Population sample
The overall population sample comprised 140 children and young people from the Hadza tribe. Sociodemographic data were collected for 107 of these children and are presented in Table 1. The sample ranged in age from 3 to 17 years with a median age of 8 years (interquartile range (IQR)= 5 to 11 years) and 53.3% of the sample were female (n=57). In terms of living status, 70.1% of children reported living with their mother, and 59.8% reported living with their father. 45.8% of the children lived in the Domanga camp, 23.4% lived in the Gideru camp, 14.0% lived in the Sengele camp, and 16.8% lived in the Ukumako camp. 29% of children had received or were receiving education with a median education duration of 4 years (IQR=2 to 6 years). No children consumed alcohol regularly, but 5.6% reported using tobacco and 3.7% reported using marijuana. Three children (2.8%) had a physical disability and three had psychological problems according to the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA).
A subsample of Hadza children aged 5-16 years (n=113) was created to facilitate comparison with data from the Mental Health of Children and Young People 2017 (MHCYP). Sample characteristics are provided in Table 1 for those children that sociodemographic data were collected for (n=83) and were similar to those reported for the overall sample. Not all participants who completed an Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) had a completed DAWBA.
Mental health of Hadza children and MHCYP comparator groups
SDQ scores for the overall sample (n=140), the subsample aged 5-16 years (n=113), and for 5-16-year-olds from MHCYP 2017 (n=2588) are presented in Table 2. As inferential statistics were not possible due to the summary nature of the MHCYP data, descriptive comparisons were made between 5-16-year-olds from the Hadza tribe and 5-16-year-olds from the MHCYP which are presented in Figure 1.
Children from the Hadza tribe (M=7.1, 95% CI=6.3 to 8.0) had lower levels of total difficulties compared to children from MHCYP (M=8.0, 95% CI=7.7 to 8.4). However, as the confidence intervals overlap it is unlikely that this difference was statistically significant. Levels of emotional problems (Hadza: M=1.3, 95% CI=0.9 to 1.6; MHCYP 2017: M=2.1, 95% CI=2.0 to 2.2), conduct problems (Hadza: M=0.6, 95% CI=0.4 to 0.8; MHCYP : M=1.4, 95% CI=1.3 to 1.5) and hyperactivity (Hadza: M=2.5, 95% CI=2.1 to 2.9; MHCYP 2017: M=3.1, 95% CI=3.0 to 3.3) were lower in the Hadza children, and levels of prosocial behaviour (Hadza: M=9.4, 95% CI=9.1 to 9.7; MHCYP 2017: M=8.7, 95% CI=8.6 to 8.8) were higher, compared to children in MHCYP 2017. However, peer problems appeared to be higher among Hadza children (Hadza: M=2.8, 95% CI=2.6 to 3.0; MHCYP 2017: M=1.4, 95% CI=1.3 to 1.5). On all SDQ subscales, confidence intervals did not overlap between Hadza children and children from the MHCYP indicating that these differences are likely to be statistically significant.
Prevalence of mental disorders of Hadza and MHCYP comparator groups
From the Hadza dataset, DAWBA data were available for 61/80 children aged 5-10, and 22/33 children aged 11-16. 3.6% (n=3) of children from the Hadza 5-16 year old subsample met the criteria for any psychiatric disorder, compared to 11.8% in the comparable age group from MHCYP. All Hadza children with psychiatric disorders in the 5-16 year sample were girls and all were from the 5-10 year old age group. All other psychiatric disorders diagnosed in Hadza children were comorbid with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). No children from the Hadza 11-16 age group met the criteria for a psychiatric disorder, compared to 14.4% in the comparable age group from MHCYP.
Regarding emotional disorders, no child from the Hadza met the criteria for an emotional disorder. In the MHCYP data, 4.1% of children aged 5-10, and 9.0% of children aged 11-16 met the criteria for a emotional disorder.
No child from the Hadza met the criteria for a behavioural disorder. In the MHCYP data, 5.0% of children aged 5-10, and 6.2% of children aged 11-16 met the criteria for a behavioural disorder.
