Tackling fungal diversity in lichen symbioses: molecular and morphological data recognize new lineages in Chaetothyriales (Eurotiomycetes, Ascomycota)

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2471374/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Tackling fungal diversity in lichen symbioses: molecular and morphological data recognize new lineages in Chaetothyriales (Eurotiomycetes, Ascomycota)

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2471374/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 13 Jul, 2023

Read the published version in Mycological Progress →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Lichens have been reappraised as self-sustaining and long-living ecosystems in which a multiplicity of microorganisms are housed, in addition to the main symbiotic partners. Lichen-associated microfungi can frequently occur cryptically, and their species diversity has recently been more fully elucidated by DNA metabarcoding studies and culture isolations. These lichen-associated fungi represent a wide array of major lineages in Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes, including both filamentous and yeast species. Thanks to culture isolations, the morphology of a subset of the lichen-associated microfungal diversity has been studied. Metabarcoding analyses have shown high diversity of ascomycetous lichen-associated fungi in the two cosmopolitan rock-inhabiting lichens – Rhizoplaca melanophthalma and Tephromela atra – and many of these taxa were successfully isolated in culture. Based on DNA sequence data and morphological analyses, two new lineages within Chaetothyriales are here recognized. Both occur in lichens from dry habitats and are described here as the new species Cladophialophora endolichena Cometto, de Hoog, Muggia and Paracaldophialophora lichenicola Cometto, de Hoog, Muggia. Other strains are placed in Pleostigmataceae, Trichomeriaceae, Pleosporales, Mycosphaerellales, Coniochaetales and Hypocreales, further filling gaps of knowledge of the high fungal diversity residing in lichen thalli.

Cladophialophora

Dothideomycetes

Herpotrichiellaceae

phylogeny

Paracladophyalophora

Sordariomycetes

Lichens have evolved as a life form that develops a particular housing morphology through the interactions of a biotrophic fungus – the mycobiont – with one or more phototrophic organisms – the photobiont (Hawksworth and Honegger 1994). However, in contrast to a simple partnership between the myco- and photobionts, lichens have been reappraised as self-sustaining and long living ecosystems (Hawksworth and Grube 2020), in which a multiplicity of other microorganisms – including other filamentous and yeast microfungi, microalgae and bacteria – are housed (Grube et al. 2009, 2015; Moya et al. 2017; Fernández-Mendoza et al. 2017; Banchi et al. 2018; Molins et al. 2018; Muggia and Grube 2018). The potential functional roles of these complementary microorganisms are a widely discussed subject of research, and they have not been clarified yet (e.g., Grube et al. 2009, 2015; Moya et al. 2017; Molins et al. 2018; Muggia and Grube 2018; Spribille 2018; Hawksworth and Grube 2020). Furthermore, the overall diversity of these lichen inhabitants/co-symbionts is still largely unknown. Ongoing research has shed light on the geographic and, only in part, ecological distributions of certain groups of microfungi and microalgae associated to lichens (Wang et al. 2016; Williams et al. 2017).

Microfungi identified in/on lichen symbioses were initially discovered in the early 19th century and have been the focus of a wide range of studies. They are commonly known as “lichenicolous fungi” for over a century, and more than 2300 species are formally recognized (Diederich et al. 2018). These lichen-associated microfungi are mainly represented by Ascomycetes (95%), while only a small fraction appears to be basidiomycetous (Diederich 1996; Lawrey et al. 2007). Lichenicolous fungi usually develop symptoms of infections on their host lichen thalli, but some are asymptomatic, occurring mostly as resting spores or hyphal fragments in other lichen species (Arnold et al. 2009; U’Ren et al. 2010, 2012, 2014; Muggia et al. 2016, 2017; Fernández-Mendoza et al. 2017; Banchi et al. 2018; Hafellner 2018). Also, most of the symptomatically occurring lichenicolous fungi show some level of host-specificity – and sometimes even dependency, on the lichen host (Lawrey and Diederich 2003; Hafellner 2018). In contrast, the specificity observed for the lichenicolous fungi, has been shown in only a few cases for some of the cryptically occurring taxa (Smith et al. 2020). Furthermore, some studies have shown that certain abiotic factors, such as climate (U’Ren et al. 2012), seasonality, light exposure (Beck et al. 2014), altitude (Wang et al. 2016) and geographic distance (Zhang et al. 2015) may be crucial in shaping the lichenicolous fungal diversity of lichen thalli (Harutyunyan et al. 2008; Arnold et al. 2009; U’Ren et al. 2010; Lagarde et al. 2018; Yoshino et al. 2020; Cometto et al. 2022).

In general, lichenicolous fungal taxa are phylogenetically distant from the lichen mycobionts and have been found in several lineages within the ascomycete classes Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, Leotiomycetes and Sordariomycetes (Arnold et al. 2009; U’Ren et al. 2010; Muggia et al. 2016, 2019, 2021; Suryanarayanan and Thirunavukkarasu 2017). Lichenicolous basidiomycetes typically belong to the classes Agaricostilbomycetes, Tremellomycetes and Cystobasidiomycetes (Zamora et al. 2011; Millanes et al. 2011, 2016, 2021; Černajová et al. 2019; Tuovinen et al. 2021; Cometto et al. 2022). The detection of the cryptically occurring lichenicolous species is nowadays feasible by culture isolation and sequence metabarcoding analyses (Arnold et al. 2009; U’Ren et al. 2010; Fernández-Mendoza et al. 2017; Banchi et al. 2018), while lichenicolous yeasts can be more specifically detected by the ad hoc combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and confocal microscopy (Spribille et al. 2016; Tuovinen et al. 2019, 2021). However, to formally characterize new species, axenically isolated strains serving for morphological studies are essential (Lawrey and Diederich 2003).

The lichenicolous fungi which cryptically occur in lichens belong mainly to the classes Eurotiomycetes and Dothideomycetes and are represented by filamentous or yeast-like melanised taxa, which are closely related to the polyphyletic lineages of rock-inhabiting fungi (RIF) and black yeasts (Gueidan et al. 2008; Ruibal et al. 2009; Gostinčar et al. 2012; Quan et al. 2020). These have frequently been reported from epilithic lichens (Harutyunyan et al. 2008; Muggia et al. 2016, 2017, 2021; Muggia and Grube 2018; Quan et al. 2020). Only a few taxa, such as lichenicolous Phoma species in Phaeosphaeriaceae (Dothideomycetes), were reported both cryptically and symptomatically occurring in epilithic, epiphytic and soil inhabiting lichens (Lawrey et al. 2012; Muggia et al. 2016, 2017). Recently two lineages within Eurotiomycetes have been formally recognized from Alpine epilithic lichens as the family Pleostigmataceae and the new genus and species Melanina gunde-cimermaniae (Muggia et al. 2021). Interestingly, lichenicolous basidiomycetes yeast species that have been described from thalli of the lichen-forming mycobiont genera Cladonia, Lecanora and Letharia (Zamora et al. 2011; Millanes et al. 2011, 2016, 2021; Černajová et al. 2019; Tuovinen et al. 2019, 2021) have been isolated recently from the epilithic lichens Rhizoplaca melanophthalma and Tephromela atra (Cometto et al. 2022), suggesting that certain taxa of cryptic lichenicolous fungi can be unexpectedly widespread in lichens.

In the present study, we deepen our investigation into the diversity of culturable, cryptically occurring lichenicolous ascomycetes from thalli of Rhizoplaca melanophthalma and Tephromela atra, as these lichens revealed to be important sources for lichenicolous fungi (Muggia et al. 2016; Smith et al. 2020; Cometto et al. 2022). Here we report on the successful isolation of 131 ascomycetous strains, 39 of which represent two new lineages within Chaetothyriales and are formally described as new taxa, while the others belong to already known genera and families of Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes and Sordariomycetes. All together, these and earlier results highlight that certain species of cryptically occurring lichenicolous fungi are more frequent than previously thought and may have their realized ecological niches in lichen thalli.

Sampling – Lichens representing the Rhizoplaca melanophthalma aggregate (Leavitt et al. 2011) have an umbilicate thallus (attached at a single point), whereas lichens representing the Tephromela atra group (Muggia et al. 2014) build a crustose thallus composed of adjacent areoles. Both lichens are characterized by a worldwide distribution and occur at different ecological conditions and elevations. Also, the mycobiont and photobiont diversity of both lichens has been extensively investigated previously (Muggia et al. 2008, 2010, 2014; Leavitt et al. 2011, 2016; De Carolis et al. 2022). For the present study, lichen samples were collected in 23 different localities on different rock types (i.e., schist-arenaria, siliceous, acidic, granitic and calcareous rocks) and at altitudes ranging from 550 to 5100 m above sea level (a.s.l.). The sampling was performed in North America (Utah, Nevada and Idaho), South America (Argentina and Chile), Europe (Spain), Mauritius and Tasmania. In total 20 populations of R. melanophthalma and five populations of T. atra were analysed (Supplementary Table S1). All the lichen samples were deposited at the herbarium of the University of Trieste (TSB).

Culture isolation – Fungal isolation was performed from four thalli for each population of Rhizoplaca melanophthalma and Tephromela atra following the protocol of Yamamoto et al. (2002). Approximately 2 mm² fragments of lichen thalli were dissected with a sterile razor blade. For R. melanophthalma, one marginal lobe and one apothecium were taken, while for T. atra, one marginal areole and one apothecium. The fragments were washed three times for 15 minutes with sterile water, followed by 30 minutes of washing with 500 µl of Tween80 diluted 1:10, and a final washing step of 15 minutes for three times with sterile water. The clean fragments were ground in sterile water under the hood and tiny thallus fragments were picked with a sterile bamboo stick and transferred into agar tubes. Six different media were used to promote the growth of as many different fungi as possible: Lilly and Barnett (LB, Lilly and Barnett 1951), Trebouxia medium (TM, Ahmadjian 1987), Potato Dextrose agar (PDA, ApplChem A5828), Sabouraud's glucose agar base medium (SAB, Pagano et al. 1958), Dichloran/Glycerol agar (DG18, Hocking and Pitt 1980) and Malt Yeast-extract (MY, Lilly and Barnett 1951). Two replicates for each medium were inoculated for a total of 12 inocula from each lichen individual, and incubated in growing chamber (17°C, 20 µmol × photons m^− 2 × s ^− 1, with a light/dark cycle of 14/10 h). When the inocula developed into a mycelium mass of about 5 mm size (after about three to six months), they were sub-cultured into Petri plates, on the same medium of the original tube.

