in our study, 80% of studied patients had ED which Almost agrees with Huyghe et al., 2009 who found ED prevalence was 76% in End-stage liver disease candidates for liver transplantation 9.
Explanation of high frequency of ED in the cirrhotic patient may be due to lower metabolic clearance rates, lower total and free levels of testosterone, reduced testosterone responses to human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation, higher estradiol levels, higher luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels and higher binding capacities of sex steroid binding globulin10.
while Jagdish et al., 2022 had the nearer result as in this study, 72.3% of men with cirrhosis had ED 3. This variation in the reported prevalence of ED is likely due to differences in the assessment tools used and differences in the severity of cirrhosis. But the prevalence of ED is higher than the result of Kim et al where the prevalence of ED was found to be 41.2% in his study 11.
This difference is probably due to the patient selection criteria used for the evaluation of ED in these studies. In his study, patients were relatively young, all patients were in stable chronic disease status and all cirrhotic patients were at the compensated stage without deteriorating their hormonal or physical status.
Frequency and severity of ED according to Child Classification of cirrhotic patients included in the study revealed that patients of child C complained of ED more than child A with increased severity of ED in patients of child C more than child A. 55(61.1%) patients of child A have ED & 20(22.2%) patients have severe ED. Where 65(92.9%) patients of child C have ED & 40(57.1%) patients have severe ED, these results are in agreement with Huyghe et al., 2009 9.
This may be due to changes in sex hormones, malnutrition, and the use of drugs such as diuretics and nonselective beta-blockers 4.
Results of penile Doppler in our study revealed that normal penile Doppler in 160 (80.0%) patients & venous leakage in 40 (20.0%) patients and the relation between penile Doppler results and Child classification of cirrhotic patients revealed that patients with child A have normal penile Doppler in 70(77.8%) patients & Venous leakage in 20(22.2%); patients with child B have normal penile Doppler in 40(100.0%) patients & Venous leakage in 0(0.0%); patients with child C have normal penile Doppler in 50(71.4%) patients & Venous leakage in 20(28.6%). Which is statistically significant as a P-value (<0.001 S).
To our knowledge, there is no reported paper revealing the relation between liver cirrhosis and venous leakage on penile Doppler. In this study, there is 40 (20.0%) patients have venous leakage which may be accidental and as there is 160 (80.0%) patients have normal penile Doppler and so these results support our conclusion that liver cirrhosis is the cause of ED in this patient.
Another notable result is the relationship between the etiology of cirrhosis and ED our study shows that patients with liver cirrhosis due to HBV have ED (57.1%) these results agree with the study of Kim et al where the prevalence of HBV-related Liver Cirrhosis was (36.7%)11 but Kim et al had smaller sample size than our study.
Also, patients who had HCV-related Liver cirrhosis had significantly Higher ED which was (86.2%) but Fábregas et al showed significant sexual dysfunction but with a lesser percentage (45.1%) 12 which may be due to patient selection criteria used for the evaluation of ED. In his study, patients were relatively young, and our study had a larger sample size.
Also, our study showed a positive relationship between age and ED and the Age group (44-55) had a significantly higher prevalence of ED. This result was agreed with Maimone et al who concluded that Patients with ED were significantly older than those without ED (p.value = 0.006)13
The explanation for this result is morphologic and physiologic mechanisms that are involved in the aging process play a key role in the development of sexual dysfunction in the absence of any other clinical or medical condition. Also, a meta-analysis done by Yoo et al concluded that Patients with ED were 5.8 years older (p < 0.001)14.
On contrary Kim et al concluded that age is not a risk factor for ED in cirrhotic patients11 but they had a smaller sample size.
As regards predictors of ED, multivariant logistic regression showed that Age group (44-55) years, Albumin less than 2.8 g/dl, INR range (1.7-2.2), Hemoglobin level more than 16g/dl and Chid C can predict ED. The explanation of patients with Hb >16 g/dl having ED may be due to increased hemoglobin levels associated with sluggish blood flow.
Limitation: The limitations of our study are: A relatively small number of the study population, a single center and a lack of controls chosen from the general population without liver disease.