No child from the Hadza met the criteria for an eating disorder. In the MHCYP data, 0.1% of children aged 5-10, and 0.6 % of children aged 11-16 met the criteria for an eating disorder.
4.9% of Hadza children aged 5-10 met the criteria for ASD, compared to 1.5% of 5-10 year olds in MHCYP 2017. No Hadza children aged 11-16 met the criteria for ASD, compared to 1.2% of the same age group in MHCYP 2017.
The number of Hadza children with mental disorders was too small to be able to conduct meaningful statistical analysis, however here we provide a narrative description for illustrative purposes:
Child 1 was a female aged 6 and met the criteria for ASD. She displayed high emotional difficulties, close to average conduct problems, high hyperactivity problems, high peer problems, very low prosocial strengths, and her total difficulties score was very high.
Child 2 was a female aged 6 and met the criteria for ASD, hyperkinetic disorder, Rett’s syndrome, social phobia, and motor tics. She displayed very high emotional difficulties, high conduct problems, very high hyperactivity problems, close to average peer problems, very low prosocial strengths, and her total difficulties score was very high.
Child 3 was a female aged 10 and met the criteria for ASD, social phobia, and Tourette syndrome. She displayed very high emotional difficulties, very high conduct problems, slightly raised hyperactivity problems, high peer problems, very low prosocial strengths, and her total difficulties score was very high. We also noted she had characteristic clinical features of Down syndrome.
Child 4 was a male aged 4 and met the criteria for ASD and hyperkinetic disorder. He displayed close to average scores for emotional problems, conduct problems, hyperactivity, prosocial strengths and total difficulties. He displayed high peer problems scores.
Gender differences in positive and negative behavioural symptoms (SDQ scores)
Looking at boys and girls separately (see Table 2) revealed that differences in SDQ scores between Hadza children and English children were much more pronounced in boys. Boys from the Hadza tribes (compared to boys from MHCYP 2017) appeared to have significantly (confidence intervals do not overlap) lower total difficulty scores, lower levels of emotional and conduct problems, lower levels of hyperactivity, and higher levels of prosocial behaviour. However, peer problems were higher in boys from the Hadza tribe.
Overlaps in confidence intervals suggest that girls from the Hadza tribe did not differ significantly from girls in England in total difficulty scores, levels of hyperactivity, and levels of prosocial behaviour. However, they had lower levels of emotional and conduct problems, and higher levels of peer problems when compared with children in MHCYP 2017.
Associations between sociodemographic factors and SDQ scores in Hadza children
We examined associations between age, sex, camp, and living status (living with father, living with mother) and SDQ scores in in the overall sample (aged 3-17 years, n=107) from the Hadza tribe. There was no evidence that age was associated with total SDQ scores or any SDQ subscale (all p values >0.05). Sex was not associated with any SDQ score apart from prosocial behaviour (β=-0.66, 95% CI=-1.19 to -0.13) where boys (M=9.94, SD=0.31) had significantly higher levels than girls (M=9.28, SD=1.88).
Summary SDQ scores for each Hadza camp are provided in Table 3 to facilitate comparison. Compared to children from the Domanga camp, children from Gideru camp had significantly lower total difficulty scores (β=-3.17, 95% CI=-5.03 to -1.31), whereas scores for the children from the Sengele camps were significantly higher (β=2.30, 95% CI=0.07 to 4.53). In terms of SDQ subscales, emotional problems were lower in the Gideru camp (β=-1.02, 95% CI=-1.80 to -0.24) and higher in the Sengele camp (β =1.30, 95% CI=0.36 to 2.23) compared to children from the Domanga camp. Similarly, when compared with children from the Domanga camp, those from the Gideru camp had lower levels of hyperactivity (β=-1.71, 95% CI=-2.48 to -0.94) and those from the Sengele camp had higher levels (β=1.73, 95% CI=0.80 to 2.65). Peer problems were lower in the Sengele (β=-0.71, 95% CI=-1.25 to -0.17) and the Ukumako camps (β=-0.80, 95% CI=-1.30 to -0.29) compared to the Domanga camp. There were no significant differences in conduct problems or prosocial behaviour between camps.
There was no evidence that living with fathers compared to living with mothers was associated with total SDQ scores.