Molecular analyses: DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing – Small parts of the cultured fungal colonies were taken and put into 1.5 ml reaction tubes, containing three sterile tungsten beads for homogenization, frozen and ground using a TissueLyserII (Retsch). The DNA extractions were performed following the CTAB protocol of Cubero et al. (1999), with minor adjustments. The identity of all fungal strains was studied with sequences of the nuclear internal transcribed spacers (nucITS) and 5.8S rDNA ribosomal gene amplified with the primers ITS1F (Bruns and Gardes 1993) and ITS4 (White et al. 1990). If ITS sequences were identical (99%-100% identity) among strains sharing the same origin – i.e., isolated from the same lichen thallus, or from thalli coming from the same population – for only a single strain the D1/D2 domain of the 28S nuclear large ribosomal subunit (nucLSU) was further amplified with the primers LR0R and LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990; http://www.biology.duke.edu/fungi/mycolab/primers.htm). Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were prepared for a 25 µl final volume containing 5 µl DNA, 12.5 µl of AccuStart II PCR ToughMix, 0.4 µl for each of the 10 µM primers. Negative control reactions were always used to check for potential contamination. PCR amplifications followed the same conditions of previous studies (Muggia et al. 2017; Cometto et al. 2022). All the amplicons were checked for their quality and size by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis stained with Green Safe Gel (Sigma-Aldrich) and purified using Mag-Bind® Normalizer Kit (Omega bio-tek). Clean amplicons were sent for Sanger sequencing to Macrogen Europe (The Netherlands).

Phylogenetic analyses – The identity of the newly generated sequences was checked with sequences available in the GenBank database by BLAST similarity search (Altschul et al. 1990). Taxa that matched our sequences with an identity value higher than 97% were selected for the phylogenetic analyses. As our sequences showed high similarity with representatives of the classes Eurotiomycetes (particularly the order Chaetothyriales), Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes, three separate datasets representing each individual fungal class were prepared (Supplementary Table S2 – S4). The total dataset included the widest spectrum of taxon diversity, as also genera and families closely related to our sequences were selected from previous studies. In particular, the Eurotiomycetes dataset was based on Harutyunyan et al. (2008), Muggia et al. (2016, 2019, 2021) and Quan et al. (2020); that of Dothideomycetes was based on Muggia et al. (2016) and Ametrano et al. (2019); that of Sordariomycetes was based on Muggia et al. (2016). Sequence alignments for each locus (nucITS and nucLSU) and for each fungal class (Eurotiomycetes, Dothideomycetes, Sordariomycetes) were prepared with MAFT v.7 (Katoh and Standley 2013) using the g-ins-I alignment strategy. Ambiguously aligned positions and introns were removed from the alignments using Trimmomatic (Bolger et al. 2014). Single locus phylogenies were inferred with Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) approaches. RAxML v.8.2 (Stamatakis 2014) was used for the ML analysis applying GTRGAMMA substitution model and 1000 bootstrap pseudoreplicates. The BI analysis was carried out with the program BEAST v.2.6.7 (Bouckaert et al. 2014) running GTRGAMMA substitution model for 100 million generations. The results were analysed using the program Tracer v1.7.2 (Rambaut et al. 2018) to check the runs for convergence (burn-in = 10%). TreeAnnotator (included in the BEAST package) was used to summarize the trees in a consensus tree representing the posterior distribution, the first 10% of data were discarded as burn-in. After checking the phylogenetic concordance of the nucITS and nucLSU loci, they were concatenated with MEGA (Kumar et al. 2018) and then analysed with both RAxML and BEAST with the same settings of the single locus analyses.

To better clarify the phylogenetic placement of two potentially new lineages recognized within Chaetothyriales we performed a further analysis based on a more extended taxon sampling of Herpotrichiellaceae and Paracladophialophoraceae (Supplementary Table S5), selecting six species of Cyphellophoraceae as outgroups (Cyphellophora eucalypti, C. laciniata, C. olivacea, C. pluriseptata, C. sessilis and Phialophora attae), and running the phylogenetic analysis using RAxML and BEAST approaches with the same settings explained above.

The phylogenetic trees were visualized using ITOL (Letunic and Bork 2019).

Morphological analysis – Morphological and anatomical characters of 10-month to one-year old cultured fungal strains were analysed with light microscopy considering the following characters: form of growth, melanisation, thickness and branching of the hyphae. A tiny part of the colony was removed by a sterile inoculation loop and mounted in water. Digital photos at light microscope were taken with a Zeiss AXIO Imager A2 coupled to a Thorlabs digital camera. The photos were adjusted for colour saturation and sharpness with Adobe Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe System Incorporated, San Jose, CA, USA) and photo-tables were assembled using Inkskape (www.inkscape.org).

Culture isolation – A total of 131 fungal strains were isolated and characterized from 80 Rhizoplaca melanophthalma and 20 Tephromela atra samples (Fig. 1a,b; Table 1; Supplementary Table S1): 65 strains belong to Eurotiomycetes (order Chaetothyriales), 53 strains to Dothideomycetes and 13 strains to Sordariomycetes. The Eurotiomycetes (order Chaetothyriales) strains were isolated from 20 samples of R. melanophthalma collected in 10 localities across South America (Argentina), North America (Utah) and Europe (Spain) and from eight samples T. atra collected in five localities across South America (Chile), Tasmania, Mauritius and Europe (Spain). The Dothideomycetes strains were isolated from 20 samples of R. melanophthalma collected in 13 localities across South America (Argentina and Chile), North America (Utah, Idaho and Nevada) and from seven samples T. atra collected in three localities in South America (Chile) and Europe (Spain). The Sordariomycetes strains were isolated from four samples of R. melanophthalma collected in two localities in South America (Argentina) and North America (Utah) and from two samples of T. atra collected in two localities in Tasmania and Mauritius. No fungal strains were obtained from R. melanophthalma thalli coming from three populations in Argentina above 3600 m a.s.l. and from one population in Spain at 2080 m a.s.l.. Only six strains belonging to Phaeosphaeriaceae sp., Elasticomyces sp., Knufia sp., Pleostigmataceae sp. and Hyalotiella sp. were isolated from lichen thalli collected over 3000 m a.s.l. in South America. Six different Eurotiomycetes taxa (identified as Pleostigma sp., Muelerella sp. and two new lineages in Chaetothyriales) and one Dothideomycetes taxon (belonging to Phaeosphaeriaceae) were isolated from both R. melanophthalma and T. atra.

