuclear C3b Assembles With The Sin3a Complex In Ptx-resistant Cells

Considering that both A549-ORI and A549-PTX cells expressed C3 in the cytoplasm but only A549-PTX cells expressed C3b in the nucleus, we next harvested nuclear proteins to identify the C3b-binding proteins in A549-PTX cells with a co-IP assay followed by mass spectrometric analysis (Fig. 4A). Based on the identified proteins, the GO analysis revealed that C3b-interacting proteins were mainly associated with the regulation of gene expression (Fig. 4B). C3/C3b have been reported to bind to histones by ELISA (21); thus, we chose the histone-binding protein RBBP4/7 for further exploration (Fig. 4B). Using a mutual co-IP assay, we determined the interaction between C3b and RBBP4/7 (Fig. 4C and D), which was further verified by the colocalization of C3b and RBBP4/7 in the nucleus of A549-PTX cells with an IF assay (Fig. 4E). Thus, these results indicate that C3b interacts with RBBP4/7 in the nucleus of PTX-resistant NSCLC cells.

It has been reported that as core components, RBBP4/7 are involved in the assembly of distinct complexes, such as NuRD, SIN3A and PRC2 (41). To further identify which RBBP4/7-containing complex could interact with C3b in A549-PTX cells, we performed a co-IP assay with antibodies against C3b to capture SIN3A, HDAC1/2, RBBP4/7, SDS, ING2, SAP18 and SAP30 (subunits of SIN3A complex); MTA1, CHD4 (subunits of NuRD complex); EZH2, or SUZ12 (subunits of PRC2 complex). The results showed that C3b only interacted with the subunits of the SIN3A complex but not the subunits of either the NuRD or PRC2 complexes (Fig. 4F). The interaction between C3b and the SIN3A complex was also validated by the ectopically expressed C3 in A549-ORI cells with a co-IP assay (Fig. 4G). The pull-down assay with purified protein C3b and bacterially expressed GST-HDAC1/2, -RBBP4, -SAP18, -ING2 and His-Sumo-RBBP7 further revealed that C3b could interact with RBBP4/7, HDAC1/2, SAP18 and ING2 directly (Fig. 4H). To further detect the physiological interaction of C3b with the SIN3A complex, nuclear proteins extracted from A549-PTX cells were fractionated by size exclusion using gel chromatography. We found that native C3b eluted with a much greater apparent molecular mass than monomeric C3b. In an immunoblotting assay, C3b was detected in chromatographic fractions greater than 660 kDa (fraction 35), which appeared simultaneously with the subunits of the SIN3A complex mainly in fractions 28 and 29 (Fig. 4I), indicating that C3b interacts with the SIN3A complex to form a novel complex with a very large molecular weight. Together, these results demonstrate that C3b assembles a complex with SIN3A in the nucleus of PTX-resistant NSCLC cells.

Identification Of Genome-wide Transcriptional Targets For The C3b-containing Sin3a Complex

To explore the functional significance of the interaction of C3b with the SIN3A complex, we next analyzed the genome-wide transcriptional targets of this C3b-containing SIN3A complex. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-based deep sequencing (ChIP-seq) was performed in A549-PTX cells using antibodies against C3b and HDAC1, the core factor of the SIN3A complex. A quantitative Venn diagram analysis confirmed the similar distribution of C3b and HDAC1 target sites, which were mainly located in the promoter region (Fig. 5A). Analysis of the characteristic genomic signatures of C3b and HDAC1 showed 15 and 26 discriminative regular expression motif elicitation (DREME), respectively, among which three DREME exhibited a very similar binding motif (Fig. 5B, Fig. S6A and B). These results strongly support that nuclear C3b exerts its transcriptional regulatory function at least by assembling a novel complex with the HDAC1-containing SIN3A complex.

