Drug and reagents
XFDZ includes seven traditional Chinese herbs: Inulae Flos (15 g, Jiangsu, 200515), Haematitum (5 g, Sichuan, 200728), Pinelliae Rhizoma Praeparatum (15 g, Hubei, 200314), Zingiberis Rhizoma Recens (25 g, Shandong, Buy from the supermarket), Ginseng Radix Et Rhizoma (10 g, Jilin, 200321), Roast Radix Glycyrrhizae (15 g, Neimenggu, 200716), Jujubae Fructus (10 g, Shandong, 200706) all of which are provided by the Pharmacy Department of Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The herbs were mixed with an 8‑fold volume of distilled water evenly. After the herbs were moistened thoroughly, the mixture was boiled at 100˚C for 40 min and filtered through a gauze to obtain the filtrate. The decoctions were stored at 4˚C. Omeprazole magnesium enteric-coated capsules were purchased from AstraZeneca Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Batch No. J20130093). Mosapride citrate tablets were produced by Lunanbet Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Batch No. H19990317). The antibodies: NLRP3, Caspase-1, IL-1β, IL-18 were purchased from Abcam (UK). All the other chemicals and reagents were of standard commercially available biochemical quality.
Detection of active ingredients in XFDZ by UPLC/Q-TOF-MS
The active ingredients of XFDZ were detected using the ultra-performance liquid chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC/Q-TOF-MS). UPLC/Q-TOF-MS method was adapted from previously established method [15].
Animals
Sixty healthy SPF male Wistar rats (220±20 g, 12 weeks) for the experiments were provided by Beijing Speightford Biotechnology Co., Ltd. [Animal license number of the rats was SCXK (Beijing) 2016-0006]. The rats were raised in Tianjin Nankai Hospital Laboratory Animal Research Center. The study protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Tianjin Nankai Hospital Laboratory, China (Approval No. NYKK-DWL-2019-083).
Experiment grouping and establishment of the RE rat model
Sixty normal SPF Wistar male rats were randomly divided according to their body weight into the following four groups: (a) Sham group; (b) Model group; (c) XFDZ group; (d) Omeprazole + mosapride group. In addition to the sham group, the remaining 45 rats underwent pyloric clip and section ligation for modeling [16]. All the 45 rats were anesthetized using 0.3% sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) and were fasted for 24 h preoperatively. The junction of pylorus and duodenum was covered with pylorus clamp with the internal diameter of 4.2 mm avoiding the blood vessels and mesenteric tissues. Then, the closure was clamped tightly with hemostatic forceps to avoid scratching of blood vessels on both sides of pylorus clamp. Then, 2/3 fundus of stomach was ligated to enhance reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. Fasting and not watering for 24 h postoperatively. Within 3 days after surgery, each rat was injected with levofloxacin hydrochloride injection at 1.5 mg/kg per day in the abdominal cavity, and was given normal saline for injection, then the rats returned to normal diet.
Drug adminstration
The rats of model group and sham group were gavaged with normal saline in the ratio of 1 ml/100 g body weight on the 8th day after surgery. The rats of treatment groups were gavaged with the XFDZ (8.55 g/kg) and omeprazole enteric-coated tablets + mosapride (1.35 g/kg) on the 8th day after the operation twice a day.All rats were sacrificed after 14 days to collect specimens for index detection.
Haematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and pathological evaluation
HE staining was performed on paraffin-embedded oesophageal section (0.4 μm). The embedded section was deparaffinized, hydrated and stained with HE. The stained sections were subsequently observed under an optical microscope.
Cell culture
HEEC purchased from Beijing Beinachuanglian Biotechnology Research Institute werecultured in DMEM complete medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA). The cell were cultured in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2, 37 °C.
Glycocholic and taurocholic acid exposure
HEEC were exposed to glycocholic and taurocholic acid mixture to induce cell inflammatory damage[17]. The HEEC were exposed to different concentrations (PH 3, 4, 5, 6) of acid medium and different concentrations (1000, 750, 500, 375 μmol/L) of alkaline medium (A mixture of gallinocholic acid and taurocholic acid in a ratio of 3:1) for 1 h to induce cell damage. A CCK-8 assay was performed to determine the viability of HEEC. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 1×105 cells/well with complete medium. After exposure to various stimulates, 10 µl CCK8 reagent (Dojindo, Japan) and 100 µl DMEM was then added. The plates were incubated at 37 ºC for 2 hour. The absorbance was measured using a microplate reader (ThermoFisher, USA) at 450 nm. Based on the effect on HEEC cell viability, PH 4.7 acidic medium was finally selected with a concentration of 500 μmol/L mixed bile acid as gastroesophageal reflux mimic to construct a reflux injury model of HEEC. When the cells reached 80% confluence, they were treated with the mixture for 1 hour.
Drug and experiment grouping of the HEEC
In order to further analyze the key active drugs in the XFDZ, the whole prescription can be divided into three groups of drugs according to the taste and function of TCM. Inulae Flos and Haematitum (IH) group are tasting bitter and have the descending effect. Pinelliae Rhizoma Praeparatum and Zingiberis Rhizoma RecensIt (PZ group) have the pungent taste and the dispersing effect. Ginseng Radix Et Rhizoma, Roast Radix Glycyrrhizae and Jujubae Fructus (GRJ group) are tasting sweet and have the role of nourishment. All the herbs’weight, brand, origin, batch as above. XFDZ and its decomposed recipes were used to treat HEEC for 24 h. Then, the cells were exposed to glycocholic and taurocholic acid mixture for 1 h.
