Previously, rodent models of mHFD were shown to induce peripheral inflammation, notably by increasing the levels of cytokines in maternal blood circulation [14, 28, 67, 68]. To evaluate the maternal immune profile in our mouse model of mHFD, we measured plasma levels of pro- (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory (IL-6, IL-10) cytokines in the dams at weaning of their litter by multiplex-ELISA. Plasma levels of IL-6 were significantly increased (p = 0.0079) in HFD-fed dams (17.74 ± 8.79 pg/mL) compared to CD-fed dams (3.636 ± 0.933 pg/mL) (Fig. 2d), while both diet groups had similar levels of IL-1 β, IL-10, IL-17 and TNF-α (Fig. 2a-b, e). Overall, these results suggest a MIA phenotype induced by mHFD in our model, confirmed by the increase of IL-6.
Other than peripheral inflammation, HFD has been associated with a variety of metabolic changes including increased body fat, obesity, diabetic-like phenotype (glucose and/or insulin intolerance) [69] and decreased fertility [70]. To characterize further our model, we assessed weight and food consumption, glucose levels, fat deposits, as well as gestation duration and litter size in the dams. These measurements revealed that mHFD does not induce obesity, although it is associated with an overconsumption of fats to the detriment of carbohydrates (Supplementary Fig. 1). HFD nevertheless resulted in an increase of retroperitoneal, subcutaneous and perigonadal fat deposition at the measured endpoint, without driving an overall increase of total body mass or an obese phenotype (Supplementary Fig. 2). Importantly, it did not lead to glycemia or fertility alterations, ruling out major metabolic alterations as often seen in diet-induced animal models of obesity (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Previous work on mHFD revealed that offspring are more prone to developing metabolic syndrome, which includes increase in fat deposits and body weight [2]. In our study, mHFD offspring had similar body weight compared to CD offspring at P30, but the mHFD males showed increased perigonadal fat deposits compared to CD males (Supplementary Fig. 3), which highlights a sexually dimorphic effect of mHFD on offspring fat deposition.
mHFD offspring have higher IL-6 plasma levels after LPS-induced immune challenge
To assess peripheral immune priming in the adolescent offspring, we measured circulating cytokines by multiplex ELISA at P30, eight hours after systemic injection of low dose LPS vs SAL. This time point corresponds to a period of inflammatory resolution after the immune challenge. In LPS-injected animals, plasma levels of IL-6 were significantly elevated (F(1,37) = 10.44, p = 0.0317) in mHFD vs CD offspring regardless of their sex (436.8 ± 107.0 pg/mL vs 197.9 ± 74.1 pg/mL) (Fig. 3d). Moreover, regardless of their maternal diet, LPS-treated female offspring had significantly (F(1,37) = 5.324, p = 0.0004) increased plasma levels of IL-6 compared to LPS-treated male offspring (504.1 ± 113.8 pg/mL vs 152.3 ± 44.0 pg/mL) (Fig. 3d). Levels of TNF-α and IL-10 were also significantly increased (TNF-α: F(1,37) = 16.43, p = 0.0002; IL-10: F(1,21) = 30.63, p < 0.0001) in LPS-treated offspring compared to SAL-treated offspring regardless of their sex or maternal diet (TNF-α: 15.23 ± 2.66 pg/mL vs 4.435 ± 0.745 pg/mL; IL-10: 82.54 ± 8.03 pg/mL vs 10.76 ± 7.40 pg/mL) (Fig. 3c, e-f). Finally, levels of IL-1β and IL-17 were similar between SAL-treated and LPS-treated offspring regardless of their sex and maternal diet (Fig. 3a-b, f). Together, these results indicate that systemic LPS administration induced IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α release detected eight hours afterwards in CD and mHFD offspring, while IL-6 release was significantly exacerbated in mHFD offspring, indicating either a sustained inflammation or a stronger response to the immune challenge specific to this cytokine upon exposure to mHFD.
Male offspring have altered gene expression after mHFD whereas both male and female offspring exhibit altered microglial morphology
Other than a peripheral inflammatory response, immune priming has been associated with changes in gene expression and/or morphology of immune cells –including microglia in the brain [1, 28, 72]. To characterize microglia-related gene changes, we used rt-qPCR to study mRNA expression in whole hippocampus of mHFD vs CD offspring at P30 (Fig. 4a). We focused on Tgfb1 –a cytokine that modulates inflammation and microglia survival [73]– as well as on receptors mainly expressed by microglia in the brain that are involved with the regulation of inflammation (i.e. Aif1 [74]), microglial survival (i.e. Tmem119 [50], Trem2 [75]) or synaptic remodeling (i.e. Cx3cr1 [76–78], Trem2 [76, 79–81]). mHFD-exposed male offspring had significantly reduced expression of Tgfb1 (F(1,19) = 10.05, CD male: p = 0.0045, CD female: p = 0.0018, mHFD female: p = 0.0008) compared to other offspring groups (detailed in Table 1; Fig. 4b). Expression of Aif1 was however similar between groups (Fig. 4c). mHFD-exposed male offspring also had a significantly lower ratio fold of Tmem119 (F(1,19) = 19.47, CD male: p < 0.0001, CD female: p < 0.0001, mHFD female: p < 0.0001), Trem2 (F(1,19) = 20.88, CD male: p < 0.0001, CD female: p < 0.0001, mHFD female: p < 0.0001) and Cx3cr1 (F(1,19) = 16.44, CD male: p = 0.0002, CD female: p < 0.0001, mHFD female: p < 0.0001) compared to the other offspring groups (detailed in Table 1; Fig. 4d-f). Together, these results indicate that mHFD leads to altered expression, specifically in males, of inflammatory-regulating (Tgfb1) as well as microglial function-related (Tmem119, Trem2 and Cx3cr1) genes.
