Anatomical characteristics and morphometric analyses of the internal carotid artery using retrospective angiographic images

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2479408/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Anatomical characteristics and morphometric analyses of the internal carotid artery using retrospective angiographic images

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2479408/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 10 Feb, 2023

Read the published version in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Purpose

Anatomical variations of the internal carotid artery (ICA) can cause complications during endovascular treatments. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the features of the ICAs obtained from 2D digital subtraction angiography (2D DSA).

Methods

The morphometrics and angles of the ICA segments from 2D DSA images from a total of 100 patients (45 males and 55 females) were investigated. The lengths (L1-3), angles (A1-3), and diameters (D1-6) through the ICA measurement points (5 segments: C2 [petrous], C3 [lacerum], C4 [cavernous], C5 [clinoid], C6 (ophthalmic] were systemically recorded by two observers. All measured parameters were compared for both sexes and sides.

Results

The lengths (mm) and angles of the ICA were 7.20 ± 2.22 (L1), 15.71 ± 2.32 (L2), 10.99 ± 1.66 (L3) and 109.31 ± 17.77 (A1), 107.87 ± 20.51 (A2), 80.81 ± 16.33 (A3), respectively. There were no differences in the angulations of the A1-A3 segments between the sexes (p > 0.05). The L2 (C3-C4) was significantly longer in males, but only the left side of females showed a greater length (p < 0.05). The averaged mean diameters of the ICA (D1-6) in both sexes were 4.17 ± 0.55 mm. However, the diameters of the D1–D6 from left and right sides of males except the right D6 were significantly longer than those of females (p < 0.05). Also of significance was that the right diameters of females (D1) and males (D1 and D2) were shorter compared to left sides.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates some differences in lengths, diameters, and angles in both sexes and sides of the normal ICA. Neurosurgeons and neurointerventionalists should be aware of such variations when operating, performing interventional procedures, and interpreting 2D DSA.

Internal carotid artery

angiography

length

angle

diameter

anatomy

The internal carotid artery (ICA) is the main blood supply to the anterior and middle parts of the brain. It can be divided into seven segments based on the classification reported by Bouthillier coworkers [3]. These segments consist of a C1 (cervical), C2 (petrous or horizontal), C3 (lacerum), C4 (cavernous), C5 (clinoid), C6 (ophthalmic or supraclinoid), and C7 (communicating or terminal) parts. Many studies have reported that anatomical variations of the ICA can be associated with various neurovascular diseases and thus, can consequently complicate endovascular and surgical approaches [4, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21]. For example, variant ICAs have been reported to result in complications during treatment of traumatic cavernous sinus fistulas (TCCF) [5, 13, 22]. Therefore, the anatomical characteristics and morphometrics of individual ICAs are important to consider prior to, for example, aneurysm clipping, angioplasty, and stenting. Previous studies have also documented that the morphometrics of the ICA for cadaver specimens and radiological images are also different among various populations [1, 8, 12, 20].

It is known that the cerebral angiography with 2-dimension (2D) and 3-dimension (3D) imaging is the gold standard for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular diseases [7]. It can be performed in both 2 and 3D imaging of all four vessels that supply the blood to the brain. Differences or variations of the ICA using 2D digital subtraction angiography data (2D DSA) have been reported between the sexes, sides, and ages of the patients [14, 17, 19]. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the ICA variations and morphometry from 2D DSA images in a Thai population.

Ethical approval and patient selection

This retrospective study on the characteristics and morphometrics of ICA was approved by the Khon Kaen University Ethics Committee for Human Research (code: HE641277). ICA morphometric analyses from 2D images were performed from January 2019 to December 2020. All parameters were performed and evaluated within a picture achieving and communication system (PACs) program. One hundred patients were studied with the following inclusion criteria: subarachnoid hemorrhage patients who underwent cerebral angiography for intracranial aneurysm diagnosis and had both ICA 2D images without any visible pathology within the ICA. Patients with any pathology of the skull base or who did not have complete ICA 2D imaging were excluded from the study. The length of the vertical part of the ICA-CS was measured on 3D images which were produced from the raw data recorded in the DSA unit (Siemens Artizee, Germany), Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. The patients’ information was retrieved from the interventional neuroradiology unit, collected from January 2020 to May 2021. Fifty-two patients who had undergone cerebral angiography were included in this study. All patients had ICA 3D images from both the right and left sides.

