3.1. Characterization before and after the sulfonated
Figure 1 illustrates the SEM images of HA and HAR before and after introducing the sulfonic acid group. The sulfonation process caused certain damages to the original morphology of HA. SHA particles are looser and have greater damage to HA than NSHA. This is because the sulfonation process of sulfuric acid has a higher temperature and is more destructive. By comparing the structures of HAR, NSHAR and SHAR, it can be found that they are all small irregularly spherical particles with a size ranging from small to large. In addition, as demonstrated in Fig. 1(a-3), (b-3) and (c-3), all of the derived resin can be expropriated as adsorbents for gold recovery.
The functional groups on SHAR and NSHAR surface mainly included –NH2 and –NH- stretching vibration (3437 cm− 1), C = C or C = O vibration (1609 cm− 1), -CH2 stretching (1474 cm− 1) and C-O stretch vibration peak (1377 cm− 1), as reflected by FT-IR of HAR, SHAR and NSHAR (shown in Fig. 2(a)) [25, 30]. Importantly, asymmetric and symmetric S = O stretching of sulfonic acid groups were observed at 1205 and 1030 cm− 1 in SHAR and NSHAR FT-IR spectrum[31]. Meanwhile, S 2p components were observed in both the XPS spectra of SHAR and NSHAR (shown in Fig. 2(b)). And the S 2p atomic percentage of SHAR is 0.24% larger than NSHAR (0.18%), which states that the degree of sulfonation of SHAR is higher than that of NSHAR.
As seen from N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (Fig. 2 (c) and (d)), both SHAR and NSHAR pertain to typical Type IV isotherm. The average pore size of SHAR and NSHAR are 3.825 nm and 3.056 nm respectively and the specific surface area are 34.56 m2·g− 1 and 142.6 m2·g− 1 respectively (Table s1), which play an important role in their adsorption performance.
3.2. Adsorption comparison before and after sulfonation
To further inspect the adsorption performance of HAR, SHAR and NSHAR, we exposed the derived resin to HAuCl4 solution at different initial concentrations, pH and contact time (Fig. 3). HAR, SHAR and NSHAR all contain some positively charged amino groups. These groups are in charge of electrostatic interaction with gold ions, and the interaction can be effectively adjusted by the pH of the solution. This is because the charge state of the adsorbent surface and the form of metal ions mightily depends on the pH of the solution[27]. When the pH was greater than 8, there was obvious gold sol’s precipitation. Therefore, only the change of adsorption capacity with pH of 1–7 was investigated. When the pH was lower than 8, gold ions mainly appeared in negatively charged complexes of AuCl4−, Au(OH)Cl3− and Au(OH)2Cl2−[32]. Generally, the lower the pH, the more obvious the protonation of the amino group, the more conducive to the adsorption of gold ions through electrostatic action. However, the lower the pH, the higher the concentration of Cl− in the liquid phase, which can form competitive adsorption with gold ions and inhibit the adsorption. Consequently, the result of the combined effect is that SHAR at pH = 3 and NSHAR at pH = 4 has better adsorption performance on gold ions. According to previous reports, pH = 3 was beneficial to the adsorption effect of HAR[25]. Therefore, the optimal pH value of each adsorbent was selected to study the maximum adsorption performance.
As shown in Fig. 3(b), the maximum adsorption capacity of SHAR was 1440 mg·g− 1 (98%), which was higher than that of NSHAR (927 mg·g− 1, 92.7%) and HAR (920 mg·g− 1, 92%), and 4 ~ 20 times higher than commercial activated carbon and ion-exchange resins. This might be because SHAR has a higher degree of sulfonation than NSHAR. According to the soft and hard acid-base theory, sulfonate as a soft base can form strong interaction with gold belonging to the soft acid, so the content of sulfonate has a non-negligible effect on the adsorption. At the same initial concentration, the time required for HAR,SHAR and NSHAR to reach adsorption equilibrium for gold ion solution was compared. Excitingly, SHAR requires 50 min and NSHAR only requires 10 min, which is much shorter than HAR (270 min). Both the adsorption capacity and the equilibrium time are improved and superior to other reported adsorbents as seen in Table 1. In practical applications, a shorter adsorption equilibrium time can not only quickly and efficiently treat the waste liquid but also substantially reduce the cost. Here, NSHAR could reach adsorption equilibrium faster than SHAR because the specific surface area of NSHAR was bigger than SHAR (Table s1). It means that more effective functional groups are exposed in the pores, which can quickly catch gold ions and shorten the reaction time.