The data from anti-C3b ChIP-Seq and anti-HDAC1 ChIP-Seq were then cross-analyzed to identify overlapping DNA sequences, which were considered to be the targets of the C3b-containing SIN3A complex (Fig. 5C). These 1,510 overlapping target genes were classified into different biological processes by expression analysis with the Metascape website (https://metascape.org/gp/index.html), among which the mitotic cell cycle process pathway was enriched most obviously (Fig. 5D). Next, the expression levels of the genes in the mitotic cell cycle pathway were verified by qRT‒PCR and/or immunoblotting assays. The results showed that C3 insufficiency in A549-PTX cells resulted in a significant increase in XPC, GADD45A and BRCA1 (Fig. 5E), whereas ectopic expression of C3 in A549-ORI cells only inhibited GADD45A expression (Fig. 5F). As expected, GADD45A was downregulated in A549-PTX cells compared with A549-ORI cells, as determined by qRT‒PCR (Fig. 5G) and RNA-Seq (Fig. 5H). Moreover, C3 and HDAC1 exhibited similar peak locations on the GADD45A promoter (Fig. 5I). Moreover, a ChIP assay combined with qPCR using specific primers in the GADD45A promoter region revealed strong enrichment of C3, HDAC1, RBBP4 and SIN3A on the promoter of GADD45A (Fig. 5J). Therefore, these results identified GADD45A as one of the downstream target genes of the C3b-SIN3A complex in PTX-resistant NSCLC cells.

C3b downregulates GADD45A expression by enhancing the binding of the SIN3A complex to the GADD45A promoter

To further explore the mechanism by which C3 regulates the expression of GADD45A via the SIN3A complex, we knocked down C3 expression and detected the binding of the C3b-SIN3A complex to the GADD45A promoter region using the ChIP and qRT‒PCR assays mentioned above. The results showed that C3 insufficiency significantly reduced the recruitment of SIN3A, HDAC1 and C3b to the GADD45A promoter (Fig. 6A). Moreover, C3 insufficiency did not change the expression of SIN3A subunits, including SIN3A, RBBP4/7, HDAC1/2 and SAP18, at the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. S4A and B). This result suggests that additional C3 in the SIN3A complex may enhance the binding activity of the SIN3A complex to the GADD45A promoter region. Using a similar approach, we observed that the level of pan-H3 acetylation (H3Ac) was markedly increased at the GADD45A promoter region upon knockdown of C3 or SIN3A (Fig. 6B), indicating that as a transcription suppressor, the C3b-SIN3A complex suppresses GADD45 expression by inhibiting histone acetylation of the GADD45D promoter region. Significantly, knockdown of either SIN3A or HDAC1 resulted in upregulation of GADD45A at both the mRNA (Fig. 6C, D) and protein levels (Fig. 6E, F). The upregulated expression of GADD45A upon C3 knockdown was constrained when SIN3A was overexpressed in A549-PTX-shC3 cells (Fig. 6G), indicating that C3 repressed GADD45A expression via the SIN3A complex. Importantly, knockdown of SIN3A or HDAC1 sensitized A549-PTX cells to PTX treatment (Fig. 6H and I). Together, these findings revealed that C3 repressed GADD45A expression by enhancing the binding of SIN3A complex with the GADD45A promoter region, thus involved in the development of PTX resistance.

Gadd45a Is Involved In Ptx Resistance In Nsclc Cells

GADD45A is involved in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and DNA repair in response to a variety of stresses (42). To assess its function in the regulation of NSCLC PTX resistance, we established stable GADD45A-overexpressing A549-PTX cells, which was confirmed by qRT‒PCR (Fig. S5A). Then, we treated these cells with PTX to detect PTX-induced apoptosis. The results showed that ectopic GADD45A expression decreased the resistance to PTX by promoting apoptosis (Fig. 7A), which was further supported by the impeded cell proliferation by ectopic GADD45A expression (Fig. 7B). In contrast, the GADD45A-insufficient A549-ORI cells (Fig. S5B) were resistant to PTX-induced apoptosis compared to the GADD45A-sufficient cells (Fig. 7C), thus obtaining a growth advantage over the GADD45A-sufficient cells under PTX treatment (Fig. 7D). Moreover, using the xenograft mouse model, we corroborated that ectopic GADD45A expression could significantly sensitize A549-PTX cells to PTX treatment (Fig. 7E-G). Taken together, these results reveal that impaired GADD45A expression by the C3b-SIN3A complex is involved in the development of PTX resistance in NSCLC cells.