Table 1

Origin data and sequence accession numbers of Eurothiomycetes, Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes strains newly isolated in culture: culture ID, the original lichen host (thalli of *Rhizoplaca melanophthalma* and *Tephromela atra* and their ID), the phylogenetic placement, the geographic origin of the original lichen samples (ID populations as in Table S1), and the new corresponding NCBI accession numbers were reported.
Culture ID	Lichen of origin	Culture medium	Population ID	Phylogenetic placement	ITS	nucLSU
L3809	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2803	LBM	24	Eurotiomycetes, incertae sedis, Pleostigmataceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3810	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2803	MY	24	Eurotiomycetes, incertae sedis, Pleostigmataceae	xxxxxxxx	-
L3258	Tephromela atra L2583	LBM	13	Eurotiomycetes, incertae sedis, Pleostigmataceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3819	Tephromela atra L2599	MY	15	Eurotiomycetes, incertae sedis, Pleostigmataceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3774	Tephromela atra L2596	MY	15	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Muellerella	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2881	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2387	LBM	1	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Trichomeriaceae, Neophaeococcomyces	xxxxxxxx	-
L2606	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2390	TM	1	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Trichomeriaceae, Neophaeococcomyces	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3238	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2668	TM	17	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Trichomeriaceae, Neophaeococcomyces	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3112	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2669	MY	17	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Trichomeriaceae, Neophaeococcomyces	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3099	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2670	SAB	17	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Trichomeriaceae, Knufia	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3064	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2786	LBM	23	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Trichomeriaceae, Knufia	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3065	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2786	MY	23	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Trichomeriaceae, Knufia	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3103	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2786	MY	23	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Trichomeriaceae, Knufia	xxxxxxxx	-
L3105	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2802	MY	24	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Trichomeriaceae, Knufia	xxxxxxxx	-
L3252	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2825	TM	25	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Trichomeriaceae, Knufia	xxxxxxxx	-
L2876	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2387	MY	1	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Melanina gunde-cimermaniae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2604	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2390	TM	1	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Melanina gunde-cimermaniae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2605	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2390	MY	1	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Melanina gunde-cimermaniae	xxxxxxxx	-
L2618	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2394	LBM	2	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Melanina gunde-cimermaniae	xxxxxxxx	-
L2628	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2398	SAB	2	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Melanina gunde-cimermaniae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3067	Tephromela atra L2572	TM	12	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Melanina gunde-cimermaniae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3068	Tephromela atra L2572	PDA	12	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Melanina gunde-cimermaniae	xxxxxxxx	-
L3233	Tephromela atra L2753	MY	22	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales sp.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3784	Tephromela atra L2755	PDA	22	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales sp.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3260	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2636	PDA	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Paracladophialophoraceae, Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3261	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2636	SAB	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Paracladophialophoraceae, Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3262	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2636	SAB	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Paracladophialophoraceae, Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3763	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2638	PDA	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Paracladophialophoraceae, Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3764	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2638	MY	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Paracladophialophoraceae, Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3765	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2638	MY	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Paracladophialophoraceae, Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3771	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2638	MY	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Paracladophialophoraceae, Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3779	Tephromela atra L2570	MY	12	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Paracladophialophoraceae, Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3780	Tephromela atra L2570	MY	12	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Paracladophialophoraceae, Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3781	Tephromela atra L2570	TM	12	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Paracladophialophoraceae, Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3782	Tephromela atra L2570	PDA	12	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Paracladophialophoraceae, Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3783	Tephromela atra L2570	PDA	12	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Paracladophialophoraceae, Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3776	Tephromela atra L2572	MY	12	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Paracladophialophoraceae, Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3096	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2734	TM	21	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2863	Tephromela atra L2596	TM	15	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3110	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2421	MY	3	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora sp.	xxxxxxxx	-
L2865	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2568	PDA	14	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora sp.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3111	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2669	LBM	17	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora sp.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3057	Tephromela atra L2561	LBM	10	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora sp.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3058	Tephromela atra L2561	LBM	10	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora sp.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3087	Tephromela atra L2598	PDA	15	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora sp.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2871	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2389	MY	1	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L2612	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2390	LBM	1	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L2614	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2390	SAB	1	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2619	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2394	LBM	2	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3059	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2635	SAB	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3060	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2635	TM	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3061	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2635	MY	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3251	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2637	MY	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3072	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2638	LBM	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3073	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2638	MY	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3074	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2638	PDA	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3766	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2638	MY	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3770	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2638	PDA	16	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3106	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2668	PDA	17	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3240	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2668	TM	17	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L3098	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2670	TM	17	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3100	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2670	PDA	17	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3264	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2670	MY	17	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L2880	Tephromela atra L2596	LBM	15	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	-
L2870	Tephromela atra L2598	MY	15	Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Herpotrichiellaceae, Cladophialophora endolichena sp. nov.	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3077	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2724	LBM	20	Dothideomycetes, incertae sedis	xxxxxxxx	-
L2869	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2387	PDA	1	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3091	Tephromela atra L2597	TM	15	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Teichosporaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2868	Tephromela atra L2598	PDA	15	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Massariaceae, Paraphaeosphaeria michotii	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3036	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2704	DG18	19	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3021	Tephromela atra L2599	LBM	15	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Didymellaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3078	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2724	MY	20	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Pleosporaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2888	Tephromela atra L2545	LBM	10	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	-
L3056	Tephromela atra L2569	TM	12	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3076	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2724	MY	20	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3042	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2734	SAB	21	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3030	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2827	TM	25	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3094	Tephromela atra L2596	TM	15	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3037	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2827	SAB	25	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	-
L3090	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2454	MY	4	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3108	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2387	DG18	1	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2622	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2398	TM	2	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	-
L2624	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2398	TM	2	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	-
L2625	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2398	LBM	2	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	-
L2627	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2398	LBM	2	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	-
L3107	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2668	MY	17	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3265	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2670	MY	17	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae, Phoma	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2897	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2670	SAB	17	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae, Phoma	xxxxxxxx	-
L3048	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2689	DG18	18	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae, Phoma	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3054	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2706	PDA	19	Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae, Phoma	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2856	Tephromela atra L2572	SAB	12	Dothideomycetes, incertae sedis	xxxxxxxx	-
L2857	Tephromela atra L2572	SAB	12	Dothideomycetes, incertae sedis	xxxxxxxx	-
L2890	Tephromela atra L2572	MY	12	Dothideomycetes, incertae sedis	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3049	Tephromela atra L2572	MY	12	Dothideomycetes, incertae sedis	xxxxxxxx	-
L3776	Tephromela atra L2572	DG18	12	Dothideomycetes, incertae sedis	xxxxxxxx	-
L3817	Tephromela atra L2572	DG18	12	Dothideomycetes, incertae sedis	xxxxxxxx	-
L3747	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2385	MY	1	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales, Mycosphaerellaceae, Ramularia	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2879	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2389	LBM	1	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3239	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2668	LBM	17	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3270	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2787	PDA	23	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2773	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2469	MY	5	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2775	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2469	SAB	5	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	-
L2777	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2469	LBM	5	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	-
L2784	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2544	LBM	9	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	-
L2785	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2544	LBM	9	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2886	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2528	SAB	9	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	-
L3079	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2687	LBM	18	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	-
L3081	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2687	LBM	18	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	-
L3082	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2687	PDA	18	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3237	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2724	PDA	20	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3104	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2802	TM	24	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3115	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2824	MY	25	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	-
L3116	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2825	LBM	25	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	-
L3117	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2825	MY	25	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	-
L3118	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2825	DG18	25	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3119	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2825	PDA	25	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	-
L3120	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2825	PDA	25	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3253	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2825	SAB	25	Dothideomycetes, Mycosphaerellales,Theratosphaeriaceae, Elasticomyces	xxxxxxxx	-
L3814	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2635	PDA	16	Sordariomycetes, Xylariales, Cryptosphaeria	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3815	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2635	PDA	16	Sordariomycetes, Xylariales, Cryptosphaeria	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3028	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2827	DG18	25	Sordariomycetes, Xylariales, Hyalotiella	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3093	Tephromela atra L2596	MY	15	Sordariomycetes, Choniochaetales, Choniochaeta	xxxxxxxx	-
L2858	Tephromela atra L2598	SAB	15	Sordariomycetes, Choniochaetales, Choniochaeta	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2877	Tephromela atra L2598	LBM	15	Sordariomycetes, Choniochaetales, Choniochaeta	xxxxxxxx	-
L2859	Tephromela atra L2598	SAB	15	Sordariomycetes, Hypocreales, Tolypocladium	xxxxxxxx	-
L2883	Tephromela atra L2598	DG18	15	Sordariomycetes, Hypocreales, Tolypocladium	xxxxxxxx	-
L3086	Tephromela atra L2598	TM	15	Sordariomycetes, Hypocreales, Tolypocladium	xxxxxxxx	-
L3089	Tephromela atra L2598	MY	15	Sordariomycetes, Hypocreales, Tolypocladium	xxxxxxxx	-
L3114	Tephromela atra L2754	TM	22	Sordariomycetes, Hypocreales, Tolypocladium	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L2896	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2636	SAB	16	Sordariomycetes, Hypocreales, Mycrocera	xxxxxxxx	xxxxxxxx
L3122	Rhizoplaca melanophthalma L2638	MY	16	Sordariomycetes, Hypocreales, Mycrocera	xxxxxxxx	-

Eurotiomycetes (order Chaetothyriales) strains were unable to grow on DG18 media, while all the other fungal strains grew on the six different culture media (Fig. 1c; Table 1). Eurotiomycetes mainly grew on MY media; Dothideomycetes on LBM and DG18 media; Sordariomycetes on SAB and MY media. In general, MY and LBM were the most suitable media for the isolation of ascomycetes taxa, as 49% of the isolates grew well on them (Fig. 1c; Table 1).

Phylogenetic and morphological analysis – A total of 131 new nucITS and 68 new nucLSU fungal sequences were generated (Table 1). Phylogenetic analyses were performed individually for each taxonomic class – Eurotiomycetes, Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes – using the concatenated two-locus datasets (Supplementary Material Tables S2-S5). Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic inference were highly concordant; most of the clades were supported and topologically congruent with previous studies (Harutyunyan et al. 2008; Ametrano et al. 2019; Muggia et al. 2016, 2019, 2021; Quan et al. 2020).

Eurotiomycetes (Figs. 2–4; Table 1, Supplementary Material Table S2, S3) – Four strains were placed in Pleostigmataceae (here unsupported as in Muggia et al. 2021): two (L3809 and L3810) isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in South America (Argentina) and other two (L3258 and L3819) isolated from T. atra collected in Europe (Spain) and Tasmania. These strains were characterized by a mycelium composed by a dense aggregate of filamentous hyphae (Fig. 3a). L3809 and L3810 strains were closely related to Pleostigma frigidum (Muggia et al. 2021) and had heavy melanized hyphae composed by subcylindrical cells (4 × 14 µm) and by roundish or elliptical cell (5 up to 17 µm diameter; Fig. 3b). L3258 and L3819 strains were sister to Pleostigma alpinum and to Chaetothyriales A955. They had melanized and branching hyphae composed by globose cells (4 up to 11 µm diameter) intercalated by rectangular cells (2–4 ×12 µm) from which ramifications generated (Figs. 3c, d).

The ‘Muellerella + Lichenodiplis’ clade (sensu Muggia et al. 2015, 2019) and the family Epibryaceae were found as the most basal lineages in Chaetothyriales. In this clade we found one strain (L3774) isolated from T. atra collected in Tasmania, and the strain Chaetothyriales sp. Pet 5a (Vasse et al. 2017). The strain L3774 was characterized by heavy melanized elliptical and elongated cells (4 × 8 µm) often constricted at the septa and with rare ramification (Fig. 3e) and conidia-like cells (4 up to 7 µm diameter; Fig. 3f).

Ten strains isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in North and South America (Utah and Argentina, respectively) were placed in Trichomeriaceae. Four of them (L2606, L2881, L3112 and L3238) were closely related to Neophaeococcomyces aloes, to which Cladophialophora proteae had a basal position. The mycelium of these four strains was a dense aggregate of heavily melanized and branching hyphae with irregular margin (Fig. 3g) composed by rectangular cells (4 × 10 µm; Figs. 3i, k) and by conidia and chlamydospore-like cells (4 up to 10 µm diameter) remaining attached to one another (Figs. 3h, j, l). The other six strains (L3064, L3065, L3099, L3103, L3105 and L3252) were related to Knufia separata, Fungal sp. CCFEE 5324 and CCFEE 5322 (Selbmann et al. 2013). Their mycelium was a dense aggregate of melanized, moniliform and branched hyphae that build a black-brown to olivaceous black colony with regular margin (Fig. 3m). Their hyphae were formed by globose and sub-globose cells (4 × 6 µm to 11 × 15 µm; Figs. 3o-q) intercalated by rectangular cells (4× 10 µm; Figs. 3n, r). Apically and lateral budding cells (Fig. 3p) and anastomosing hyphae (Fig. 3n) were present.

In the Melanina gunde-cimermaniae clade, five (L2604, L2605, L2618, L2628 and L2876) isolates from R. melanophthalma collected in South America (Argentina) and two isolates from T. atra collected in Europe (Spain) were found together with other two specimen Capronia sp. 97003b and Capronia sp. 97003a. Our isolates were characterized by a dark grey to black mycelium (Fig. 3s) composed by toruloid hyphae and filaments of conidia (4 up to 10 µm diameter; Figs. 3t-v).

Two isolates (L3233 and L3784) from T. atra collected in Mauritius were found alone on individual branches nested with samples of Chaetothyriales sp. [two uncultured samples Chaetothyriales sp. FM034.2 (Martos et al. 2012), Chaetothyriales sp. NOUTOTU-121 (Qin et al. 2019), and Herpotrichiellaceae sp. MUT 5408 (Gnavi et al. unpublished)], being closely related to the recently described family Paracladophialophoraceae (Wijayawardene et al. 2020) and to a monophyletic lineage that was identified here for the first time and we referred to it as the new species “Paracladophialophora lichenicola” (see below and Fig. 4). The two isolates L3233 and L3784 were characterized by heavy or slight melanized hyphae in which cylindrical and rectangular cells (4 × 10–15 µm; Fig. 3ac) were intercalated to spherical cells (5 to 15 µm diameter; Fig. 3ad).

The new lineage of Paracladophialophora lichenicola was represented by 13 newly isolated strains [seven isolates – L3260, L3261, L3262, L3763, L3764, L3765 and L3771 – from R. melanophthalma collected in North America (Utah) and other six isolates – L3776, L3779, L3780, L3781, L3782 and L3783 – from T. atra collected in Europe (Spain)] and several other strains (Figs. 2, 4 4), including many Chaetothyriales sp. (S1, h2, Sh9, Sh10, Sh12, Sh25, Sh36, L204, L474, 01001a, 01001b, 04001a, 97001a and 131b) identified in previous studies by Harutyunyan et al. (2008), Wang et al. (only sequences published in NCBI) and Favero-Longo (2015).

