The median recent CD4+ T-cell count of the study participants was showed an increment by 166 cells/µl, reaching to 388 cells/µl. The median change in CD4+ T-cell count of this study was higher compared to the studies in Nigeria and Ethiopia (Jigiga) [17, 24], and lower than compared to other study findings done elsewhere [14.19]. Thought 56% of the study participants with baseline CD4+ T-cell count < 200 cells/µl were restored the CD4+ T-cells count to ≥ 200 cells/µl after at least 6 months of ART initiation, none of them were reached ≥ 500 cells/µl, which is consistent with reports elsewhere [8, 25–27]. In contrast, a retrospective study reported that 28.4% individuals with CD4 count < 200 cells/µl at baseline raised to 500 cells/µl or greater in long term ART follow up [19]. The different might be explained due to variation in the duration of ART follow up. Inadequate CD4+ T-cells restoration may possibly associate with increased intrinsic CD4+ T-cell depletion, thymic and lymphoid differentiation dysfunction of HIV infected individuals.
Immunological failure was characterized by persistent low CD4+ T-cell count < 100 cells/µl after ART initiation [3, 9]. In this study, the median CD4+ T-cell count of the individuals categorized under the immunological failure was 65(IQR: 53–88) cells/µl. However, after the ART initiation, the proportion of HIV positive individuals with CD4 cell count < 100 cells/µl in two or more consecutive measurements was drastically reduced by 96% after ART administration, which was consistent with other studies conducted in Ethiopia [19, 28]. On the other side, our result is higher compared to the other studies [29, 30]. The difference might be due to variation in immunological status of the study participants and ART follow up duration. Moreover, various studies underlined that low CD4+ T-cells count before ART initiation was the most determinant predictor for immunological failure among HIV patients [18]. In addition, one of the possible reasons for poor immune recovery during ART could due to the persistent CD4+ T cells cytolysis as a consequence of residual viral replication [31].
At 6 months of ART follow up, the median CD4+ T-cell count was 319 cells/µl, raised on average by 69 cells/µl from the baseline and this was similar with other studies [23]. By 12 months of ART follow up, the median CD4+ T-cell count was steadily reached to 403 cells/µl which is increased by 153 cells/µl from the baseline count. Moreover, by the 48, 49 months and onward of ART follow up, the median CD4+ T-cell count was 427 and 436 cells/µl respectively which is implied a continuous increment of the CD4+ T-cell count following ART initiation, which is consistent with other similar studies [10, 15, 25].
Comparing to the other age groups, age group 25–34 years were more likely recover their CD4+ T-cells after ART combination therapy, P = 0.001. This is indicated that HIV infected individuals at younger age groups have more possibility for the rapid recovery of CD4+ T-cells compared to the older age groups in post ART initiation time. This is comparable with other studies in Zimbabwe, Uganda, Ethiopia, France and Australia [14, 15, 19, 32, 33]. Other studies were also demonstrated that the younger age group who had a baseline CD4+ T-cell count < 500 cells/µl have shown rapid recovery and longer life expectancy comparable to these having > 500 cells/ µl[5, 18]. Moreover, studies in China indicated that patients who were started ART at younger age were more likely to achieve their optimum immune recovery compared to the older age groups [16, 26]. Other similar studies were also suggested that CD4+ T-cell count gain was slower with increasing age during the ART initiation time [31, 34–36]. In contrast, other studies reported that the younger age of HIV infected individuals were less likely regain immune reconstitution than the older age groups (50 years or greater) following ART administration [37, 38].