Table 1
mHFD effect on hippocampal mRNA levels of P30 offspring. Transcripts level of Tgf1b, Aif1, Tmem119, Trem2 and Cx3cr1 were normalized by Rpl32, where CD male offspring represent the reference group. 2−ΔΔCt: ratio fold compared to expression of the reference group, ΔΔCt: difference of cycle threshold between ΔCt of the target gene and ΔCt of Rpl32, CD: control diet, mHFD: maternal high-fat diet.
Gene | Male | Female | F | p |
CD | mHFD | CD | mHFD |
Tgfb1 | 2−ΔΔCt=1.000 ΔΔCt = 0.000 ± 0.218 | 2−ΔΔCt=0.2764 ΔΔCt = 1.860 ± 0.262 | 2−ΔΔCt=1.139 ΔΔCt=-0.190 ± 0.407 | 2−ΔΔCt=1.282 ΔΔCt=-0.360 ± 0.335 | Sex*Diet:10.05 Sex: 14.16 Diet: 6.965 | Sex*Diet:0.0050 Sex: 0.0013 Diet: 0.0162 |
Aif1 | 2−ΔΔCt=1.000 ΔΔCt = 0.000 ± 0.328 | 2−ΔΔCt= 0.7169 ΔΔCt = 0.480 ± 0.340 | 2−ΔΔCt=1.069 ΔΔCt=-0.100 ± 0.290 | 2−ΔΔCt=1.196 ΔΔCt= -0.260 ± 0.299 | Sex*Diet:1.035 Sex: 1.783 Diet:0.2588 | Sex*Diet:0.3218 Sex:0.1976 Diet:0.6168 |
Tmem119 | 2−ΔΔCt=1.000, ΔΔCt = 0.000 ± 0.313 | 2−ΔΔCt=0.1346 ΔΔCt = 2.89 ± 0.269 | 2−ΔΔCt=1.260, ΔΔCt=-0.330 ± 0.350 | 2−ΔΔCt=1.101, ΔΔCt=-0.140 ± 0.265 | Sex*Diet:19.47 Sex: 30.15 Diet: 25.34 | Sex*Diet:0.0003 Sex:<0.0001 Diet:<0.0001 |
Trem2 | 2−ΔΔCt=1.000, ΔΔCt = 0.000 ± 0.282 | 2−ΔΔCt=0.1690 ΔΔCt = 2.570 ± 0.229 | 2−ΔΔCt=0.9781, ΔΔCt = 0.030 ± 0.326 | 2−ΔΔCt=0.9598, ΔΔCt = 0.060 ± 0.242 | Sex*Diet:20.88 Sex: 19.90 Diet: 21.88 | Sex*Diet:0.0002 Sex: 0.0003 Diet: 0.0002 |
Cx3cr1 | 2−ΔΔCt=1.000, ΔΔCt = 0.000 ± 0.203 | 2−ΔΔCt=0.1724 ΔΔCt = 2.520 ± 0.479 | 2−ΔΔCt=1.147, ΔΔCt=-0.200 ± 0.315 | 2−ΔΔCt=1.207 ΔΔCt=-0.270 ± 0.276 | Sex*Diet:16.44 Sex: 21.92 Diet: 14.71 | Sex*Diet:0.0007 Sex: 0.0002 Diet: 0.0011 |
After performing rt-qPCR, we characterized the density, distribution, morphology and ultrastructure of microglia in mHFD vs CD-exposed offspring at P30. We focused on the dorsal hippocampus CA1, particularly the st rad and st lac mol –two main layers where neuronal plasticity occurs during cognitive processes [82] and that are associated to behavioral deficits previously reported in mHFD animal models [8, 14–18]. In both layers (Fig. 5a-e, n-r), the density and distribution of microglia (IBA1+/TMEM119+) and infiltrated myeloid cells (IBA1+/TMEM119−) were similar between groups (Table 2; Fig. 5j, w). Of note, infiltrated myeloid cells were marginal, accounting for 0.207% of IBA1 + cells in the st rad and 0.240% in st lac mol. Regardless of their sex and maternal diet, adolescent offspring displayed similar values for microglial soma, arbor and cell area, as well as morphological index (soma area/manual arborization area) in both CA1 st rad and st lac mol (Table 3–4; Fig. 5f-i, s-v). In st rad, further analysis of ‘skeletonized’ microglia revealed no significant difference between offspring groups in terms of number of branches, junctions, as well as average and maximal branch length (Table 3). However, shape descriptor analysis of microglia identified a significant decrease in their circularity value (F(1,16) = 4.683, p = 0.0459) in mHFD offspring compared to controls (0.0265 ± 0.0004 vs 0.0295 ± 0.0006), but solidity and aspect ratio remained unchanged (Table 3; Fig. 5k-m). In st lac mol, microglia of mHFD-exposed offspring had significantly shorter branch length (F(1,16) = 4.553, p = 0.0487) compared to CD-exposed offspring (3.276 ± 0.015 µm vs 3.442 ± 0.022 µm) (Table 4; Fig. 5z). In addition to their shorter branch length, microglia of mHFD-exposed offspring had a significantly increased solidity (F(1,16) = 5.616, p = 0.0307) compared to CD offspring (0.2845 ± 0.0030 vs 0.2603 ± 0.0023), regardless of the sex (Table 4; Fig. 5y), which could indicate a difference in microglial arborization distribution and/or organization with mHFD. In this layer, microglial branch number, maximal branch length, junction number, circularity and aspect ratio were also similar between groups. Together, these morphological changes align with a microglial priming hypothesis, in which mHFD alters microglial morphology.