2D image localization and definition

The 2D image measurements were conducted by two radiologists. The lateral views of the left and right ICA images were retrieved from the PACS. The ICA morphometry included the angle (A), length (L) and diameter (D) (Fig. 1). The points of C1 to C6 were the midpoint of ICA at each bending of C2, C3, C4, C5 (Fig. 1A) and the origin of the ophthalmic artery based on previous classifications [3]. The lengths of the C2-C3, C3-C4 and C4-C6 were defined as L1, L2, and L3, respectively (Fig. 1B). In addition, the diameter (D1-6) was the diameter of C3 (D2), C4 (D4), C5 (D6) and between C2-C3 (D1), C3-C4 (D3), C4-C5 (D5) as demonstrated in Fig. 1D.

Morphometric measurements

The measurements were performed as follows; 1) selected the 2D ICA image with optimal contrast media filling in vessels from a lateral view, 2) magnified images as much as possible to view all points (as shown in Fig. 1), 3) marked the locations of C2-6, and 4) measured the length of L1-L3 (Fig. 1B), A1-A3 (Fig. 1C) and D1-D6 (Fig. 1D), respectively. All measurements were performed using PACS image tools. The elliptical region of interest was used to localize the C2-C6 while the lengths of L1-L3 and D1-D6 were performed using the ruler tool. The measurement of A1-A3 was performed as previously reported [18]. The angle measurement tool was used to analyze the angles between the different parts of the ICA. Then, the angles of each bend were measured and recorded in triplicate. The 21 cases were used to determine the reliability between intra and inter-observers.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 21 and the data were expressed as mean ± SD. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine the data distribution. Independent sample t-test and Mann - Whitney U test were used for analyze the differences among all parameters of normal and abnormal distribution data sets. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to analyze the reliability between observers. In addition, the analysis of age and sex correlations was performed using Spearman's rho. A P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Demographic data of population

One hundred patients (45 males and 55 females) were recruited to determine the morphometrics of the ICA from 2D DSA images. Their mean age was 53±13.28 years old. The age of the female patients ranged from 44 to 81 years and the age of the males ranged from 15 to 77 years old.

Reliability between observers

The reliability between observers showed that there was high reliability in both intra (0.97-1.00) and inter observers (0.95-1.00). There was no significant difference between them. This high reliability had coefficients of 0.92-0.99 and 0.97-0.99.

ICA morphometry of females and males for various age ranges

Tables 1- 3 show the morphometrics of the ICA including the lengths, angles, and diameters between females and males from different age ranges (interval ages, 10 years). The age range of patients in this study was 15-85 years old. No female patient was less than 35 years old. It was found that the maximal mean length of the ICA in both sexes was that of L2. The mean length in males aged ≥ 76 years old was 17.45 ± 1.40 mm and that of females aged 66-75 years old was 15.84±2.08 mm. The shortest length of the ICA was for L1 in both sexes with an age range of 36-45 years old and the values for this part in males and females were 5.78±0.65 mm and 5.96±1.16 mm, respectively.

The angle measurements for the various segments of the ICA are shown in Table 2. It was found that the mean angle of A1 (101.52±14.43), A2 (105.31±16.95) and A3 (78.73±16.57) in the age ranges of 46-55 years old in males was less than those in females (111.58±20.04, 115.98±24.18, 82.26±14.68 degrees, respectively). In addition, the angles of 56-65 year old males (121.55±18.27, 113.41±17.11, 81.78±15.781 degrees) was greater than those in females (105.62±19.22, 98.78±21.13, 82.26±14.68 degrees), respectively.

The results of the diameter of the ICA for its various segments are shown in Table 3. These demonstrate that the diameter of D4, D5, and D6 in females gradually increased with age. The smallest diameter was found in the age range of 36-45 years old and the largest diameter was found in the age range of 76-85 years old. In males, the diameter of D1 slightly decreased with age. The largest diameter in males was observed in the age range of 15-35 years old while the age range of ≥ 76 years old was found to have the smallest diameters.

