Physicochemical properties of experimental soil
Table 1 Selected characteristics of the experimental soil
Parameters
|
Soil (SC1)
|
Soil group
|
Nitisol
|
Sand (%)
|
23.2
|
Silt (%)
|
28.6
|
Clay (%)
|
48.2
|
Bulk density (gcm-1)
|
1.32
|
Field capacity (%)
|
29.5
|
Permanent wilting point (%)
|
19.6
|
pH (H2O)
|
4.65
|
Cation exchange capacity (cmolc kg-1)
|
21.15
|
Exchangeable acidty (cmolc kg-1)
|
3.76
|
Exchangeable Al (cmolc kg-1)
|
2.54
|
Organic carbon (%)
|
1.58
|
Mehlich-III P (mg kg-1)
|
8.09
|
Alox (mmolkg-1)
|
147.37
|
Feox (mmolkg-1)
|
174.69
|
Phosphorous sorption Capacity (PSC) (mg P Kg-1)
|
133.54
|
Source: Ayenew et al. (2018b)
Vermicompost compositions
The vermicompost that has been harvested after sixty days of decomposition was dark brown in color. As depicted in Table 2 the vermicompost prepared by using parthinium, wheat straw, cow dung and poultry manure as a substrate had a pH value of 8.63. Therefore, the pH value obtained for the vermicompost verifies that it could be used for liming the soil. The vermicompost was analyzed for nutrients concentrations and the corresponding values were found N (2.41%), OC (24.40%), and C:N (10.12), P (109.23 ppm), K (577.54 ppm ), Ca (1198.28 ppm ), Na (127.12 ppm ), Mg (137.20 ppm ).
Table 2 Characterization of vermicompost
Treatments
|
pH
|
OC
|
N
|
P
|
K
|
Na
|
Ca
|
Mg
|
C:N
|
|
|
….. (%) ......
|
……………………. (mg kg-1) ………….………………
|
VC
|
8.68
|
24.40
|
2.41
|
109.23
|
577.54
|
133.92
|
1198.28
|
137.20
|
10.12
|
OC = organic carbon, VC = Vermicompost
pH, exchangeable acidity, CEC and available P after Incubation
After eight weeks incubation period the soil was found to have pH ranging from 4.68 to 6.73 (Table 3). It is generally believed that applications of organic materials reduce pH of a soil (Abdala et al. 2015). However, contrary to the general contemplation, the results of the present study confirmed that application of vermicompost resulted in higher and significant effect on the pH of studied soils as compared to the control treatment (Table 3). The alkaline reaction in vermicompost, and the presence of strongly soluble cations in higher concentrations might have contributed to lessening acidic reactions of the soil. In addition, decomposition of vermicompost in soil during incubation might have produced soluble organic acids, which could interact with soil through the oxyhydroxide functional group of clay surfaces and release OH- to soil solution. Similar results have been reported that vermicompost application alone could have increased the pH of the soil (Gopinath and Mina 2011; Gopinath, et al. 2011, Ilker and Tavali 2014).
Analysis of variance also revealed that the application of inorganic P alone had no significant effect on pH of the soil; however the interaction of two factors (lime x inorganic P, lime x vermicompost, inorganic P x vermicompost) and three factors (vermicompost x inorganic P x lime) influenced significantly the pH of the soil (Tables 3). Furthermore, the highest pH (6.73) value of the soil was recorded at combined application of lime, vermicompost and inorganic P (lime x vermicompost x inorganic P) in a proportion amounted 11.50 ton CaCO3 ha-1, 10 ton VC ha-1 and 149.01 kg P ha-1 whilst, the lowest pH value (4.68) was achieved from the control. The findings of the present study was in concurrent with that of Ashoka et al. (2014) which reported addition of inorganic P alone did not have any appreciable effect on soil pH values.
The acidity reduced by lime, vermicompost and inorganic P was synergistic having a mechanism that calcium from lime replaces the exchangeable forms of Al and Fe, which reacts with hydroxide ion released from water in the soil solution forming insoluble Al and Fe hydroxides (Buni, 2015); while compost forms insoluble Al and Fe organic acid complex bounding to the exchangeable Al and Fe (Haynes and Mokolobate 2001). In the meantime, the adsorption of the added phosphate at the exchange site might have contributed to the raise in pH of the studied soil through ligand exchange. In agreement with this, a study revealed that there was a steady increase in the pH of the supernatant solution as sorption progressed, because sorption occurs by the replacement of hydroxyl groups, exposed on surface sites, by phosphate in solution (Goldberg et al. 2008).
The results obtained after eight weeks incubation period showed that the amount of available P extracted by Mehlich-III, method ranged from 8.77 to 21.89 mg kg−1 at SC1 study site (Table 3). Analysis of variance also revealed that the main factors (vermicompost and inorganic P) applied to soil significantly increased Mehlich-III P content of the soil compared to the control treatment. Similar results have been reported by Ilker and Tavali (2014) showing that vermicompost applied to soil significantly increased available phosphorous. Moreover, statistically significant (P < 0.05) influences were observed whenever the three factors are interacted (vermicompost x lime x inorganic P). Consequently, the highest (21.89 mg kg-1) value of Mehlich-III P was recorded when vermicompost was applied in combination with lime and inorganic P at the rates of 10 ton VC ha-1, 9.20 ton CaCO3 ha-1 and 149.01 kg P ha-1, while the lowest (8.77 mg kg-1) was recorded from the control. The compelling reason for the enhanced increase in available P of soils after incubation could be due to with ability of the lower molecular organic acids (decomposition product of vermicompost) and their anionic carboxylate functional groups to interact with soil, by occupying P adsorption sites and competing with phosphate (Guppy et al. 2005). The increased amount of phosphate adsorbed on free metal oxyhydroxides and the presence of soluble cations in lime and vermicompost, which displace acidic caions, might have triggered the availability of P. In harmony with this, Kamprath (1984) reported that the Ca2+ in lime, and Ca2+, K+, Na+ in vermicompost (organic matter) could displace Al3+, Fe2+ and H+ ions from the soil sorption sites, so that P fixation would be reduced.