JC-1 fluorescence measurement of the mitochondrial membrane potential
The mitochondrial membrane potential was detected using JC-1 fluorescence mitochondrial imaging. The HEEC were incubated with JC-1 solution for 20 minutes at 37 °C. The cells were then washed twice with JC-1 buffer and medium was added to each well. Images were taken using a microplate reader (ThermoFisher, USA). The ratio of red to green fluorescence represented the mitochondrial membrane potential.
Relative quantification of mtDNA copy number using real-time PCR
The total genomic DNA was extracted using a DNA extraction kit (DP304, Tiangen, China) from HEEC according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The mtDNA copy number was determined via quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). For qRT-PCR, each genomic DNA sample was mixed with primers (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) and SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The expression of β-actin gene in the nucleus was used as a control, and the mt-Nd1 gene was used as a target mitochondrial gene. The sequences of the primers used for amplification of the target genes were as follows: 5’-CTCCATCCTGGCCTCGCTGT-3’ and 5’-GCTGCTACCTTCACCGTTCC-3’ for β-actin; 5’- CCTCTCCACCCTTATCACAACAC-3’ and 5’- CATATTATGGCCAAGGGTCAT-3’ for Nd1. The target genes of the mixture were amplified using a CFX96™ Real-Time system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with the following protocol: 95 ˚C for 30 s, followed by 42 cycles of 95 ˚C for 5 s, and 58 ˚C for 30 s. The relative mtDNA copy number was determined by the 2–ΔΔCt method [18].
Detection of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels
After stimulation, the cells were placed in test tubes and washed three times with cell culture medium (without serum) after undergoing 2,7-dichlorodi-hydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA, Beyotime, China) staining. The other cells were treated with Rosup as the positive control. Adherent cells were rinsed with pancreatic enzymes and incubated with DCFH-DA at 37 °C for 20 min. All the cells were observed and analyzed under a fluorescence microscope (Leica, USA). The reaction between the ROS and DCFH-DA resulted in dichlorofluorescein (DCF), a compound that emits green fluorescence [19].The relative fluorescence value, which indicated the relative level of ROS, was determined with Microplate fluorescence wavelength detection (Tecan, Mannedorf, Switzerland).
NLRP3 expression was detected by high-intension cell analysis
After treatment with the XFDZ and its decomposed recipes. HEEC exposed to glycocholic and taurocholic acid mixture for 1 h. The cells were washed 3 times with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. 0.5% Triton X-100 was permeable at room temperature for 20 min and washed with PBS for 3 times. NLRP3 (1:1000, Santa, sc-518122) was added as primary antibody and incubated overnight at 4˚C in a wet box. On the second day, the cells were washed with PBST for 3 times, followed by fluorescent secondary antibody, incubated in a wet box for 2 h at room temperature, soaked with PBST, and stained with DAPI. The fluorescence intensity was observed and calculated under a high-content cell imaging analyzer (IN Cell Analyzer 2500 HS, GE, USA). HEEC were double-stained with NLRP3 and DAPI fluorescence. The effect of drug on NLRP3 expression was investigated by high-connotation cell imaging and fluorescence quantitative techniques.
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
XFDZ and its decomposed recipes were used to treat HEEC for 24 h. MCC950 as a specific small-molecule NLRP3 inhibitor, given with a low level (MCC950L group, 10 µmol/L) and the high level (MCC950H group, 50 µmol/L) for 2 h before administration of the simulated reflux. Then, the cells were exposed to glycocholic and taurocholic acid mixture for 1 h. Serum of RE rats and the supernatants from HEEC cell cultures were collected and centrifuged to remove cell debris. The concentration of Caspase-1, IL-1β and IL-18 in serum and cells were detected by ELISA kit (Multi sciences Biotech.CO., China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All assays were performed in triplicate in three independent experiments.
Western blot
Oesophageal strips or cultured cells were collected to extract the protein with RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Biotech. CO., China). After complete lysis, the samples were centrifuged at 12,000 r/min for 10 minutes at 4 °C to precipitate the tissue debris. The supernatants were used to measure the protein concentration by a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Biosharp, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The proteins were electrophoresed in 5% SDS-PAGE gels and then transferred to PVDF membranes. After blocking with 5% skim milk for 1 hour at room temperature, the membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies: NLRP3 (1:1,000, ab263899, Abcam), caspase-1 (1:1,000, ab179515, Abcam), IL-1β (1:1,000, ab216995, Abcam), IL-18 (1:200, ab207324, Abcam), β-Tubulin (1:5,000, ab68193, Abcam) and GAPDH (1:1,000, ab181603, Abcam) at 4 °C overnight. The membrane was washed with TBST and incubated with secondary antibodies (1: 5,000, CW0103S, CWBIO) for 2 hours at 25 °C. β-Tubulin and GAPDH were used as loading control. Protein bands were visualized on the membrane with a Gel Imaging System (BIO-RAD, ChemiDocTM XRS+, USA), and the protein bands were quantified with Image Lab software. A high-content analysis system was used to analyze NLRP3 protein expression.
Statistical analysis
Each experiment was conducted independently and at least three times for statistical analysis. Student's t-tests were performed to analyze the differences between two groups. The data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), which were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the least significant difference (LSD) test, using SPSS 22.0 software. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.