The difference of length, angle, and diameter of ICA between sexes

The comparisons of the lengths and angles of the ICAs between females and males are shown in Table 4. It was found that the L2 of males on both sides was significantly longer than that of females (p<0.05). The left L2 in males (16.95 ± 2.36 mm) was longer than that of females (16.021 ± 2.23 mm) (p= 0.047) while right L2 of male (15.58 ± 2.13 mm) was also longer than that of female (14.51 ± 1.92 mm) significantly (p=0.01). However, there was no significant differences in females and males for both sides (p>0.05). The comparison of diameter of the various segments of ICA (D1-D6) between males and females is shown in Table 5. It was found that the diameter of D1-D6 on left sides and D1-D5 on the right sides of males was significantly larger than that of females (p<0.05).

The difference of length, angle, and diameters of left and right ICAs

The lengths (L1-L3) and angles (A1-A3) between left and right ICAs of males and females are shown in Table 6. The results showed that the length of the left L2 ICA (16.95 ± 2.36 mm) in males was significantly different from the right ICA (15.58 ± 2.13 mm) (p=0.005). In contrast, the left L2 ICA in females (16.02 ± 2.23 mm) was also significantly different (p<0.001) from the right ICA (14.51 ± 1.92 mm). The other parameters showed no significant differences. In addition to length, the angle of the left A1 in males (109.14 ± 17.56 degrees) showed a significant difference (p=0.005) compared to the right A1 (106.72 ± 16.33 degrees). Moreover, the angle of the left A1 of females showed a similar trend as males with a significant difference (p=0.002). The comparison of the ICA diameter between left and right sides of males and females is demonstrated in Table 7. It was found that the diameter of the left ICA at D5 (4.07 ± 0.67 mm) in females was significantly different (p=0.039) from right sides (3.80 ± 0.68 mm). In males, the left ICA at D1 (4.70 ± 0.51 mm) and D2 (4.70 ± 0.53 mm) was also significantly different (p=0.05) from right sides (4.35 ± 0.50, 4.41 ± 0.57 mm, respectively).

Correlation of sex and age on the morphometrics of ICA

The correlation analysis revealed that sex had a correlation with D1-D5 (p<0.001, all, r = -0.464, -0.436, -0.475, -0.369 and -0.393) and L2 (p = 0.012, r = -0.250) with a statistical significance. In addition, the age analysis showed a correlation with L3 (p=0.002, r=-0.304) and D2 (p=0.042, r=-0.203). The angle of ICA at A1 had a significant correlation with A2 (p<0.001, r=0.515), L1 (p=0.047, r=0.199), L2 (p=0.017, r=-0.237), L3 (p<0.001, r=-0.481) while the A2 had a significant correlation with L1, L2 and L3 (p=0.011, r=-0.253; p=0.011, r=-0.354; p<0.001, r=-0.570). A3 showed a significant correlation with L2 and D6 (p<0.001, r=-0.353; p=0.046, r=-0.200), respectively.

It has been demonstrated that the morphometrics of the ICA are different among various in many populations [1, 8, 12, 20]. The data source for ICA analysis used in this study were from 2D DSA. Our study differed from previous studies in that we have investigated differences between the sexes. The mean angles of A1 in Thai males (106.72 degrees) and females (102.10 degrees) were more similar than that of an Indian population (102 degrees) [20]. Interestingly, both angles of ICA-CS in Indians (78.62–89.62 and 40.96-46.00 degree) were less than those observed in our Thai population (104.18-111.84 and 80.11–81.31 degrees). Baz and coworkers have reported that in 70 Romanian patients (140 ICAs) from computed tomography angiography (CTA) had differences in sides and sex [1]. In comparison, the diameters of the ICA (D1, D3, D4, D5 and D6 in this study), were comparable and could be compared with C2, C3, C4, C5 and C6, respectively as described in a previous study [1]. Most of the ICA diameters (C2-C5) in the Romanian patients were larger than that of Thais (D1-D6) although C6 was smaller than (D6) as observed in this study. This is the first study to measure the lengths of the ICA (L1, L2 and L3) in Thais according to previous classifications [3].