Twenty eight new isolates (Figs. 2, 4 Table 1) were placed in Herpotrichiellaceae, here the largest represented family. Two strains (L3096 and L2863), isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in North America (Nevada) and from T. atra collected in Tasmania, were placed next to Phaeoannellomyces elegans, Exophiala nigra and Exophiala spinifera (Fig. 2, 4). They were characterized by a dense mycelium with brown margin that became paler to grey-white in the centre of the colony (Fig. 3w) and by hyphae composed of elongated and rectangular cells (3 × 12 µm) with branches (Fig. 3x). Other six strains, isolated from both R. melanophthalma collected in North and South America (Utah and Argentina, respectively) and Europe (Spain) and from T. atra collected in South America (Chile) and Tasmania, were related to three Cladophialophora strains isolated from lichens, i.e. Cladophialophora sp. S5, L359 from Rusawskia elegans and Gyalolechia fulgida, respectively, and C. parmeliae (Figs. 2, 41). Their mycelium is composed by a dense aggregate of melanized hyphae that builds a blackish-brown colony with irregular margin (Fig. 3ae). Mostly of the hyphae are composed by rectangular and cylindrical cells (4 × 12–17 µm) from which branches generate (Fig. 3af) and from laterally budding cells (Fig. 3ag).

The remaining 20 strains, isolated from both R. melanophthalma collected in North and South America (Utah and Argentina, respectively) and from T. atra collected in Tasmania, formed a separate monophyletic lineage with further Cladophialophora strains (Figs. 2, 4) isolated from lichens in previous studies (Harutyunyan et al. 2008, Muggia et al. 2016, 2017, 2021), i.e. Cladophialophora sp. Sh8, A1044 and A1069. We recognize this second new lineage as the new species Cladophialophora endolichena (see below). The phylogenetic position of the two new species Paracladophialophora lichenicola and Cladophialophora endolichena has been further confirmed by the extended analyses of Fig. 4.

The detailed morphological descriptions of both Paracladophialophora lichenicola and Cladophialophora endolichena are presented below in the Taxonomy section.

Dothideomycetes (Figs. 5, 6; Table 1; Supplementary Material Table S4) – Fifty-three new strains were found in Dothideomycetes. The strain L3077, isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in North America (Idaho), was placed on an own branch basal to Dothideomycetes, as well as Lichenothelia papilliformis (Ametrano et al. 2019), Lichenostigmatales sp. A930 (Muggia et al. 2016) and Fungal sp. TRN529 (Ruibal et al. 2009). L3077 was morphologically similar to Lichenostigmatales sp. A930, with a yeast-like black mycelium (Fig. 6a), budding hyphae and melanized cells (3 up to 20 µm diameter; Figs. 6b, c). Most strains belonged mainly to the orders Pleosporales and Mycosphaerellales. Twenty-four strains were placed in Pleosporales and belonged to five family level lineages highly supported and fully resolved. In particular, the strain L2869, isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in South America (Argentina), was placed in Lophiotremataceae and was characterized by hyaline hyphae (3 µm diameter; not shown). The strain L3091, isolated from T. atra collected in Tasmania, was placed in Teichosporaceae and was closely related to an uncultured fungus B3_1986 (found by Vázquez-Nion et al. 2016) and characterized by a grey mycelium with brown margin with septate hyphae (4 × 15 µm; not shown). The strain L2868, isolated from T. atra from Tasmania, was placed in the well-supported clade of Paraphaeosphaeria michotii and it was characterized by hyaline hyphae (2 µm diameter; not shown).

The strain L3036, isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in North America, was nested in a clade with the Pleosporales sp. A1039 isolated from lichens (by Muggia et al. 2016), Periconia sp. and two uncultured strains S241 (Fröhlich-Nowoisky et al. 2009) and L042885-122-065-F09 (Fröhlich-Nowoisky et al. 2012).

The strain L3021, isolated from T. atra collected in Tasmania, was placed in the family Didymellaceae, here represented by Phoma herbarum, Ampelomyces sp. and Didymella spp. This strain was characterized by a white to grey mycelium (Fig. 6d) with slight melanized hyphae (5 × 15 µm; Fig. 6e).

The strain L3078, isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in North America was placed in the family Pleosporaceae next to Pleospora spp. and Comoclathris lini. This strain was characterized by a grey mycelium with brown margin and septate hyphae (4 × 15 µm; not shown).

Eighteen additional strains were found within Phaeosphaeriaceae in five clades. Two strains (L2888 and L3056), isolated from T. atra collected in South America (Chile) and in Europe (Spain), built a clade with Capnodiales sp. UFMGCB8750 and Catenulostroma sp. UFMGCB8746 (Santiago et al. 2015). They were characterized by a pale pink mycelium with regular margin (Fig. 6f) and very slightly melanized hyphae composed by cylindrical and rectangular cells (5 × 15 µm) often branching and constricted at the septa (Fig. 6g). Four strains (L3030, L3042, L3076 and L3094), isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in North America (Idaho and Nevada) and South America (Argentina) and from T. atra thallus collected in Tasmania were closely related to Ascomycota PLC12C, Leptosphaeria sp. plC11E (Mouhamadou et al. 2011) and to an uncultured fungus OTU569 (Qin et al. unpublished). They were characterized by a black to grey mycelium composed by slight melanized hyphae with rectangular and elliptical cells (5 × 15 µm; Figs. 6h-j) from which the ramifications generate. Conidial cells (5 µm diameter) were observed (Fig. 6j). The strain L3037, isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in South America (Argentina), was closely related to two uncultured fungi (G2_CC10, Karst et al. 2013; 99_NA9_P31_O2, Timling et al. 2014) and had a brown to black mycelium with pale pink regular margin (data not shown). The strain L3090, isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in South America (Argentina), was placed together with Jeremyomyces labinae, Melanomma sanguinarium, Dothideomycetes LTSP_EUKA_P5M163 (Hartmann et al. 2009), an uncultured fungus 112_NA4_P31_N4 (Timling et al. 2014) and Pleosporales sp. 19 KB-2015 (Travadon et al. 2015). L3090 was characterized by a grey mycelium with brown margin (data not shown). Six strains (L2622, L2624, L2625, L2627, L3017 and L3108), isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in North and South America (Utah and Argentina, respectively), built a separate clade closely related to Didymocyrtis brachylaenae and four Phaeosphaeria strains [namely Phaeosphaeria sp. SW_0_F12, Phaeosphaeria sp. AC (Travadon et al. 2016), Phaeosphaeria sp. 1715242 and Phaeosphaeria sp. M129 (Berube et al. 2015)]. These six strains had an ochre to pale pink mycelium with hyaline hyphae composed by rectangular cells (4 × 12 µm; not shown). Four strains (L2897, L3048, L3054 and L3265), isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in North America (Utah), were nested within Phoma species described from lichens, i.e., Phoma caloplacae and P. cladoniicola and likely correspond to these two species. They were characterized by a whitish to pale pinkish mycelia with a pale orange margin and composed by hyaline hyphae distributed to form a dense aggregate (5 × 15 µm) and conidiogenous-like cells (10 µm diameter) (Figs. 6k, l).

Twenty-two strains were found in the order Mycosphaerellales (Abdollahzadeh et al. 2020) and belonged to Mycosphaerellaceae and Teratosphaeriaceae. The strain L3747 isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in South America (Argentina) was genetically identical to Ramularia vizellae in Mycosphaerellaceae. Within the Teratosphaeriaceae, instead, the newly isolated strains were placed in four separated clades. The strain L2879, isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in South America (Argentina) was close related to Teratosphaeriaceae sp. CPC 12419 (Crous et al. 2008) and closely related to Saxomyces penninicus and Teratosphaeria parva. This strain was characterized by a dark black mycelium (Fig. 6p) composed of melanized and hyaline hyphae with rectangular cells (4 × 10 µm) from which ramification started. Filaments of isodiametric, conidia-like cells (7 µm diameter) with apical cell developing into hyphae were observed (Fig. 6q). The strain L3239, isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in North America (Utah) was placed in a supported clade together with three unknown fungi labelled as sp. agrD231, agrD244 and agrD242 (Peršoh et al. 2012). This strain was characterized by a blackish mycelium composed by heavy melanized hyphae with rectangular cell (5 × 15 µm) from which ramification started (data not shown). The strain L3270, isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in South America (Argentina) was close related to three unidentified fungi Dothideomycetes sp. AK1125 (U’Ren, 2012), Dothideomycetes sp. PIMO_109 and fungal sp. PIMO_21 (Larkin et al. 2012). Lastly, 14 strains, isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in South America (Argentina and Chile) and North America (Utah and Idaho), built a separate clade together with Elasticomyces elasticus and four still undetermined fungal samples [i.e. Dothideomycetes sp. s_C03_05.ab (Amend et al. 2010), Dothideomycetes sp. PIMO_446 (Larkin et al. 2012) and two uncultured fungi (127_NA4_P32_L9 and FunN4_01B; Timling et al. 2014; Nemergut et al. 2008)]. These strains likely correspond to Elasticomyces elasticus and were characterized by blackish to greenish mycelia with irregular margin (Fig. 6r) and heavy melanized hyphae composed by cylindrical and rectangular cells (5 × 8–12 µm) with ramification (Figs. 6s, t).

Six strains (strains L2856, L2857, L2890, L3049, L3776 andL3817), isolated from T. atra collected in Europe (Spain), were placed together with two Dothideomycetes sp., i.e. A931 and A552, isolated from lichens (Muggia et al. 2016) in a clade closely related to Venturiales, Lichenocloniales and Abrothallales. These strains had a pink mycelium with regular margin (Fig. 6m) composed by hyaline hyphae built by rectangular cells (2 × 15 µm) from which branches generated (Figs. 6n, o).

Sordariomycetes (Figs. 7, 8; Table 1; Supplementary Material Table S5) – Thirteen strains were found belonging to Xylariales, Coniochaetales and Hypocreales. In Xylariales two strains (L3814 and L3819), isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in North America (Utah), were nested in a clade with Cryptosphaeria pullmanensis and the fungal sp. NLEndoHerit_007_2008N6-09-2I (Lamit et al. 2014); they were characterized by a blackish mycelium with some agglomerations of less melanised hyphae(Fig. 8a), rather thin (3 µm diameter; Figs. 8b, c). One strain (L3028), isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in South America (Argentina) was closely related to Hyalotiella transvalensis, H. spartii, Truncatella angustata, Broomella rosae and a Xylariales sp. A1014 (Muggia et al. 2016). It was characterized by a reddish-orange mycelium built by hyaline hyphae (3 µm diameter; Figs. 8d, e).