The increase in soil pH was reflected by corresponding decrease in exchangeable acidity from 2.57 cmolc kg−1 in control to 0.31 cmolc kg−1 (P < 0.05). The main factors (lime, vermicompost and inorganic P), the interaction between two factors (lime x inorganic P, vermicompost x lime, inorganic P x vermicompost) and three factors (lime x vermicompost x inorganic P) significantly altered the levels of exchangeable acidity in the studied soil (Tables 3). Moreover, the greatest (87.94%) change was obtained from the integrated applications of lime, vermicompost and inorganic P at the rates of (11.50 ton ha-1, 10 ton VC ha-1, 149.01 kg P ha-1), while the lowest (1.53%) was recorded from the control the soil. The reduction in exchangeable acidity can partially be attributed to an initial increase in soil pH that was observed with lime and vermicompost.
Similar analysis showed that except for the sole applications of inorganic P, the other factors including two factors (lime x inorganic P, vermicompost x lime, inorganic P x vermicompost) and three factors interactions (lime x vermicompost x inorganic P) had significant decreasing effects on exchangeable aluminum. It could also be noted that the three factors interaction appeared to have a significant effect and decreased the exchangeable Al of the soil by 88.09 to 95.23% compared to the control, indicating the synergistic effects of the three factors on the exchangeable aluminum in the studied soil. An increase in soil pH might have resulted in precipitation of exchangeable and soluble Al, as insoluble Al hydroxides (Ritchie 1994), thus reducing concentration of Al in soil solution. However, there are other mechanisms involved in the reactions of Al with OM, which are intricate and probably involve complex formation with low-molecular weight organic acids, such as citric, oxalic, and malic acids, and humic material produced during the decomposition of the OM and adsorption of Al onto the decomposing organic residues (Ritchie, 1994). In agreement with this result, Teshome et al. (2017) reported that integrated application of lime, mineral P and compost had reduced the exchangeable aluminum, due to the formation of organo-Al (chelation) complexes, insoluble aluminum hydroxide precipitate, and aluminum phosphate precipitate from compost, lime and inorganic P respectively.
As far as CEC of the soil is concerned, the interactions of three factors had significant (P< 0.01) influence on the CEC of the soil (Tables 3). After eight weeks incubation period, CEC values of the soil was found in the range of 22.05 cmolc kg-1 (control) and 29.53 cmolc kg-1 in combined applications of vermiccompost, lime and inorganic P at the rates of 10 ton VC ha-1, 11.50 ton CaCO3 ha-1, and 149.01 kg P ha-1. Sole applications of inorganic P had no significant effect on CEC of incubated soil (Table 3). The possible reason for the enhancement of CEC during combined (lime x vermicompost x inorganic P) application of those amendments could be the increase in pH of the soils. Because with increasing pH (i.e. increasing activity of OH- ions) H+ is dissociated from oxide surfaces or from organic functional groups, thus resulting in a negative charge, which could be allied with the CEC of the soils.
Table 3 Effects of amendments on selected chemical properties of soil (SC1)
|
|
|
exAc
|
exAl
|
CEC
|
Mehlich 3 P
|
PAcs
|
PAls
|
Treatments
|
pH ………………( cmolckg-1 ) ……………… .…. (mg/kg)…
|
………. ( % ) .........
|
P0
|
V0
|
L0
|
4.68v
|
2.57a
|
1.37a
|
22.05op
|
8.77r
|
11.76a
|
6.27a
|
|
|
L1
|
5.67o
|
0.59i
|
0.11i
|
22.15op
|
9.06rq
|
2.70i
|
0.49i
|
|
|
L2
|
5.93k
|
0.42k
|
0.11i
|
22.33on
|
9.43q
|
1.89k
|
0.48i
|
|
|
L3
|
6.33f
|
0.37m
|
0.11i
|
22.48n
|
10.09p
|
1.70m
|
0.48i
|
|
V1
|
L0
|
4.79u
|
2.15b
|
0.33b
|
23.42m
|
9.39q
|
9.85b
|
1.49b
|
|
|
L1
|
5.85m
|
0.68h
|
0.03j
|
25.39g
|
12.18n
|
3.11h
|
0.12j
|
|
|
L2
|
6.03i
|
0.59i
|
0.11i
|
25.83def
|
12.10n
|
2.70i
|
0.48i
|
|
|
L3
|
6.67bc
|
0.33o
|
0.11i
|
28.71b
|
12.73m
|
1.51o
|
0.48i
|
|
V2
|
L0
|
4.99t
|
1.99c
|
0.31cd
|
24.02jkl
|
10.36po
|
9.14c
|
1.41cd
|
|
|
L1
|
5.94k
|
0.59i
|
0.03j
|
25.60gf
|
10.75o
|
2.70i
|
0.12j
|
|
|
L2
|
6.11h
|
0.42k
|
0.11i
|
25.93cde
|
12.59m
|
1.89k
|
0.48i
|
|
|
L3
|
6.71ba
|
0.35n
|
0.03j
|
29.45a
|
13.17l
|
1.59n
|
0.12j
|
P1
|
V0
|
L0
|
4.68v
|
2.56a
|
0.32bc
|
23.08p
|
16.73k
|
11.71a
|
1.44bc
|
|
|
L1
|
5.68o
|
0.68h
|
0.11i
|
23.79l
|
16.86k
|
3.11h
|
0.48i
|
|
|
L2
|
5.76n
|
0.50j
|
0.11i
|
24.16j
|
17.95i
|
2.31j
|
0.48i
|
|
|
L3
|
6.32f
|
0.39l
|
0.11i
|
24.46hi
|
18.28ih
|
1.79l
|
0.48i
|
|
V1
|
L0