Table 2
mHFD effects on microglial density, distribution, and peripheral myeloid cell infiltration in the dorsal hippocampus CA1 of P30 offspring. %Infiltration: Average percentage of IBA1+/TMEM119− cells on total myeloid cells count, a.u.: arbitrary unit, CD: control diet, St lac mol: stratum lacunosum moleculare, mHFD: maternal high-fat diet, St rad: stratum radiatum.
Parameters | Mean ± standard error of the mean | F | p |
Male | Female |
CD | mHFD | CD | mHFD |
St rad | Density (cells/mm²) | 228.5 ± 12.1 | 233.8 ± 2.1 | 225.4 ± 10.1 | 214.9 ± 5.4 | Sex*Diet: 0.8838 Sex: 1.725 Diet: 0.09162 | Sex*Diet: 0.3611 Sex: 0.2075 Diet: 0.7660 |
Spacing Index (a.u.) | 0.452 ± 0.014 | 0.469 ± 0.006 | 0.456 ± 0.011 | 0.454 ± 0.013 | Sex*Diet: 0.6857 Sex: 0.2303 Diet: 0.4325 | Sex*Diet: 0.4198 Sex: 0.6378 Diet: 0.5201 |
Cluster | 0.261 ± 0.138 | 0.051 ± 0.031 | 0.182 ± 0.084 | 0.222 ± 0.091 | Sex*Diet: 1.759 Sex: 0.2359 Diet: 0.8177 | Sex*Diet: 0.2034 Sex: 0.6338 Diet: 0.3793 |
%Infiltration | 0.201 ± 0.131 | 0.150 ± 0.092 | 0.270 ± 0.143 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | Sex*Diet: 1.031 Sex: 0.1433 Diet: 2.241 | Sex*Diet: 0.3250 Sex: 0.7100 Diet: 0. 1539 |
St lac mol | Density (cells/mm²) | 248.8 ± 14.5 | 272.7 ± 14.2 | 239.4 ± 11.8 | 259.6 ± 15.0 | Sex*Diet: 0.01730 Sex: 0.6481 Diet: 2.507 | Sex*Diet: 0.8970 Sex: 0.4326 Diet: 0.1329 |
Spacing Index (a.u.) | 0.473 ± 0.019 | 0.466 ± 0.004 | 0.442 ± 0.016 | 0.470 ± 0.022 | Sex*Diet: 1.105 Sex: 0.6448 Diet: 0.4185 | Sex*Diet: 0.3089 Sex: 0.4337 Diet: 0.5268 |
Cluster | 0.122 ± 0.062 | 0.179 ± 0.093 | 0.029 ± 0.029 | 0.147 ± 0.065 | Sex*Diet: 0.2179 Sex: 0.9011 Diet: 1.739 | Sex*Diet: 0.6469 Sex: 0.3566 Diet: 0.2058 |
%Infiltration | 0.073 ± 0.073 | 0.437 ± 0.151 | 0.233 ± 0.154 | 0.216 ± 0.091 | Sex*Diet: 2.421 Sex: 0.06043 Diet: 2.006 | Sex*Diet: 0.1393 Sex: 0.8089 Diet: 0.1758 |
Table 3
mHFD effects on microglial morphological parameters in the dorsal hippocampus CA1 stratum radiatum of P30 offspring. #: number, %: percentage on total myeloid cells, a.u.: arbitrary unit, CD: control diet, mHFD: maternal high-fat diet.