Three strains (L2858, L2877 and L3093), isolated from T. atra collected in Tasmania, were nested in Coniochaetales, closely related to Coniochaeta sp. Y111c (Muriel et al. 2022) and other still unnamed Coniochaetales sp. from lichens [i.e., A518, A524, A551, A890 and A1007 (Muggia et al. 2016)] and not [1 TKPB-2017 (Kowalski and Bilański, 2021), Sordariomycetes sp. n165.1 and TS1_1_5i]. These strains were characterized by a white mycelium (Fig. 8f) composed by hyaline hyphae (3 µm diameter; Fig. 8g).

Seven strains were placed in the order Hypocreales. Five strains (L2859, L2883, L3086, L3089 and L3114), isolated from T. atra collected in Tasmania and Mauritius, were nested in the lineage of Tolypocladium sp. (MS217, M1-1-5U and JDF-2013g; Jiang et al. 2015), Thielavia sp. KoLRI_053268 (Yang et al. 2022) and Elaphocordyceps ophioglossoides. These strains were characterized by a greyish and white mycelium (Figs. 8h, k) composed of hyaline hyphae (3 µm diameter) with branches (Figs. 8i, j, l). Two strains (L2896 and L3122), isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in North America (Utah), are closely related to Microcera physciae (Crous et al. 2012) and other Microcera species as well as two Fusarium sp. samples, Nectria cinnabarina and Cosmospora quaranticola. These strains were characterized by an orange mycelium (Fig. 8m) made of hyaline hyphae (4 µm diameter) with branches (Figs. 8n, o).

Taxonomy

Cladophialophora endolichena Cometto, de Hoog, Muggia sp. nov.

Mycobank: MBXXXXX

Etymology: residing inside lichens.

Holotype: L3074, cultured strain, preserved in metabolically inactive state in MY medium (September 2020, date at which they were first identified in culture isolation), isolated from the thallus of Rhizoplaca melanophthalma (L2638).

Description: endolichenic (i.e., cryptically present in lichen thalli) fungus derived likely from hyphae fragments entrapped in the thalline matrix of the lichen hosts, growing in vitro rather slowly. The mycelium is composed by a dense aggregate of melanized hyphae that builds a blackish-brown colony with irregular margin (not shown). Mostly of the hyphae are composed by rectangular and cylindrical cells (4 × 12–17 µm) from which branches generate (Fig. 3ai). Apical muriform conidiogenous cells (10 × 12 µm, Fig. 3ah) and lateral conidiogenous cell (8 × 10 µm; Fig. 3aj) were observed.

Distribution: boreal isolated from lichens growing on siliceous-granitic, quartzite, basalt and sandstone rocks at about 1600–1900 m a.s.l.; austral, isolated from lichens growing on basaltic and dolorite rocks at about 545–2000 m a.s.l.. Isolated so far from the following lichen species: Lecanora bicincta, L. polytropa, Protoparmeliopsis muralis, Rhizoplaca melanophthalma, Tephromela atra.

Material examined: SOUTH AMERICA, Argentina, prov. Mendoza, on basalitic boulders, alt. 1450–2000 m a.s.l., endolichenic fungi isolated from R. melanophthalma lichen thalli, 2019, L. Muggia, strain numbers L2612, L2614, L2619 and L2871. NORTH AMERICA, Utah, Rock Canyon, and Emery County, on quartzite and sandstone rocks, alt. 1665–1700 m a.s.l., endolichenic fungi isolated from R. melanophthalma lichen thalli, 2019, S. D. Leavitt, strain numbers L3059, L3060, L3061, L3072, L3073, L3074, L3098, L3100, L3106, L3240, L3251, L3264, L3766 and L3770. OCEANIA, Tasmania, three Thumbs, on dolorite rocks, alt. 545 m a.s.l., endolichenic fungi isolated from T. atra lichen thalli, 2019, G. Kantvilas, strain numbers L2870 and L2880. ASIA, Armenia, Kotayk, Geghard, on basalt rocks, alt. 1875 m a.s.l., endolichenic fungi isolated from P. muralis, 2006, S. Harutyunyan and H. Mayrhofer, strain number SH8. EUROPE, Austria, between the states Styria and Carinthia, Koralpe mountain, siliceous-schist/ gneissic rocks, alt. 1800–2100 m a.s.l., endolichenic fungi isolated from Lecanora bicincta and L. polytropa lichen thalli, 2012, L. Muggia, strains number A1044 and A1069.

Paracladophialophora lichenicola Cometto, de Hoog, Muggia sp. nov.

Mycobank: MBXXXXX

Etymology: associated to lichens.

Holotype: L3782, cultured strain, preserved in metabolically inactive state in MY medium (September 2020, date at which they were first identified in culture isolation), isolated from the thallus of Tephromela atra (L2570).

Description: endolichenic (i.e., cryptically present in lichen thalli), isolates derived likely from hyphal fragments or spores entrapped in the thalline matrix of the lichen hosts, grown in vitro rather slowly. Dark grey to black mycelium with a regular margin composed by heavy or often slight melanized hyphae (Fig. 3y). The hyphae have a peculiar shape in which cylindrical and rectangular cells (4 × 10–15 µm; Fig. 3aa) intercalate to spherical cells (5 to 15 µm dimeter; Fig. 3ab). Branching has originated from rectangular (Fig. 3aa). Chain of conidia (2–5 µm diameter) were observed (Figs. 3z, ab).

Distribution: boreal, isolated from lichens growing on limestone, siliceous and quartzite rocks at about 1260–2000 m a.s.l and on basalt rocks from 15 m a.s.l. to 2800 m a.s.l. Isolated so far from the lichen species Caloplaca gomerana, C. saxicola, Lecidella stigmatea, Protoparmeliopsis muralis, Rhizoplaca melanophthalma, Rusawskia elegans, Tephromela atra, Umbilicaria virginis and U. vellea.

Material examined: NORTH AMERICA, Utah, Rock Canyon, on quartzite rocks, alt. 1700 m a.s.l., endolichenic fungi isolated from R. melanophthalma lichen thalli, 2019, S. D. Leavitt, strain numbers L3260, L3261, L3262, L3763, L3764, L3765 and L3771. ASIA, Armenia, Kotayk, Garni gorge, on basalt rocks, alt. 1180–2820 m a.s.l., endolichenic fungi isolated from P. muralis lichen thalli, 2006, S. Harutyunyan and H. Mayrhofer, strain number Sh9, Sh10, Sh12, Sh25 and Sh36. Armenia, Kotayk, Garni gorge, on basalt rocks, alt. 1180 m a.s.l., endolichenic fungi isolated from C. saxicola lichen thalli, 2006, S. Harutyunyan and H. Mayrhofer, strain number h2. EUROPE, Spain, prov. Madrid, Miraflores del la Sierra, Puerto de la Morquera, summit of Pico Najarra, on siliceous-granitic boulders, alt. 2080 m a.s.l., endolichenic fungi isolated from T. atra lichen thalli, 2019, L. Muggia and S. Perez-Ortega, strain numbers L3776, L3779, L3780, L3781, L3782 and L3783. Spain, Canary Islands, Tenerife, Punta Roja, on basalt rocks, alt. 15 m a.s.l., endolichenic fungi isolated from C. gomerana lichen thalli, 2005, L. Muggia, strain number L204. Austria, Styria, Röthelstein, on limestone rocks, alt. 1260 m a.s.l., endolichenic fungi isolated from L stigmatea, 2006, L. Muggia and J. Hafellner, strain number L474.

The culture approach applied in the present study captured a great diversity of the microfungi associated with two cosmopolitan, epilithic lichens – Rhizoplaca melanophthalma and Tephromela atra – collected in the broad range of their distribution and including sites characterized by harsh environmental conditions. Here, we detected both already known fungal lineages and two new lineages, i.e. the species Cadophialophora endolichena sp. nov. and Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov., which seem to be recurrently associated to lichen thalli. Indeed, many strains belonging to the two new lineages were previously detected in local communities of alpine (Fleischhacker et al. 2015; Muggia et al. 2016, 2017) and Mediterranean lichens (Harutyunyan et al. 2008). Although fungi can adapt to diverse environments and develop different lifestyles and evolutionary strategies, some lineages seem to preferentially reside in lichen thalli and might develop a certain specificity to their hosts or, more in general, to the micro conditions that the symbiotic lichen thalli offer.

Phylogenetic relationships of the 131 new fungal isolates were inferred, among which 65 belong to Eurotiomycetes, 53 to Dothideomycetes and 13 to Sordariomycetes. Furthermore, isolates representing most of the phylogenetic lineages were morphologically characterized. We found that these microfungi grew on six different culture media, and the percentage of their growth success corresponded well to that reported by Muggia et al. (2017). We obtained fungal isolates from almost all the lichen samples, with the exception of those thalli of R. melanophthalma collected in three localities in the Argentinian Andes at altitudes ranging from 3600 to 5100 m a.s.l., and in Spain at 2080 m a.s.l.. The fact that no fungal strains could be isolated from these lichen thalli may be explained by the selective constraints in which the lichen grew, that were not simulated in the culture conditions. Thus, the culture conditions applied seem to have not favoured in vitro the development of mycelia, particularly of those fungi that would be more extremophilic. In fact, the inocula were incubated at 17°C and constant humidity in growth chambers, while the original thalli experienced harsher conditions of drought stress and radiation in the environments. An alternative explanation may be found in the fact that the original lichen thalli presented a lower and different mycobiome diversity in the DNA metabarcoding analyses (Cometto et al. submitted), which would likely support the lack of culturable strains within the species-poor pool of fungi. Extremophilic fungi, indeed, grow extremely slowly in vitro, if not at all, and their isolation often demands specific requirements and extended amounts of incubation time (Urzı and De Leo 2001; Selbmann et al. 2014).

Interestingly, 50% of the isolates obtained in this study had already been reported for lichens from arid Mediterranean and alpine habitats (Harutyunyan et al. 2008; Muggia et al. 2016, 2017) collected on soil and trees (Peršoh et al. 2012; Harutyunyan et al. 2008; Lawrey et al. 2012; Muggia et al. 2016, 2017; Crous et al. 2021). The other identified strains form either small, still unnamed (because still too poorly represented) lineages were closely related to species of rock-inhabiting fungi and plant endophytes within each of the three classes. In fact, strains corresponding to the rock-inhabiting genera Knufia (Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Trichomeriaceae), Elasticomyces (Dothideomycetes, Teratosphaeriaceae), or the endophytic Neophaeococcomyces (Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriales, Trichomeriaceae), Paraphaeosphaeria (Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales), and Cryptosphaeria (Sordariomycetes, Xylariales), Tolypocladium and the lichenicolous Microcera (Sordariomycetes, Hypocreales) were identified here.