|
5.18s
|
1.82d
|
0.29e
|
23.44m
|
16.99kj
|
8.34d
|
1.35e
|
|
|
L1
|
5.95jk
|
0.50j
|
0.03j
|
25.40g
|
17.36j
|
2.31j
|
0.12j
|
|
|
L2
|
6.02i
|
0.35n
|
0.11i
|
25.84c-f
|
18.09ih
|
1.59n
|
0.48i
|
|
|
L3
|
6.66c
|
0.33o
|
0.11i
|
28.73b
|
18.41h
|
1.49o
|
0.48i
|
|
V2
|
L0
|
4.99t
|
1.56f
|
0.27f
|
24.07jk
|
18.26ih
|
7.13f
|
1.21f
|
|
|
L1
|
5.99ji
|
0.42k
|
0.11i
|
25.64fg
|
19.37feg
|
1.89k
|
0.48i
|
|
|
L2
|
6.29f
|
0.59i
|
0.11i
|
25.99cd
|
19.30fg
|
2.70i
|
0.48i
|
|
|
L3
|
6.68abc
|
0.34no
|
0.11i
|
29.48a
|
19.41fe
|
1.56no
|
0.48i
|
P2
|
V0
|
L0
|
4.68v
|
2.54a
|
0.31cde
|
22.12op
|
18.99g
|
11.76a
|
1.40cde
|
|
|
L1
|
5.36q
|
0.42k
|
0.11i
|
23.84kl
|
19.13fg
|
1.89k
|
0.48i
|
|
|
L2
|
5.86lm
|
0.42k
|
0.19h
|
24.19ij
|
20.54dc
|
1.89k
|
0.85h
|
|
|
L3
|
6.39e
|
0.33o
|
0.03j
|
24.52h
|
20.73c
|
1.49o
|
0.12j
|
|
V1
|
L0
|
5.19s
|
1.74e
|
0.29de
|
23.45m
|
19.35fg
|
7.93e
|
1.37de
|
|
|
L1
|
5.55p
|
0.50j
|
0.11i
|
25.42g
|
19.06fg
|
2.30j
|
0.48i
|
|
|
L2
|
5.94k
|
0.59i
|
0.11i
|
25.87c-f
|
19.77e
|
2.70i
|
0.48i
|
|
|
L3
|
6.55d
|
0.35n
|
0.11i
|
28.76b
|
20.17d
|
1.60n
|
0.48i
|
|
V2
|
L0
|
5.24r
|
1.47g
|
0.25g
|
24.11jk
|
21.37b
|
6.73g
|
1.15g
|
|
|
L1
|
5.91kl
|
0.59i
|
0.19h
|
25.66efg
|
21.62ba
|
2.70i
|
0.85h
|
|
|
L2
|
6.24g
|
0.42k
|
0.11i
|
26.12c
|
21.89a
|
1.89k
|
0.48i
|
|
|
L3
|
6.73a
|
0.31p
|
0.03j
|
29.53a
|
21.82a
|
1.43p
|
0.12j
|
Mean
|
|
|
5.82
|
0.86
|
0.17
|
25.11
|
16.45
|
3.91
|
0.79
|
F-test
|
|
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
CV(%)
|
|
|
4.49
|
1.05
|
4.49
|
0.68
|
1.47
|
1.05
|
4.49
|
Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different; ** = significant at P ≤ 0.01 using the Duncan’s multiple range test; CV = coefficient of variation of treatments; exAc = exchangeable acidity; exAl = exchangeable Al; PAcs = percentage of acid saturation; PAls = percentage of Al saturation; L0 = No lime; L1 = 5.93 tons lime ha-1; L2 = 9.57 tons lime ha-1; L3 = 11.96 tons lime ha-1; V0 = No vermicompost; V1 = 5 tons vermicompost ha-1; V2= 10 tons vermicompost ha-1; P0 = No mineral P; P1 = 74.51 kg P ha-1; P2= 149.01 kg P ha-1.
Amendments effect on oxalate and dithionite extractable P, Al and Fe
Data revealing the distribution of extractable P, Fe and Al after eight weeks incubation of the soil is presented in Tables 4. In view of a study results reported by Asmare et al. (2015) on eight Ethiopian acidic soils the soil considered in the current study had high oxalate extractable Al and Fe and dithionite citrate bicarbonate extractable Al and Fe (Ayenew et al. 2018a). Since oxalate and dithionite extractable iron and aluminum contents of the soil were high; Fe and Al oxyhydroxides could be the dominant species with which P interacts. The changes in some of the properties of soil upon applications of amendments might be ascribed to the change in concentration of the extractable form of Fe and Al present in the soil (Table 4). As a case in point, Torrent et al. (1990) reported that the nature, amount and distribution of iron and aluminum oxides in soil affect the ionic charge, chemical characteristics, and ion adsorption especially phosphorous sorption.
Data showing main and interaction effects of treatments on oxalate extractable aluminium (Alox) are exhibited in Table 4. The highest (152.64 mmol kg-1) value of Alox from sole application of vermicompost at the rate of 10 ton ha-1 and the least (141.93 mmol kg-1) from the integrated applications of lime, vermicompost and inorganic P were recorded for the soil. Thus, the highest (6.85%) reduction in oxalate extractable Al was obtained from combined applications of lime, vermicompost and inorganic P at the rates of 9.20 ton CaCO3 ha-1, 10 ton VC ha-1 and 149.01 kg P ha-1. After a given incubation period the results of analysis of variance revealed that sole (inorganic P, lime and vermicompost), combined applications of the ammendments had significant (p<0.01) effect on the oxalate extractable aluminum over the control (Table 4).
The effects of treatments on dithionite citrate bicarbonate extractable aluminium (Ald) are also presented in Table 4. In the interim sole and integrated applications of amendments had substantial (p<0.01) influence on dithionite citrate bicarbonate extractable aluminum (Ald). Consequently, the highest (173.77 mmol kg-1 dithionite citrate bicarbonate extractable (Ald) value was obtained from the control while the lowest (169.23 mmol kg-1) attained from pooled applications of lime, vermicompost and inorganic P at the rates of 9.20 ton CaCO3 ha-1, 10 ton VC ha-1 and 149.01 kg P ha-1.
