Evaluation of antiparasitic therapy directly administered for the control of canine echinococcosis in an endemic area of hydatidosis.

Background: Echinococcosis remains endemic despite attempts to reduce the prevalence of this disease. The objective of the study was to evaluate the results of an intervention program based on antiparasitic therapy directly administered to the dogs for the control of Echinococcus in an endemic area of cystic echinococcosis (CE). Methods: The dog faeces were analyzed by coproantigen using the immunoenzymatic technique for the diagnosis of echinococcosis before and after the direct and observed administration of praziquantel 5mg by kg orally in three doses every 30 days each cycle was 2 times at year for two consecutive years. Results: A total of 252 dogs entered the study, of them 119 (47%) dogs had positive results for Echinococcus at the beginning of the intervention. The adverse effects that occurred with the administration of prazicuantel were vomiting (13%), diarrhea (2.4%) and lethargy (2%); 229 dogs completed the 4 cycles of praziquantel treatment. The presence of a positive coproantigen was evident in 03 (1.3%) dogs at the end of the study. Conclusions: Antiparasitic chemotherapy administered directly to the dogs periodically managed to reduce the prevalence of canine echinococcosis.


Background
Echinococcus granulosus is the parasitic agent that causes CE, it is found in the small intestine of its de nitive host, dog, which can eliminate up to a quarter of a million eggs during all his life [1][2], When cattle feed on these contaminated meadows, they have high probability of becoming infected, the eggs enters orally and becomes they break in the stomach releasing the oncosphere which migrates to the mainly viscera tissues where they develop cystically and the dog is infected again when ingested raw viscera of infected sheep, the human accidentally becomes infected by ingesting the eggs released by parasitized dogs [3][4][5]. Echinococcosis is common among people living in poor sanitary conditions in developing countries.
In Peru, the practice of sacri cing adult sheep for domestic consumption and allowing dogs to feed on infected viscera generates the ideal conditions for the persistence of this disease [6][7]. In some rural areas the prevalence of infection can reach up to 50% [8].
Some programs that attempted to control canine echinococcosis with the massive administration of praziquantel have been able to reduce the prevalence of CE from 22.1 per 100,000 to 6.2 per 100,000, with persistence of high transmission rates in some focal areas [9][10], while others studies have obtained little encouraging results, because it has not been possible to raise awareness about the need for canine prophylaxis and the lack of permanent control programs [11][12][13][14] The objective of the study was to evaluate the results of an intervention program based on antiparasitic therapy directly administered for the control of canine Echinococcosis in an endemic area of CE.

Results
A total 252 were analyzed before administering the antiparasitic, 119 (47%) dogs presented positive results to Echinococcus in the stool sample by coproantigen study, while 133 (53%) dogs showed negative results for the coproantigen study. The other parasitic found with the microscopic examination of the feces, at the beginning of the study, were Toxocara canis, Balantidium coli, Entamoeba coli, Blastocystis hominis, Endolimax nana, Entamoeba coli, giardia canis, Taenia spp eggs, Fasciola hepática, Urbanorum spp, Dipylidium caninum, Ancylostoma; 9 out of 10 dogs had at least one parasite.
The average age of the dogs was 33 months, the male sex was the most frequent representing 72% of the dogs; the number of dogs chosen was related to the proportion of inhabitants in each community; overall, the average number of dogs per home was 2.4; this being higher average in the houses of infected dogs (2.5) compared to non-infected dogs whose average number of dogs per house was 2.2 (p = 0.0025).
The dogs coming from the street or homeless were 21 (8.3%), of which 17 (80.9%) dogs presented positive results to the coproantigen study (p = 0.001), the owned dogs were 231 (91.7%), of them 102 (44.2%) presented positive results to the study of the coproantigen for Echinococcus granulosus (Table  1).
Overall, 73 dogs (29%) had ever received antiparasitic treatment in the last year, of which 27 (36.9%) dogs had a positive result for infection with Echinococcosis; It is characteristic in these rural areas that dogs share their home with sheep raising, it was found that 79 (31%) dogs live together with sheep.
The treatment administered was independent of the result of the coproantigen test obtained, all dogs received 02 cycles of antiparasitic treatment with praziquantel per year for two consecutive years, each cycle was composed of 03 doses with a difference of 30 days between each dose. There were reported complications : 13 (5.2%) dogs had vomiting after receiving the antiparasitic, 6 (2.4%) dogs had diarrhea, 5 (2%) had drowsiness or lethargy, however, the most severe complication was the death of 02 (0.8%) dogs after 7 days of the rst dose, these dogs came from the same house, it is very di cult to associate this death of dogs with the Praziquantel.
During the follow-up, some dogs left the study because they died (2 dogs), the owners moved to another community (4 dogs), the owners refused to continue the study (3 dogs), the owner or dog was not found by more than two months (6 dogs) and some street dogs ceased to be seen (8 dogs).
After two years, 229 dogs completed the 4 cycles of the administration of praziquantel, subsequently they were evaluated by studying stool samples to verify the presence of Echinococcus infection, the procedure was performed in the same way as before program intervention. Of the 229 samples analyzed, 03 (1.3%) dogs presented positive coproantigene after direct antiparasitic intervention, these 03 infected dogs were street dogs, 02 came from Usibamba and one from Chaquicocha (Table 2).