Our data show that most of the isolated strains are members of the Eurotiomycetes. Within this class, the majority of microfungi belong to families in Chaetothyriales, an order which also includes many saprophytic and opportunistic pathogens on humans and cold-blooded vertebrates (de Hoog et al. 2011; Teixeira et al. 2017, Quan et al. 2020). The newly isolated strains share the characteristic traits of the melanised polyextremotolerant fungi already described for rock-inhabiting fungi, pathogens and lichen-associated lineages (Gostinčar et al. 2012, 2018). Indeed, three strains represent Pleostigma species, one Muellerella and another seven correspond to the recently described species Melanina gunde-cimermaniae. Muellerella is a well-known genus of symptomatic lichenicolous fungi which was successfully isolated from ascospores and conidia but occurs also cryptically in lichens (Muggia et al. 2015, 2019, 2021). The strain L3774 which is in the clade ‘Muellerella + Lichenodiplis’ sensu Muggia et al. (2015, 2019) was indeed isolated from a thallus of Tephromela atra (which is the original lichen host species of Muellerella atricola and Lichenodiplis lecanorae; Atienza et al. 2009; Muggia et al. 2015, 2019), but morphological inspections confirmed that this thallus is devoid of any perithecia or sporodochia, thus supporting the cryptic occurrence of the Muellerella fungus.

The genera Pleostigma – together with the corresponding family Pleostigmataceae – and Melanina were recently described by Muggia et al. (2021) to allocate black fungal strains that were isolated from alpine lichens (i.e. Aspicilia caesiocinerea, A. simoensis, Aspicilia sp., Lecanora intricata, L. polytropa, Lecidea lapicida, Lecidea sp., Rhizocarpon geographicum, Schaereria fuscocinerea and Umbilicaria cylindrica; Muggia et al. 2021) and a few fungi that were identified by Ruibal et al. (2009) from calcareous rocks in the Mediterranean basin. Finding here both Pleostigma spp. and Melanina also in thalli collected at diverse altitudes and across a worldwide geographic range supports their specific endolichenic lifestyle and likely their ubiquitous distribution in lichens.

The most important outcome is that the present research conducted on such a broad scale allowed us to recognize additionally two new lineages of lichen-associated fungi in Chaetothyriales. Our phylogenetic inferences are topologically congruent with those of Crous et al. (2016, 2018), Quan et al. (2020) and Wijayawardene et al. (2020). The new specie level lineage of Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov. is included in Paracladophialophoraceae, being closely related to Paracladophialophora cyperacearum and P. carceris (Fig. 2, S1). Paracladophialophora lichenicola sp. nov. is well represented by multiple strains isolated here form both R. melanophthalma and T. atra (n. 15), but also previously from other lichens collected in the Mediterranean basin and Armenia (i.e., Caloplaca gomerana, Lecidella stigmatea, Protoparmeliopsis muralis, Umbilicaria virginis and U. vellea; Harutyunyan et al. 2008). Members of this lineage occur at different altitudes and on different rock substrates (basalt, calcareous and siliceous). Harutyunyan et al. (2008) assigned the first isolated strains to the genus Rhinocladiella because at that time only a few sequences were available for comparison. Later Rhinocladiella was included in Herpotrichiellaceae (Teixeira et al. 2017), while the still undescribed strains provisionally maintained this genus name. Also at that time, Harutyunyan et al. (2008) suggested that these strains could be facultative lichen colonisers because of the absence of a specific lichen host and the infection symptoms. However, our results strengthen the idea that Paracladophialophora lichenicola has developed a certain preference for the lichen-associated lifestyle, thus presenting additional data to support its formal recognition.

The second new lineage – here described as the new species Cladophialophora endolichena – is placed within Herpotrichiellaceae, and its topology is mostly congruent with that of Muggia et al. (2017, 2021). In addition to our 26 strains isolated from both R. melanophthalma and T. atra, this new clade includes other Cladophialophora samples previously isolated from other lichen species (Gyalolechia fulgida, Lecanora polytropa, P. muralis and Rusavskia elegans; Harutyunyan et al. 2008; Muggia et al. 2016, 2017). Herpotrichiellaceae is the largest family in Chaetothyriales which includes ecologically very diverse fungi (e.g., human opportunists, rock-inhabiting fungi and lichenicolous fungi; Crous et al. 2007; Quan et al. 2020) and our results are not unexpected – the lichen-associated lifestyle is ancestral in this order (Quan et al. 2020, Quan et al. 2022 under review). Interestingly, the lichen associated Herpotrichiellaceae are mainly found to be likely Cladophialophora species, a genus known to be involved in the aromatic hydrocarbon degradation (Prenafeta-Boldú et al. 2006; Badali et al. 2008) and supposed to be able also to take benefits from the secondary metabolites found in lichens (Harutyunyan et al. 2008). The strains of Cladophialophora endolichena are strictly lichen-associated fungi, while the closest related species are C. chaetospira, C. nyingchiensis and C. tengchongensis, the latter two recently described as microcolonial melanised rock-inhabiting fungi (Sun et al. 2020).

Significant diversity of lichen-associated microfungi is also found in Dothideomycetes, although here the isolated strains are phylogenetically more heterogeneous. In Dothideomycetes, our samples were related to fungi with different lifestyles (Schoch et al. 2009; Hyde et al. 2013; Wijayawardene et al. 2014), as well as lichenicolous fungi such as Phoma caloplacae and P. cladonicola (Lawrey et al. 2012). Interestingly, most of the isolates retrieved in Dothideomycetes are related to fungi previously isolated from lichens or to rock-inhabiting fungi from extreme environments, such as Elasticomyces elasticus or Saxomyces penninicus (Selbmann et al. 2008, 2013; Ruibal, 2011; Muggia et al. 2016, 2017). All the new strains placed in Teratosphaeriaceae were isolated from R. melanophthalma collected in relatively high altitude (about 2000–4300 m a.s.l.) in Argentina, Chile and Utah, allowing a hypothesis that their choice to live endolichenically enhances protection from the high irradiation and the continuous fluctuation of temperature that characterize high-altitude mountain environments. However, one exception is the strain L3239, isolated from R. melanophthalma which (in Teratosphaeriaceae) forms a clade together with fungi isolated from lichens in the association of Letharietum vulpinae (Peršoh et al. 2012). Four strains are nested with Phoma cladoniicola, P. caloplacae and many other Phoma samples isolated from alpine epilithic lichens (Muggia et al. 2016). This result strengthens the hypothesis of Lawrey et al. (2012), who suggested that the same Phoma species can be isolated from a variety of lichens, in contrast to a previous assumption that Phoma species were highly selective for their hosts (Hawksworth and Cole 2004; Diederich et al. 2007).

In Sordariomycetes, some new microfungal strains also correspond to previously isolated fungi from lichens, in particular within Coniochaetales, Hypocreales and Xylariales. Five strains isolated from T. atra collected in Tasmania and Mauritius are related to Tolypocladium sp. and Elaphocordyceps sp. isolated from other lichen species (Jiang et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2022). Interestingly, Tolypocladium is a genus of fungicolous fungi (Sun et al. 2019), and its presence in lichens may hint to his parasitic behaviour towards the lichen mycobiont. Furthermore, we also recovered two strains related to Microcera physciae, recently isolated and described from the lichen Physcia tenella (Crous et al. 2021).

In conclusion, lichens are long-lived symbiotic systems and serve as suitable niches for many cryptically occurring fungi, some of which have likely specialized to them, finding in these systems a kind of protection and realized niche. These fungi do not germinate further and do not exit the lichen thalli when environmental conditions are too harsh and unfavourable, remaining even undetectable by morphological inspections. However, most of these fungi, that do not readily grow in the natural habitat, may start to grow when isolated as axenic culture under suitable culture conditions. The remaining unculturable/uncultivated fraction of lichenicolous fungi seems to demand further efforts to be evidenced and morphologically studied.

Acknowledgements

Roberto De Carolis is thanked for the help in the lab work, Claudio G. Ametrano for the help in bioinformatic analyses. Angel E. Armesto is thanked for the support in the field work in South America, Sergio Pérez-Ortega, Julieta Orlando, Diego Leiva, Damien Ertz and Ginteras Kantvilas are thanked for providing further specimens from their countries and trips.

Ethics approval and Consent to participate (include appropriateapprovals or waivers)

Not applicable.

Consent for publication (include appropriate statements)

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR, Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca) project PRIN2017 (project code 20177559A5) assigned to LM.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation was performed by Lucia Muggia, Agnese Cometto, Steven Leavitt; data collection and analysis were performed by Agnese Cometto and Lucia Muggia. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Agnese Cometto and Lucia Muggia and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, while sequences are public available in NCBI Genbank.