Parameters | Mean ± standard error of the mean | F | p |
Male | Female |
CD | mHFD | CD | mHFD |
Soma area (µm²) | 46.59 ± 1.92 | 46.88 ± 2.54 | 44.42 ± 1.38 | 45.82 ± 1.84 | Sex*Diet: 0.08109 Sex: 0.6758 Diet: 0.1842 | Sex*Diet: 0.7795 Sex: 0.4231 Diet: 0.6735 |
Arbor area (µm²) | 1352.68 ± 154.93 | 1355.63 ± 112.22 | 1374.23 ± 160.96 | 1377.16 ± 129.59 | Sex*Diet: 4.378 × 10− 9 Sex: 0.02340 Diet: 0.0004357 | Sex*Diet: >0.9999 Sex: 0.8803 Diet:0.9836 |
Morphological index (a.u.) | 0.036 ± 0.003 | 0.035 ± 0.001 | 0.034 ± 0.003 | 0.035 ± 0.004 | Sex*Diet: 0.09893 Sex: 0.1851 Diet: 0.0001109 | Sex*Diet: 0.7572 Sex: 0.6728 Diet: 0.9917 |
Cell area (µm²) | 425.49 ± 86.24 | 430.71 ± 55.12 | 473.40 ± 79.36 | 435.13 ± 49.86 | Sex*Diet: 0.09819 Sex: 0.1422 Diet: 0.05674 | Sex*Diet: 0.7581 Sex: 0.7110 Diet: 0.8148 |
Circularity (a.u.) | 0.029 ± 0.001 | 0.027 ± 0.001 | 0.030 ± 0.001 | 0.027 ± 0.001 | Sex*Diet: 0.03614 Sex: 0.7875 Diet: 4.683 | Sex*Diet: 0.8516 Sex: 0.3880 Diet: 0.0459 |
Solidity (a.u.) | 0.281 ± 0.020 | 0.290 ± 0.018 | 0.302 ± 0.012 | 0.285 ± 0.006 | Sex*Diet: 0.7345 Sex: 0.2907 Diet: 0.07122 | Sex*Diet: 0.4041 Sex: 0.5972 Diet: 0.7930 |
Aspect ratio (a.u.) | 1.666 ± 0.055 | 1.648 ± 0.053 | 1.633 ± 0.065 | 1.663 ± 0.069 | Sex*Diet: 0.1587 Sex: 0.02512 Diet: 0.008885 | Sex*Diet: 0.6956 Sex: 0.8761 Diet: 0.9261 |
# Branches | 101.92 ± 21.70 | 104.47 ± 13.79 | 113.11 ± 17.14 | 102.23 ± 12.52 | Sex*Diet: 0.1622 Sex: 0.07200 Diet: 0.06261 | Sex*Diet: 0.6925 Sex: 0.7919 Diet: 0.8056 |
Average branch length (µm) | 3.318 ± 0.127 | 3.218 ± 0.075 | 3.172 ± 0.071 | 3.237 ± 0.041 | Sex*Diet: 0.9630 Sex: 0.5690 Diet: 0.04635 | Sex*Diet: 0.3410 Sex: 0.4616 Diet: 0.8323 |
Longest branch (µm) | 13.29 ± 0.24 | 13.26 ± 0.49 | 12.77 ± 0.21 | 13.99 ± 0.21 | Sex*Diet: 4.048 Sex: 0.1145 Diet: 3.750 | Sex*Diet: 0.0614 Sex: 0.7395 Diet: 0.0707 |
# Junctions | 52.38 ± 12.05 | 53.49 ± 7.28 | 58.43 ± 9.08 | 52.28 ± 6.78 | Sex*Diet: 0.1616 Sex: 0.07164 Diet: 0.07779 | Sex*Diet: 0.6930 Sex: 0.7924 Diet: 0.7839 |
Table 4
mHFD effects on microglial morphological parameters in the dorsal hippocampus CA1 stratum lacunosum moleculare of P30 offspring. #: number, %: percentage on total myeloid cells, a.u.: arbitrary unit, CD: control diet, mHFD: maternal high-fat diet.
Parameters | Mean ± standard error of the mean | F | p |
Male | Female |
CD | mHFD | CD | mHFD |
Soma area (µm²) | 40.18 ± 1.74 | 42.45 ± 2.06 | 40.14 ± 0.92 | 40.64 ± 1.57 | Sex*Diet: 0.2961 Sex: 0.3230 Diet: 0.7283 | Sex*Diet: 0.5938 Sex: 0.5777 Diet: 0.4060 |
Arbor area (µm²) | 988.76 ± 125.44 | 908.98 ± 111.46 | 974.04 ± 118.48 | 973.34 ± 157.09 | Sex*Diet: 0.09350 Sex: 0.03685 Diet: 0.09685 | Sex*Diet: 0.7637 Sex: 0.8502 Diet: 0.7597 |
Morphological index (a.u.) | 0.043 ± 0.004 | 0.049 ± 0.005 | 0.044 ± 0.006 | 0.047 ± 0.009 | Sex*Diet: 0.04385 Sex: 7.575 × 10− 5 Diet: 0.5447 | Sex*Diet: 0.8368 Sex: 0.9932 Diet: 0.4712 |
Cell area (µm²) | 272.57 ± 46.35 | 272.50 ± 36.57 | 269.99 ± 40.25 | 283.11 ± 43.67 | Sex*Diet: 0.02479 Sex: 0.009177 Diet: 0.02427 | Sex*Diet: 0.8769 Sex: 0.9249 Diet: 0.8782 |
Circularity (a.u.) | 0.028 ± 0.003 | 0.033 ± 0.003 | 0.031 ± 0.003 | 0.032 ± 0.006 | Sex*Diet: 0.2333 Sex: 0.1162 Diet: 0.6419 | Sex*Diet: 0.6357 Sex: 0.7377 Diet: 0.4348 |
Solidity (a.u.) | 0.258 ± 0.012 | 0.287 ± 0.008 | 0.263 ± 0.007 | 0.282 ± 0.013 | Sex*Diet: 0.2641 Sex: 0.004823 Diet: 5.616 | Sex*Diet: 0.6144 Sex: 0.9455 Diet: 0.0307 * |