The results of this study demonstrated that the diameter of ICA in males was larger than that in females and that the length of the L2 or the length of C3 to C4 in males was also longer than in females. Previous studies have also found that sex differences affected the diameter and the vertical lengths of the ICA [11, 14, 19 Hypertension was reported to associate with a smaller ICA diameter. Moreover, it has been shown that factors such as age, weight and height are associated with the diameter of the femoral artery [19]. Additionally, a patient’s height and skull structure have been associated with the size and length of the ICA [1]. However, we did not evaluate these factors because it was not the main objective of our study. It has been shown that age and hemodynamics are both important factors for the variation of the basilar artery. However, this study observed less correlation between age and the morphometric parameters of the ICA. The small sample size and the combination of both sexes in the analysis might also produce some effects. In addition, the increased diameter of the D4-6 in female patients with increasing age might be due to the reduction of intraluminal elastin [9]. It has also been reported that cardiac hemodynamics and blood flow in the left and right carotid arteries are different with the flow being higher on left sides [2, 6]. These factors might also contribute to the significant differences of diameters, lengths and angles between the left and right ICAs as seen in this study.

In conclusion, the morphometry of the ICA in our population was found to be slightly different from other studied ethnicities. The comparison of morphometric data between sex and side of the ICA was also elucidated.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Research Program Grant, Khon Kaen University.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University (HE641277). The authors state that every effort was made to follow all local and international ethical guidelines and laws that pertain to the use of 2D digital subtraction angiography data (2D DSA) in morphometric research.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study was supported by Research Program Grant, Khon Kaen University.