In the current study, we reveal that nuclear C3b acts as a cofactor of the chromatin remodeling SIN3A complex to repress the expression of GADD45A, thus conferring acquired resistance of lung cancer to PTX treatment. This study is a first step toward elucidating that tumor cell-derived complement proteins enter the nucleus to induce chemoresistance via epigenetic regulation. This finding also suggests that C3 may act as a predictor for drug resistance in NSCLC patients and might be a potential target for NSCLC chemotherapy.

Previous studies have demonstrated that C3 regulates tumor initiation and progression through the C3a-C3aR-PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. The binding of tumor cell-secreted C3a to membrane C3aR activates the PI3K-AKT pathway, thus facilitating ovarian cancer cell proliferation (22). C3a-C3aR-PI3K-AKT signaling also induces cancer-associated fibroblasts to secrete pro-metastatic cytokines and to express extracellular matrix components in breast cancer (23) and modulates tumor-associated macrophages to repress the antitumor immunity of PD-L1 antibody(43). However, we detected little expression of C3aR on the plasma membrane either in original or PTX-resistant NSCLC cells. PTX-resistant cells even expressed lower C3aR levels than the original NSCLC cells. Moreover, C3 knockdown reversed the sensitivity of tumor cells to PTX treatment and had no effect on proliferation, indicating that C3 regulated NSCLC PTX resistance in a C3a/C3aR/PI3K/AKT-independent manner.

Complement has been known to be activated almost exclusively in the blood, and its components are synthesized by the liver and restricted cell types. This classical paradigm has changed until the intracellular complement components in immune cells were discovered in recent years (16, 44). It is well established that many types of cells, including immune cells, epithelial cells, fibroblast cells and endocrine cells, are capable of synthesizing and activating complement proteins (16, 17, 23). This locally operating intracellular “complosome” is an important player in driving vital cellular processes, such as immune response, metabolism, and proliferation(17, 18, 45 6). In addition, serum-derived C3/C3a, but not C3b, may enter the nucleus to bind to histone proteins in B cells, suggesting a potential ability to induce chromatin remodeling and regulate DNA transcription (21). Herein, we revealed that C3 was upregulated in PTX-resistant NSCLC cells, and its active fragment C3b translocated into the nucleus to regulate gene transcription indirectly by interacting with the SIN3A/HDAC corepressor complex; thus, the subsequent downregulation of GADD45D induced PTX resistance. Moreover, the nuclear translocation of C3b was also found in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, a dominant tissue/cell type responsible for C3 production. This finding suggests that nuclear C3b, another subcellular distribution of the C3 cleavage product, exerts a complement-independent function, at least in epigenetically regulating gene expression.

In both yeast and mammals, together with diverse interacting partners, SIN3 proteins have been shown to activate or repress the transcription of target genes for regulating various biological functions (33), in which the repression activity mostly involves deacetylation of histone or non-histone proteins, while the activation process is less clear and may be HDAC independent (33, 46). For example, the interaction between SMAR1 and the SIN3A/HDAC complex contributes to cyclin D1 repression via a histone deacetylation-related mechanism (47). The recruitment of wild-type p53 to the SIN3A/HDAC complex represses the expression of target genes such as Map4 (48), while Ebp1 interacting with SIN3A/HDAC shows a strong repressive effect on E2F1 transcription (49). The lncRNA NEAT1 scaffolds the binding of FOXN3 to the SIN3A/HDAC complex, thus repressing GATA3 transcription (37). In yeast, Sin3 (also called GAM2) may instead act as a positive transcriptional regulator of GAM3/ADR6 (50). Yeast histone deacetylase Rpb3 may be recruited by MAPK Hog1 upon osmotic stress to assemble the Rpd3-Sin3 complex onto the promoters of osmo-responsive genes, thus inducing their transcription (51). Interestingly, recruitment of the mSin3A/HDAC complex by p53 in differentiated cells downregulates Nanog, while Sox2 association with the mSin3A/HDAC complex activates Nanog in proliferating embryonic stem cells (52, 53). In the present study, we demonstrate that nuclear C3b may scaffold the SIN3A/HDAC complex to repress the expression of GADD45A, thus inducing NSCLC resistance to PTX.

