Rheological properties of prepared chitosan/gelatin nanoedible coating and film solutions incorporated with AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compound actives to produce edible coating and films:-
The study prepared measurements of rheological properties such as shear rate, shear stress, and viscosity of samples on chitosan/gelatin nanoedible films and coatings at different treatments T1, T2, T3, and T4 and different shear rates (13.2, 26.4, 39.6, 52.8,52.8 66.00, and 79.2 1/s). Figures (1 and 2) and table (2) The results show that the forming solution exhibits a trend of non-Newtonian pseudoplastic behaviour at different treatments (T1, T2, T3, and T4) and fits the power law equation τ = kγn → (1) Where : τ: shear stress, Pa γ: shear rate 1/sec, k: consistency index n: flow behavior index. The results in the table and figure indicated a relationship between shear rate, apparent viscosity, and shear stress for different samples. Explains why the k (consistency index) for T1, T2, T3, and T4 is the same. With the exception of T4 (0.152), all samples exhibited pseudoplastic behavior. Moreover, it was found that the n 1 flow behaviour index indicated that the fluid had the pseudoplastic behaviour of nanoscale AgNO3/ZnONPs edible films and coatings. Treatments T2, T3, and T4 all produce edible film and coatings to create edible film-forming suspension solutions, and their consistency index is higher than that of sample T1, which had a consistency index of 0.1335. The flow behaviour index increased with increasing concentration, except for the decreased T4 (0.406) of nanoscale AgNO3/ZnONPs edible films and coatings. It shows that all samples behave as non-Newtonian pseudoplastic, and constitutive equations are necessary to provide the required material parameters by controlling the process, rate of shear stress, and properties of mixtures of chitosan components and to determine the relationship between shear time and viscosity for mixing components. Because materials and time depend on mixing, the viscosity decreases continuously over time, which means that when the material is cut, it causes disruption of the collected particles and therefore provides less resistance to flow and decreases the viscosity over time until the values are stable. He worked on data for the decomposition of shear stress in different treatments and with different concentrations of nanomaterials with chitosan, where it was found that the shear stress variation with shear time was fitted. Suisui Jiang et al. (2016).
Table (2): Relationship between flow behavior index (n) and consistency index (k) at different treatments preparation of prepared chitosan/gelatin nano films solution combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compound active to produce edible film-forming suspension solution:
Treatments | Viscosity | shear stress |
K | N | R2 | K | N | R2 |
produced edible film of prepared chitosan/gelatin nano edible coating & films solution combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs to produce edible coating and films |
T1 | 0.1335 | 0.316 | 0.8852 | 0.1076 | 0.8014 | 0.9778 |
T2 | 0.1398 | 0.416 | 0.904 | 0.1205 | 0.7288 | 0.9832 |
T3 | 0.175 | 0.514 | 0.9859 | 0.0277 | 0.9633 | 0.9941 |
T4 | 0.152 | 0.406 | 0.8969 | 0.1205 | 0.7288 | 0.9832 |
Physical And Mechanical Properties Of Films:
The results shown in Table 3 show that the thickness values of chitosan/gelatin nanoedible coatings and films combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compound actives were 174, 125, 129, and 128 um for T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. The results indicated that treatment T1 had the highest thickness value, while treatment T4 had the lowest thickness value. Also, it could be observed that the lowest values of tensile strength (58.45 N), elongation (25.62%), oxygen (27.25 M3/M2/X10−7), CO2 (20.12 M3/M2/X10 − 8), water vapour transmission rate (18.87 g/hr.m2), water vapour permeability (0.159 g/m2/day.mmHg), and solubility (23.18%) were recorded for treatment T4. It also revealed that the T1, T2, and T3 treatments had the lowest tensile strength (65.43, 61.25, and 54.63 N), elongation (39.25, 28.43, and 24.56%), oxygen (43.22, 33.24, and 30.40 M3.M/M2 X10-7), CO2 (36.45, 31.65, and 27.68 M3.M/M2 X10-8), water vapour transmission rates (High film elongation is always a desirable characteristic if the film is to be used for food applications. All the main factors significantly affected the mechanics of the film, as described below. The chitosan film had an 18% higher elongation than the chitosan film, and in addition to the incorporation of thymol, this reduced the chitosan layer. Nelson et al. (2016), (ASTM, 2003).