Abdollahzadeh J, Groenewald JZ, Coetzee MPA, et al (2020) Evolution of lifestyles in Capnodiales. Stud Mycol 95:381–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2020.02.004
Ahmadjian V (1987) Coevolution in lichens. Ann N Y Acad Sci 503:307–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb40617.x
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, et al (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410.
Amend AS, Seifert KA, Bruns TD (2010) Quantifying microbial communities with 454 pyrosequencing: does read abundance count?. Mol Ecol 19:5555–5565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04898.x
Ametrano CG, Knudsen K, Kocourková J, et al (2019) Phylogenetic relationships of rock-inhabiting black fungi belonging to the widespread genera Lichenothelia and Saxomyces. Mycologia 111:127–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2018.1543510
Arnold AE, Miadlikowska J, Higgins KL, et al (2009) A phylogenetic estimation of trophic transition networks for ascomycetous fungi: are lichens cradles of symbiotrophic fungal diversification?. Syst Biol 58:283–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syp001
Atienza V, Perez-Ortega S, Etayo J (2009) Two new conidial lichenicolous fungi from Spain indicate the distinction of Lichenodiplis and Minutoexcipula. Lichenologist 41:223–229.
Badali H, Gueidan C, Najafzadeh MJ, et al (2008) Biodiversity of the genus Cladophialophora. Stud Mycol 61:175–191. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2008.61.18
Banchi E, Stankovic D, Fernández-Mendoza F, et al (2018) ITS2 metabarcoding analysis complements lichen mycobiome diversity data. Mycol Prog 17:1049–1066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-018-1415-4
Beck A, Peršoh D, Rambold G (2014) First evidence for seasonal fluctuations in lichen- and bark-colonising fungal communities. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 59:155–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-013-0278-y
Bérubé JA, Nicolas GG (2015) Alien fungal species on asymptomatic live woody plant material imported into Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 37:67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2014.986526
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120.
Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, et al (2014) BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003537.
Bruns TD, Gardes M (1993) Molecular tools for the identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi-taxon‐specific oligonucleotide probes for suilloid fungi. Mol Ecol 2:233–242.
Černajová I, Škaloud P (2019) The first survey of Cystobasidiomycete yeasts in the lichen genus Cladonia; with the description of Lichenozyma pisutiana gen. nov., sp. nov. Fungal Biol 123:625–637.
Cometto A, Leavitt SD, Millanes AM, et al (2022) The yeast lichenosphere: high diversity of basidiomycetes from the lichens Tephromela atra and Rhizoplaca melanophthalma. Fungal Biol 126:587–608.
Crous PW, Osieck ER, Jurjevi Ž, et al (2021) Fungal planet description sheets: 1284–1382. Persoonia-Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 47:178–374.
Crous PW, Schubert K, Braun U, et al (2007) Opportunistic, human-pathogenic species in the Herpotrichiellaceae are phenotypically similar to saprobic or phytopathogenic species in the Venturiaceae. Stud Mycol 58:185–217. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2007.58.07
Crous PW, Summerell BA, Mostert L, Groenewald JZ (2008) Host specificity and speciation of Mycosphaerella and Teratosphaeria species associated with leaf spots of Proteaceae. Persoonia: Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 20:59–86. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158508X323949
Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Burgess TI, et al (2016) Fungal Planet description sheets: 469–557. Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 37:218–403. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158516X694499
Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Burgess TI, et al (2018) Fungal Planet description sheets: 716–784. Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 40:239–392. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2018.40.10
Cubero OF, Crespo A, Fatehi J, Bridge PD (1999) DNA extraction and PCR amplification method suitable for fresh, herbarium-stored, lichenized, and other fungi. Plant Systematics and Evolution 216:243–249.
De Carolis R, Cometto A, Moya P, et al (2022) Photobiont diversity in lichen symbioses from extreme environments. Front Microbiol 13:381.
de Hoog GS, Vicente VA, Najafzadeh MJ, Harrak MJ, Badali H, Seyedmousavi S (2011). Waterborne Exophiala species causing disease in cold-blooded animals. Persoonia-Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 27:46–72.
Diederich P (1996) The lichenicolous heterobasidiomycetes. Bibl Lichenol 61:1–198.
Diederich P, Kocourková J, Etayo J, Zhurbenko M (2007) The lichenicolous Phoma species (coelomycetes) on Cladonia. Lichenologist 39:153–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282907006044
Diederich P, Lawrey JD, Ertz D (2018) The 2018 classification and checklist of lichenicolous fungi, with 2000 non-lichenized, obligately lichenicolous taxa. Bryologist 121:340–425. https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745-121.3.340
Favero-Longo SE, Accattino E, Matteucci E, et al (2015) Weakening of gneiss surfaces colonized by endolithic lichens in the temperate climate area of northwest Italy. Earth Surf Process Landf 40:2000–2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3774
Fernández-Mendoza F, Fleischhacker A, Kopun T, et al (2017) ITS1 metabarcoding highlights low specificity of lichen mycobiomes at a local scale. Mol Ecol 26:4811–4830. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14244
Fleischhacker A, Grube M, Kopun T, et al (2015) Community analyses uncover high diversity of lichenicolous fungi in Alpine habitats. Microb Ecol 70:348–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-015-0579-6
Fröhlich-Nowoisky J, Burrows SM, Xie Z, et al (2012) Biogeography in the air: fungal diversity over land and oceans. Biogeosciences 9:1125–1136. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1125-2012
Fröhlich-Nowoisky J, Pickersgill DA, Després VR, Pöschl U (2009) High diversity of fungi in air particulate matter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:12814–12819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811003106
Gostinčar C, Muggia L, Grube M (2012) Polyextremotolerant black fungi: oligotrophism, adaptive potential, and a link to lichen symbioses. Front Microbiol 3:390. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00390
Gostinčar C, Zajc J, Lenassi M, et al (2018) Fungi between extremotolerance and opportunistic pathogenicity on humans. Fungal Divers 93:195–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0414-8
Grube M, Cardinale M, de Castro JV, et al (2009) Species-specific structural and functional diversity of bacterial communities in lichen symbioses. ISME Journal 3:1105–1115. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.63
Grube M, Cernava T, Soh J, et al (2015) Exploring functional contexts of symbiotic sustain within lichen-associated bacteria by comparative omics. ISME J 9:412–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.138
Gueidan C, Villaseñor CR, De Hoog GS, et al (2008) A rock-inhabiting ancestor for mutualistic and pathogen-rich fungal lineages. Stud Mycol 61:111–119. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2008.61.11
Hafellner J (2018) Focus on lichenicolous fungi: diversity and taxonomy under the principle “one fungus–one name.” Biosyst Ecol 34:227–243.
Hartmann M, Lee S, Hallam SJ, Mohn WW (2009) Bacterial, archaeal and eukaryal community structures throughout soil horizons of harvested and naturally disturbed forest stands. Environ Microbiol 11:3045–3062. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02008.x
Harutyunyan S, Muggia L, Grube M (2008) Black fungi in lichens from seasonally arid habitats. Stud Mycol 61:83–90. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2008.61.08
Hawksworth DL, Cole MS (2004) Phoma fuliginosa sp. nov., from Caloplaca trachyphylla in Nebraska, with a key to the known lichenicolous species. Lichenologist 36:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282904013982
Hawksworth DL, Grube M (2020) Lichens redefined as complex ecosystems. New Phytologist 227:1281–1283.
Hawksworth DL, Honegger R (1994) The lichen thallus: a symbiotic phenotype of nutritionally specialized fungi and its response to gall producers. Syst Assoc Spec 49:77–77.
Hocking AD, Pitt JI (1980) Dichloran-glycerol medium for enumeration of xerophilic fungi from low-moisture foods. Appl Environ Microbiol 39:488–492. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.39.3.488-492.1980
Hyde Kevin, Gareth Jones EB, Liu J-K, et al (2013) Families of Dothideomycetes. Fungal Divers 63:1–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0263-4
Jiang DF, Zhao L, Guo H, Wang HY (2015) New lineages of Elaphocordyceps harboring in lichen thalli. Plant Diversity Resour 37:746–750.
Karst J, Piculell B, Brigham C, et al (2013) Fungal communities in soils along a vegetative ecotone. Mycologia 105:61–70. https://doi.org/10.3852/12-042
Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780.
Kowalski T, Bilański P (2021) Fungi detected in the previous year’s leaf petioles of Fraxinus excelsior and their antagonistic potential against Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Forests 12:1412. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12101412
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, et al (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
Lagarde A, Jargeat P, Roy M, et al (2018) Fungal communities associated with Evernia prunastri, Ramalina fastigiata and Pleurosticta acetabulum: three epiphytic lichens potentially active against Candida biofilms. Microbiol Res 211:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.03.006
Lamit LJ, Lau MK, Sthultz CM, Wooley SC, Whitham TG, Gehring CA (2014) Tree genotype and genetically based growth traits structure twig endophyte communities. Am J Bot 101:467–478. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1400034
Larkin BG, Hunt LS, Ramsey PW (2012) Foliar nutrients shape fungal endophyte communities in Western white pine (Pinus monticola) with implications for white-tailed deer herbivory. Fungal Ecol 5:252–260.
Lawrey JD, Binder M, Diederich P, et al (2007) Phylogenetic diversity of lichen-associated homobasidiomycetes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 44:778–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.12.023
Lawrey JD, Diederich P (2003) Lichenicolous fungi: interactions, evolution, and biodiversity. Bryologist 106:80–120. https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745(2003)106[0080:lfieab]2.0.co;2
Lawrey JD, Diederich P, Nelsen MP, et al (2012) Phylogenetic placement of lichenicolous Phoma species in the Phaeosphaeriaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes). Fungal Divers 55:195–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-012-0166-9
Leavitt SD, Fankhauser JD, Leavitt DH, et al (2011) Complex patterns of speciation in cosmopolitan “rock posy” lichens - discovering and delimiting cryptic fungal species in the lichen-forming Rhizoplaca melanophthalma species-complex (Lecanoraceae, Ascomycota). Mol Phylogenet Evol 59:587–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.03.020
Leavitt SD, Grewe F, Widhelm T, et al (2016) Resolving evolutionary relationships in lichen-forming fungi using diverse phylogenomic datasets and analytical approaches. Sci Rep 6:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22262
Letunic I, Bork P (2019) Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W256–W259. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz239
Lilly VG, Barnett HL (1951) Physiology of the fungi. Physiology of the fungi. New York pp 464.
Lutzoni F, Miadlikowska J (2009) Lichens. Current Biology 19:R502–R503.
Martos F, Munoz F, Pailler T, et al (2012) The role of epiphytism in architecture and evolutionary constraint within mycorrhizal networks of tropical orchids. Mol Ecol 21:5098–5109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05692.x
Millanes AM, Diederich P, Ekman S, Wedin M (2011) Phylogeny and character evolution in the jelly fungi (Tremellomycetes, Basidiomycota, Fungi). Mol Phylogenet Evol 61:12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.05.014
Millanes AM, Diederich P, Wedin M (2016) Cyphobasidium gen. nov., a new lichen-inhabiting lineage in the Cystobasidiomycetes (Pucciniomycotina, Basidiomycota, Fungi). Fungal Biol 120:1468–1477.