Table 1
Comparison of SHAR and NSHAR with other adsorbents for gold recovery
Materials | Equilibrium time (min) | Adsorption capacity (mg·g− 1) | Reference |
UiO-66-TU | 90 | 326 | [33] |
TP | 120 | 1557 | [34] |
MFRM | 750 | 179.2 | [35] |
MoS2 | 60 | 1133 | [36] |
MNP-G3 | 240 | 347 | [37] |
BTU-PT | 360 | 502 | [38] |
QAPT gel | 300 | 403 | [39] |
Modified straw | 120 | 450 | [40] |
HCSs-M | 300 | 1115 | [28] |
SHAR | 50 | 1440 | This work |
NSHAR | 10 | 927 |
3.3. Adsorption kinetics and isotherms
The kinetic fitting curves and parameters of Au(III) on SHAR and NSHAR are listed in Fig. 4 and Table s2, respectively. The results show that the pseudo -second-order models of the two adsorbents all have a better fit than the pseudo -first-order models. This indicates that the valence bond force is generated between gold ions and adsorbent by sharing or exchanging electrons, and the adsorption process belongs to chemical adsorption[13]. For the solid-liquid adsorption process, there are three consecutive steps for the adsorption of Au(III) on SHAR and NSHAR: (1) the diffusion of Au(III) to the outer surface of the adsorbent (2) the diffusion of Au(III) in the pores of adsorbent and (3) the adsorption of Au(III) on the inner surface. The third stage is usually ignored due to its rapid progress[41]. The speed-limiting steps can be easily found by fitting the experimental data with intra-particle diffusion model. The method of piecewise linear regression was used to divide the curve into different linear regions[42], which avoids subjective judgment when choosing the start and end points of each region. As shown in Fig. 4(b). The last process indicates that the adsorption has reached equilibrium due to kid3 < 1. The adsorption of gold ions on the SHAR is divided into two stages, film diffusion and pore diffusion. Furthermore, the rate-controlling step is pore diffusion (kid2 > kid1), due to the low specific surface area of SHAR and insufficient pore channels[42]. However, in the process of NSHAR capturing gold ions, the adsorption process was only divided into one stage, and there was no obvious boundary between interface diffusion and pore diffusion, which is due to the rich pore structure of NSHAR and the fast adsorption process.
The isotherm fitting curves and parameters of Au(III) on SHAR and NSHAR are listed in Fig. 5(a) and Table s3, respectively. In general, for the isotherms of SHAR and NSHAR, the Freundlich model is more suitable, indicating that the adsorption of Au(III) on SHAR and NSHAR belongs to multilayer adsorption. In addition, the value of 1/n is between 0 and 1, and the n of SHAR is greater than that of NSHAR, which reflects that Au(III) is easy to adhere to the adsorbent, and the interaction between SHAR and Au(III) is stronger than that of NSHAR and Au(III)[27]. This also provides evidence that SHAR has a higher adsorption capacity than NSHAR. Furthermore, the change of Gibbs free energy (ΔG°) and enthalpy (ΔH°) were calculated according to the Van't Hoff equation (listed in the Table s4). The negative ΔG° and positive ΔH° imply a spontaneous and endothermic adsorption process.
3.4. Adsorption mechanism
In the process of adsorption, the color of the adsorption solution had a magical change (yellow-pink-purple-blue-colorless) as time increased, which corresponds to the typical color change during the growth of gold colloidal particles. This phenomenon intuitively indicates that Au(Ⅲ) was reduced during the adsorption process. The standard reduction potentials of Au(Ⅲ)/Au(Ⅰ) and Au(Ⅰ)/ Au(0) are 1.4 V and 1.0 V. Therefore, in general, Au(Ⅲ) is first reduced to Au(Ⅰ), and then Au(Ⅰ) is reduced to Au(0) [27]. The XRD diffraction analysis can prove that elemental gold appeared on the adsorbent. As presented in Fig. 6(a), there are sharp peaks at 38.13°, 44.32°, 64.60° and 77.62° corresponding to the (111), (200), (220), (311) crystal plane of elemental gold[40], indicating that the gold ions are indeed reduced during the adsorption process by SHAR and NSHAR. However, in the XPS survey spectra, not only Au 4f is observed, but also the Cl 2p, which shows that the gold species adsorbed on SHAR and NSHAR is a mixture of gold element and gold compounds containing chlorine. In order to explore the specific forms and percentage of gold species, XPS Au 4f narrow scan of Au-SHAR and Au-NSHAR were analyzed in detail. According to the results of Fig. 6(c) and Table s5, it can be seen that most of the gold species attached to adsorbent are Au(0) (68.6%, 65.7%), a small part are Au(Ⅰ) (34.3%, 31.4%) and no Au(Ⅲ). This means that Au(Ⅲ) was completely reduced. The same conclusion can be drawn from the elemental analysis results of SEM-EDS. According to the weight percentages of gold and chlorine in Fig. 6(d) and (e), the corresponding molar ratio of gold to chlorine can be calculated, which is greater than 0.33 (AuCl3) and 1 (AuCl). Gold nanoparticles are also found in the SEM and TEM images. In conclusion, it is clear that the redox reaction occurs when Au(Ⅲ) is captured by SHAR and NSHAR.