Table No. (3) mechanical properties, permeability and thickness of prepared chitosan/gelatin nano edible coating & films solution combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compound active to produce edible coating and films:
Treatments | Thickness Um | Tensile strength N | Elongation % | O2 M3.M/M2×10− 7day.mmHg | Co2 M3.M/M2×10− 8day.mmHg | Water vapors Transmission rate, g/hr.m2 | Water vapors g.mm/m2.day.mmHg | solubility in water % |
produced edible film of prepared chitosan/gelatin nano edible coating & films solution combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs to produce edible coating and films |
T1 | 174 | 65.43 | 39.25 | 43.22 | 36.45 | 39.65 | 0.167 | 35.30 |
T2 | 125 | 61.25 | 28.43 | 33.24 | 31.65 | 27.64 | 0.139 | 30.23 |
T3 | 129 | 54.63 | 24.56 | 30.40 | 27.68 | 22.67 | 0.149 | 28.34 |
T4 | 128 | 58.45 | 25.62 | 27.25 | 20.12 | 18.87 | 0.159 | 23.18 |
Determination of particales size and zeta potentioal of nanotechnology of prepared chitosan/gelatin nano edible coating & films solution combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compound active to produce edible coating and films solution formed from it:
1-partical Size Distribution:
The obtained results are presented in Table 4 and Fig. 3. It is shown that the addition of AgNO3 nanomaterials, ZnONPs, and phenolic compounds has an effective effect on the dispersion properties of the film and coating emulsions, which were evaluated based on the change in the size distribution of the nanoparticles with respect to the coating and film emulsion sample. These values were 0.756, 0.758, and 0.360 for T2, T3, and T4 based on the change in the polydispersion index (suspended particles with zeta potentials higher than + 30 or less than − 30 mV repel each other because they are considered stable, but if the potential zeta is between + 30 and − 30 mV, they tend to attract each other. (Tunc¸ and Duman, 2010 ) and Ortiz-Zarama et al (2016).
2-zeta Potential:
From the results of the analysis in Table 4 and Fig. 4, In the treatments T1, T2, T3, and T4 of the zeta potential of nanotechnology of prepared chitosan/gelatin nano edible coating and films solution combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compound actives to produce edible coating and films solution, it was discovered that the sizes of the active phenolic compounds, the oil distribution, and the deviation of the extracted oil and nanoparticles depend on the size of the plant nanoparticles.The zeta potential distribution and zeta deviation (mV) for the treatment at the peak were 50.70, 7.64, 6.98, and 6.42, 2.90, and 4.13, respectively, when compared to the initial control samples Tl, 1 zeta potential of 57.7 and zeta deviation (mV) of 5.48 (mV).The zeta potential is an important indicator of surface charges because it measures the electric charge at the colloidal particle boundary.The higher the zeta potential, the better the dispersion stability. Desirable zeta potentials can be obtained by Roy et al. (2019) and Rajabi et al. (2020).
Table (4) Measured particles size and zeta potential of nanotechnology of prepared chitosan/gelatin nano edible coating & films solution combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compound active to produce edible coating and films solution formed from it:
Treatments | particle size distribution(nm) | Zeta potential(mv) |
Poly Dispersity indexs Pdi | Hydrodynamic Diameter nm | Z-Potentioal | Z- Devition |
produced edible film of prepared chitosan/gelatin nano edible coating & films solution combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compound active to produce edible coating and films |
T1 | 0.417 | 1123 | 57.7 | 5.48 |
T2 T3 T4 | 0.756 0.758 0. 360 | 12.52 49.19 191.5 | 50.70 7.64 6.98 | 6.42 2.90 4.13 |
Determination of color apparent and transmittance light transmittance of prepared chitosan/gelatin nano edible coating & films combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compound active to produce edible films.
The results obtained are presented in table (5) and figures (5 and 6). From the curves illustrated in Fig. 1, it is clear that the apparent colour decreased with increasing concentration (exception b) at different treatments (T1, T2, T3, and T4). It was also observed that treatment T2 was higher than the following treatments, T3 and T4. The treatments also had higher apparent colour values: T1 was 81.48, 8.75, 12.75, and 3.31 for L, a, b, and E, respectively, while T3 was 79.11, 2.90, 17.34, and 3.39 for L, a, b, and E, respectively, as compared to T1 for L, a, b, and E of 83.20, 0.74, 7.02, and 9.23.On the other hand, the barrier and transparency of the films were evaluated by measuring the percent light transmittance at T550, 430, and 395 nm, respectively. Light transmittance at 550nm was found to be higher in T2 (86.1), followed by T4 (85.1), when compared to T1.While it was found that the light transmittance measured at 430nm was higher in T4 (79.5), followed by T177.9, as compared to T1, it was lower at 64.5. It was also observed that the light transmittance measured at 395nm was higher in T3 (72.3), followed by T2 (67.7), compared to T1. according to Swarup Roy and Jong-Whan Rhim (2021), Li et al. (2014), Maria-Loana Socaciu et al. (2020), and Munir et al. (2019).
