Fungal and bacterial strains and insects
Wild type Beauveria bassiana strain Bb2860 (CGMCC 7.34) and its derived genetically modified strains were routinely cultured as described previously (He et al., 2015). Pichia pastoris GS115 (Invitrogen, USA) was used for expression of BbRNT2 and BbTrv and their mutated proteins as described previously (Lu et al., 2021). Escherichia coli DH5ɑ and Agrobacterium tumefaciens were employed for DNA manipulations and fungal transformations, respectively.
Silkworm (Bombyx mori) larvae were used for preparation of insect hemolymph and cuticle extracts as described previously (Deng et al., 2022). Last-instar larvae of Galleria mellonella, were used for bioassay and investigation of insect immune response. The G. mellonella hemocytes cultured in Schneider’s Insect Medium (Sigma, UK) and Spodoptera frugiperda ovarian epithelial cells, sf9 cells cultured in cultured in Sf-900™ II SFM medium (Invitrogen, USA), were used for examination of cytotoxicity.
Molecular Manipulation
All the primers used for gene manipulation are listed in Table S1. Single gene (BbRNT2 or BbTrv) disruption was performed using the herbicide phosphinothricin resistance bar gene with homologous recombination as described previously (He et al., 2015). For disruption of double genes, the BbTrv homologous recombination cassette was generated using the herbicide sulfonylurea resistance sur gene based on pK2-sur (Wang et al., 2018), which was introduced into the BbRNT2 disruption strain (ΔBbRNT2) using A. tumefaciens-mediated method (Ma et al., 2009). To reverse complement the single gene disrupted mutants, wild type genes, BbRNT2 and BbTrv, were separately cloned into the pK2-sur vector, which was then introduced into their gene disruption mutants, ΔBbRNT2 and ΔBbTrv.
For overexpression of the genes, cDNAs of BbRNT2 and BbTrv were cloned into pBARGPE1 under the control of Aspergillus nidulans gpd promoter, PgpdA. The resultant vectors were separately transformed into B. bassiana wild type strain as described previously (Ying and Feng, 2006), generating BbRNT2OE and BbTrvOE strains. To simultaneously overexpress the two genes, the Pgpd::BbTrv::trpC element was amplified from the BbTrvOE vector and inserted into pK2-sur, which was introduced into BbRNT2OE strain as described previously (Ma et al., 2009), forming the DOE strain.
To detect BbRNT2 and BbTrv expression, eGFP was separately fused to the promoters of the two genes. Briefly, the promoter sequences (855 bp for BbRNT2 and 1940 bp for BbTrv) were amplified with the primers shown in Table S1 and inserted into pK2surPB3-GFP (Lu et al., 2021) to replace the PB3 promoter. To examine protein distribution in fungal cells, eGFP was fused to the 3'-end of the gene. Briefly, the full genes of BbRNT2 and BbTrv were separately amplified using the primers (Table S1) and cloned into pK2surPB3-GFP to replace the PB3 promoter. All the resultant vectors were separately introduced into B. bassiana wild type strain using the A. tumefaciens-mediated method (Ma et al., 2009).
All the transformants were selected using the phosphinothricin (bar) or/and sulfonylurea (sur) resistance markers (Lu et al., 2021) and then verified using PCR, RT-PCR (gene disruption and reverse complement strains) or RT-qPCR (overexpression strains).
Rt-pcr, Rt-qpcr And Blotting
RT-PCR and RT-qPCR were performed as described previously (Lu et al., 2021). Loss or restoration of gene transcription in the target gene disruption mutants or its complementation strains was verified using RT-PCR analysis from 1/4 SDY cultures for 48 h at 26°C with 18S rRNA (BBA_07911) as a reference gene. RT-qPCR was used to evaluate transcription patterns of BbRNT2 and BbTrv in the wild type and overexpression strains, which was performed using a quantitative real-time PCR kit (Bio-Rad, CA) and 18S rRNA as the reference gene for normalization of candidate gene expression levels as described previously (Luo et al., 2012; He et al., 2015). Transcription patterns of BbRNT2 and BbTrv in the wild type strain under different nutrient and oxidative stress conditions were evaluated as described previously (Lu et al., 2021). Transcription levels in the overexpression strains as compared to the wild type strain were detected from 1/4 SDY cultures for 72 h at 26°C. Primer sequences for all the genes examined are given in Table S1.
Western blotting analysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Clarity Max Western ECL Substrate; Bio-Rad, Philadelphia, PA) and routine methods as described previously (Lu et al., 2021). Relative amount of the proteins was measured by densitometric analyses of bands using the ImageJ software (Jensen, 2013).