According to reports, AuCl4− can be reduced to Au(0) by the abundant hydroxyl groups in the biosorbent, and the hydroxyl groups are oxidized to carbonyl groups[28, 43–45]. In our previous work, it was also found that when HAR adsorbed Au(Ⅲ) from acidic aqueous solution, Au(Ⅲ) was reduced by hydroxyl groups[25]. What is the adsorption mechanism of SHAR and NSHAR when they quickly adsorb gold? Further investigation is required. Therefore, XPS C 1s, O 1s, N 1s and S 2p narrow scans of the adsorbent before and after adsorption were analyzed in detail. Taking SHAR as an example, the peaks of C1s (Fig. s1(a)) appear at 284.27 eV, 284.98 eV, 286.12 eV, 287.46 eV and 290.96 eV, assigned to C = C, C-C/C-H, C-O, C = O and O-C = O, respectively[46]. After adsorption, the percentage of C-O decreases from 32.8–29.3% while C = O increases from 9.8–15.5% (Table s6). The O 1s peaks (Fig. s1(b)) correlated to CO-O, -SO3−, C = O and C-O appears at 530.87 eV, 531.89 eV, 532.69 eV and 533.42 eV, respectively[47]. Likewise, after adsorption, the percentage of C-O reduced while C = O increased, implying that C-O was oxidized to C = O during the adsorption process. The two peaks of N 1s shift to higher Bes, but the percentage has no significant changes. This indicates that there exist covalent bonds between nitrogen atoms and gold atoms[48] that do not participate in the redox reaction. The S 2p curve shown in Figure s1(d) roughly contains two peaks of sulfonate at ~ 162ev and sulfonate at ~ 168ev. Before adsorption, it mainly exists in the form of sulfonate (90.9%), and after adsorption, it mainly exists in the form of sulfide Au-S (79.5%)[49].This evidence suggests that -SO3− is involved in the reaction and forms stable Au-S bonds after adsorption.
In summary, the possible adsorption mechanism of gold ions on SHAR and NSHAR can be proposed: Au(Ⅲ) is uptaked by SHAR and NSHAR with electrostatic interaction and coordinationi nteracts through nitrogen-containing functional groups, and covalent bond with -SO3−. Then, Au(Ⅲ) is reduced to Au(Ⅰ) and Au(0) by C-O groups. Finally, Au(Ⅰ) and Au(0) are stabilized on the adsorbent. The introduction of -SO3− plays a key role in the adsorption process because Au(0) has no positive charge and could not be stably stored on the adsorbent surface through electrostatic interaction. Therefore, the reduced product gold particles are easily released into the liquid phase. As a result, the adsorption solution showed a color change of gold sol. Thus, the introduction of sulfonic acid groups not only accelerates the recovery rate of Au(Ⅲ) by SHAR and NSHAR, but also increases their adsorption capacity.
3.5. Recovery of gold and competitive adsorption of Au(III) in other metal ions
Since SHAR and NSHAR has the same adsorption mechanism for gold ions, and the adsorption capacity of SHAR is larger than NSHAR, we took SHAR as a representative to investigate the selectivity of metal ions on sulfonated humic acid-derived resin. The types and concentrations of base metal ions in the adsorption solution simulated the leaching solution of gold ore and waste electronic circuit boards. As shown in Fig. 7, under competing conditions, SHAR shows excellent selectivity to gold ions in the leaching solution. By comparison, it is found that the selectivity to gold ions in the leaching solution of the electronic board is better, which may be because the concentration of gold ions and base metal ions in the leaching solution of ore is generally low, leading to a poor separation effect. However, the recovery rate of gold ions is much higher than that of other metal ions, which basically satisfies the practical application.
In order to directly recover gold on the adsorbent, an incineration process is further employed, during which the gold species are reduced to the metal form as the organic components are oxidized. Since gold is more expensive than base metals, and the preparation cost of sulfonated humic acid-based resin is inexpensive than other artificial resins, it is an economical and good choice to recover gold from SHAR by incineration. Au-SHAR was incinerated at 600℃ to remove organic components and directly recover gold from Au-SHAR (Fig. 7(e)). According to the XRD curve in Fig. 7(f), the burning product belongs to element gold.12
3.5. Column adsorption
As shown in Fig. s2(a), Au(III) solution entered the ion exchange column from below, avoiding bed resistance caused by small adsorbent particles. 0.1 g resin was soaked by water for 4 h, and packed into the column in a wet state. At a temperature of 298 K, the Au(III) solution with a concentration of 100 mg·mL− 1 was pumped into the column through a peristaltic pump, and the flow rate was controlled to 1.5 mL·min− 1. In order to better compare the influence of the introduction of sulfonate on the dynamic adsorption, NSHAR and HAR were selected to draw the penetration curve. Because they have a considerable maximum adsorption capacity, which is more convenient for us to clearly evaluate the effect of adsorption rate on the penetration speed. It can be observed from Fig. s2(b) that HAR reached penetration faster than NSHAR. According to the static adsorption experiment, 0.1 g of HAR and NSHAR can capture 92 mg and 92.7 mg gold, respectively. However, the dynamic adsorption capacities of HAR and NSHAR in the column adsorption experiment are 45 mg and 71 mg. The utilization of the resin increased from 48.9–67%. This is because in continuous experiments, the contact time between Au(III) and the adsorbent is relatively short, while HAR has a slow adsorption rate for Au(III), which leads to insufficient adsorption and low utilization rate. In summary, the introduction of -SO3− into humic acid-derived resin to shorten the adsorption equilibrium time can not only improve efficiency but also save costs, which has important value in practical application.