The growth arrest and DNA damage (GADD)-inducible gene family is often upregulated in response to various environmental stresses and drug therapies. GADD45A was the first stress-inducible gene found to be activated by the p53 tumor suppressor(54). Moreover, GADD45A was demonstrated to be involved in many cellular and biological processes, such as DNA damage, cell proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis (54–56). Our study provides a p53-independent mechanism for GADD45A regulation, in which nuclear C3b interacts with the SIN3A/HDAC complex to repress GADD45A transcription via histone deacetylation in the promoter region of GADD45A in PTX-resistant NSCLC cells. Similarly, methylation-mediated silencing of GADD45A also contributes to prostate cancer resistance to docetaxel (57), indicating that both deacetylation and methylation of the GADD45A promoter region are involved in the transcriptional regulation of GADD45A. Moreover, it has been reported that the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) could increase GADD45A expression to stimulate the cell cycle checkpoint and induce apoptosis, which provides a potential strategy for cancer treatment (58). Herein, our study further elucidates the underlying mechanism by which the C3b/SIN3A/HDAC complex downregulates the expression level of GADD45A via histone deacetylation.

Complement C3 mainly circulates in the blood in an inactive form and is also expressed intracellularly in various cell types, including immune cells (16) and epithelial cells (59). To exert its function, C3 needs to be cleaved into biologically active C3a and/or C3b in a convertase-dependent (for extracellular C3) or -independent (for intracellular C3) way. Intracellular C3 in T cells is cleaved by CTSL in lysosomes and endosomes to C3a and C3b, and C3a is required for homeostatic T cell survival by binding to C3aR (16). However, we found that CTSL deficiency had no effect on the nuclear C3b level in PTX-resistant A549 cells, indicating that CTSL is another protease responsible for C3 cleavage. The other key step involves how C3b is translocated into the nucleus. Due to the large size of C3b (~ 180 kDa), this process most likely requires the assistance of nuclear transporters. However, mutation of the predicted nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequence in C3b failed to block its nuclear translocation. Therefore, the underlying mechanisms for C3b nuclear transportation require further investigation.

In summary, our study revealed that the tumor cell-derived activated fragment C3b can be translocated into the nucleus to epigenetically regulate gene transcription by interacting with the chromatin remodeling SIN3A/HDAC complex. This new C3b/SIN3A/HDAC corepressor complex may suppress the transcription of downstream target genes, such as GADD45A, by deacetylating histone 3 around its promoter region, thus inhibiting apoptosis induced by PTX and leading to PTX resistance in NSCLC cells. Therefore, we established a link between the nuclear complement system and epigenetic regulation of genes and further revealed its function in cancer chemoresistance.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by grants to W.H. from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81790254, 91629301, 81872354, 82121004 and 82273185) and the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (2013CB910802).

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Data are available at Cell Death & Disease online.

