Preparation and characterization of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem
The degradable Fe-MOF nanoparticles (FNP) were synthesized by conjugation of Fe2+ with ROS-cleaved linker TK using hydrothermal reaction. In order to improve biocompatibility and tumor targeting capacity, HA coat-layer was introduced into the surface of FNP nanoparticles, which was used to prolong the circulation in blood vessels and endowed HFNP nanosystem with the tumor targeting features. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), zeta potential measurement, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR), ultraviolet and visible spectrophotometry (UV-vis) were employed to monitor the functionalization of HFNP nanosystem. Firstly, both FNP and HFNP exhibited the distinctively spherical morphology with good monodispersity detected by TEM (Fig. 2a, b), and the uniform sizes were respectively distributed at 130 ± 9.2 and 158 ± 6.5 nm, which was consistent with the corresponding DLS results (Fig. 2c). As companying with the introduction of HA, the size of HFNP displayed an obvious increase, indicating the successful modification of HA. Simultaneously, the zeta potential of HFNP was also significantly reduced from − 22 ± 1 to -25 ± 0.4 mV after the conjugation of HA (p < 0.01, Additional file 1: Fig. S1), suggesting the successful construction of HFNP nanosystem again. Secondly, XRD results showed that the obvious peaks of 5.58°, 8.62° and 10.1° were observed in FNP sample (Additional file 1: Fig. S2), attributed to the typical structure of Fe-MOF nanoparticles [16]. After conjugation with HA molecule, similar peaks of 5.62°, 8.64° and 10.08° were also displayed in HFNP sample, indicating again the synthesis of FNP. More importantly, the new peak of 25.18° was shown in the XRD spectrum of HFNP, it was ascribed to the characteristic peak of HA, which was consistent with previous research [17]. The result further confirmed the successful modification of HA and fabrication of HFNP. Thirdly, both the FTIR spectrum of FNP and HFNP showed that the typical characteristic peak of carboxyl at 1637 cm− 1 and 1425 cm− 1 [18], owing to the introduction of the abundant TK ligand with carboxyl in the synthesis of FNP and HFNP. Furthermore, the distinctively characteristic peaks of HA (1051 cm− 1, 1085 cm− 1 and 1150 cm− 1) were displayed in the FTIR spectrum of HFNP (Additional file 1: Fig. S3), attributing to the C-O-C stretching peaks of glycosyl agent in the HA molecule [17, 19]. It thus implied that the HA layer was actually conjugated on the surface of FNP. The results collectively suggested that the ROS-responsive degradable Fe-MOF nanosystem HFNP with HA modification was successful construction.
Subsequently, the drug loading content and drug loading efficiency of GOX and PFC in HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem were detected via UV-vis spectrophotometry and gas chromatography (GC). As shown in Fig. 2d, both HFNP@GOX and HFNP@GOX@PFC groups without H2O2 treatment had no obvious GOX release, proved by the negligible absorption intensity of GOX at 276 nm, indicating the successfully GOX loading in the nanosystem. Furthermore, the loading content and encapsulation efficiency of GOX in HFNP were calculated as 2.42% and 82.5% based on the associating standard curve (Additional file 1: Fig. S4). Moreover, after treatment with H2O2, both HFNP@GOX and HFNP@GOX@PFC groups showed the typical GOX absorption peak at 276 nm compared with GOX group, implying the effective drug release. Furthermore, the loading content and efficiency of PFC in HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem were measured with GC. HFNP@GOX@PFC exhibited the obvious elution peak of PFC at 1.152 min the same as PFC (Additional file 1: Fig. S5), indicating the successful encapsulation of PFC. The loading content and encapsulation efficiency of PFC in HFNP@GOX@PFC were determined as 32.37% and 78.07%, according to the corresponding standard curve (Additional file 1: Fig. S6). These results indicated that the nanosystem had been fabricated successfully. Additionally, the stability of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem was evaluated. As shown in Fig. 2e, f, the size & zeta potential of HFNP@GOX@PFC had no significant change, despite the short-term (0–24 h) in 10% fetal bovine serum of PBS or long-term (1–14 day) in PBS incubation, proving that HFNP@GOX@PFC had great biostability & storage stability, and it was conducive to the drug delivery as nanocarriers for tumor therapy in vivo and in vitro.