Aspect ratio (a.u.) | 1.803 ± 0.089 | 1.787 ± 0.058 | 1.793 ± 0.078 | 1.752 ± 0.094 | Sex*Diet: 0.02490 Sex: 0.07486 Diet: 0.1260 | Sex*Diet: 0.8766 Sex: 0.7879 Diet: 0.7273 |
# Branches | 72.83 ± 12.86 | 73.24 ± 9.70 | 73.90 ± 11.91 | 77.18 ± 12.65 | Sex*Diet: 0.01466 Sex: 0.04465 Diet: 0.02438 | Sex*Diet: 0.9052 Sex: 0.8353 Diet: 0.8779 |
Average branch length (µm) | 3.464 ± 0.077 | 3.262 ± 0.048 | 3.420 ± 0.120 | 3.291 ± 0.037 | Sex*Diet: 0.2168 Sex: 0.008423 Diet: 4.553 | Sex*Diet: 0.6477 Sex: 0.9280 Diet: 0.0487 |
Longest branch (µm) | 13.61 ± 0.46 | 12.51 ± 0.55 | 12.96 ± 0.57 | 12.98 ± 0.61 | Sex*Diet: 1.024 Sex: 0.02989 Diet: 0.9634 | Sex*Diet: 0.3265 Sex: 0.8649 Diet: 0.3409 |
# Junctions | 36.88 ± 6.99 | 37.01 ± 5.19 | 37.61 ± 6.37 | 39.29 ± 6.71 | Sex*Diet: 0.01468 Sex: 0.05614 Diet: 0.02034 | Sex*Diet: 0.9051 Sex: 0.8157 Diet: 0.8884 |
Microglia from mHFD male offspring show increased interactions with astrocytes whereas both male and female offspring have decreased extracellular space pockets
To provide insights into microglial functions, we further performed SEM analysis to reveal, at nanoscale resolution, possible changes in their organelles and intercellular relationships in the dorsal hippocampus CA1 of mHFD- vs CD-exposed offspring, upon sacrifice at P30. We determined the number of microglial organelles involved in phagolysosomal activity (primary, secondary and tertiary lysosomes, lipofuscin, endosomes with or without content) and alterations to organelles that serve as markers of cellular stress (dilated cisternae of endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus, elongated and total mitochondria). We also evaluated microglial interactions with their microenvironment, particularly direct contacts with astrocytic cell bodies, neuronal cell bodies, axon terminals, dendritic spines, oligodendrocytic cell bodies, myelinated axons, and blood vessels, as well as associations with extracellular space pockets containing degraded elements or debris indicative of extracellular digestion or “exophagy” [62, 63].
In the st rad, no significant difference in microglial organelles was observed between offspring groups, but there was a trend for a main diet effect regarding the total number of mitochondria per microglial cell body (F(1,146) = 3.870, p = 0.0511) (Table 5). In terms of microglial interactions with their microenvironment, we detected a Sex*Diet interaction for the number of microglial contacts with astrocytes (F(1,146) = 0.0446). Post-hoc analysis revealed that microglial cell bodies from mHFD-exposed male offspring made more cell-cell contacts with astrocytic cell bodies compared to CD male offspring (p = 0.0182, 0.225 ± 0.067 contacts vs 0.054 ± 0.038 contacts) (Table 5; Fig. 6a-e). Microglial interactions with synaptic elements, myelinated axons, neurons as well as oligodendrocytes remained unchanged (Table 5). We also identified a Sex*Diet interaction for the prevalence of microglia-associated extracellular digestion (F(1,146) = 0.0433), however, post-hoc analysis revealed no significant different between offspring groups (Table 5).
Table 5
mHFD effects on microglial ultrastructure in the dorsal hippocampus CA1 stratum radiatum of P30 offspring. #: number, 1ary: primary, 2ary: secondary, 3ary: tertiary, Astro: astrocyte, CD: control diet, Dil ER/golgi: dilated endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus cisterna, Elong: elongated mitochondria, mHFD: maternal high-fat diet, Mito: mitochondria, N/A: not applicable, Oligo: oligodendrocyte.
