On August 24, 2022, a 51-year-old female with a choking feeling after eating and epigastric dull pain and discomfort was treated at the Outpatient Department of Gastroenterology of the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College. The patient had a poor appetite and normal urine. The folds of the fundus and body of the stomach were thick, stiff, and poorly inflated. Multiple irregular ulcers and surrounding mucosal protrusions could be seen (Fig. 1A). Poorly differentiated cancer was considered in biopsy pathology, which requires immunohistochemical detection; however, the patient did not undergo immunohistochemical detection.
The patient was hospitalized on August 30, 2022. She had a history of cerebral infarction and hypertension. She had no history of alcohol use or smoking. She also denied recent ingestion of raw foods, overseas travel, or sick contacts. The patient’s family history was unremarkable, with no history of cancer in any blood relatives. Physical examination of the abdomen was unremarkable. The routine blood test results showed that the hemoglobin level (108 g/L) and lymphocyte ratio (4.0%) were decreased, and the white blood cell count (18.96 * 10 ^ 9/L) and neutrophil ratio (92.7%) were increased. Computed tomography (CT) reconstructed the gastric wall thickness, showing multiple ulcer-like changes in the gastric fundus and body and multiple lymph nodes around the cardia (Fig. 1B). Gastrointestinal radiography revealed that barium was slightly blocked through the cardia, the local lumen was irregularly narrow, and mucosal folds were interrupted and destroyed (Fig. 1C). The patient did not undergo immunohistochemical detection but directly underwent radical gastrectomy.
The patient underwent total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection. Macroscopic examination revealed an ulcerative mass measuring 4.5x3x0.3 cm. The dissected surface showed a yellow‒white area surrounding the area of the ulcer. The surrounding mucosa was grayish white with folds. Microscopically, hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained tissue sections showed two different types of tumors. One was germinal center type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (GC-DLBCL), Lugano stage I, and the other was moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma, pT1N0M0 (WHO stage) (Fig. 2A). The lymphoma component involved the mucosa, submucosa and muscle layer, without a complete lymphoid follicular structure or a germinal center, and diffuse infiltration of B cells could be seen. The components of adenocarcinoma were limited to the gastric mucosa and submucosa. The cancer cells were arranged into glandular and cribriform patterns, showing an infiltrative growth pattern. A large number of infiltrating lymphocytes was observed, and lymph follicles could be seen locally. The background mucosa gland was severe chronic atrophic gastritis with glandular intestinal metaplasia. No vessel or nerve invasion was found. No adenocarcinoma or lymphoma was involved in the lymph nodes. Serial sections of the area showed clear boundaries and no histological transition where the two lesions collided. On immunohistochemistry, immuno in situ hybridization: EBER (-). Immunohistochemistry and gene detection were carried out, and the immunohistochemical results were as follows: CK (epithelial component +), LCA (lymphoid tissue +), Vimentin (-), and Ki67 (adenocarcinoma: proliferation index approximately 80%; lymphoma: proliferation index approximately 90%); adenocarcinoma: PMS2 (-), MLH1 (-), MSH2 (+), MSH6 (+), and HER2 (0); lymphoma: CD3 (scattered+), CD5 (scattered+), CD20 (+), CD79a (+), CD10 (+), Bcl-6 (+), CD21 (+), CD23 (-), MUM1 (-), CyclinD1 (individual cells+), Bcl-2 (focal+), c-myc (-), and Helicobacter pylori (+) (Fig. 2B-F). The gene detection results were as follows: mutation of ERBB2 V8421, mutation of BRAF V600E, mutation of MLH1 163mfs * 6, mutation of PIK3CA K111E, and mutation of ARID1A Q1404.
Treatment: The patient underwent two cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy. The patient developed a gastrointestinal reaction after medication, which improved after symptomatic treatment with metoclopramide.
Follow-up: At present, the patient's condition is stable without recurrence or metastasis.