The vital features of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem are ROS-responsive Fe-MOF disassembly, drug release, self-produced H2O2 and cascade amplification of CDT. Firstly, TEM, DLS and UV-vis spectrophotometry were used to monitor the ROS-responsive Fe-MOF disassembly & drug release trait. As shown in Fig. 2g, h, both the morphology of FNP and HFNP were obviously changed from the initial sphere to collapse structure when exposed to H2O2 (Fig. 2a, B vs. Figure 2g, h), attributing to the ROS-responsive disassembly. It is consistent with the related DLS results (Fig. 2i). The reason could be explained that the key group of the linker agent TK is S-C-S, which could actually cleave in response to H2O2 stimuli. Thus, FNP and HFNP composed of Fe2+ ions and TK linker could be rapidly disintegrated triggered by H2O2, which is beneficial for the following drug release. Furthermore, both the ROS-responsive Fe2+ and GOX release behaviours of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem were quantitatively measured using o-phenanthroline method and UV-vis spectrophotometry. The intracellular ROS concentration of tumor cells was simulated through H2O2 to analyse the drug release of nanosystem. As shown in Fig. 3a, there was barely any Fe2+ release in the control group (PBS) upon 48 h, indicating the good encapsulation, stability and potential biocompatibility of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem (owing to no leakage during the blood circulation). In contrast, the release amount of Fe2+ was dramatically increased in the presence of H2O2, showing the H2O2 concentration-dependence drug release pattern (Fig. 3a, 0.1 M H2O2 vs. 1 M H2O2), suggesting that HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem actually possesses the ROS-responsive drug release capability. At the same time, GOX also showed H2O2 concentration-dependent release behaviour, and the release amount reached 69% and 91% (almost complete drug release) in 0.1 mM H2O2 and 1 mM H2O2 treatment groups, while the release amount of GOX was negligible in control group as well (Fig. 3b). The result further confirmed again the effective ROS-responsive drug release features of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem with good stability. Notably, H2O2 led to the disintegration of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem and the release of Fe2+ with H2O2-dependent pattern, which benefited for the subsequent CDT treatment.
Secondly, UV-vis spectrophotometry was used to characterize the self-produced H2O2 capability of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem, since H2O2 possesses the natural characteristic peak at 240 nm. As shown in Fig. 3c, GOX loaded nanoparticles (HFNP@GOX and HFNP@GOX@PFC) co-incubated with glucose exhibited the obviously characteristic peak of H2O2 compared to control (PBS) and negative HFNP groups, confirming the self-generation of H2O2. It also indicated that the catalytic activity of GOX was not affected by the encapsulation of the HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem. Furthermore, the self-supply H2O2 capability of the HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem displayed a time-dependent pattern (Fig. 3d), and the yield of H2O2 at 6 h incubation was about 160 times that of 1 h, proving again self-produced H2O2 feature of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem. It could be explained that the GOX loaded HFNP@GOX@PFC nanocarrier could continuously generate H2O2 under glucose via GOX-mediated catalytic reaction, and the self-supply dose of H2O2 was increased with time. More importantly, the self-generation of H2O2 would not only accelerate nanocarriers disassembly and drug release in turn, but also provide the fuel “H2O2 and Fe2+” for Fenton reaction, leading to the cascade amplification of CDT and desired antitumor effect.
Thirdly, the generation level of ·OH as the direct indicator labelled CDT was investigated via Hydroxyl Free Radical assay Kit for evaluating the cascade amplification of CDT. As shown in Fig. 3e, compared with control (PBS), HFNP, HFNP@GOX and HFNP@GOX@PFC groups co-incubated with H2O2 all showed the typical ·OH peaks without glucose input, which further proved the successful construction of Fe2+-based MOF with good Fenton reaction ability. More importantly, the production of ·OH increased sharply after adding glucose, because the catalytic activity of GOX was amplified under glucose and produced much more H2O2, so as to cascade amplify the Fenton reaction of the nanosystem. Considering the good stability, ROS-responsive Fe-MOF disassembly, drug release, self-produced H2O2 and cascade amplification of CDT performance of the nanosystem, it inspired us to further explore the antitumor effect in vitro and in vivo.