Discussion
Direct administration ensured the correct dose and frequency or administer a second dose in case of vomiting to ensure compliance with antiparasitic treatment, because our objective was to evaluate the results of an intervention program based on antiparasitic therapy directly administered for control of canine Echinococcosis. The initial prevalence of 47% was evidenced and after the intervention, two years later, the prevalence was reduced to 1.3% in the two rural communities. Increasing continuous cycles of canine deworming with praziquantel ensures a decrease in the prevalence of Echinococcus reinfection after two years of intervention.
CE is still considered as an unattended zoonotic disease with great economic impact in rural areas (17) and in communities with cold weather that favors the viability of Echinococcus eggs in the environment for several months [18][19].
In some countries it is considered a reemerging disease, because it is very di cult to control or eliminate, mainly in more remote areas and di cult to access. Massive treatment with praziquantel has proven effective in some countries and in others not so much due to the different schemes they use, noncompliance with doses, non-supervision of medication administration, non-permanent and non-periodic programs. Many of these programs are costly in nancial terms, but bene cial in terms of disease expenses, but poorly assessed in relation to impact [20][21][22].
Praziquantel is effective in the treatment of echinococcosis, reduces the burden of infection in dogs and indirectly in sheep, but does not protect against future reinfections if the treatment is not continuous and cyclic, so it can explain the poor decrease in prevalence in places where short deworming and the schemes are prophylactic and discontinuous.
The use of praziquantel as preventive chemotherapy, that is to say to administer periodic treatment in populations at risk, is approved by the World Health Organization to reduce the disease burden of some pathology such as schistosomiasis, whose objective is to prevent infected hosts from developing the chronic disease and cure mild symptoms [23][24][25]. Although reinfection can occur after treatment, it is still considered the main effective measure in the ght against echinococcosis.
Praziquantel is the treatment of choice against Echinococcus, it seems to be a safe medication with good tolerance levels, safety, easy to administer but with little effect on young stages of parasites, with some adverse effects evidenced in the study as vomiting, diarrhea and lethargy that were self-limited [26][27]; However, the e cacy of praziquantel depends on the host's immune response, and the severity of side effects may increase in hyperinfested dogs after administration of the antiparasitic causing a severe in ammatory response [28], this may explain the death of two dogs that they received praziquantel at the rst dose.
Attempts to eliminate canine echinococcosis take years because effective control has not been achieved, however in some countries they have been reduced to undetectable levels thanks to the sustained effort of programs based on continuous deworming.
Some limitations found in the study is that the positive coproantigen test may be higher than reported because this test does not usually detect low parasite loads in the stool [29], however to compare the response to the antiparasitic was used the same test before and after administration of praziquantel.
The advantages of this intervention study is that infection surveillance in dogs is non-invasive through the stool samples collected from the ground (30). This control program was only applied in two communities and we do not have data to evaluate the gradual response in time after the two years of intervention, because the study ended, the application of the program being necessary on longer and more sustained time scales to evaluate response and reinfection rates.