Table (5) Measured of color apparent and transmittance light transmittance of prepared chitosan/gelatin nano edible coating & films combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compound active to produce edible films.
Films | L | a | b | \(\varDelta\)E | T550nm | T430nm | T395nm |
produced edible film of prepared chitosan/gelatin nano edible coating & films solution combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compound active to produce edible coating and films |
T1 | 83.20 | 0.74 | 7.02 | 9.23 | 77.3 | 64.5 | 56.4 |
T2 | 81.48 | 8.75 | 12.75 | 3.31 | 86.1 | 77.9 | 67.7 | |
T3 | 81.12 | 1.68 | 12.65 | 2.31 | 79.3 | 72.9 | 66.1 | |
T4 | 79.11 | 2.90 | 17.34 | 3.39 | 85.1 | 79.5 | 72.3 | |
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) microstructure of prepared nano edible coatings and films combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compound active to produce edible films:
There are four microscopic images of nanoedible coatings and films combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compound actives to produce edible films. After taking the cross-section, the morphology of the surface was investigated using SEM images (Fig. 4), and the surface roughness was estimated using nanoedible coatings and films. The SEM images showed that the edible films were intact and smooth without any noticeable delamination on the surface, which was found to rise with increasing concentration upon different treatments. In the figure, prepared nano-edible coatings and films combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs/GCE to produce edible films (T1, T2, T3, and T4) are shown. It was found that T1, a 0% treatment, has cracks in the edible film due to poor treatment that does not contain AgNO3/ZnONPs. In general, the edible film is composed of a homogeneous solution with some compact fine grains and an intact smooth crystal morphology in a continuous matrix. It can be concluded that these studies are useful for learning about the microstructure and membrane morphology, which can help in selecting the edible nanofilm formulas for coating and packing. Our results are in agreement with those obtained by Priyadarshi et al. (2021). SEM images found that the elegant CMC film was smooth and intact without any deformation, and the surface was clear. The surface roughness of the films supplemented with grape seed extract was slightly increased, as confirmed by the higher surface roughness of the CMC/grape seed extract film compared to the elegant CMC film Sotelo-Boy et al. (2015) and Maria-Ioana Socaciu et al. (2020).
FTIR analysis of prepared chitosan/gelatin nano edible coatings and films, which were combined with AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compounds to produce edible films.
The FTIR measurements of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles were carried out to identify the possible interaction between AgNO3/ZnONPs and phenolic compounds active in producing edible films responsible for the formation and stabilisation of nanoparticles. Results of FTIR measurements showed transmittance peaks located at about 3000 cm1, 1750 cm1, and 1050 cm1 (Fig. 5). From the spectrum, the major peak was assigned at 3250 cm1, which indicates OH stretching in alcohols and phenolic compounds (Praphulla et al., 2014). The absorption peak at 1700 cm-1 is assigned to the amide I bond of chitosan and gelatin arising due to carbonyl stretch in proteins that are present in leaf extract. The absorption peak at 1750 cm1 is close to that reported for native proteins (Sharma et al., 2014). This evidence suggests that chitosan and gelatin are interacting with biosynthesized nanoparticles and that their secondary structures were not affected during the reaction with Ag + ions or after binding with Ag nanoparticles (Fayaz et al., 2010). A small peak at 1650 cm-1 is assigned to the NH/Zno stretch mode and was found to be enhanced when compared with the FTIR spectrum of leaf extract.
Physico-chemical and microbiological properties of nano edible film and coated Al Hulwah and Soukari dates during storage period.