Baz RA, Scheau C, Niscoveanu C, Bordei P (2021) Morphometry of the entire internal carotid artery on CT angiography. Medicina (Kaunas) 17:57(8):832. doi: 10.3390/medicina57080832.
Bogren HG, Buonocore MH, Gu WZ (1994) Carotid and vertebral artery blood flow in left- and right-handed healthy subjects measured with MR velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 4(1):37-42. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880040110.
Bouthillier A, van Loveren HR, Keller JT (1996) Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 38(3):425-32: discussion 432-3. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199603000-00001.
Bridio S, Luraghi G, Rodriguez Matas JF, Dubini G, Giassi GG, Maggio G, Kawamoto JN, Moerman KM, McGarry P, Konduri PR, Arrarte Terreros N, Marquering HA, van Bavel E, Majoie CBLM, Migliavacca F (2021) Impact of the internal carotid artery morphology on in silico mtent-retriever thrombectomy outcome. Front Med Technol 3:3:719909. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2021.719909.
Choi BJ, Lee TH, Kim CW, Choi CH (2009) Endovascular graft-stent placement for treatment of traumatic carotid cavernous fistulas. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 46(6):572-6. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.6.572.
Fukuhara T, Hida K, Manabe Y, Munemasa M, Matsubara H, Akao I, Namba Y, Kuyama H (2007) Reduced flow velocity in the internal carotid artery independently of cardiac hemodynamics in patients with cerebral ischemia. J Clin Ultrasound 35(6):314-21. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20332.
Hacein-Bey L, Provenzale JM (2011) Current imaging assessment and treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(1):32-44. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5329. PMID: 21178044.
Jittapiromsak P, Sabuncuoglu H, Deshmukh P, McDougall CG, Spetzler RF, Preul MC (2010) Anatomical relationships of intracavernous internal carotid artery to intracavernous neural structures. Skull Base 20(5):327-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1253577.
Kamenskiy AV, Pipinos II, Carson JS, MacTaggart JN, Baxter BT (2015) Age and disease-related geometric and structural remodeling of the carotid artery. J Vasc Surg 62(6):1521-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.041.
Kim DW, Kang SD (2007) Association between internal carotid artery morphometry and posterior communicating artery aneurysm. Yonsei Med J 31:48(4):634-8. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2007.48.4.634.
Krejza J, Arkuszewski M, Kasner SE, Weigele J, Ustymowicz A, Hurst RW, Cucchiara BL, Messe SR (2006) Carotid artery diameter in men and women and the relation to body and neck size. Stroke 37(4):1103-5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000206440.48756.f7.
Lin LM, Colby GP, Jiang B, Uwandu C, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, Coon AL (2015) Classification of cavernous internal carotid artery tortuosity: a predictor of procedural complexity in Pipeline embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 7(9):628-33. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011298.
Permana GI, Suroto NS, Al Fauzi A (2021) Clinical improvement of patients with endovascular treatment in the traumatic carotid-cavernous fistula. Asian J Neurosurg. 28:16(2):376-380. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_246_20.
Pham XD, Kim JJ, Parrish AB, Tom C, Ihenachor EJ, Mina D, de Virgilio C (2016) Racial and gender differences in arterial anatomy of the arm. Am Surg 82(10):973-976.
Phan TG, Beare RJ, Jolley D, Das G, Ren M, Wong K, et al (2012) Carotid artery anatomy and geometry as risk factors for carotid atherosclerotic disease. Stroke. 43:1596–601. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645499
Sacco S, Totaro R, Baldassarre M, Carolei A (2007) Morphological variations of the internal carotid artery: Prevalence, characteristics, and association with cerebrovascular disease. Int J Angiol 16(2):59-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1278249.
Shatri J, Bexheti D, Bexheti S, Kabashi S, Krasniqi S, Ahmetgjekaj I, Zhjeqi V. Influence of gender and age on average dimensions of arteries forming the circle of Willis study by magnetic resonance angiography on Kosovo's population. Maced J Med Sci. 2017 Oct 9;5(6):714-719. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2017.160.
Silva Neto ÂR, Câmara RL, Valença MM (2012) Carotid siphon geometry and variants of the circle of Willis in the origin of carotid aneurysms. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 70(12):917-21. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2012001200003.
Tran K, Dorsey C, Lee JT, Chandra V (2017) Gender-related differences in iliofemoral arterial anatomy among abdominal aortic aneurysm patients. Ann Vasc Surg. 44:171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.01.025.
Vijaywargiya M, Deopujari R, Athavale SA (2017) Anatomical study of petrous and cavernous parts of internal carotid artery. Anat Cell Biol 50(3):163-170. doi: 10.5115/acb.2017.50.3.163. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
Waihrich E, Clavel P, Mendes GAC, Iosif C, Moraes Kessler I, Mounayer C (2017) Influence of carotid siphon anatomy on brain aneurysm presentation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38(9):1771-1775. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5285.
Wu Z, Zhang Y, Wang C, Yang X, Li Y (2000) Treatment of traumatic carotid-cavernous fistula. Interv Neuroradiol 22:6(4):277-89. doi: 10.1177/159101990000600402.

Table 1 Length of ICA segments for females and males for various age ranges

Age ranges (n)	Length (mm, mean ± S.D.) of ICA segments (L1-L3)
	Females			Males
	L1	L2	L3	L1	L2	L3
≤25 (n,12)	ND	ND	ND	7.53 ± 2.73	16.03 ± 1.58	10.14 ± 1.07
26-35 (n,10)	ND	ND	ND	7.18 ± 2.82	16.46 ± 2.08	11.48 ± 0.95
36-45 (n, 20)	5.96 ± 1.16	14.72 ± 1.29	10.82 ± 0.69	5.78 ± 0.87	15.59 ± 1.88	10.60 ± 1.32
46-55 (n, 54)	7.32 ± 2.04	14.66 ± 2.31	10.38 ± 2.23	6.87 ± 1.71	16.95 ± 2.61	11.09 ± 2.07
56-65 (n, 76)	7.38 ± 2.60	15.52 ± 2.32	11.53 ± 1.72	7.64 ± 2.36	15.87 ± 2.52	10.87 ± 0.98
66-75 (n, 24)	7.32 ± 2.08	15.84 ± 2.08	10.63 ± 1.42	7.64 ± 1.77	16.06 ± 2.93	11.27 ± 1.09
≥76 (n, 4)	6.94 ± 1.39	15.79 ± 0.29	12.46 ± 0.98	8.43 ± 1.57	17.45 ± 1.40	12.82 ± 0.48