Parameters | Mean ± standard error of the mean | F | p |
Male | Female |
CD | mHFD | CD | mHFD |
Organelles | # Lysosomes | 1ary | 1.405 ± 0.461 | 1.150 ± 0.317 | 0.878 ± 0.213 | 1.438 ± 0.258 | Sex*Diet: 1.552 Sex: 0.1344 Diet: 0.2160 | Sex*Diet: 0.2149 Sex: 0.7144 Diet: 0.6428 |
2ary | 0.108 ± 0.052 | 0.200 ± 0.096 | 0.146 ± 0.075 | 0.188 ± 0.083 | Sex*Diet: 0.1028 Sex: 0.02644 Diet: 0.7068 | Sex*Diet: 0.7490 Sex: 0.8711 Diet: 0.4019 |
3ary | 0.027 ± 0.027 | 0.025 ± 0.025 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.031 ± 0.031 | Sex*Diet: 0.5148 Sex: 0.2007 Diet: 0.3970 | Sex*Diet: 0.4742 Sex: 0.6548 Diet: 0.5296 |
# Lipofuscin | 0.135 ± 0.079 | 0.100 ± 0.048 | 0.073 ± 0.041 | 0.063 ± 0.043 | Sex*Diet: 0.04895 Sex: 0.8091 Diet: 0.1716 | Sex*Diet: 0.8252 Sex: 0.3699 Diet: 0.6793 |
# Endosome | Empty | 0.108 ± 0.052 | 0.200 ± 0.089 | 0.098 ± 0.058 | 0.063 ± 0.043 | Sex*Diet: 0.9319 Sex: 1.267 Diet: 0.1867 | Sex*Diet: 0.3360 Sex: 0.2621 Diet: 0.6663 |
Content | 0.432 ± 0.120 | 0.250 ± 0.128 | 0.268 ± 0.086 | 0.188 ± 0.070 | Sex*Diet: 0.2278 Sex: 1.132 Diet: 1.528 | Sex*Diet: 0.6339 Sex: 0.2890 Diet: 0.2185 |
# Dil ER/golgi | 5.892 ± 0.945 | 6.000 ± 1.046 | 6.171 ± 1.069 | 5.188 ± 0.723 | Sex*Diet: Sex: Diet: | Sex*Diet: 0.5814 Sex: 0.7874 Diet: 0.6584 |
# Mito | Elong. | 0.459 ± 0.148 | 0.450 ± 0.138 | 0.293 ± 0.094 | 0.375 ± 0.087 | Sex*Diet: 0.1409 Sex: 0.9777 Diet: 0.08878 | Sex*Diet: 0.7080 Sex: 0.3244 Diet: 0.7662 |
Total | 2.270 ± 0.365 | 3.075 ± 0.486 | 2.195 ± 0.309 | 2.906 ± 0.322 | Sex*Diet: 0.01475 Sex: 0.1002 Diet: 3.870 | Sex*Diet: 0.9035 Sex: 0.7521 Diet: 0.0511 |
Interactions with microenvironment | # Synaptic terminal | Pre | 6.243 ± 0.504 | 9.075 ± 0.958 | 7.683 ± 0.808 | 7.688 ± 0.647 | Sex*Diet: 3.521 Sex: 0.008597 Diet: 3.111 | Sex*Diet: 0.0701 Sex: 0.9732 Diet: 0.0692 |
Post | 3.081 ± 0.286 | 4.150 ± 0.438 | 3.707 ± 0.457 | 3.875 ± 0.559 | Sex*Diet: 1.028 Sex: 0.1562 Diet: 1.936 | Sex*Diet: 0.3123 Sex: 0.6933 Diet: 0.1663 |
# Myelinated axon | 0.135 ± 0.069 | 0.200 ± 0.089 | 0.073 ± .054 | 0.031 ± 0.031 | Sex*Diet: 0.6218 Sex: 2.949 Diet: 0.02917 | Sex*Diet: 0.4280 Sex: 0.0880 Diet: 0.8646 |
# Degenerating myelin | 0.216 ± 0.079 | 0.150 ± 0.067 | 0.098 ± 0.047 | 0.042 ± 0.042 | Sex*Diet: 0.006245 Sex: 3.020 Diet:0.8740 | Sex*Diet: 0.9371 Sex: 0.0845 Diet: 0.3515 |
# Contacts with brain cells | Astro | 0.054 ± 0.038 | 0.225 ± 0.067 | 0.049 ± 0.034 | 0.031 ± 0.031 | Sex*Diet: 4.104 Sex: 4.576 Diet: 2.719 | Sex*Diet: 0.0446 Sex: 0.0341 Diet: 0.1013 |
Neuron | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.125 ± 0.053 | 0.122 ± 0.052 | 0.094 ± 0.052 | Sex*Diet: 2.771 Sex: 0.9714 Diet: 1.106 | Sex*Diet: 0.0981 Sex: 0.3260 Diet: 0.2946 |
Oligo | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
Blood vessel | 0.189 ± 0.065 | 0.075 ± 0.042 | 0.073 ± 0.041 | 0.031 ± 0.031 | Sex*Diet: 0.5805 Sex: 2.837 Diet: 2.709 | Sex*Diet: 0.4473 Sex: 0.0942 Diet: 0.1019 |
# Extracellular space | 0.216 ± 0.079 | 0.650 ± 0.146 | 0.537 ± 0.168 | 0.500 ± 0.168 | Sex*Diet: 2.596 Sex: 0.3406 Diet: 1.851 | Sex*Diet: 0.1093 Sex: 0.5604 Diet: 0.1757 |
# Extracellular digestion | 0.135 ± 0.057 | 0.275 ± 0.101 | 0.366 ± 0.120 | 0.125 ± 0.059 | Sex*Diet: 4.154 Sex: 0.1867 Diet: 0.2923 | Sex*Diet: 0.0433 Sex: 0.6663 Diet: 0.5896 |
In st lac mol, microglial organelle content and ultrastructure were unaffected by offspring groups (Table 6), but their interactions with the microenvironment differed. Similar to microglia in the st rad, microglial cell bodies in st lac mol of mHFD-exposed male offspring had increased interactions with astrocytic cell bodies (F(1,128) = 4.604, p = 0.0446) compared to CD male offspring (0.028 ± 0.028 contacts vs 0.214 ± 0.094 contacts) (Table 6; Fig. 6a-e, h-k, q). Of note, a significant main sex effect was also detected for microglial interactions with neurons (F(1,128) = 6.062, p = 0.0151), where microglial cell bodies from male offspring compared to female offspring made more cell-cell contacts with neuronal cell bodies, regardless of maternal diet (0.081 ± 0.026 contacts vs 0.000 ± 0.000 contacts) (Table 6; Fig. 6h-k, r). Microglial interactions with synaptic elements, oligodendrocytes and myelinated axons were also unchanged across sex and diet groups (Table 6). Lastly, mHFD-exposed offspring had a significant decrease (F(1,128) = 7.666, p = 0.0065) in microglia-associated extracellular space pockets compared to CD offspring (0.1374 ± 0.0768 contacts vs 0.5349 ± 0.0206 contacts) (Table 6; Fig. 6l-o, s) in the two sexes.