Weight Loss Percentage:
Table (6) shows that the treatments (control, T1, T2, T3, and T4) increased the values of weight loss with increasing the storage period at cooled temperatures, and that the percentage of loss increased in the control and T1. It was also found that the treatments T2, T3, and T4 were low in percentage weight loss compared to other treatments. As noted, the values of the losses are increasing gradually with treatments (control, T1, T2, T3, and T4). Edible coating application results in reducing weight loss because it has semi-permeable properties, which led to extending shelf life by reducing moisture and solute migration, respiration, and oxidative reaction rates, as well as suppressing physiological disorders on fresh-cut fruits, as reported by Bellaouchi et al. (2017).
Table (6) Effect of nano edible film and coatings on weight loss (%) of Al Hulwah and Soukari dates during storage at 2–4ºC.
| Al Hulwah | Soukari |
Storage period week | Treatments | Treatments |
Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
1 | 2.36 | 1.81 | 1.42 | 1.32 | 1.77 | 0.81 | 1.18 | 1.08 | 0.66 | 0.71 |
2 | 3.95 | 2.49 | 3.64 | 1.86 | 2.34 | 1.53 | 2.41 | 1.53 | 1.23 | 1.47 |
3 | 5.96 | 3.79 | 4.43 | 2.46 | 3.39 | 2.46 | 3.33 | 1.88 | 2.07 | 2.16 |
4 | 8.04 | 4.91 | 4.89 | 3.33 | 4.80 | 2.97 | 4.53 | 2.29 | 2.65 | 3.05 |
5 | 9.41 | 5.35 | 5.22 | 4.41 | 5.07 | 3.43 | 5.07 | 3.07 | 3.42 | 3.31 |
6 | 10.75 | 5.83 | 5.77 | 5.47 | 5.40 | 3.94 | 5.27 | 3.73 | 3.81 | 3.77 |
LSD | S = 1.876 T = 1.805 S&T = 0.264 | S = 1.986 T = 1.864 S&T = 0.325 |
Total Soluble Solids (Tss):
In general, there was a gradual increase in total soluble solids (TSS) during the complete storage period at chilled temperatures (Table 7), but the TSS was reduced in control as compared to other treatments. As noted, the values increased gradually with treatments (control, T1, T2, T3, and T4). The total soluble solids significantly (p < 0.05) increased with storage time in all treatments, with the exception of fruit covered with the bilayer film, which had no significant change with time. The foam tray wrapped with PVC film showed a small increase in total soluble solids and had higher total soluble solids and slightly advanced starch breakdown. (Omaima Hafez, 2011 and 2012)
Table (7) Effect of nano edible film and coatings on TSS of Al Hulwah and Soukari dates during storage at 2–4ºC.
| Al Hulwah | Soukari |
Storage period week | Treatments | Treatments |
Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
0 | 36.40 | 36.70 | 36.10 | 36.90 | 36.20 | 48.10 | 49.30 | 50.60 | 51.40 | 49.90 |
1 | 38.10 | 38.30 | 37.60 | 38.20 | 38.50 | 49.50 | 51.20 | 51.70 | 52.60 | 51.20 |
2 | 39.40 | 39.90 | 39.10 | 39.80 | 39.90 | 50.30 | 52.50 | 52.90 | 54.30 | 52.60 |
3 | 40.60 | 40.50 | 40.00 | 41.30 | 41.80 | 51.60 | 53.80 | 54.60 | 55.70 | 54.80 |
4 | 41.50 | 40.20 | 41.80 | 43.50 | 43.70 | 52.90 | 54.70 | 55.10 | 56.80 | 55.70 |
5 | 42.30 | 43.10 | 42.60 | 44.80 | 44.30 | 53.40 | 55.60 | 56.50 | 57.20 | 56.60 |
6 | 42.90 | 43.70 | 44.70 | 45.8 | 45.40 | 54.60 | 56.30 | 56.60 | 57.40 | 57.90 |
LSD | S = 1.731 T = 1.675 S&T = 0.167 | S = 1.873 T = 1.764 S&T = 0.194 |
Total Acidity:
The total acidity of Al Hulwah and Soukari dates changed during storage at cool temperatures. The obtained results are recorded in Table 8. The results showed that as the storage period at cooled temperature increased, the total acidity decreased gradually. It is also considered that coatings reduce the rate of respiration and may therefore delay the utilisation of organic acids. Omaima Hafez, (2011), and Esam et al. (2016) agree. However, the decrease in acidity during storage demonstrated fruit senescence. The same authors outlined that coatings may slow the changes in pH and titratable acidity and effectively delay fruit senescence. This was probably because the semi-permeablity of coating films formed on the surface of the fruit might have modified the internal atmosphere, i.e., the endogenous CO2 and O2 concentration of the fruit, thus retarding the ripening process.Bellaouchi., (2017).