ND (not determined), S.D. (standard deviation), ICA (internal carotid artery), L (length of internal carotid artery), L1 (length of ICA from C2-C3), L2 (length of ICA from C3-C4), L3 (length of ICA from C4-C5)

Table 2 Angles of the ICA segments observed in females and males for various age ranges

Age ranges (n)

Angles (degrees, mean ± S.D.) of ICA segments (A1-A3)

Females

Males

≤25 (n,12)

112.83

16.11

106.81

18.41

79.30

13.42

26-35 (n,10)

109.28

13.59

106.77

4.37

74.73

16.80

36-45 (n, 20)

101.87

13.70

115.42

16.87

86.75

14.90

112.20

15.66

128.45

18.31

85.58

14.35

46-55 (n, 54)

111.58

20.04

115.98

24.18

82.26

14.68

101.52

14.43

105.31

16.95

78.73

16.57

56-65 (n, 76)

105.62

19.22

98.78

21.13

78.46

19.08

121.55

18.28

113.41

17.11

81.54

15.78

66-75 (n, 24)

110.01

12.73

105.00

14.73

81.38

17.82

108.19

9.90

102.08

18.93

91.29

7.68

≥76 (n, 4)

96.08

10.96

90.08

12.14

80.33

18.39

132.33

8.96

122.08

11.67

77.17

0.00

ND (not determined), S.D. (standard deviation), ICA (internal carotid artery), A (angle of internal carotid artery), A1 (angle of ICA at C3), A2 (angle of ICA at C4), A3 (angle of ICA at C5)

Table 3 Diameters of the ICA at D1-D6 from females and males for various age ranges

Age ranges (n)

Diameters (mm, mean ± S.D.) of ICA (D1-D6)

Females

Males

≤25 (n,12)

4.84

0.35

4.78

0.34

4.78

0.36

4.76

0.87

4.95

0.45

4.55

0.45

26-35 (n,10)

4.77

0.32

4.98

0.65

4.63

0.52

4.58

0.33

4.70

0.40

4.45

0.43

36-45 (n, 20)

4.05

0.62

4.01

0.71

3.78

0.71

3.54

0.63

3.62

0.91

3.33

0.48

4.52

0.75

4.59

0.79

4.44

0.67

4.33

0.59

4.39

0.63

4.059

0.59

46-55 (n, 54)

3.78

0.60

3.74

0.53

3.76

0.53

3.60

0.62

3.70

0.66

3.75

0.70

4.46

0.64

4.45

0.62

4.45

0.65

4.30

0.88

4.28

0.93

4.21

0.78

56-65 (n, 76)

3.98

0.64

4.13

0.67

3.99

0.65

4.04

0.64

4.02

0.59

4.13

0.63

4.42

0.38

4.37

0.37

4.39

0.42

4.03

0.83

4.19

0.62

4.17

0.52

66-75 (n, 24)

3.84

0.76

3.93

0.66

4.14

0.52

4.07

0.81

4.19

0.70

4.24

0.59

4.41

0.54

4.54

0.53

4.61

0.54

4.71

0.53

4.69

0.50

4.44

0.79

≥76 (n, 4)

4.48

0.07

4.63

0.20

4.63

0.46

5.06

1.36

4.80

0.38

5.03

0.62

3.95

0.01

4.45

0.01

3.97

0.09

4.66

0.28

4.25

0.08

4.33

0.30

ND (not determined), S.D. (standard deviation), ICA (internal carotid artery), D (diameter of internal carotid artery), D1 (diameter of ICA between C2-C3), D2 (diameter of ICA at C3), D3 (diameter of ICA between C3-C4), D4 (diameter of ICA at C4), D5 (diameter of ICA between C4-C5), D6 (diameter of ICA at C5)

Table 4 Comparison of lengths and angles of the ICA segments on left and right sides between males and females