The effects of treatments on oxalte extractable iron (Feox) are also shown in Table 4. The values of Feox obtained after incubation was ranged from 88.59 - 96.39 mmol kg-1 in which the maximum (96.39 mmol kg-1) was recorded from the application of vermicompost at the rate of 10 ton ha-1 alone and the least (88.59 mmol kg-1) recorded from the integrated applications of lime vermicompost and inorganic P at the highest rates. The highest value obtained from sole application of vermicompost may be ascribed to organo-metal complex formed during the incubation period. It has been reported that in Fe- and Al-rich soil, organic matter could inhibit the crystallization of Al and Fe by forming stable complexes with them, which in turn can increase P sorption as noncrystalline Al and Fe increases (Kang et al. 2009). A significant (p<0.01) decreases in oxalate (Feox) and dithionite extractable iron (Fed) were observed as a result of integrated applications of lime, vermicompost and inorganic P as two factors (lime x inorganic P, lime x vermicompost, inorganic P x vermicompost) and three factors (vermicompost x lime x vermicompost x inorganic P) compared to the control. Accordingly, the maximum (9.32%) reduction in Feox at the exchange sites was recorded from integrated applications of lime, vermicompost and inorganic P at the rates of 11.50 ton CaCO3 ha-1, 10 ton VC ha-1 and 149.01 kg P ha-1 respectively, whereas the least (1.34%) was obtained from the sole application of vermicompost at the rates of 10 tone ha-1.
Similarly, amalgamated applications of these amendments at the rates of 11.50 ton CaCO3 ha-1, 10 ton VC ha-1 and 149.01 kg P ha-1 had brought the maximum (1.73%) reduction in Fed, and the least (0.16%) variation from the control compared to the native soil. Similar results were reported by Asmare et al. (2015) who found that individual and combined applications of organic and inorganic minerals had significant effect on oxalate (Alox, Feox) and dithionite (Ald, Fed) extractable aluminum and iron free oxides.
It could be noted that synergistic effects of the three factors on the oxalate and dithionite extractable Fe and Al were remarkable. This might have occurred through different reaction mechanisms like the liming effect which develops negative charge through abstraction of H+ by OH- ions and Ca+2 ions displacement of Al at the exchange sites forming insoluble precipitates Al(OH)3 as a result of applications of liming materials. Additionally, formations of organo-metal complexes from soluble organic molecules that arouse from organic amendments could in turn occupy the exchange sites and inhibit the interaction between the metallic oxyhdroxides and oxalate extractants. Furthermore, adsorption reaction through which soil interacts with foreign materials; i.e along with the application of inorganic P the amount of phosphate adsorbed on metal oxyhydroxides increased and this could reduce free metallic oxides at exchange sites. In this regard, the results of the present study were in concomitant with that of Asmare et al. (2015), in which the reductions in Alox, Feox, Ald and Fed contents as the result of application of P bearing materials to a soil was reported and justified by the fixation of Al and Fe in the form of Al-P and Fe-P as a cause for reduction in amount extracted by oxalic acid.
Ammonium oxalate extractable phosphorous is associated with oxalate extractable iron and aluminum, because Fe and Al oxyhydroxides are good indicators for P sorption as they act as a sink for soluble phosphates (Vaananen et al. 2008). It is a potentially useful measure of the P associated with the amorphous iron and aluminum oxides in the soil (Wolf and Baker 2008). In the current study, upon the exclusive (main factor), integrated [two factors (lime x vermicompost, inorganic P x lime, vermicompost x inorganic P) and three factors (lime x vermicompost x inorganic P)] applications to soils for eight weeks incubation period appreciable (p<0.001) differences in oxalate extractable P (Pox) were observed in the soil. In the case where integrated application of amendments (lime x vermicompost x inorganic P) at the rates of 11.50 ton CaCO3 ha-1, 10 ton VC ha-1 and 149.01 kg P ha-1 was executed, the highest (8.70 mmol kg-1) was achieved whereas the lowest (5.88 mmol kg-1) recorded from the control. It can be observed that as the amount of oxalate and dithionite extractable form of those metal oxides reduced from the exchange sites, phosphorous extracted by ammonium oxalate (Pox) obviously enhanced. Similar to the present study, it has been noted that sole or integrated applications of P sources (organic and inorganic) had a significant effect on the oxalate extractable Al and Fe (Gikonyo et al. 2011) which in turn influence Pox, since P adsorbed by soil mainly attributed to P adsorbed on amorphous metal oxides (Feox and Alox) (Cui et al. 2017).
Phosphorous sorption capacities was significantly (P<0.05) influenced by the main and joined applications of treatments (Table 4). After the incubation period, the highest sorption capacity was recorded from the soil incubated solely with vermicompost at the rate of 10 ton ha-1 (132.98 mmol kg-1) and the lowest (123.31 mmol kg-1) value was obtained due to combined applications of the treatments (lime x vermicompost x inorganic P) at the rates of 9.20 ton CaCO3 ha-1, 10 ton VC ha-1, and 149.01 kg P ha-1. It can also be seen that the adsorption capacity of the soil decreased significantly with increasing applications rates of integrated amendments while applications of vermicompost solely increased the sorption capacity of the two soils under study. The increased adsorption capacity of the soil because of the exclusive application of vermicompost may be due to hindrance of crystallization of Fe and Al oxides. In Fe and Al rich soil, organic matter could inhibit the crystallization of Al and Fe by forming stable complexes with them, which in turn can increase P sorption as non-crystalline Al and Fe increases (Borggaard et al. 1990; Kang et al. 2009). The reduction in magnitude of phosphorous sorption capacities due to integrated application could be attributed to the coating of metal oxyhydroxides species by organic molecules from vermicompost applications, which reduce the availability of binding sites for phosphate ions, formations of insoluble aluminum hydroxides from the applications of lime, which reduces adsorptions of phosphate on the exchange site and addition of inorganic P, which occupy the exchange sites where P is expected to be adsorbed. Thus, the result of the present study is in concurrent with the study made by Gikonyo et al. (2011), which showed that sole or integrated applications of P sources (organic and inorganic) had a significant effect on the PSC of a soil.
The change in DPS of the soil was presented in Table 4. The phosphate ion is negatively charged and hence, continued P fixation leads to a “semi-permanent” increase in surface negative charge, resulting in a decrease in the electric potential of the reacting soil particle (Barrow et al. 1998; Celi et al. 2000). Consequently, increasing P saturation leads to weaker and weaker retention of P, implying that the degree of phosphorus saturation (DPS) appears to govern solution P concentration (Magdoff et al., 1999). Furthermore, recent studies have shown that the degree of P saturation (DPS) is a good indicator of the soil’s potential to release P (Hooda et al., 2000).