HIV infected individuals having a baseline CD4+ T-cell count ≥ 200 cells/µl were more likely increased their CD4+ T-cells, above 350 cells/µl, compared to those with a baseline CD4+ T-cell count < 200 cells/µl following ART initiation, P = 0.001. A long prospective cohort study suggested that ART treated individuals with CD4 cell count ≥ 200 cells/µl at ART initiation demonstrated a greater tendency to recover CD4+ T-cells faster than those who had a normalized CD4+ T-cells count [8, 25, 39–41]. A systematic review study reported that individuals with CD4 T cell count, at baseline, ≥ 350 cells/µl had a greater likelihood of immune recovery after ART administration, reducing the chance to progression to AIDS or death [42]. Moreover, similar studies finding indicated that individuals with higher pre-ART CD4+ T-cell count have shown optimum immune reconstitution following ART initiation [15, 16, 26, 33, 43–45]. Besides, evidence also indicated that earlier initiation of ART is the best opportunity for CD4 + T-cell recovery, and immune system preservation which decreased CD4 + T-cell depletion, lower rate of AIDS events or opportunistic infections, and higher capacity for the reconstitution of the immune system in general [22]. In contrast, some studies suggested that HIV patients with low pre-ART CD4+ T-cell count indicated a rapid CD4+ T-cell recovery, and higher long term mean CD4+ T-cells in post-ART [11, 14, 30, 35]. Unlike the above findings, few studies indicated that the baseline CD4+ T-cell count have no significant association with immune recovery following ART administration [27,51]. The variation might be due to the difference in duration of ART initiation time (early Vs late), lower rate of AIDS events, and higher rate of immune reconstitution system compared to among patients with low CD4 T-cell at ART initiation [18]. Though, the variation of the findings need further well-designed prospective study, majority of the studies reported that the higher CD4+ T-cell count at baseline, the greater is the ART impact on CD4+ T-cell recovery [13, 19, 24, 30, 46, 47].
The CD4+ T-cell count is more likely increased by 12 months of follow up compared to those on the first 6 months of ART initiation, P = 0.017. In line with this, a number of retrospective longitudinal studies demonstrated there were a rapid CD4+ T-cell recovery in the first one year of ART initiation [15, 29, 37]. Another finding also indicated that CD4+ T-cell recovery was steady increased by 12 months, and continually increased thereafter until it was reached to a plateau for optimal immune restoration following ART administration [21]. Similarly, the CD4 T-cells recovery was very optimal after 48 months, 49 months and onwards of ART initiation.
This is indicated a sustained increase in CD4+ T-cell count throughout their ART follow ups. Moreover, prospective cohort studies in London and South Africa have shown consistent findings on immune reconstitution characterized by increased CD4+ T-cells throughout their months of ART follow up [10, 25]. An observational cohort studies conducted in China and Ethiopia (Gondar University hospital) shown that HIV patients on ART for longer time have shown optimum immune recovery [10, 16, 22, 25, 41, 43, 48]. Besides, many study findings also described as the length of ART follow up time increases the CD4+ T-cell count is also continually increased until it reached a plateau or threshold, which is consistent with our study [38, 44, 45, 47, 48].
These HIV patient on 1st line ART drug combination, TDF-3CT-Efv, were more likely to restore their CD4+ T-cell levels compared to those on other 1st line drug categories, P = 0.003, which comparable to reports from Australia and Ethiopia [15, 43]. Moreover, studies conducted in Zambia, Ghana and China also indicated that HIV infected individuals took tenofovir based ART combination regimen were experienced higher level of CD4+ T-cell restoration than on Zidovudine regimen [343, 37, 47]. Similarly, TDF based ART regimen is the preferable ART regimen for optimal viral suppression, rapid CD4+ T cell recovery and continual improvement of the depleted CD4+ T-cells following long term AR duration [49, 50]. A contradicting report on the other side demonstrated that a TDF based ART regimen did not indicate a significant impact on immune reconstitution compared to the other ART regimens [48]. The difference might be attributed to the duration of time on ART, and immunological status of patients during ART initiation though it needs a well-designed prospective study. None of the variables like sex, residence, marital status occupation and educational status have shown statistical significant association for CD4+ T cell recovery following ART uptake. The limitation of this study is lacking to describe the clinical HIV/AIDS stage and virological status of the patients at baseline and after ART administration.