After the creation of an arteriovenous connection, there is an increase in blood flow, which results in vasodilatation through upregulation of cyclooxygenase and nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells which catalyze the synthesis of prostacyclin and nitric oxide. PPIs are known to impair nitric oxide (NO) by elevating concentrations of NO synthetase inhibiters (NOSi) such as asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA) (Fig. 3),[11] which impairs nonenzymatic formation of nitric oxide [4]. Since it is well known that NO is essential for fistula maturation [8–9] (Fig. 1), we examined the possibility that PPIs may interfere with vascular access development.
Even after our analysis, it remains unclear as to the magnitude of the effect of PPIs on fistula development. It is not surprising that the chronic inflammation of an indwelling vascular hemodialysis catheter might be associated with delayed maturation and decreased NO production since NOSi are regularly used to control inflammation [12] and therefore the lack of an additional effect by PPIs might be expected. Lack of an effect in forearm fistulas may be more difficult to explain. Despite being less likely to be diabetic or have known vascular disease this location is already known to have a slower maturation rate that has been thought due to lower shear stress resulting from smaller caliber blood vessels. Perhaps, the slower maturation rates of catheter patients and forearm fistulas are not as dependent upon the production of large quantities of nitric oxide. Two previous studies have evaluated whether ADMA was associated with fistula stenosis or thrombosis and they are conflicted [13, 14]. The first study which had much lower levels of ADMA than the second demonstrated that lower levels of ADMA were associated with restenosis [13]. The second which found much higher levels measured ADMA levels at the time of fistula creation did not result in higher rates of thrombosis or stenosis in 60 patients; although the cumulative index of thrombosis was more than double in patents with above median ADMA at 200 days [14]. That number did not reach statistical significance, however. Furthermore, the time to maturation was not correlated to those levels [14]and indeed their time to maturation was over twice as long for their fastest maturation as the length of time for 100% maturation in our data for upper arm fistulas with no catheters. We evaluated a totally different association. We believe that inflammatory pathways are more important in stenosis and thrombosis, but dilatation and increased blood flow rate from NO more important in maturation. Since we found no association for the slower rates associated with forearm fistulas and catheters, we would not have been surprised that their times to maturation were unaffected by ADMA levels since their maturation times were much slower and more comparable to our patients with catheters and forearm fistulas.
Recently, PPIs have been found to be more harmful in dialysis patients than previously thought. While the vascular calcification they cause [15] may not be associated with increased access failure [16], the increased mortality associated with PPI use [17] in dialysis patients cannot be ignored. There should be further investigation into the detrimental and therapeutic effects that cannot be answered by this study.
While the study has the benefit of a single center with adequate cases, it is limited by being a retrospective ad hoc analysis of previous data. Therefore, while it appears that PPIs might be able to inhibit the rapid maturation of upper arm fistulas in patients who do not have an indwelling vascular catheter, we suggest further randomized controlled studies to determine the effect of PPIs on fistula maturation.
REQUIRED STATEMENTS:
Neither this paper nor any of the details of this study have been submitted elsewhere and it has never been under review by another journal nor has it been published previously. No author has any conflict of interest and all the authors are aware of and approve the manuscript as submitted to this journal. In Compliance with Ethical Standards: As the work was purely observational by the physicians following the patients after renal failure began and no treatment intervention was either given or withheld by the observers, no other approval was necessary