Our study was a prospective non-randomized study on 20 glaucomatous patients managed by trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C to evaluate the effect of surgery on the corneal endothelium. we used a non-contact specular microscope (Topcon sp-1p, Topcon Medical Inc., Japan) to measure ECD (cells/mm2), CV in cell size, HEX%, and CCT.
By comparing the preoperative and postoperative data, it revealed a very significant decrease in IOP, Cell density, and HEX % with an increase in CV, while there is a non-significant change in corneal thickness following trabeculectomy, Pillunat et al.10 reported in his study Trabeculectomy can significantly lower intraocular pressure (IOP), although it does not affect the structural tissue qualities of the cornea.
Omatsu et al. 11 support us as post-operatively, the IOP dropped dramatically. The average intraocular pressure (IOP) in the trabeculectomy group decreased from 18.3 ± 8.7 mmHg at baseline to 9.8 ± 3.6 mmHg at 6 months, 10.9 ± 4.3 mmHg at 12 months, 10.9 ± 4.3 mmHg at 18 months, and 11.2 ± 4.8 mmHg at 24 months. At baseline, the mean CECD in the trabeculectomy group was 2505 ± 280 cells/mm2, but by months 6, 12, 18, and 24, this number had dropped to 2398 ± 274 cells/mm2 (P < 0.001), 2349 ± 323 cells/mm2 (P 0.001), 2293 ± 325 cells/mm2 (P < 0.001), and 2277 385 cells/mm2 (P = 0.003).
The specific mechanism responsible for the endothelial cell loss following trabeculectomy has yet to be fully clarified and is likely multifactorial. Several potential reasons have been hypothesized for the reductions in CECD after trabeculectomy. Despite evidence that MMC is harmful to the corneal endothelium, postoperative complications like poor IOP regulation and greater anterior chamber manipulation persist. A decrease in CECD was seen in several trabeculectomy studies without the use of MMC. Inferring then that other factors may be involved in the endothelium damage that has been seen.12
Dios et al. 13 reported in his study that Statistically significant (p < 0.001) reductions in mean endothelial cell density (ECD) of 464 cells/mm2 (17.86%) at 30 days post-surgery and 563 cells/mm2 (21.67%) after 120 days were observed. No significant reduction in ECD was seen between patients who had whole success (IOP 18 mm Hg postoperatively) and those who had partial success or failure (26.08 percent and 29.4 per cent, respectively; p < 0.001). Complications after surgery, such as hyphema or a flat anterior chamber, were associated with a greater decrease in ECD than were complications-free individuals (-1059 vs -456 cells/mm2; p 0.001). Pseudophakic individuals also had a lower ECD than those who had never had cataract surgery (-571 vs. -405 cells/mm2; p < 0.001). In agreement with our findings, the CV was found to be significantly higher in nearly all patients, despite differences in IOP value, complications, and lens status.
He concluded finally that Postoperative time, inadequate intraocular pressure control following trabeculectomy, postoperative problems (such as a flat anterior chamber), and a history of cataract surgery were all linked to a more severe loss. Almost all patients had an elevated CoV count, and there was no clear risk factor increase. Our findings lend credence to the idea that risk factors for corneal injury ought to be taken into account when determining surgical care for glaucoma, with the aim of preventing surgical complications.13
Also in Hirooka et al.14 study, the average CECD was 2420357 cells/mm2 before surgery, and it dropped significantly to 2276400 cells/mm2 at 6 months, 2290 ± 398 cells/mm2 at 18 months, and 2267 ± 446 cells/mm2 at 24 months (p0.001). After observing a 10% drop in CECD at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-op, he concluded that CECD dramatically and persistently decreased after trabeculectomy.
Okumura et al. 15 study trabeculectomy, which was performed on 51 eyes belonging to 37 glaucoma patients. Through the use of contact specular microscopy, the CEC density was calculated. Slit-scanning wide-field contact specular microscopy showed that the average CEC densities of all eyes on the side of the bleb opposite the bleb, in the centre of the cornea, and near the bleb were 2210, 1930, and 1519 cells/mm2, respectively, indicating a significantly lower CEC density near the bleb than at the other two sites. The coefficient of variation (a clinical indicator of polymegathism) was consistently 0.38 in the region surrounding the bleb, which was much higher than the bleb's core and the bleb's opposite side (0.32 and 0.33, respectively). Near the bleb, there was a markedly smaller percentage of hexagonal cells (a clinical signal of polymorphism) than in the middle (54.9 and 60.4 percent, respectively).