2.1 Animals
There were 10 male SAMR1 mice and 30 male SAMP8, with a body mass of 27–32 g. They were obtained from the First Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin Traditional Chinese Medicine University (Tianjin, China). The mice were housed in the SPF level laboratory in Southern Medical University (Guangzhou, China) under standard conditions (22–23 °C, 12-h light/dark cycle, and 60% ± 10% humidity) and provided with water and food ad libitum. They were adapted to their environmental conditions for 7 days before experiments.
2.2 Experimental Designs
After acclimatization to laboratory conditions for 1 week, 10 male SAMR1 were defined as the control group(R1-Ct, treated with saline), and 30 SAMP8 were randomly divided into three groups (10 /group): model group(P8-Ct, treated with saline), salidroside group(P8-SAL, treated with 50mg·kg− 1·d− 1 salidroside) and donepezil group(P8-DNP, treated with 1mg·kg− 1·d− 1 donepezil). Salidroside(C14H20O7, purity > 98%) was obtained from Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Donepezil was supplied by Eisai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). All the mice were treated once per day for 3 months and tissues were then removed for other experiments. Every effort to minimize suffering was made.
2.3 Open Fields Test (oft)
Spontaneous activity was tested in a clear plastic cube box (40 × 40 × 40 cm) under a camera. Each mouse was placed in the center of the Open Field and given 5 min to move freely. Total traveled distances were analyzed using Smart V3.0 Panlab software.
2.4 Y-maze
Spontaneous spatial recognition was assessed in a Y maze apparatus, which was composed of three identical arms (30 cm length, 8 cm width, and 15 cm height). Each mouse was allowed to explore the three arms freely from the center of the maze for 5 min. The sequence of arm entries was recorded by a camera right above the apparatus. A spontaneous alternation was defined as arm choices differing from the previous two choices (e.g., ABC, BCA, CAB, etc). Alternation percentage (%) was calculated as a proportion of total spontaneous alternations to possible alternations (total arm entries − 2) × 100%.
2.5 Morris Water Maze (mwm)
To assess the ability of hippocampus-dependent learning and memory ability of the mice, the Morris Water Maze test was performed after the Y maze, The MWM apparatus consists of a blue circular pool of 120 cm in diameter with 2/3 of water(25℃±1) containing nontoxic ink, and a circular platform (14 cm in diameter) submerged 1.5 cm below the water surface. The MWM tests were performed as described previously[21]. Briefly, during the acquisition trial (days 1–5), each mouse was trained to find the hidden platform within 60 s. The searching trajectories were monitored with a camera and the escape latencies were measured using DigBehv-Morris software (Shanghai Jiliang, China). Within 60 s, the time each mouse spends finding the platform was defined as the escape latency. If the mouse did not find the platform successfully, the latency was recorded as 60 s, and it was gently guided to the platform and allowed to stay on the platform for 10 s. A probe trial was performed on day 6 with the platform removed. The number of target platform crossings and the time spent in target in each quadrant were recorded.
2.6 Histological Analysis
Mice were anesthetized and intracardially perfused with cold PBS. The brain and intestine tissues were carefully dissected and immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C overnight. After paraffin-embedded, the tissues were cut into sections. Intestine tissue was performed by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis was performed on the brain sections with Beta Amyloid 1–42 antibody (ab201060-10, 1:1000; Abcam) following the standard IHC-paraffin protocol from Abcam. Pictures were taken with a MVX10 microscope (Olympus). For immunofluorescence(IF) analysis, the brain sections were blocked with 5% BSA for 1 h and incubated with primary antibodies,CD68 (1:500; Servicebio), overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with anti-rabbit Cy3-labeled secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The nuclei were stained with DAPI reagent (Servicebio). For IF imaging, confocal microscopy (Zeiss, LSM800) was used and images were taken and processed with the ZEN software and Microsoft PowerPoint.
2.7 Flow Cytometry
Flow cytometry was performed to detect the proportion of CD4 or CD8 positive lymphocytes in the spleen. Subsequent to sacrifice, the spleen was removed in sterile conditions, weighed, and processed into a single cell suspension, which then stained according to standard protocols for flow cytometry with the following antibodies: CD3 (BD Biosciences, 560527), CD4 (BD Biosciences, 562891), CD8a (BD Biosciences, 553030). Labeled cells were fixed with 1% PFA and analyzed with a LSRFortessa X-20 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, MA, USA) on FACSDiva 8.0.1 software (BD Biosciences, MA, USA). In each sample, the corresponding isotype control antibodies were used. CD3 + cells were gated as T lymphocytes, and then the CD4 + and CD8 + populations were analyzed.
2.8 Western Blot
Protein was extracted using a Whole Cell Lysis Assay (KeyGEN, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The protein was separated using SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked in 5% BSA for 1.5 h and then incubated with the following primary antibodies: Anti-beta Amyloid 1–42 (ab201060-10, 1:1000; Abcam), occludin (DF7504, 1:1000; Affinity), ZO-1 (AF5145; 1:1000; Affinity), β-Actin(4970; 1:1000; CST), GAPDH-HRP (HRP-60004, 1:8000; Proteintech).after washed with TBS‐T, the membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies(SA00001-2, 1:8000; Proteintech), except for GAPDH-HRP, for 2 h at 4℃. The protein signals were detected using an ECL system (Affinity, Jiangsu, China).
2.9 PCR
Total RNA was extracted from brain tissues using Trizol reagent (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd) and converted to cDNA using HiScript® III RT SuperMix for qPCR (+ gDNA wiper) kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd). qPCR reactions were performed with ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd). All primers used are shown in (Table S1). The relative quantitative calculation of of mRNA was normalized in relevance to that of GAPDH (B661304, Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). The relative expression of genes was analyzed by the method of fold changes(2 −ΔΔCt).
2.10 16s Rrna Sequencing And Data Analysis Of Fecal Sample
Fecal samples were collected by standardized collection procedures and were chosen at random, and a final n = 5/group was used for 16S rRNA sequencing. DNA samples were quantified, followed by the amplification of the V3-V4 hypervariable region using the 338F(5′ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG 3′) and 806R(5′GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT 3′) primers. ALL PCR amplicons were concentrated and purified by gel electrophoresis, and subsequently extracted to obtain 3 µg of amplicons. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq.
2.11 Multiplex Cytokine Assay
Serum was collected by centrifugation at 1000xg for 15 min at 4 °C, aliquoted, and stored at -80 °C until analysis. Mouse High Sensitivity T Cell Magnetic Bead Panel ((EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) was performed on the Luminex-MAGPIX multiplex immunoassay system according to the manufacturer's instructions. Data were analyzed using Milliplex Analyst 5.1 software (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).
2.12 Statistical Analyses
The statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 20; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Comparisons between groups were performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by LSD or Dunnett’s T3 post hoc test. The following significance levels were used for comparisons between independent groups: #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 versus R1-Ct group; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 versus P8-Ct group, and “ns” indicates no significant difference.