Table 6
mHFD effects on microglial ultrastructure in the dorsal hippocampus CA1 stratum lacunosum moleculare of P30 offspring. #: number, 1ary: primary, 2ary: secondary, 3ary: tertiary, Astro: astrocyte, CD: control diet, Dil ER/golgi: dilated endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus cisterna, Elong: elongated mitochondria, mHFD: maternal high-fat diet, Mito: mitochondria, N/A: not applicable, Oligodendrocyte.
Parameters
|
Mean ± standard error of the mean
|
F
|
p
|
Male
|
Female
|
CD
|
mHFD
|
CD
|
mHFD
|
Organelles
|
# Lysosomes
|
1ary
|
1.556 ±0.419
|
1.357 ±0.258
|
1.229 ±0.239
|
1.182 ±0.202
|
Sex*Diet: 0.06292
Sex: 0.6902
Diet: 0.1644
|
Sex*Diet: 0.8023
Sex: 0.4076
Diet: 0.6858
|
2ary
|
0.361 ±0.090
|
0.250 ±0.098
|
0.229 ±0.092
|
0.212 ±0.104
|
Sex*Diet: 0.2389
Sex: 0.7742
Diet: 0.4337
|
Sex*Diet: 0.6259
Sex: 0.3806
Diet: 0.5113
|
3ary
|
0.028 ±0.028
|
0.000 ±0.000
|
0.000 ±0.000
|
0.030 ±0.030
|
Sex*Diet: 1.817
Sex: 0.003435
Diet:0.003435
|
Sex*Diet: 0.1800
Sex: 0.9534
Diet: 0.9534
|
# Lipofuscin
|
0.111 ±0.053
|
0.107 ±0.060
|
0.029 ±0.029
|
0.061 ±0.042
|
Sex*Diet: 0.1493
Sex: 1.918
Diet: 0.09070
|
Sex*Diet: 0.6999
Sex: 0.1684
Diet: 0.7638
|
# Endosome
|
Empty
|
0.194 ±0.078
|
0.107 ±0.079
|
0.229 ±0.101
|
0.091 ±0.051
|
Sex*Diet: 0.09748
Sex: 0.01231
Diet: 1.945
|
Sex*Diet: 0.7554
Sex: 0.9118
Diet: 0.1655
|
Content
|
0.361 ±0.144
|
0.214 ±0.079
|
0.171 ±0.077
|
0.152 ±0.063
|
Sex*Diet: 0.3989
Sex: 1.579
Diet: 0.6886
|
Sex*Diet: 0.5288
Sex: 0.2113
Diet: 0.4082
|
# Dil ER/golgi
|
5.611 ±0.788
|
7.643 ±1.413
|
5.800 ±0.805
|
7.512 ±1.168
|
Sex*Diet: 0.1075
Sex: 0.02125
Diet: 2.659
|
Sex*Diet: 0.7436
Sex: 0.8843
Diet: 0.1054
|
# Mito
|
Elong
|
0.472 ±0.180
|
0.500 ±0.159
|
0.257 ±0.118
|
0.485 ±0.235
|
Sex*Diet: 0.3099
Sex: 0.4110
Diet:0.5061
|
Sex*Diet: 0.5787
Sex: 0.5226
Diet: 0.4781
|
Total
|
3.111 ±0.534
|
2.071 ±0.430
|
2.400 ±0.341
|
2.970 ±0.543
|
Sex*Diet: 2.856
Sex: 0.03862
Diet: 0.2435
|
Sex*Diet: 0.0935
Sex: 0.8445
Diet: 0.6225
|
Interactions with microenvironment
|
# Synaptic terminal
|
Pre
|
6.250 ±0.745
|
5.821 ±0.587
|
5.171 ±0.527
|
5.125 ±0.442
|
Sex*Diet: 0.1168
Sex: 2.138
Diet: 0.1406
|
Sex*Diet: 0.7331
Sex: 0.1462
Diet: 0.7083
|
Post
|
3.306 ±0.378
|
3.036 ±0.369
|
3.629 ±0.482
|
3.030 ±0.300
|
Sex*Diet: 0.1726
Sex: 0.1614
Diet: 1.206
|
Sex*Diet: 0.6785
Sex: 0.6885
Diet: 0.2742
|
# Myelinated axon
|
0.417 ±0.108
|
0.536 ±0.167
|
0.486 ±0.161
|
0.545 ±0.151
|
Sex*Diet: 0.04059
Sex: 0.07164
Diet: 0.3689
|
Sex*Diet: 0.8406
Sex: 0.7894
Diet: 0.5447
|
# Degenerating myelin
|
0.083 ±0.047
|
0.179 ±0.090
|
0.200 ±0.069
|
0.121 ±0.058
|
Sex*Diet: 1.763
Sex: 0.2047
Diet: 0.01575
|
Sex*Diet: 0.1867
Sex: 0.6517
Diet: 0.9003
|
# Contacts with brain cells
|
Astro
|
0.028 ±0.028
|
0.214 ±0.094
|
0.114 ±0.055
|
0.061 ±0.042
|
Sex*Diet: 4.604
Sex: 0.3601
Diet: 1.408
|
Sex*Diet: 0.0338
Sex: 0.5495
Diet: 0.2376
|
Neuron
|
0.056 ±0.039
|
0.107 ±0.060
|
0.000 ±0.000
|
0.000 ±0.000
|
Sex*Diet: 0.6095
Sex: 6.062
Diet: 0.6095
|
Sex*Diet: 0.4364
Sex: 0.0151
Diet: 0.4364
|
Oligo
|
0.000 ±0.000
|
0.036 ±0.036
|
0.000 ±0.000
|
0.000 ±0.000
|
Sex*Diet: 1.384
Sex: 1.384
Diet: 1.384
|
Sex*Diet: 0.2417
Sex: 0.2417
Diet: 0.2417
|
Blood vessel
|
0.056 ±0.039
|
0.143 ±0.067
|
0.114 ±0.055
|
0.152 ±0.063
|
Sex*Diet: 0.2002
Sex: 0.3625
Diet: 1.238
|
Sex*Diet: 0.6553
Sex: 0.5482
Diet: 0.2679
|
# Extracellular space
|
0.556 ±0.176
|
0.214 ±0.094
|
0.514 ±0.180
|
0.061 ±0.042
|
Sex*Diet: 0.1533
Sex: 0.4611
Diet: 7.666
|
Sex*Diet: 0.6961
Sex: 0.4984
Diet: 0.0065
|
# Extracellular digestion
|
0.528 ±0.216
|
0.321 ±0.219
|
0.200 ±0.090
|
0.364 ±0.105
|
Sex*Diet: 1.231
Sex: 0.7334
Diet: 0.01641
|
Sex*Diet: 0.2693
Sex: 0.3934
Diet:0.8983
|