The incubated soil was found to have DPS (%) values ranging from 4.49-7.06%. The DPS (%) value was significantly (P<0.01) affected by individual (lime, vermicompost, inorganic P) and combined applications of these treatments (Table 4). The maximum DPS (7.06%) value was recorded from the integrated applications of (lime x vermicompost x inorganic P) amendments at the rates of 11.50 ton CaCO3 ha-1, 10 ton VC ha-1, and 298.03 kg P ha-1. Whereas the minimum DPS (4.49%) value was observed from the control, Thus, the result of present study is in concurrent with the study made by Gikonyo et al. (2011) which showed that sole or integrated applications of P sources (organic and inorganic) had a significant effect on the DPS of soils. It can be inferred that the observed increase in the DPS of the soils as a result of application of these amendments might have brought the better mobility of P in the soils. In this regard Yan et al. (2017) reported that due to decrease of the sorption sites for further P sorption, the concentrations of exchangeable P increased with increasing DPS and soil P mobility increases.
Table 4 Effects of amendments on Oxalate and dithionite extractable iron, Aluminum and phosphorous of SC1 Soil
|
|
|
|
Alox
|
Ald
|
Feox
|
Fed
|
Pox
|
PSC
|
DPS
|
|
|
|
……………………………………………….. mmolkg-1……………………………………………………………………………………………..
|
%
|
P0
|
V0
|
L0
|
150.35a
|
173.77a
|
94.29a
|
634.82a
|
5.88r
|
130.64a
|
4.499n
|
|
|
L1
|
147.16b
|
171.60b
|
92.53b
|
630.72b
|
6.62q
|
127.99b
|
5.17m
|
|
|
L2
|
145.94b-g
|
171.51b
|
92.37bc
|
630.33b
|
6.74qp
|
127.26b-e
|
5.29lm
|
|
|
L3
|
144.44h-k
|
170.65b-f
|
92.29bcd
|
629.02c
|
6.88op
|
126.41c-h
|
5.44kl
|
|
V1
|
L0
|
151.59ab
|
171.43b
|
95.89ab
|
628.38cd
|
6.74qp
|
132.15a
|
5.09r
|
|
|
L1
|
146.84bc
|
171.37bc
|
91.79b-f
|
627.99cde
|
6.75qp
|
127.43bcd
|
5.29lm
|
|
|
L2
|
146.35b-e
|
171.23bcd
|
91.69b-f
|
627.63def
|
7.15lm
|
127.11b-e
|
5.63ij
|
|
|
L3
|
144.91f-j
|
171.13bcd
|
91.61b-f
|
627.51def
|
7.17lkm
|
126.30d-i
|
5.68hi
|
|
V2
|
L0
|
152.64a
|
171.35bcd
|
96.39a
|
626.79efg
|
6.79op
|
132.98a
|
5.11qr
|
|
|
L1
|
145.33d-h
|
171.29bcd
|
91.27b-h
|
626.65e-h
|
6.83op
|
126.35d-i
|
5.41kl
|
|
|
L2
|
144.63h-k
|
171.20bcd
|
91.08b-i
|
626.61e-i
|
7.54hi
|
125.87f-k
|
5.99ef
|
|
|
L3
|
144.48h-k
|
171.03bcd
|
90.75c-i
|
626.49f-j
|
7.62hg
|
125.62g-k
|
6.07ef
|
P1
|
V0
|
L0
|
147.12b
|
171.57b
|
90.99b-i
|
630.76b
|
6.91on
|
127.15b-e
|
5.44kl
|
|
|
L1
|
142.84l-o
|
171.45b
|
90.87c-i
|
628.58cd
|
6.85op
|
124.80jkl
|
5.49jk
|
|
|
L2
|
143.14l-o
|
171.03bcd
|
90.69d-j
|
627.71c-f
|
7.68g
|
124.87jkl
|
6.150e
|
|
|
L3
|
142.87l-o
|
170.98b-e
|
90.59e-j
|
627.67c-f
|
7.06nm
|
124.67kl
|
5.66hi
|
|
V1
|
L0
|
146.47bcd
|
171.14bcd
|
91.19b-i
|
625.92g-k
|
7.18lkm
|
126.91b-f
|
5.66hi
|
|
|
L1
|
146.04b-f
|
170.79b-f
|
90.96b-i
|
625.89g-k
|
7.31jk
|
126.56c-g
|
5.78ghi
|
|
|
L2
|
143.92i-l
|
170.69b-f
|
90.66d-j
|
625.83g-k
|
8.11e
|
125.26h-l
|
6.47cd
|
|
|
L3
|
145.67c-h
|
170.52b-g
|
90.52e-k
|
625.63g-k
|
8.27d
|
126.13e-i
|
6.56c
|
|
V2
|
L0
|
145.12e-h
|
170.47b-g
|
90.19f-l
|
625.25h-l
|
7.43ji
|
125.65g-k
|
5.91fg
|
|
|
L1
|
143.57k-n
|
170.44b-g
|
90.14f-l
|
625.13jkl
|
7.58hg
|
124.80jkl
|
6.07ef
|
|
|
L2
|
145.39d-h
|
170.21b-g
|
90.03g-l
|
625.03jkl
|
8.53bc
|
125.72g-k
|
6.79b
|
|
|
L3
|
142.99l-o
|
169.95c-g
|
89.79h-l
|
624.61klm
|
8.61bac
|
124.31lm
|
6.93ab
|
P2
|
V0
|
L0
|
145.18e-i
|
171.25bcd
|
90.29e-k
|
625.25h-l
|
7.65hg
|
125.74g-k
|
6.08e
|
|
|
L1
|
143.64j-m
|
170.86b-f
|
90.26e-k
|
625.21h-l
|
7.27lk
|
124.89jkl
|
5.82gh
|
|
|
L2
|
142.28no
|
170.83b-f
|
90.25e-l
|
625.16i-l
|
7.87f
|
124.17lm
|
6.34d
|
|
|
L3
|
142.18o
|
170.75b-f
|
90.23e-l
|
625.08jkl
|
8.48c
|
124.11lm
|
6.83b
|
|
V1
|
L0
|
145.97b-g
|
170.73b-f
|
91.11b-i
|
625.91g-k
|
8.28d
|
126.60c-g
|
6.54c
|
|
Continues…
|
|
|
L1
|
144.45h-k
|
170.50b-g
|
90.83c-i
|
625.85g-k
|
7.68hg
|
125.64g-k
|
6.11e
|
|
|
L2
|
144.81f-k
|
170.47b-g
|
90.62e-k
|
625.79g-k
|
8.25ed
|
125.72g-k
|
6.56c
|
|
|
L3
|
143.11l-o
|
170.42b-g
|
90.52e-k
|
625.62g-k
|
8.65ba
|
124.76jkl
|
6.93ab
|
|
V2
|
L0
|
144.88f-j
|
169.94d-g
|
89.57i-l
|
623.99mn
|
8.64ba
|
125.19i-l
|
6.90ab
|
|
|
L1
|
144.74g-k
|
169.53fg
|
89.08jkl
|
623.55mno
|
8.21ed
|
124.86jkl
|
6.57c
|
|
|
L2
|
141.93o
|
169.23g
|
88.99kl
|
622.82no
|
8.67ba
|
123.31m
|
7.03a
|
|
|
L3
|
142.37mno
|
169.59efg
|
88.59l
|
622.65o
|
8.70a
|
123.33m
|
7.06a
|
Mean
|
|
|
144.95
|
170.86
|
91.08
|
626.61
|
7.57
|
126.04
|
6.01
|
F-test
|
|
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
CV
|
|
|
0.74
|
0.41
|
1.12
|
0.12
|
1.17
|
0.72
|
1.83
|
Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different; ** = significant at P ≤ 0.01 using the Duncan’s multiple range test; CV = coefficient of variation of treatments; exAc = exchangeable acidity; exAl = exchangeable Al; PAcs = percentage of acid saturation; PAls = percentage of Al saturation; L0 = No lime; L1 = 5.93 tons lime ha-1; L2 = 9.57 tons lime ha-1; L3 = 11.96 tons lime ha-1; V0 = No vermicompost; V1 = 5 tons vermicompost ha-1; V2= 10 tons vermicompost ha-1; P0 = No mineral P; P1 = 74.51 kg P ha-1; P2= 149.01 kg P ha-1.
Amendments effect on forms and distributions of P
The combined and sole applications of the amendments altered significantly the chemical properties expected to impact the distributions of phosphorous in the soil (Table 5). The forms and distribution of the various P fractions [NH4Cl-P, NaHCO3-Pi, NaHCO3-Po NaOH-Pi, NaOH-Po (NaOH-Pi)sn, (NaOH-Po)sn HCl-Pi, residual P and total P] following incubation of the soil are shown in Table 5 too. After eight weeks incubation period, the distributions and forms of Pi were in the order of magnitude: NH4Cl-P < NaHCO3 - Pi < (NaOH-Pi)sn < HCl-Pi < NaOH-Pi. The highest percentage change in each fraction was recorded from the interactions of three factors (lim x vermicompost x inorganic P) whereas; the lowest was obtained from the control. Results of the analysis of variance also indicated that integrated applications of both two factors (lime x vermicompost x inorganic P) and three factors (lim x vermicompost x inorganic P) amendments had statistically significant (P<0.01) effect on the amount and distributions of NH4Cl-P, NaHCO3-Pi, NaOH-Pi)sn, HCl-Pi, and NaOH-Pi fractions in the soil.
The distributions of easily mineralisable (NaHCO3)-Po and less labile (NaOH)-Po were in the order of magnitude: NaOH-Po < (NaOH-Po)sn < NaHCO3-Po. The highest percentage change in each fraction was recorded from the interactions of three factors (lime x vermicompost x inorganic P) and the lowest was obtained from the control. According to analysis of variance all the treatments influenced significantly (p<0.01) the amount and distributions of the extracted organic form of P (Tables 5).
The NaOH-Pi was the largest extractable inorganic P fraction and the most abundant active P form contributing to about 22.66 – 45.49% and 17.76 – 42.07% of the total P, in the studied soil. Thus, NaOH-P was the major sink for the applied P. Previous studies also reported that organic amendments with high P contents could significantly increase NaOH-Pi contents (and to a lesser extent NaOH-Po) (Iyamuremye et al. 1996; Li et al. 2015). The increase of this fraction observed in these soils amended by phosphorus fertilizer and vermicompost was possibly as a result of phosphate released from phosphorus fertilizer and vermicompost. Similar result has been reported by Pavan and Andmcioli (1995) where application of compost was able to promote NaOH-Pi. It can be deduced that since NaOH-Pi fraction is a site for P sorption; increase in this fraction provide evidence that P-rich amendments in the studied soil may decrease future P sorption in soil by reacting with these sorption sites (Daly et al. 2001; Yan et al. 2013). This result is also in concomitant with what has been reported by Elias et al. (2010) that goat manure and inorganic phosphate addition influenced NaOH-Pi to greater extent.
After eight weeks of incubation period the least (2.04 mg kg-1) concentration of the readily available NH4Cl extractable P (Gunatilaka, 1988), was recorded from the control and the highest (33.37 mg kg-1) was obtained from the combined applications of lime, vermicompost and inorganic P at the rates of 11.50 ton CaCO3 ha-1, 10 ton VC ha-1, 149.01 kg P ha-1 respectively.
According to the result of the present study (Table 5) lime alone had no significant effect on readily available fractions (NH4Cl-P) at both study sites. Contrasting result was mentioned by Hartono et al. (2000) that lime had significant effect on readily available Pi but it agrees with that of Iyamuremye et al. (1996) where lime didn’t affect readily available Pi. Even though sole applications of lime didn’t appreciably affect the readily available fractions of P (NH4Cl-P) the magnitude of enhancement varied along with the rates of lime. This change in magnitude may be attributed to the decrease of exchangeable Al that is precipitated by OH-. In the case where lime was applied in combination with other materials like inorganic P and vermicompost, significant differences were observed over the control (Table 5). On the other hand, the readily available fraction (NH4Cl-P) was significantly affected by single or combined applications of inorganic P and vermicompost as compared to the control.