Authors contribution

W.H. conceived and supervised the project; W.H. and X.W. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript; X.W. performed most of the experiments and analyzed the data, with assistance from Y.H., J.C., P.D., X.L., D.Z., Ling Li, Luying Li, Y.X., W.Z., L.C. and T.L.; X.H., and Q.J. contributed ideas.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Galletti, E., Magnani, M., Renzulli, M.L. and Botta, M. (2007) Paclitaxel and docetaxel resistance: molecular mechanisms and development of new generation taxanes. ChemMedChem, 2, 920-942.
Cui, H., Arnst, K., Miller, D.D. and Li, W. (2020) Recent Advances in Elucidating Paclitaxel Resistance Mechanisms in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Strategies to Overcome Drug Resistance. Curr Med Chem, 27, 6573-6595.
Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Fuchs, H.E. and Jemal, A. (2022) Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin, 72, 7-33.
Molina, J.R., Yang, P., Cassivi, S.D., Schild, S.E. and Adjei, A.A. (2008) Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc, 83, 584-594.
Berzenji, L., Debaenst, S., Hendriks, J.M.H., Yogeswaran, S.K., Lauwers, P. and Van Schil, P.E. (2021) The role of the surgeon in the management of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a literature review. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 10, 3409-3419.
Garon, E.B., Hellmann, M.D., Rizvi, N.A., Carcereny, E., Leighl, N.B., Ahn, M.J., Eder, J.P., Balmanoukian, A.S., Aggarwal, C., Horn, L. et al. (2019) Five-Year Overall Survival for Patients With Advanced Non‒Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Pembrolizumab: Results From the Phase I KEYNOTE-001 Study. J Clin Oncol, 37, 2518-2527.
Hong, S., Won, Y.J., Park, Y.R., Jung, K.W., Kong, H.J. and Lee, E.S. (2020) Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2017. Cancer Res Treat, 52, 335-350.
Walport, M.J. (2001) Complement. First of two parts. N Engl J Med, 344, 1058-1066.
Dunkelberger, J.R. and Song, W.C. (2010) Complement and its role in innate and adaptive immune responses. Cell Res, 20, 34-50.
Merle, N.S., Church, S.E., Fremeaux-Bacchi, V. and Roumenina, L.T. (2015) Complement System Part I - Molecular Mechanisms of Activation and Regulation. Front Immunol, 6, 262.
Merle, N.S., Noe, R., Halbwachs-Mecarelli, L., Fremeaux-Bacchi, V. and Roumenina, L.T. (2015) Complement System Part II: Role in Immunity. Front Immunol, 6, 257.
Ricklin, D., Hajishengallis, G., Yang, K. and Lambris, J.D. (2010) Complement: a key system for immune surveillance and homeostasis. Nat Immunol, 11, 785-797.
Zhou, X., Hu, W. and Qin, X. (2008) The role of complement in the mechanism of action of rituximab for B-cell lymphoma: implications for therapy. Oncologist, 13, 954-966.
Markiewski, M.M., DeAngelis, R.A., Benencia, F., Ricklin-Lichtsteiner, S.K., Koutoulaki, A., Gerard, C., Coukos, G. and Lambris, J.D. (2008) Modulation of the antitumor immune response by complement. Nat Immunol, 9, 1225-1235.
Ding, P., Li, L., Li, L., Lv, X., Zhou, D., Wang, Q., Chen, J., Yang, C., Xu, E., Dai, W. et al. (2020) C5aR1 is a master regulator in Colorectal Tumorigenesis via Immune modulation. Theranostics, 10, 8619-8632.
Liszewski, M.K., Kolev, M., Le Friec, G., Leung, M., Bertram, P.G., Fara, A.F., Subias, M., Pickering, M.C., Drouet, C., Meri, S. et al. (2013) Intracellular complement activation sustains T cell homeostasis and mediates effector differentiation. Immunity, 39, 1143-1157.