Dark microglia and perivascular cells display increased number of dilated endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus cisterna in mHFD offspring
Previously, our laboratory identified a microglial subset, the “dark microglia”, which are characterized by a distinct ultrastructural signature compared with typical microglia. These cells are found within the brain parenchyma, notably in the ventral/dorsal hippocampus CA1 st rad and st lac mol. Dark microglia exhibit several markers of cellular stress (dilatation of endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi, elongated mitochondria) as well as a dark, electron-dense cytoplasm and nucleoplasm [64]. These stressed microglia are rare in healthy mature mice, but become abundant in pathological conditions [64] including in a MIA mouse model induced with polyinosinic:polycytidulic acid (poly I:C) [49]. In the current study, we characterized the density and ultrastructure of dark microglia in the dorsal hippocampus CA1, st rad and st lac mol, comparing mHFD with CD offspring at P30. While imaging, we also noticed intriguing dark perivascular cells, localized inside the perivascular space yet displaying dark features similar to the dark microglia (i.e., dark, electron-dense cytoplasm and nucleoplasm, as well as markers of cellular stress). We further encountered apoptotic cells, identified by their dark cytoplasm, which was accompanied in this case by a distinctive pyknotic and fragmented nucleus. We decided to also quantify their density. The quantitative analysis of dark microglia and apoptotic cells revealed no significant difference in their density among the st rad and st lac mol of the adolescent offspring, regardless of their sex and maternal diet (Supplementary Table 1; Fig. 7a-c). Notwithstanding, more than half of the apoptotic cells we observed (four out of seven) were identified as microglia by their IBA1+ staining. In the st rad, dark perivascular cells also displayed a similar density between offspring groups. In the st lac mol, however, a sex difference was observed, with the female offspring showing a significantly increased density of dark perivascular cells (F(1,12) = 5.692, p = 0.0344) compared to male offspring (12.58 ± 1.99 cell/mm² vs 0.94 ± 0.94 cell/mm²) (Supplementary Table 1; Fig. 7d-e); regardless of maternal diet.
To study changes in organelles among the stressed dark cells in the st lac mol, we pooled together dark microglia and dark perivascular cells to obtain a sufficient sample size, required to be around 50 individual cells total for a large effect size (~ 0.4) (also see Supplementary Table 2 for the semi-descriptive analysis of the dark microglia and dark perivascular cells considered separately). This quantitative analysis of dark cells revealed a main diet effect on their number of dilated endoplasmic reticulum or Golgi apparatus cisternae, which significantly increased (F(1,55) = 4.264, p = 0.0437) in mHFD compared to CD offspring (14.38 ± 0.62 dilated cisterna vs 9.805 ± 3.090 dilated cisterna) (Supplementary Table 3; Fig. 7f-j). In addition, secondary lysosomes were significantly more abundant in female offspring compared to male offspring regardless of their maternal diet (Female offspring: 0.453 ± 0.120 lysosomes vs Male offspring: 0.077 ± 0.109 lysosomes) (Supplementary Table 3). This finding may describe a sex difference, regardless of maternal diet, in terms of dark cells phagolysosomal pathways. Across groups, the two types of stressed dark cells lastly displayed in the st lac mol similar numbers of lysosomes, lipofuscin, endosomes and mitochondria, and their relationships with the microenvironment did not differ between groups.