The HCl-Pi fraction is associated with the primary minerals such as apatite (Tiessen et al. 1984) and with calcium-bound P, which is little or missing in highly weathered soils (Walker and Syers 1976). In the present exploration, it appeared that integrated applications of the amendments of two factors (lime x vermicompost, inorganic P x lime, vermicompost x inorganic P) and three factors (lime x vermicompost x inorganic P) tended to enhance HCl-Pi significantly (Table 5). Consequently, the highest value of HCl-Pi was recorded from the interaction of lime, vermicompost and inorganic P, at the respective maximum rates, whereas the lowest was recorded from the control. However, in the current study, HCl-P did not varied significantly with the sole applications of those treatments. The absence of substantial changes in HCl-Pi is explicable because the soil is acidic which would favor formation of Al and Fe P inorganic compounds over Ca products (Hartono et al. 2000). Similar result was reported by Pavan and Androcioli (1995) that application of compost didn’t significantly influence HCl-Pi. Hartono et al. (2000) found that applications of inorganic phosphorous or lime to acidic soils had no significant effects on the concentrations of HCl-Pi.
Generally, the dynamics of the two labile P fractions (NH4Cl-P, NaHCO3-Pi) varied considerably (p<0.05) when combined applications of lime, vermicompost and inorganic P were executed at both sampling sites. Whilst, the lower plant available chemisorbed Pi associated with amorphous and crystalline Fe and Al hydroxides and clay minerals (NaOH-pi) and moderately labile, easily mineralisable (NaHCO3)-Po and less labile (NaOH)-Po were significantly altered during the incubation period.
Table 5 Effects of amendments on Inorganic and organic P fractions of SC1, Soil
|
|
Treatment
(Kg ha-1)
|
NH4Cl-pi
|
NaHCO3-pi
|
NaHCO3-po
|
NaOH-pi
|
NaOH-po
|
NaOH-pi) sn
|
NaOH-po) sn
|
HCl-pi
|
Residual
P
|
Total P
|
|
|
|
…………………………………………………………………………..………..mg kg-1………………………………………………………………………………………………..
|
P0
|
V0
|
L0
|
2.04r
|
2.46z
|
2.79z
|
142.35j
|
153.85i
|
34.09ef
|
36.27klm
|
65.53hi
|
167.34i
|
606.34v
|
|
|
L1
|
2.15r
|
2.49
|
2.79z
|
142.24j
|
153.81i
|
33.68f
|
35.96lm
|
65.76hi
|
167.31i
|
606.31v
|
|
|
L2
|
2.21r
|
2.59y
|
2.79z
|
142.10j
|
153.72i
|
33.68f
|
35.86m
|
65.96ghi
|
167.54i
|
606.43v
|
|
|
L3
|
2.16r
|
2.75x
|
2.79z
|
141.83j
|
153.47i
|
34.06ef
|
36.01lm
|
66.17ghi
|
167.74i
|
607.25v
|
|
V1
|
L0
|
2.64q
|
2.59y
|
3.21t
|
146.06i
|
166.33h
|
35.31def
|
39.45j
|
65.96ghi
|
168.56i
|
630.12u
|
|
|
L1
|
4.76o
|
6.72w
|
3.25s
|
146.57i
|
165.87h
|
35.14def
|
39.18jk
|
69.35ghi
|
175.84h
|
646.70tu
|
|
|
L2
|
4.77o
|
6.90v
|
3.29q
|
156.46h
|
165.74h
|
35.56def
|
38.76j-m
|
74.04d
|
175.88h
|
661.42st
|
|
|
L3
|
4.82o
|
7.07u
|
3.45ij
|
156.40h
|
165.41h
|
35.62def
|
38.84jkl
|
82.91c
|
176.71h
|
671.25rs
|
|
V2
|
L0
|
3.23p
|
2.73x
|
3.27r
|
171.19g
|
170.61g
|
36.66de
|
43.78i
|
68.08ghi
|
169.37i
|
668.96s
|
|
|
L1
|
5.36n
|
6.91v
|
3.40l
|
171.54g
|
170.24g
|
36.25def
|
43.29i
|
73.65de
|
176.85h
|
687.52qr
|
|
|
L2
|
5.37n
|
7.08u
|
3.44j
|
171.26g
|
170.01g
|
36.17def
|
43.66i
|
86.48bc
|
177.15h
|
700.64pq
|
|
|
L3
|
5.41n
|
7.28t
|
3.47g
|
171.65g
|
169.97g
|
36.77d
|
43.54i
|
97.04a
|
177.45h
|
712.61p
|
P1
|
V0
|
L0
|
14.71m
|
7.87s
|
3.10y
|
395.58f
|
182.73f
|
53.22c
|
81.24e
|
64.8i
|
185.08g
|
988.36o
|
|
|
L1
|
16.80l
|
10.62p
|
3.12wx
|
395.15f
|
182.50f
|
53.61c
|
78.19f
|
65.93ghi
|
190.26ef
|
996.21o
|
|
|
L2
|
16.84l
|
10.79o
|
3.14v
|
395.28f
|
182.29f
|
53.48c
|
78.55ef
|
65.10i
|
190.70ef
|
996.19o
|
|
|
L3
|
16.89l
|
10.99n
|
3.18u
|
395.36f
|
182.17f
|
52.99c
|
78.47ef
|
66.30ghi
|
191.07e
|
997.44o
|
|
V1
|
L0
|
17.32k
|
8.19q
|
3.31p
|
400.66e
|
233.43c
|
55.52bc
|
53.61h
|
65.67hi
|
187.82fg
|
1025.54n
|
|
|
L1
|
19.45i
|
14.97h
|
3.32o
|
400.17e
|
233.37c
|
55.29bc
|
53.43h
|
72.64def
|
198.39d
|
1051.06m
|
|
|
L2
|
19.46i
|
15.09g
|
3.33n
|
400.46e
|
233.23c
|
55.55bc
|
53.57h
|
84.58bc
|
198.79d
|
1064.07lm
|
|
|
L3
|
19.50i
|
15.25f
|
3.37m
|
400.08e
|
233.01c
|
55.39bc
|
52.73h
|
95.64a
|
199.10d
|
1074.09l
|
|
V2
|
L0
|
17.92j
|
8.11r
|
4.34f