Ding, P., Xu, Y., Li, L., Lv, X., Li, L., Chen, J., Zhou, D., Wang, X., Wang, Q., Zhang, W. et al. (2022) Intracellular complement C5a/C5aR1 stabilizes β-catenin to promote colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell Rep, 39, 110851.
Arbore, G., Kemper, C. and Kolev, M. (2017) Intracellular complement - the complosome - in immune cell regulation. Mol Immunol, 89, 2-9.
Jiménez-Reinoso, A., Marin, A.V. and Regueiro, J.R. (2017) Complement in basic processes of the cell. Mol Immunol, 84, 10-16.
Wang, Y., Sun, S.N., Liu, Q., Yu, Y.Y., Guo, J., Wang, K., Xing, B.C., Zheng, Q.F., Campa, M.J., Patz, E.F., Jr. et al. (2016) Autocrine Complement Inhibits IL10-Dependent T-cell-Mediated Antitumor Immunity to Promote Tumor Progression. Cancer Discov, 6, 1022-1035.
Kremlitzka, M., Nowacka, A.A., Mohlin, F.C., Bompada, P., De Marinis, Y. and Blom, A.M. (2019) Interaction of Serum-Derived and Internalized C3 With DNA in Human B Cells-A Potential Involvement in Regulation of Gene Transcription. Front Immunol, 10, 493.
Cho, M.S., Vasquez, H.G., Rupaimoole, R., Pradeep, S., Wu, S., Zand, B., Han, H.D., Rodriguez-Aguayo, C., Bottsford-Miller, J., Huang, J. et al. (2014) Autocrine effects of tumor-derived complement. Cell Rep, 6, 1085-1095.
Shu, C., Zha, H., Long, H., Wang, X., Yang, F., Gao, J., Hu, C., Zhou, L., Guo, B. and Zhu, B. (2020) C3a-C3aR signaling promotes breast cancer lung metastasis via modulating carcinoma associated fibroblasts. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 39, 11.
Boire, A., Zou, Y., Shieh, J., Macalinao, D.G., Pentsova, E. and Massagué, J. (2017) Complement Component 3 Adapts the Cerebrospinal Fluid for Leptomeningeal Metastasis. Cell, 168, 1101-1113.e1113.
Ponnusamy, L., Mahalingaiah, P.K.S. and Singh, K.P. (2020) Epigenetic reprogramming and potential application of epigenetic-modifying drugs in acquired chemotherapeutic resistance. Adv Clin Chem, 94, 219-259.
Nebbioso, A., Tambaro, F.P., Dell'Aversana, C. and Altucci, L. (2018) Cancer epigenetics: Moving forward. PLoS Genet, 14, e1007362.
Kondo, Y. (2009) Epigenetic cross-talk between DNA methylation and histone modifications in human cancers. Yonsei Med J, 50, 455-463.
Nair, S.S. and Kumar, R. (2012) Chromatin remodeling in cancer: a gateway to regulate gene transcription. Mol Oncol, 6, 611-619.
Marmorstein, R. and Trievel, R.C. (2009) Histone modifying enzymes: structures, mechanisms, and specificities. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1789, 58-68.
Gillette, T.G. and Hill, J.A. (2015) Readers, writers, and erasers: chromatin as the whiteboard of heart disease. Circ Res, 116, 1245-1253.
McDonel, P., Demmers, J., Tan, D.W., Watt, F. and Hendrich, B.D. (2012) Sin3a is essential for the genome integrity and viability of pluripotent cells. Dev Biol, 363, 62-73.
Ellison-Zelski, S.J. and Alarid, E.T. (2010) Maximum growth and survival of estrogen receptor-alpha positive breast cancer cells requires the Sin3A transcriptional repressor. Mol Cancer, 9, 263.
Kadamb, R., Mittal, S., Bansal, N., Batra, H. and Saluja, D. (2013) Sin3: insight into its transcription regulatory functions. Eur J Cell Biol, 92, 237-246.
Muñoz, I.M., MacArtney, T., Sanchez-Pulido, L., Ponting, C.P., Rocha, S. and Rouse, J. (2012) Family with sequence similarity 60A (FAM60A) protein is a cell cycle-fluctuating regulator of the SIN3-HDAC1 histone deacetylase complex. J Biol Chem, 287, 32346-32353.