Table (8) Effect of nano edible film and coatings on acidity of Al Hulwah and Soukari dates during storage at 2–4ºC.
| Al Hulwah | Soukari |
Storage period week | Treatments | Treatments |
Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
0 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.21 |
1 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.20 |
2 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.20 |
3 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.19 |
4 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.19 |
5 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.18 |
6 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.18 |
LSD | S = 1.893 T = 1.643 S&T = 0.172 | S = 1.963 T = 1.784 S&T = 0.195 |
Total sugar and reducing sugar in Al Hulwah and Soukari dates during storage at 2–4ºC.
The results obtained in table 9 The total sugar gradually increased with the lengthening of the storage period in both samples kept in packaged plastic trays and in carton boxes. While reducing sugar gradually decreased with increasing storage period, indicating that cooling temperatures encouraged the inversion of fruit starch to simple sugars and thus increased fruit sweetness. The obtained results are consistent with those obtained by Bai et al. (2003), who reported that the total soluble sugar gradually increased in coated fruits during storage temperature; the authors discovered that the total sugar increased with increasing storage. Patricia, et al, 2005) Who found that the total sugar content of all coated, packed and control fruit quality significantly increased " total sugar " fruits were highest in reducing sugars content (47.94%), Bellaouchi (2017). This decreasing might be due to consumption of reducing sugars through respiration Esam (2016). edible films nanomaterials reduced the reducing sugars loss significantly as compared with the edible films.
Table (9) Effect of nano edible film and coatings reducing sugar and total sugar in Al Hulwah and Soukari dates during storage at 2–4ºC.
| Reducing sugar |
| Al Hulwah | Soukari |
Storage period week | Treatments | Treatments |
Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
0 | 42.17 | 44.61 | 45.10 | 43.09 | 41.68 | 48.56 | 49.21 | 47.49 | 48.11 | 48.36 |
1 | 41.61 | 43.70 | 44.83 | 42.51 | 41.23 | 48.10 | 48.57 | 46.71 | 47.24 | 47.41 |
2 | 40.86 | 42.81 | 43.29 | 41.89 | 40.76 | 47.23 | 47.19 | 45.23 | 45.89 | 45.36 |
3 | 39.98 | 41.63 | 42.76 | 41.07 | 39.57 | 45.89 | 45.98 | 44.69 | 44.31 | 44.79 |
4 | 38.21 | 40.98 | 41.89 | 40.36 | 38.13 | 44.23 | 44.53 | 43.59 | 43.62 | 43.09 |
5 | 37.48 | 39.42 | 41.07 | 39.11 | 37.97 | 43.89 | 43.21 | 42.10 | 42.91 | 42.81 |
6 | 36.17 | 39.09 | 40.29 | 38.93 | 37.68 | 41.32 | 42.99 | 41.56 | 42.00 | 42.36 |
L.S.D | S = 1.489 T = 1.479 S&T = 0.172 | S = 1.689 T = 1.572 S&T = 0.189 |
Total sugar |
0 | 45.63 | 48.31 | 49.27 | 47.73 | 48.54 | 56.17 | 57.81 | 58.24 | 59.13 | 57.80 |
1 | 46.41 | 49.27 | 50.43 | 48.27 | 49.16 | 57.24 | 58.37 | 59.03 | 60.24 | 58.17 |
2 | 47.39 | 50.61 | 51.19 | 49.33 | 49.91 | 58.41 | 59.01 | 59.84 | 60.81 | 59.01 |
3 | 48.97 | 51.49 | 51.87 | 50.49 | 50.39 | 58.93 | 59.87 | 60.17 | 61.49 | 59.75 |
4 | 49.67 | 52.84 | 52.63 | 51.29 | 51.65 | 59.75 | 60.63 | 60.87 | 61.92 | 60.34 |
5 | 50.65 | 53.24 | 52.91 | 51.86 | 52.09 | 60.83 | 61.97 | 61.09 | 62.45 | 60.97 |
6 | 51.73 | 53.61 | 53.07 | 52.23 | 52.64 | 61.67 | 62.41 | 61.64 | 63.13 | 61.60 |