The ROS self-generation and hypoxia suppression of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem
As the realization of the desired antitumor effect is closely with the activity of GOX and PFC cargoes, which was used to start the designed starvation and Fenton-based CDT therapy in HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem. The intratumoral activity of GOX and PFC were subsequently investigated. Since the GOX-mediated tumor starvation and PFC-mediated O2 supply and CDT amplification were accompanied by ROS generation and hypoxia suppression, which were respectively investigated in the following study. For one thing, 4T1 cells were treated with administrations and the ROS generation level were monitored by FCM using the typically ROS probe of DCFH-DA. As shown in Fig. 4a, compared with control (PBS), HFNP treatment induced the obvious fluorescence signal of DCF, indicating the generation of ROS, which was owed to the production of ·OH via Fenton reaction mediated by Fe2+ [20]. Furthermore, the amount of ROS generation generated by HFNP@GOX was significantly higher than HFNP group, benefitting from the introduction of GOX. Moreover, HFNP@GOX@PFC induced the highest ROS level in tumor cells among all treatments (Additional file 1: Fig. S7), implying the effective ROS self-generation capacity. The reason could be explained that the introduction of O2 supplier PFC in HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem could provide the endogenous O2, which was the key fuel of GOX-mediated starvation, leading to the dramatically H2O2 self-generation and ·OH accumulation via the cascade amplification of Fe2+-based Fenton reaction. These results directly illustrated that HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem is capable of the ROS self-generation features, which was helpful for the improved tumor killing.
For another thing, the hypoxia suppression induced by HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem were simultaneously investigated. Since the hypoxia level of tumor cells is positively associated with the expression of the typically hypoxia protein CD47 [8], its expression was thus monitored for evaluation the hypoxia suppression in tumor cells using Western blot and Image J software. After treatment for above groups for 24 h, there was no obvious difference in the CD47 expression of 4T1 cells between control (PBS) and HFNP group (Fig. 4b), suggesting that the introduction of HFNP without O2 supplier PFC and O2 consumer GOX loading has no effect on the hypoxia suppression, resulting from the inactivation of O2 generation. On the contrary, the expression of CD47 was significantly up-regulated in H2O2 supplier of GOX loaded HFNP@GOX group owing to the additional O2 exhaustion, which was the indispensable fuel of the catalytic reaction mediated by GOX. Furthermore, HFNP@GOX@PFC group induced the sharply downregulation of the CD47 expression (p < 0.01, Fig. 4c), compared with other groups. Accordingly, the FCM result confirmed the above phenomenon, with a significant reduction in CD47 expression on the HFNP@GOX@PFC group (Fig. 4d and Additional file 1: Fig. S8). Benefiting from the relatively higher loading content of PFC than GOX (32.37% vs. 2.42%, Additional file 1: Fig. S6 and Fig. S4), the self-supply amount of the endogenous O2 generated by PFC in HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem is correspondingly higher than that of O2 exhaustion mediated by GOX, leading to the effective hypoxia suppression, as shown by the lowest CD47 expression in 4T1 cells. The result further confirmed that the HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem not only self-supply O2 in tumor cells and relieve its hypoxic state, but also self-generate ROS via initiating the starvation mediated by GOX, and cascade amplify CDT effect mediated by Fe2+-based Fenton reaction, leading to the desired tumor killing.
The in vitro tumor apoptosis of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem
In order to further explore the antitumor effect in vitro, the apoptosis ratio of 4T1 cells treated with above experiment group was subsequently detected using Annexin V-FITC/PI kit (NeoBioscience, China) and analyzed by FCM. As shown in Fig. 4e, blank HFNP group caused a moderate apoptosis ratio compared to control (PBS), attributed to the limited CDT efficiency in presence of the insufficient H2O2. Furthermore, HFNP@GOX treatment group caused more severe apoptosis compared to HFNP group (p < 0.01, Fig. 4f), owing to the introduction of starvation therapy mediated by GOX. Moreover, the HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem induced the highest apoptosis rate compared with other groups, as confirmed by the quantitative analysis (Fig. 4f). The reasons could be explained that the introduction of O2 supplier-PFC could effective self-supply the endogenic O2 and relieve intracellular hypoxia, which were conducive to promote the GOX-based starvation reaction and generate the abundant H2O2, followed by accelerating MOF disassembly, drug release and cascade boosting CDT, consequently leading to the effective tumor apoptosis. Subsequently, the expression levels of the typical proteins closely associated with apoptosis pathway were measured with western blotting and qPCR assays for revealing the apoptosis mechanism induced by HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem [21, 22]. Compared to control, HFNP, HFNP@GOX and HFNP@GOX@PFC groups certainly downregulated the expression of anti-apoptotic BCL-2 & CytC genes and upregulated the expression of pro-apoptotic BAX, Casp3 genes & p53 protein (Fig. 4g, h and Additional file 1: Fig. S9), in an order of HFNP < HFNP@GOX < HFNP@GOX@PFC, confirming again the superior tumor killing efficiency of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem. It was explained that taking the combined advantages of the self-supply O2 via PFC, the dramatically H2O2 self-generation via GOX-based catalytic reaction, the ·OH accumulation via the cascade amplification of Fenton reaction, and the improved delivery efficiency via HA-targeted strategy, HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem induced the most serious cell apoptosis in vitro.