Gambi, G., Di Simone, E., Basso, V., Ricci, L., Wang, R., Verma, A., Elemento, O., Ponzoni, M., Inghirami, G., Icardi, L. et al. (2019) The Transcriptional Regulator Sin3A Contributes to the Oncogenic Potential of STAT3. Cancer Res, 79, 3076-3087.
Yang, C., Wu, J., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Liu, B., Chen, X., Wu, X., Yan, D., Han, L., Liu, S. et al. (2020) Circadian Rhythm Is Disrupted by ZNF704 in Breast Carcinogenesis. Cancer Res, 80, 4114-4128.
Li, W., Zhang, Z., Liu, X., Cheng, X., Zhang, Y., Han, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Yang, J., Xu, B. et al. (2017) The FOXN3-NEAT1-SIN3A repressor complex promotes progression of hormonally responsive breast cancer. J Clin Invest, 127, 3421-3440.
Yang, Y., Huang, W., Qiu, R., Liu, R., Zeng, Y., Gao, J., Zheng, Y., Hou, Y., Wang, S., Yu, W. et al. (2018) LSD1 coordinates with the SIN3A/HDAC complex and maintains sensitivity to chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Mol Cell Biol, 10, 285-301.
Roumenina, L.T., Daugan, M.V., Petitprez, F., Sautès-Fridman, C. and Fridman, W.H. (2019) Context-dependent roles of complement in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer, 19, 698-715.
Liu, R., Chen, Y., Liu, G., Li, C., Song, Y., Cao, Z., Li, W., Hu, J., Lu, C. and Liu, Y. (2020) PI3K/AKT pathway as a key link modulates the multidrug resistance of cancers. Cell Death Dis, 11, 797.
Millard, C.J., Varma, N., Saleh, A., Morris, K., Watson, P.J., Bottrill, A.R., Fairall, L., Smith, C.J. and Schwabe, J.W. (2016) The structure of the core NuRD repression complex provides insights into its interaction with chromatin. Elife, 5, e13941.
Salvador, J.M., Brown-Clay, J.D. and Fornace, A.J., Jr. (2013) Gadd45 in stress signaling, cell cycle control, and apoptosis. Adv Exp Med Biol, 793, 1-19.
Zha, H., Wang, X., Zhu, Y., Chen, D., Han, X., Yang, F., Gao, J., Hu, C., Shu, C., Feng, Y. et al. (2019) Intracellular Activation of Complement C3 Leads to PD-L1 Antibody Treatment Resistance by Modulating Tumor-Associated Macrophages. Cancer Immunol Res, 7, 193-207.
Arbore, G., West, E.E., Spolski, R., Robertson, A.A.B., Klos, A., Rheinheimer, C., Dutow, P., Woodruff, T.M., Yu, Z.X., O'Neill, L.A. et al. (2016) T helper 1 immunity requires complement-driven NLRP3 inflammasome activity in CD4⁺ T cells. Science, 352, aad1210.
Kunz, N. and Kemper, C. (2021) Complement Has Brains-Do Intracellular Complement and Immunometabolism Cooperate in Tissue Homeostasis and Behavior? Front Immunol, 12, 629986.
Baymaz, H.I., Karemaker, I.D. and Vermeulen, M. (2015) Perspective on unraveling the versatility of 'co-repressor' complexes. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1849, 1051-1056.
Rampalli, S., Pavithra, L., Bhatt, A., Kundu, T.K. and Chattopadhyay, S. (2005) Tumor suppressor SMAR1 mediates cyclin D1 repression by recruitment of the SIN3/histone deacetylase 1 complex. Mol Cell Biol, 25, 8415-8429.
Murphy, M., Ahn, J., Walker, K.K., Hoffman, W.H., Evans, R.M., Levine, A.J. and George, D.L. (1999) Transcriptional repression by wild-type p53 utilizes histone deacetylases, mediated by interaction with mSin3a. Genes Dev, 13, 2490-2501.
Zhang, Y., Akinmade, D. and Hamburger, A.W. (2005) The ErbB3 binding protein Ebp1 interacts with Sin3A to repress E2F1 and AR-mediated transcription. Nucleic Acids Res, 33, 6024-6033.