Conclusions
Antiparasitic chemotherapy administered directly to the dogs periodically and sustainably managed to reduce the prevalence of canine echinococcosis and is considered the main effective measure. There is not su cient information about the number of dogs that living in the study area to evaluate the sample size, it was calculated on an unknown population with an expected prevalence of 28% of dogs infested with E. granulosus in endemic areas [15], 95% as a con dence interval, power of 80% and adding 10% for probable losses. The sample tested was 260 stool samples, using the proportions method with the statistical program Stata v. 13.1 (Stata Corporation, Texas, USA).

Methods
Procedures: An epidemiological study of canine echinococcosis was performed. Before the intervention, the houses were chosen at random according to the proportion of inhabitants of each community and each street, with the support of the demographic survey of the municipality of San José de Quero, on satellite images and on the map geographical. To implement the random allocation sequence, the houses were previously numbered and the odd numbers were chosen, these numbers were generated by the research group were not blinded. All the dogs present in each house were sampled, if the occupants of a house were absent, refused to participate in the study or had no dog, we selected a neighboring house and asked about the presence or absence of dogs. The process was continued until the sample size was completed.
Prior informed consent to the owners, the information was collected by means of a structured and validated form, as well as the measures of prevention of CE, a lea et containing information on the importance of deworming was given and obtained samples of Fresh feces, maintaining the biosecurity measures, the samples were deposited in a bottle with 10% formalin and kept refrigerated at 4 ° C, then transported to the microbiology laboratory of the Institute of Tropical Medicine -University National Mayor of San Marcos for microscopic identi cation. Samples of fresh feces were also collected from the elds and from the main square of the annexes in order to compare the results microbiologically.
For the microscopic examination of faecal samples preserved in 10% formalin, select the direct method that consists of dissolving the sample well, keeping it at rest for 5 minutes and with the help of a Pasteur pipette, take a drop from the bottom and place it in a slide, protected with a coverslip and observe under a microscope at a magni cation of 10 and 40. The objective of this procedure was to identify the presence of other parasites.
For the diagnosis of echinococcosis, analyze stool samples from the dogs by using coproantigen analysis, using the commercial immunoenzymatic technique (ELISA) for E. granulosus (Cestodas Zoonoses Research Group, University of Salford). The plates were read at 490 nm +-3 standard deviations with a kinetic microplate reader. Two positive and two negative controls are used per plate [16]. The same stool sample was used for both techniques.

Intervention
Due to the unevenness of the work area surface, an electronic foot scale was used to calculate the dog's weight, the owner loaded the dog to the scale, then subtracted the difference from the owner's weight to obtain the dog's weight. For stray dogs, the weight of the dogs was calculated approximately according to external characteristics.
The dogs received 4 cycles of treatment, with an interval of 6 months between each cycle, in each cycle they received three doses of praziquantel, one per month. The rst cycle of treatment started in July 2014, the second cycle started in April 2015, the third cycle started in January 2017, and the last cycle started in October 2017. Dog feces samples were collected at the beginning of the rst cycle and at the end of the fourth cycle of treatment.
Praziquantel 5 mg / kg was administered orally to dogs every 30 days for three consecutive months, every 6 months for two years, the dogs received 12 doses in 2 years. The Stray dogs found in parks were also dewormed, praziquantel was combined with bread or chicken, stray dogs received a dose and frequency similar to other dogs, a photograph was selected in each deworming process to identify the dog. The administration of the medication went directly to the dog and under supervision, the medication was not delivered to the owner or to the health facility.
At each home visit, messages on EC prevention and the delivery of informational materials were reinforced, an antiparasitic card was also given to the owner and marked every time the dog received antiparasitic treatment, in the same way that it was obtained Information on the adverse effects presented by the dog When the owner was not found, we visited him the next day until we were able to deworm the dogs.
After two years, in December 2017, we collected the stool samples again in the same way as before the intervention and transported them to the microbiology laboratory to identify the parasite.

Statistical analysis
Microsoft Excel for Windows was utilized for double data entry process. STATA version 12.0 for Windows (STATA Corp, College Station, TX, US) was used for analysis. Initially, a description of demographic characteristics was tabulated according to general characteristics of the dogs before the intervention. Categorical variables were compared using Chi squared or Fisher's exact test as appropriate, whereas numerical variables were compared using the Student's t test. In addition, mean of quantitative variables such as dog age and number of dogs per house, were calculated for each group according to the positive or negative Echinococcus result.

Supplementary Files
This is a list of supplementary les associated with this preprint. Click to download. CONSORT2010Checklist.doc