Millanes AM, Diederich P, Westberg M, Wedin M (2021) Crittendenia gen. nov., a new lichenicolous lineage in the Agaricostilbomycetes (Pucciniomycotina), and a review of the biology, phylogeny and classification of lichenicolous heterobasidiomycetes. Lichenologist 53:103–116.
Molins A, Moya P, García-Breijo FJ, et al (2018) A multi-tool approach to assess microalgal diversity in lichens: isolation, Sanger sequencing, HTS and ultrastructural correlations. Lichenologist 50:123–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282917000664
Mouhamadou B, Molitor C, Baptist F, et al (2011) Differences in fungal communities associated to Festuca paniculata roots in subalpine grasslands. Fungal Divers 47:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-011-0091-3
Moya P, Molins A, Martinez-Alberola F, et al (2017) Unexpected associated microalgal diversity in the lichen Ramalina farinacea is uncovered by pyrosequencing analyses. PLoS One 12:e0175091. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175091
Muggia L, Fleischhacker A, Kopun T, Grube M (2016) Extremotolerant fungi from alpine rock lichens and their phylogenetic relationships. Fungal Divers 76:119–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0343-8
Muggia L, Grube M (2018) Fungal diversity in lichens: from extremotolerance to interactions with algae. Life 8:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/life8020015
Muggia L, Grube M, Tretiach M (2008) Genetic diversity and photobiont associations in selected taxa of the Tephromela atra group (Lecanorales, lichenised Ascomycota). Mycol Prog 7:147–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-008-0560-6
Muggia L, Kopun T, Ertz D (2015) Phylogenetic placement of the lichenicolous, anamorphic genus Lichenodiplis and its connection to Muellerella-like teleomorphs. Fungal Biol 119:1115–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2015.08.011
Muggia L, Kopun T, Grube M (2017) Effects of growth media on the diversity of culturable fungi from lichens. Molecules 22:824. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22050824
Muggia L, Pérez-Ortega S, Ertz D (2019) Muellerella, a lichenicolous fungal genus recovered as polyphyletic within Chaetothyriomycetidae (Eurotiomycetes, Ascomycota). Plant Fungal Syst 64:367–381. https://doi.org/10.2478/pfs-2019-0024
Muggia L, Pérez-Ortega S, Fryday A, et al (2014) Global assessment of genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity in the lichen-forming species Tephromela atra. Fungal Divers 64:233–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0271-4
Muggia L, Quan Y, Gueidan C, et al (2021) Sequence data from isolated lichen-associated melanized fungi enhance delimitation of two new lineages within Chaetothyriomycetidae. Mycol Prog 20:911–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-021-01706-8
Muggia L, Zellnig G, Rabensteiner J, Grube M (2010) Morphological and phylogenetic study of algal partners associated with the lichen-forming fungus Tephromela atra from the Mediterranean region. Symbiosis 51:149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-010-0060-8
Muriel S, Olariaga I, Prieto M (2022) Gypsum content influences culturable soil fungal communities in semi-arid steppes from central Spain. J Arid Environ 202:104756.
Nemergut DR, Townsend AR, Sattin SR, et al (2008) The effects of chronic nitrogen fertilization on alpine tundra soil microbial communities: implications for carbon and nitrogen cycling. Environ Microbiol 10:467–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01735.x
Pagano J, Levin JD, Trejo W (1958) Diagnostic medium for differentiation of species of Candida. Antibiot Annu 5:137–143.
Peršoh D, Rambold G (2012) Lichen-associated fungi of the Letharietum vulpinae. Mycol Prog 11:753–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-011-0786-6
Prenafeta-Boldú FX, Summerbell R, de Hoog SG (2006) Fungi growing on aromatic hydrocarbons: biotechnology’s unexpected encounter with biohazard? FEMS Microbiol Rev 30:109–130.
Qin J, Zhang W, Ge ZW, Zhang SB (2019) Molecular identifications uncover diverse fungal symbionts of Pleione (Orchidaceae). Fungal Ecol 37:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2018.10.003
Quan Y, Muggia L, Moreno LF, et al (2020) A re-evaluation of the Chaetothyriales using criteria of comparative biology. Fungal Divers 103:47–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-020-00452-8
Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, et al (2018) Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst Biol 67:901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
Ruibal C, Gueidan C, Selbmann L, et al (2009) Phylogeny of rock-inhabiting fungi related to Dothideomycetes. Stud Mycol 64:123–133. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2009.64.06
Ruibal C, Millanes AM, Hawksworth DL (2011) Molecular phylogenetic studies on the lichenicolous Xanthoriicola physciae reveal Antarctic rock-inhabiting fungi and Piedraia species among closest relatives in the Teratosphaeriaceae. IMA Fungus 2:97–103. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.01.13
Santiago IF, Soares MA, Rosa CA, et al (2015) Lichensphere: a protected natural microhabitat of the non-lichenised fungal communities living in extreme environments of Antarctica. Extremophiles 19:1087–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-015-0781-y
Schoch CL, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, et al (2009) A class-wide phylogenetic assessment of Dothideomycetes. Stud Mycol 64:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2009.64.01
Selbmann L, De Hoog GS, Zucconi L, et al (2008) Drought meets acid: three new genera in a dothidealean clade of extremotolerant fungi. Stud Mycol 61:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2008.61.01
Selbmann L, Grube M, Onofri S, et al (2013) Antarctic epilithic lichens as niches for black meristematic fungi. Biology (Basel) 2:784–797. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology2020784
Selbmann L, Isola D, Egidi E, et al (2014) Mountain tips as reservoirs for new rock-fungal entities: Saxomyces gen. nov. and four new species from the Alps. Fungal Divers 65:67–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0234-9
Smith HB, Dal Grande F, Muggia L, Keuler R, Divakar PK, Grewe F, et al (2020) Metagenomic data reveal diverse fungal and algal communities associated with the lichen symbiosis. Symbiosis, 82:133–147.
Spribille T (2018) Relative symbiont input and the lichen symbiotic outcome. Curr Opin Plant Biol 44:57–63.
Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313.
Sun J-Z, Liu X-Z, McKenzie EHC, et al (2019) Fungicolous fungi: terminology, diversity, distribution, evolution, and species checklist. Fungal Divers 95:337–430.
Sun W, Su L, Yang S, et al (2020) Unveiling the hidden diversity of rock-inhabiting fungi: Chaetothyriales from China. Journal of Fungi 6:187.
Suryanarayanan TS, Thirunavukkarasu N (2017) Endolichenic fungi: the lesser known fungal associates of lichens. Mycology 8:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2017.1352048
Teixeira MM, Moreno LF, Stielow BJ, et al (2017) Exploring the genomic diversity of black yeasts and relatives (Chaetothyriales, Ascomycota). Stud Mycol 86:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2017.01.001
Timling I, Walker DA, Nusbaum C, et al (2014) Rich and cold: diversity, distribution and drivers of fungal communities in patterned-ground ecosystems of the North American Arctic. Mol Ecol 23:3258–3272. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12743
Travadon R, Lawrence D, Vallance J, Rey P (2015) Influence of pruning systems on trunk pathogens and other fungi colonizing grapevine wood. Annual Meeting of the American Phytopahtological Society, Pasadena CA 68-O.
Travadon R, Lecomte P, Diarra B, et al (2016) Grapevine pruning systems and cultivars influence the diversity of wood-colonizing fungi. Fungal Ecol 24: 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2016.09.003
Tuovinen V, Ekman S, Thor G, et al (2019) Two basidiomycete fungi in the cortex of wolf lichens. Current Biology 29:476–483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.022
Tuovinen V, Millanes AM, Freire-Rallo S, et al (2021) Tremella macrobasidiata and Tremella variae have abundant and widespread yeast stages in Lecanora lichens. Environ Microbiol 23:2484–2498. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15455
U’Ren JM, Lutzoni F, Miadlikowska J, et al (2012) Host and geographic structure of endophytic and endolichenic fungi at a continental scale. Am J Bot 99:898–914. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100459
U’Ren JM, Lutzoni F, Miadlikowska J, Arnold AE (2010) Community analysis reveals close affinities between endophytic and endolichenic fungi in mosses and lichens. Microb Ecol 60:340–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9698-2
U’Ren JM, Riddle JM, Monacell JT, et al (2014) Tissue storage and primer selection influence pyrosequencing-based inferences of diversity and community composition of endolichenic and endophytic fungi. Mol Ecol Resour 14:1032–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12252
Urzı C, de Leo F (2001) Sampling with adhesive tape strips: an easy and rapid method to monitor microbial colonization on monument surfaces. J Microbiol Methods 44:1–11.
Vasse M, Voglmayr H, Mayer V, et al (2017) A phylogenetic perspective on the association between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and black yeasts (Ascomycota: Chaetothyriales). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284: 20162519. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2519
Vázquez-Nion D, Rodríguez-Castro J, López-Rodríguez MC, et al (2016) Subaerial biofilms on granitic historic buildings: microbial diversity and development of phototrophic multi-species cultures. Biofouling 32:657–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2016.1183121
Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990
Wang Y, Zheng Y, Wang X, et al (2016) Lichen-associated fungal community in Hypogymnia hypotrypa (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) affected by geographic distribution and altitude. Front Microbiol 7:1231. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01231
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications 8:315–322.
Wijayawardene NN, Crous PW, Kirk PM, et al (2014) Naming and outline of Dothideomycetes-2014 including proposals for the protection or suppression of generic names. Fungal Diversity 69:1–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-014-0309-2
Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Al-Ani LKT, et al (2020) Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 11:1060–1456.
Williams L, Colesie C, Ullmann A, et al (2017a) Lichen acclimation to changing environments: photobiont switching vs. climate‐specific uniqueness in Psora decipiens. Ecol Evol 7:2560–2574.
Yamamoto Y, Kinoshita Y, Yoshimura I (2002) Culture of thallus fragments and redifferentiation of lichens. In: Protocols in Lichenology pp 34–46.
Yang JH, Oh SY, Kim W, Hur JS (2022) Endolichenic fungal community analysis by pure culture isolation and metabarcoding: a case study of Parmotrema tinctorum. Mycobiology 50:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/12298093.2022.2040112
Yoshino K, Yamamoto K, Masumoto H, et al (2020) Polyol-assimilation capacities of lichen-inhabiting fungi. Lichenologist 52:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282919000483
Zamora JC, Pérez-Ortega S, Rico VJ (2011) Tremella macrobasidiata (Basidiomycota, Tremellales), a new lichenicolous fungus from the Iberian Peninsula. Lichenologist 43:407–415. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282911000405
Zhang T, Wei XL, Zhang YQ, et al (2015) Diversity and distribution of lichen-associated fungi in the Ny-Ålesund Region (Svalbard, High Arctic) as revealed by 454 pyrosequencing. Sci Rep 5:14850. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14850

AscopaperSupplMaterial.docx

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 13 Jul, 2023

Read the published version in Mycological Progress →

Reviewers agreed at journal
26 Jan, 2023
Reviewers invited by journal
26 Jan, 2023
Editor invited by journal
18 Jan, 2023
Editor assigned by journal
17 Jan, 2023
First submitted to journal
13 Jan, 2023

You are reading this latest preprint version

Tackling fungal diversity in lichen symbioses: molecular and morphological data recognize new lineages in Chaetothyriales (Eurotiomycetes, Ascomycota)

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Results

Taxonomy

Discussion

Declarations

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1