L.S.D | S = 1.841 T = 1.764 S&T = 0.169 | S = 1.562 T = 1.491 S&T = 0.147 |
Total Count:
The results in Table 10 showed that the microbial load increased with the increase in storage in all storage treatments, but that the increase in control and T1 was higher than in other treatments. It was also found that the treatments (control, T1, T2, T3, and T4) are lower in microbial load than the treatments (T2, T3, and T4). The counts reached 101 CFU/g after 12 days of storage in both coated and uncoated samples, as compared with the initial counts ease in control and T1 was higher than in other treatments. It was also found that the treatments (control, T1, T2, T3, and T4) are lower in microbial load than the treatments (T2, T3, and T4). The counts reached 10.89–12.0 101 CFU/g after 12 days of storage in both coated and uncoated samples, as compared with the initial counts. 0.35 10− 1 CFU/g: this shows the changes in total bacterial counts of Al Hulwah and Soukari coated with nanomaterials during storage periods at 2–4°C. The data show that total counts of different edible films nanomaterial treatments (control, T1, T2, T3, and T4) gradually increased with increasing cold storage period in both Al Hulwah and Soukari. Bacterial counts reached 17.23 and 17.39 x 10− 1 CFU/g for control and T1 of Al Hulwah and Soukari, respectively, while bacterial counts of Al Hulwah and Soukari coated recorded 12.26 and 12.83 x 10− 1 CFU/g with T4 and T4 of cold storage, respectively, as compared to the initial counts (2.68 and 1.34 x 10− 1 CFU/g) of Al Hulwah and Soukari after 6 weeks. which prevents respiration and leads to anaerobic conditions and fruit degradation. Furthermore, the edible coating and film nanoparticle material may have a significant effect on the rate of microbial counts during cooled storage.. María L. et al.,(2020).
Table (10) Effect of nano edible film and coatings on total count of Al Hulwah and Soukari dates during storage at 2–4ºC.
| Al Hulwah | Soukari |
Storage period week | Treatments | Treatments |
Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
0 | 4.89 | 3.20 | 3.38 | 2.85 | 2.68 | 4.67 | 2.51 | 1.97 | 1.53 | 1.34 |
1 | 6.57 | 4.16 | 3.95 | 3.56 | 3.25 | 5.42 | 3.93 | 2.39 | 2.19 | 2.81 |
2 | 8.29 | 5.29 | 4.86 | 4.69 | 4.42 | 6.84 | 4.65 | 3.85 | 3.52 | 3.27 |
3 | 10.63 | 8.17 | 7.72 | 7.18 | 7.09 | 9.91 | 7.23 | 5.27 | 5.37 | 5.31 |
4 | 13.45 | 10.86 | 9.26 | 9.05 | 8.21 | 11.51 | 9.84 | 6.79 | 6.29 | 7.61 |
5 | 14.65 | 13.43 | 12.57 | 11.63 | 11.74 | 13.74 | 12.25 | 8.92 | 8.28 | 9.46 |
6 | 17.23 | 16.24 | 14.49 | 12.82 | 12.26 | 17.39 | 14.65 | 12.64 | 12.29 | 12.83 |
LSD | S = 1.982 T = 1.743 S&T = 0.846 | S = 2.310 T = 2.176 S&T = 0.549 |
Psychrophilic Bactetial
Table 11 shows the changes in total bacterial counts of Al Hulwah and Soukari coated with nanomaterials during storage periods at 2-4 oC. The data show that psychrophilic bacteria increased gradually as the cold storage period was increased in both Al Hulwah and Soukari of different edible films nanomaterial treatments (control, T1, T2, T3, and T4). Bacterial counts reached 10.26 and 11.83 x 10-1 CFU/g for control and T1 of Al Hulwah and Soukari, respectively, while bacterial counts of Al Hulwah and Soukari coated with T4 and T4 of cold storage recorded 12.26 and 12.83 x 10-1 CFU/g, respectively, as compared to the initial counts (1.23 and 0.39 x 10-1 CFU/g) after 6 weeks. María L. et al.,(2020).