Re-education of macrophage and anti-metastasis in vitro
As the level of H2O2 is closely associated with the polarization of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) [8], and HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem actually possess the ROS self-generation features, as revealed by above result (Fig. 3c-e and Fig. 4a). Thus, the HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem may play a key role in the re-education of TAMs. Based on above consideration, 4T1 tumor cells and IL4-pretreated RAW264.7 macrophages were firstly cocultured in the Transwell, and 4T1 cells were then treated with various administrations, FCM was finally used to monitor the re-education degree of macrophages. The coculturation platform was illustrated in Fig. 5a, and the gate strategy of FCM was shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S10. After above administrations, the percentage of M1 macrophages were all significantly increased compared with control (PBS), in an order of HFNP < HFNP@GOX < HFNP@GOX@PFC (p < 0.01, Fig. 5b, c), indicating the effective TAMs polarization. It was attributed to the difference ROS generation capacity (Fig. 3c-e and Fig. 4a). Notably, the introduction of O2 supplier PFC and H2O2 supplier GOX in HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem could provide the sufficient fuel (O2 and H2O2) for GOX-mediated catalytic reaction and Fe2+-based Fenton reaction, leading to the abundant production of ROS (including H2O2 and ·OH) and the highest re-education number of TAMs.
As the polarization of TAMs is positively associated with the special cytokine secretion [23]. In general, TNF-α and IL-6 are considered to be the special markers of M1 macrophages, and IL-10 is considered to be the special marker of M2 macrophages [24]. In order to further clarify the re-education degree of TAMs, Elisa assay were employed to investigate expression change of above cytokine mentioned. As shown in Fig. 5d, the expression of TNF-α and IL-6 in HFNP and HFNP@GOX groups were obviously higher than control (PBS), and HFNP@GOX@PFC group induced the highest expression among all the treatments. On the contrary, the expression of IL-10 in treatment groups displayed the decrease tendency, in an order of HFNP@GOX@PFC < HFNP@GOX < HFNP, and HFNP@GOX@PFC group caused the lowest expression than other treatment groups, confirming again the great TAMs polarization capability. It was consistent with previous FCM analysis on the re-education of TAMs (Fig. 5b). These results directly confirmed that HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem is capable of the re-education of TAMs features, which was helpful for the immune activation and tumor killing.
As mentioned above, we have confirmed that HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem can induce the re-education of TAMs, but the molecular mechanism needs further explored in the following study. It is reported that ROS may serve as secondary messenger to promote the regulation of downstream pathways, such as NF-κB and MAPK, which are closely associated with macrophage polarization [25]. Therefore, 4T1 and RAW264.7 cells were co-cultured in the Transwell chamber and treated with HFNP, HFNP@GOX and HFNP@GOX@PFC, respectively. The key proteins of SYK, PLCγ2, ASK1, pp38 and p38 associated with NF-κB and MAPK pathways were measured with Western blot. As shown in Fig. 5e, the expression of SYK, PLCγ2, ASK1 and pp38 positive regulatory proteins associated with TAMs polarization in HFNP group were obviously higher than control (PBS), and HFNP@GOX group displayed higher expression than HFNP group. Importantly, HFNP@GOX@PFC group induced the highest expression among all the treatments (p < 0.01, Fig. 5f). It was attributed to the highest ROS generation of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem. These results proved that the molecular mechanism of TAMs re-education of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem was indeed achieved by ROS-activated NF-κB and MAPK signalling pathways.