Yoshimoto, H., Ohmae, M. and Yamashita, I. (1992) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAM2/SIN3 protein plays a role in both activation and repression of transcription. Mol Gen Genet, 233, 327-330.
De Nadal, E., Zapater, M., Alepuz, P.M., Sumoy, L., Mas, G. and Posas, F. (2004) The MAPK Hog1 recruits Rpd3 histone deacetylase to activate osmoresponsive genes. Nature, 427, 370-374.
Lin, T., Chao, C., Saito, S., Mazur, S.J., Murphy, M.E., Appella, E. and Xu, Y. (2005) p53 induces differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells by suppressing Nanog expression. Nat Cell Biol, 7, 165-171.
Baltus, G.A., Kowalski, M.P., Tutter, A.V. and Kadam, S. (2009) A positive regulatory role for the mSin3A-HDAC complex in pluripotency through Nanog and Sox2. J Biol Chem, 284, 6998-7006.
Zerbini, L.F., Wang, Y., Correa, R.G., Cho, J.Y. and Libermann, T.A. (2005) Blockage of NF-kappaB induces serine 15 phosphorylation of mutant p53 by JNK kinase in prostate cancer cells. Cell Cycle, 4, 1247-1253.
Hollander, M.C. and Fornace, A.J., Jr. (2002) Genomic instability, centrosome amplification, cell cycle checkpoints and Gadd45a. Oncogene, 21, 6228-6233.
Takekawa, M. and Saito, H. (1998) A family of stress-inducible GADD45-like proteins mediate activation of the stress-responsive MTK1/MEKK4 MAPKKK. Cell, 95, 521-530.
Ramachandran, K., Gopisetty, G., Gordian, E., Navarro, L., Hader, C., Reis, I.M., Schulz, W.A. and Singal, R. (2009) Methylation-mediated repression of GADD45alpha in prostate cancer and its role as a potential therapeutic target. Cancer Res, 69, 1527-1535.
Hirose, T., Sowa, Y., Takahashi, S., Saito, S., Yasuda, C., Shindo, N., Furuichi, K. and Sakai, T. (2003) p53-independent induction of Gadd45 by histone deacetylase inhibitor: coordinate regulation by transcription factors Oct-1 and NF-Y. Oncogene, 22, 7762-7773.
Kulkarni, H.S., Elvington, M.L., Perng, Y.C., Liszewski, M.K., Byers, D.E., Farkouh, C., Yusen, R.D., Lenschow, D.J., Brody, S.L. and Atkinson, J.P. (2019) Intracellular C3 Protects Human Airway Epithelial Cells from Stress-associated Cell Death. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 60, 144-157.

(Not answered)

Download PDF

Editorial decision: revise
27 Feb, 2023
Review #1 received at journal
13 Feb, 2023
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
25 Jan, 2023
Reviewers invited by journal
25 Jan, 2023
Submission checks completed at journal
11 Jan, 2023
First submitted to journal
10 Jan, 2023
Unknown event
09 Jan, 2023
Editor assigned by journal
08 Jan, 2023

You are reading this latest preprint version

Nuclear Complement C3b Promotes Paclitaxel Resistance by assembling the SIN3A/HDAC1/2 complex in non-small cell lung cancer

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Cell culture and treatment

Animal model

Cell proliferation and colony formation assay

Apoptosis assay

GST-pull down

Statistical analysis

Results

C3 is upregulated in PTX-resistant lung cancer cells

C3 Is Required For Ptx Resistance In Nsclc

Nuclear C3b Assembles With The Sin3a Complex In Ptx-resistant Cells

Identification Of Genome-wide Transcriptional Targets For The C3b-containing Sin3a Complex

Gadd45a Is Involved In Ptx Resistance In Nsclc Cells

Discussion

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1