Table (11) Effect of nano edible film and coatings on Psychrophilic bactetial of Al Hulwah and Soukari dates during storage at 2–4ºC
| Al Hulwah | Soukari |
Storage period week | Treatments | Treatments |
Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
0 | 1.23 | 0.75 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.46 | 0.87 | 0.39 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.38 |
1 | 1.86 | 1.25 | 0.96 | 0.83 | 0.67 | 1.79 | 1.32 | 1.49 | 1.52 | 1.20 |
2 | 3.20 | 2.81 | 2.65 | 2.98 | 2.45 | 2.86 | 1.87 | 1.94 | 1.75 | 2.98 |
3 | 4.97 | 3.36 | 3.11 | 3.98 | 3.84 | 4.69 | 3.11 | 2.61 | 2.34 | 3.96 |
4 | 5.53 | 4.73 | 4.17 | 4.93 | 4.00 | 6.75 | 4.65 | 3.87 | 4.20 | 4.19 |
5 | 7.62 | 5.99 | 5.63 | 5.64 | 5.87 | 9.47 | 6.32 | 5.76 | 6.34 | 5.89 |
6 | 10.26 | 7.24 | 6.35 | 6.89 | 6.97 | 11.83 | 6.73 | 6.61 | 7.18 | 6.72 |
LSD | S = 1.895 T = 1.796 S&T = 0.168 | S = 1.229 T = 1.135 S&T = 0.119 |
Moulds and yeast :
The changes in mould and yeast counts of fresh Al Hulwah and Soukari were determined during cold storage. Table 12 displays the obtained results. The results showed that the mould and yeast counts gradually increased with increasing storage time at a cold temperature in both coated and uncoated samples. Mold and yeast counts are higher in uncoated samples than in coated samples. The mould and yeast counts reached 11.83 and 9.83.85 101 CFU/g after 6 weeks of storage in both the control and T1 samples, as compared with the initial counts of 0.12 101 CFU/g. In addition, bio-films and coatings, by themselves, are acting as carriers of food additives (i.e., antioxidants and antimicrobials) and have been particularly considered in food preservation due to their ability to extend the shelf life. (Sallam, 2007).
Table (12) Effect of nano edible film and coatings on molds & yeast of Al Hulwah and Soukari dates during storage at 2–4ºC
| Al Hulwah | Soukari |
Storage period week | Treatments | Treatments |
Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | Control | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
0 | 2.36 | 0.97 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.82 | 1.42 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.62 | 0.49 |
1 | 4.79 | 1.63 | 1.91 | 1.49 | 1.61 | 2.17 | 1.16 | 1.37 | 1.23 | 1.65 |
2 | 6.23 | 2.98 | 2.56 | 2.17 | 2.89 | 4.57 | 2.63 | 2.48 | 2.56 | 2.89 |
3 | 7.93 | 3.16 | 3.79 | 3.52 | 4.02 | 6.72 | 3.10 | 3.65 | 3.87 | 4.06 |
4 | 9.62 | 4.29 | 5.23 | 4.69 | 5.73 | 7.19 | 4.81 | 4.23 | 4.69 | 4.93 |
5 | 10.45 | 6.81 | 7.37 | 6.69 | 7.29 | 8.27 | 5.27 | 5.62 | 5.83 | 5.29 |
6 | 11.83 | 8.23 | 8.96 | 7.67 | 8.78 | 9.83 | 6.53 | 6.17 | 6.20 | 6.02 |
LSD | S = 1.935 T = 2.056 S&T = 0.264 | S = 1.986 T = 2.137 S&T = 0.219 |
Sensory Evaluation Of Nano Edible Film And Coatings Fresh Al Hulwah And Soukari :-
The mean scores of the sensory properties (texture, odour, taste, color, and general acceptance) of fresh Al Hulwah and Soukari are shown in Figs. 6 and 7. Fresh AlHulwah and Soukari had a high palatability for panellists and were generally well accepted on the first day. Control treatment was rejected after one week of storage, while coated treatment continued with the nanoedible coating for six weeks. On the other hand, the results of the statistical analysis showed that treatments (T3 and T4) had the best appearance, followed by treatment (T2). T3 and T4 treatments had the highest taste and texture values, followed by T1 and T2 treatments throughout the storage period. In terms of overall acceptance, all treatments were well received when stored for the first time, but not after 6 weeks. Generally, it could be concluded that the alginate coating of fresh Alhulwuh and Soukari prolonged its shelf life, freshness, and eating quality upon storage at a cold temperature. However, storage of the coated Also, packaging with a nanoedible coating had a large effect on the keeping quality and shelf life of the examined samples. Based on the results obtained in this study, it can be concluded that these results may be useful for application in the field of the dating industry and its products..