Since TAMs could involve directly or indirectly in malignant tumor behaviours of metastasis [26], we additionally investigated the wound healing, migration and invasion behaviour of 4T1 cells in Transwell co-culturation system containing RAW 264.7 cells after above administrations (Fig. 5g), detected by the optical microscope. As for the wound healing assay, compared with the control group (PBS), the wound closure rate of HFNP, HFNP@GOX and HFNP@GOX@PFC groups obviously decreased to 85.9%, 68.9% and 42.6% (Fig. 5h and Additional file 1: Fig. S11), respectively. It was due to that the addition of PFC accelerated the generation of ROS and improved the re-education of macrophages, because the pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages can suppress to tumor cells and anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages can be conducive to tumor metastasis and progress [27]. As for migration and invasion assay, compared with control, HFNP, HFNP@GOX and HFNP@GOX@PFC groups could dramatically down-regulate migration ratio to 73.3%, 63.4% and 55.2% (Fig. 5h and Additional file 1: Fig. S12), and invasion rate to 94.1%, 79.9% and 73.9% (Fig. 5h and Additional file 1: Fig. S13) as well, suggesting again the effective anti-tumor invasion and migration capability of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem. Above results collectively suggested that the HFNP@GOX@PFC uptake by tumor cells with high efficiency can significantly self-supply H2O2 and O2 via delivering GOX and PFC, which could not only accelerate the disintegration of the HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem and drug release, but also cascade amplify the GOX-mediated tumor starvation and CDT therapy via Fe2+-based Fenton reaction with re-educated TAMs, consequently devoting to the effective antitumor effect in vitro.
In vivo antitumor effect of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem
Inspired by the excellent antitumor effect of the HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem in vitro, we further studied its antitumor effect in vivo in 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse models. After various administrations, the tumor volume, body weight and survival rate of the tumor-bearing mouse were significantly changed. In detail, HFNP group induced moderate tumor growth inhibition (Fig. 6a) compared with control (saline), attributing to the insufficient CDT. Furthermore, the inhibition effect of tumor growth in HFNP@GOX group was higher than of HFNP, owing to the additional starvation therapy mediated by GOX. Moreover, the HFNP@GOX@PFC group generated the most serious tumor growth inhibition, resulting from the combined effect between GOX-provided starvation therapy and cascade amplification CDT mediated by Fe2+-based Fenton reaction. Additionally, the re-education of TAMs mediated by HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem may also play an essential role in the overall antitumor effect, which was investigated in the following section. The tumor volume analysis (Fig. 6b) further confirmed the similar inhibition tendency of the tumor growth. More importantly, compared with other groups, HFNP@GOX@PFC group significantly prolonged the survival time of tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 6c) without weight loss (Additional file 1: Fig. S14), displaying the highest survival rate as 83.3% upon 36 days, suggesting the excellent anti-tumor efficacy and good biosafety in vivo.
Subsequently, H&E, TUNEL and immunofluorescence staining (IFC) assays were performed to further reveal the tumor killing in vivo. Compared with saline, HFNP, HFNP@GOX and HFNP@GOX@PFC groups all led to different degree of tumor tissues damage, in an order of HFNP < HFNP@GOX < HFNP@GOX@PFC, demonstrated by the chromatin condensation and distinctly tissue structure damaged in H&E images, and abundant magenta dots labelled the damaged DNA in TUNEL images (Fig. 6d). Besides, the IFC analysis of Ki67 in the tumor tissues also verified that HFNP@GOX@PFC group could effectively reduce the expression of Ki67 (Fig. 6d), confirming again the excellent antitumor effect in vivo of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem. It may be attributed to the combined therapy advantages between the GOX-mediated starvation therapy and cascade amplification CDT provided by Fe2+-based Fenton reaction with potential TAMs re-education in HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem. The results collectively suggested again that HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem certainly was capable of the excellent antitumor efficiency in vivo.