Sexes

Length (mm, mean ± S.D.) of ICA

Angles (degrees, mean ± S.D.) of ICA

Left

Right

Left

Right

Female

7.20

2.61

16.02

2.23

11.14

1.713

7.23

1.90

14.51

1.92

10.94

1.93

112.64

16.52

104.19

21.78

81.31

18.68

102.10

18.40

107.27

22.33

80.106

15.957

Male

7.16

2.41

16.95*

2.36

11.15

1.32

7.20

1.89

15.58*

2.13

10.74

1.55

116.68

16.40

109.14

17.56

80.86

14.26

106.72

16.33

111.84

19.11

81.052

16.186

P-value

0.921

0.047

0.969

0.941

0.010

0.580

0.225

0.168

0.892

0.188

0.273

0.771

*Significant difference compared between sex (P ≤0.05), S.D. (standard deviation), ICA (internal carotid artery), L (length of internal carotid artery), L1 (length of ICA from C2-C3), L2 (length of ICA from C3-C4), L3 (length of ICA from C4-C5), A1 (angle of ICA at C3), A2 (angle of ICA at C4), A3 (angle of ICA at C5)

Table 5 Comparison of the diameters of the ICA segments on left and right sides between males and females

Sexes

Diameter (mm, mean ± S.D.) of ICA segments

Left

Right

Female

4.03

0.66

4.09

0.70

4.02

0.65

3.95

0.69

4.07

0.67

4.03

0.69

3.81

0.61

3.90

0.59

3.87

0.57

3.84

0.74

3.80

0.68

3.93

0.70

Male

4.70*

0.51

4.70*

0.52

4.56*

0.54

4.36*

0.81

4.51*

0.72

4.37*

0.60

4.35*

0.50

4.41*

0.57

4.44*

0.54

4.38*

0.76

4.37*

0.68

4.18

0.63

P-value

<0.001

0.009

0.002

0.012

<0.001

0.056

*Significant differences between the sexes (P ≤0.05), S.D. (Standard deviation), ICA (internal carotid artery), D (diameter of internal carotid artery), D1 (diameter of ICA between C2-C3), D2 (diameter of ICA at C3), D3 (diameter of ICA between C3-C4), D4 (diameter of ICA at C4), D5 (diameter of ICA between C4-C5), D6 (diameter of ICA at C5)

Table 6 Comparison of length and angles between left and right ICAs of males and females

Sides

Length (mm, mean ± S.D.) of ICA

Angles (degrees, mean ± S.D.) of ICA

Female

Male

Female

Male

Left

7.20

2.61

16.02

2.23

11.14

1.713

7.16

2.42

16.95

2.36

11.15

1.32

112.64

16.53

104.18

21.78

81.31

18.68

116.68

16.39

109.14

17.56

80.86

14.26

Right

7.23

1.90

14.51*

1.92

10.94

1.93

7.20

1.89

15.58*

2.12

10.74

1.55

102.10*

18.39

107.27

22.33

80.11

15.96

106.72*

16.33

111.84

19.11

81.05

16.19

P-value

0.961

<0.001

0.561

0.925

0.005

0.182

0.002

0.464

0.718

0.005

0.488

0.951

*Significant difference between right and left ICAs (P ≤0.05), S.D. (standard deviation), ICA (internal carotid artery), L (length of internal carotid artery), L1 (length of ICA from C2-C3), L2 (length of ICA from C3-C4), L3 (length of ICA from C4-C5), A1 (angle of ICA at C3), A2 (angle of ICA at C4), A3 (angle of ICA at C5)

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 10 Feb, 2023

Read the published version in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy →

Editorial decision: Major revision
25 Jan, 2023
Reviews received at journal
25 Jan, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
16 Jan, 2023
Reviewers invited by journal
16 Jan, 2023
Editor assigned by journal
16 Jan, 2023
Submission checks completed at journal
15 Jan, 2023
First submitted to journal
14 Jan, 2023

You are reading this latest preprint version

Anatomical characteristics and morphometric analyses of the internal carotid artery using retrospective angiographic images

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Figures

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Ethical approval and patient selection

2D image localization and definition

Morphometric measurements

Statistical analysis

Results

Discussion

Declarations

References

Tables

Additional Declarations

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1