Yeast–expression And Enzyme Assays
BbRNT2, BbTrv and their active site-mutated proteins were expressed in P. pastoris GS115 as described previously (Lu et al., 2021; Deng et al., 2022). To generate mutated proteins, primers were designed to introduce the mutated sites, in which the active sites 89H (histidine), 92W (tryptophan), 169H (histidine), 170E (glutamic acid), 73K (lysine) and 174H (histidine) in BbRNT2 and 69H (histidine), 72W (tryptophan), 126H (histidine), 127E (glutamic acid), 130K (lysine) and 131H (histidine) in BbTrv were all mutated to A (alanine). Briefly, cDNA fragments of BbRNT2 were separately amplified with the primer pairs BbRNT2-F1/R1, BbRNT2-F2/R2 and BbRNT2-F3/R3, and then fused together by overlap PCR, termed iBbRNT2. Similarly, cDNA fragments of BbTrv were amplified with the primer pairs BbTrv-F1/R1, BbTrv-F2/R2 and BbTrv-F3/R3, and then fused by overlap PCR, and designated iBbTrv. All the primers are shown in Table S1.
The expressed proteins were purified using a MagneHis Protein Purification System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein concentrations were determined using BCA kits (Generay Biotech, China). Ribonuclease activities of the proteins were assayed using total RNA from G. mellonella larvae and B. bassiana. Briefly, 1 µg of RNA was dissolved in 18 µL 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.0) and reacted at 37oC for 30 min after addition of 2 µL 2 mg/mL protein. The reaction mixture was separated in 1% agarose gel, and stained with 1/10000 (v/v) Gelred (Biomed, China) and viewed under a Gel imager as described previously (Ke et al., 2017).
Insect Bioassays And Detection Of The Immune Response
Insect bioassays were performed using last-instar larvae of G. mellonella via two methods as described previously (Zhao et al., 2019): 1) inoculation via the larval cuticle (natural route of infection) by spraying 1 mL conidia suspension (5×107 spores/ mL); 2) injection of 2 µL conidia suspensions (5×107 spores/ mL) via the second proleg (by-passing the cuticle). The controls in both assays were treated with 0.05% (v/v) Tween-80. Mortality was recorded every 12 h for assay 1) and 6 h for assay 2). Each treatment was performed with three replicates of 30 insects each, and the experiments were repeated thrice.
To detect the immune response after inoculation, blackened nodules on the cuticle were observed and counted after inoculation. Moreover, infected larvae were bled to examine the interaction of fungal cells and hemocytes. The numbers of fungal cells (hyphal bodies) and hemocytes were counted.
Assays For Cytotoxicity Against Insect Cells
Insect hemocytes were collected from the blood of healthy G. mellonella larvae after surface sterilization by immersion in 75% ethanol for 5 min. Hemocytes were immediately harvested in 200 µL Schneider’s insect medium (Sigma, UK) containing 0.6 mg/mL L-cysteine and cultured at 28°C. Hemocytes were sampled for observation under a microscope at intervals of 15 min after addition of the expressed proteins at a final concentration of 34 µg/mL. Alternatively, S. frugiperda sf9 cells cultured in Sf-900™ II SFM medium (Invitrogen, USA) were adjusted to 0.4×106 cells/mL and used for assessment of cytotoxicity of yeast-expressed BbRNT2 and BbTrv at a final concentration of 34 µg/mL. Cells treated with 0.1 M PBS (pH 8.0) at the same volume were used as controls.
Cell viability was assayed using a Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8, Sangon Biotech, China) that uses a water-soluble tetrazolium salt to quantify the number of live cells by producing an orange formazan dye upon bio-reduction in the presence of an electron carrier. Briefly, 5×104 cells/mL cells were treated with protein at a final concentration of 34 µg/mL. At intervals of 15 min, 100 µL cells were sampled and labeled using 10 µL CCK-8 solution, and were immediately used to test absorbance at 450 nm using a microplate reader. Cells treated with 1× PBS were used for controls. Cell viability was calculated by the following formula: At/Ac ×100, where At and Ac were the absorbance values of protein-treated cells and controls, respectively. The experiments were repeated three times.
Assays for phenoloxidase (PO) activities, reactive oxygen species (ROS), nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and lysozyme activities
Insect phenoloxidase (PO) activity weas assayed according to a method described previously (Yang et al., 2014). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) in haemolymph were evaluated by examination of H2O2 levels using a Hydrogen Peroxide Colorimetric/Fluorometric Assay Kit (BioVision, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions as described previously (Pan et al., 2012). Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity was measured using a T-NOS assay kit (Njjcbio, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Lysozyme activity was assayed using the fluorogenic substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-N, N’, N”-tetraacetylchitotriose as described previously (Fruttero et al., 2016). The reaction mixture was assayed at 355 and 460 nm as the respective excitation and emission wavelengths using a plate reader, respectively. Enzyme activity was expressed as relative fluorescence units (RFU)/µg protein/20 min.
Data analysis
The survival data in insect bioassays were plotted as Kaplan–Meyer curves, and a log-rank test was used to analyze the differences between groups. The median lethal time (LT50) was calculated using SPSS 17.0. The differences between two groups and between more than two groups were tested using the Student’s t test (t-test) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVAs) with a subsequent LSD test, respectively. All data are shown as the results obtained from three independent experiments with standard deviations (SD) of the mean. The values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.