In order to clarify the antitumor mechanism of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem, we firstly investigated hypoxia suppression in vivo, as the level of endogenous O2 was closely with GOX-mediated starvation effect, and the H2O2 produced by GOX also affected the subsequent CDT and the overall antitumor effect. The IFC analysis of hypoxia marker CD47 in tumor sections after various administrations was investigated for characterizing the hypoxia suppression in vivo. As shown in Fig. 6d, the expression of CD47 in HFNP group exhibited the relatively high dose, as shown by the bright green fluorescence, and it was no different from that of control (saline) group, indicating the inherent tumor hypoxia and the little hypoxia suppression without additional O2 supply or exhaustion, Furthermore, O2 consumer and H2O2 supplier of GOX loaded HFNP@GOX group displayed the much higher expression of CD47 than HFNP group, and the reason could be attributed the fact that the GOX indeed induces the H2O2 generation with O2 deletion via the catalytic reaction, leading to the increased hypoxia in the tumor, as shown by the higher expression of CD47. Importantly, HFNP@GOX@PFC group with high PFC loading content (32.37%) displayed the lowest expression of CD47 among all groups (p < 0.01, Additional file 1: Fig. S15), implying the effective hypoxia suppression. It was explained that the abundant introduction of O2 supplier-PFC could significantly relieve the hypoxia of tumor cells. These results were consistent with the western blotting and FCM analysis of CD47 expression in vitro (Fig. 4b-d and Additional file 1: Fig. S8). Therefore, the results collectively suggested that the HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem could self-supply O2 and H2O2 with high efficiency, which could not only relieve tumor hypoxia, but also contribute to the realization of the cascade amplification the CDT and GOX-mediated tumor starvation, leading to the most effective antitumor effect in vivo.
We next studied the polarization degree of TAMs in vivo for further revealing the antitumor mechanism of HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem, as the self-generation of ROS could actually influence the re-education of TAMs and devote to the overall antitumor performances in vivo. Accordingly, the IFC analysis of the typical marker CD86 labelled M1 macrophages in tumor sections after various administrations was detected by CLSM for evaluating the polarization degree of TAMs in vivo. As shown in Fig. 6d, compared with control (saline), HFNP induced the moderate TAMs re-education, as shown by the suitable up-regulation of the CD86 expression, owing to the limited CDT and insufficient ROS generation. Moreover, the number of M1-macrophages in HFNP@GOX group was obviously higher than HFNP group, attributing to the additional H2O2 generation mediated by GOX and its promotion effect on TAMs polarization. More importantly, HFNP@GOX@PFC group induced the highest TAMs polarization, shown by the brightest fluorescence of CD86 among all treatment groups (Additional file 1: Fig. S16). It was explained that the delivery of PFC could significantly promote the GOX-mediated tumor starvation with the abundant H2O2 generation via supplying the plenty of O2, which could not only accelerate MOF disassembly, drug release, and cascade amplify CDT via provided the sufficient fuel of Fe2+ and H2O2, but also enhanced the polarization of TAMs, consequently contributing to the desired antitumor effect in vivo.
Finally, the blood biosafety of the tumor-bearing mouse was investigated for evaluating the overall biosafety of the HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem in vivo by hematology analysis. As shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S17, compared with control (saline), most of the measured parameters for HFNP@GOX@PFC treated displayed no discernible changes. Excitingly, the major tissues (heart, liver, spleen, kidney and lung) also had no obvious damage in HFNP@GOX@PFC group (Additional file 1: Fig. S18), and the body weight steadily increased with the feeding time after HFNP@GOX@PFC treatments as well (Additional file 1: Fig. S14), confirming the good biocompatibility of the HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem. Based on the above results, the excellent antitumor effect of the HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem with good biosafety could be explained as follows (Fig. 6e): (1) the HA-modified functional nanosystem HFNP@GOX@PFC based on ROS- responsive degradable Fe-MOF could effectively uptake by 4T1 cells via the active targeting endocytosis pathway; (2) the endocytosed nanosystem could rapidly degradable and release cargoes of the O2 supplier PFC, H2O2 supplier plus starvation inducer GOX and CDT trigger agent Fe2+ in response to the relatively high concentrations of ROS in the cytoplasm; (3) GOX from HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem could effectively consume intracellular glucose and O2 to starve tumor cells and generate plenty of H2O2, and the PFC from nanosystem could self-supply abundant O2 for further promoting GOX-mediated tumor starvation and H2O2 generation. More importantly, the self-generation of H2O2 could not only accelerate HFNP@GOX@PFC disassembly and cargoes release, but also cascade amplify the CDT via Fe2+-based Fenton reaction; (4) ROS generated by above cycle reactions could excitingly re-educate TAMs, which could further improve tumor killing. The above works could collectively devote to the superior tumor therapy effect. The in vitro and in vivo data suggested that HFNP@GOX@PFC nanosystem could achieve effective antitumor therapy with good biocompatibility by the cascade amplification tumor starvation mediated by GOX and CDT with TAMs re-education.