|
527.87c
|
228.14d
|
57.29b
|
58.57g
|
68.16ghi
|
189.88ef
|
1160.29k
|
|
|
L1
|
20.04h
|
15.10g
|
4.39e
|
527.24c
|
228.00d
|
57.73b
|
58.25g
|
73.87de
|
201.06cd
|
1185.70hi
|
|
|
L2
|
20.05h
|
15.26f
|
4.39e
|
527.39c
|
227.78d
|
57.41b
|
58.37g
|
86.79bc
|
201.29cd
|
1198.75gh
|
|
|
L3
|
20.09h
|
15.46e
|
4.39e
|
527.70c
|
227.70d
|
57.59b
|
58.58g
|
97.35a
|
201.42cd
|
1210.33g
|
P2
|
V1
|
L0
|
27.84g
|
11.85m
|
3.12xy
|
471.75d
|
215.86e
|
69.28a
|
101.99b
|
65.79hi
|
201.02cd
|
1168.53jk
|
|
|
L1
|
29.24f
|
14.57j
|
3.13vwx
|
471.36d
|
215.79e
|
69.13a
|
102.11b
|
69.96efg
|
205.71b
|
1181.03ij
|
|
|
L2
|
29.98e
|
14.74i
|
3.13vw
|
471.16d
|
215.42e
|
69.62a
|
102.30b
|
75.03d
|
206.53b
|
1187.94hi
|
|
Continues…
|
|
|
L3
|
30.03e
|
14.92h
|
3.13v
|
471.13d
|
215.39e
|
69.50a
|
102.44b
|
86.91bc
|
206.66b
|
1200.13gh
|
|
V1
|
L0
|
30.46d
|
12.25k
|
3.42k
|
601.62b
|
278.81b
|
69.41a
|
118.36a
|
65.88h
|
203.98bc
|
1384.21f
|
|
|
L1
|
32.58b
|
18.95d
|
3.45ij
|
601.20b
|
278.65b
|
69.47a
|
118.83a
|
72.85def
|
214.63a
|
1410.62e
|
|
|
L2
|
32.59b
|
18.96d
|
3.46hi
|
601.11b
|
278.59b
|
69.46a
|
118.44a
|
84.79bc
|
214.51a
|
1421.93de
|
|
|
L3
|
32.64b
|
19.29b
|
3.46gh
|
601.29b
|
278.24b
|
69.57a
|
118.55a
|
95.85a
|
215.10a
|
1434.02d
|
|
V2
|
L0
|
31.05c
|
12.05l
|
4.44d
|
628.42a
|
373.69a
|
70.26a
|
81.35e
|
68.39ghi
|
205.80b
|
1475.47c
|
|
|
L1
|
33.17a
|
18.98d
|
4.50c
|
628.02a
|
373.55a
|
70.47a
|
91.17d
|
74.09d
|
216.72a
|
1510.71b
|
|
|
L2
|
33.19a
|
19.11c
|
4.54b
|
628.06a
|
373.34a
|
70.48a
|
93.52cd
|
87.03b
|
217.12a
|
1526.40ab
|
|
|
L3
|
33.37a
|
19.44a
|
4.58a
|
627.13a
|
373.29a
|
70.23a
|
96.19c
|
97.58a
|
217.65a
|
1539.49a
|
Mean
|
|
|
17.78
|
11.12
|
3.49
|
387.63
|
222.34
|
53.47
|
68.98
|
75.89
|
192.44
|
1033.17
|
F-test
|
|
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
CV%
|
|
|
1.46
|
0.39
|
0.21
|
0.42
|
0.74
|
3.07
|
2.65
|
3.26
|
0.92
|
1.01
|
Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different; ** = significant at P ≤ 0.01 using the Duncan’s multiple range test; CV = coefficient of variation of treatments; exAc = exchangeable acidity; exAl = exchangeable Al; PAcs = percentage of acid saturation; PAls = percentage of Al saturation; L0 = No lime; L1 = 5.93 tons lime ha-1; L2 = 9.57 tons lime ha-1; L3 = 11.96 tons lime ha-1; V0 = No vermicompost; V1 = 5 tons vermicompost ha-1; V2= 10 tons vermicompost ha-1; P0 = No mineral P; P1 = 74.51 kg P ha-1; P2= 149.01 kg P ha-1.
Correlation among soil properties
The correlation between soil properties after incubation with amendments is exhibited in Table 6. The readily available NH4Cl extractable P was strongly positively correlated with Mehlich 3-P, NaHCO3-Pi, NaHCO3-Po, HCl-P, NaOH-Pi, NaOH-Po and Pox. This could be an indication for the presence of higher concentration of NH4Cl extractable P in soils where there are prominently higher concentrations of Mehlich 3-P, NaHCO3-Pi, NaHCO3-Po, HCl-P, NaOH-Pi, NaOH-Po and Pox in the soil. In addition, the correlation result verified the scientific speculation that Pox thought to be P adsorbed initially (native P) and the higher the concentrations of native P the smaller the size of the adsorption sites left over for P added in the form of amendments. Therefore, up on additions of P bearing amendments to soils having higher Pox only smaller amounts of P tend to be adsorbed and the remaining P would be forced to soil solution and become available. According to the correlation result from incubated soils, enhanced amount of available P was manifested where there was higher HCl extractable P (Ca bound P) as liming materials are applied. The strong rationale for strong positive association between HCl-P and readily available P might be the occurrence of dissolution rather than precipitation in acidic soils.
Meanwhile, those readily available fractions of P (NH4Cl-P, NaHCO3-Pi and NaHCO3-Po) in the studied soils had strong and negative association with oxalate extractable Fe (Feox), oxalate extractable Al (Alox) and PSC. The results pointed out that the availability of P was very low in soils dominated by higher concentrations of free oxyhydroxides of Fe and Al. In addition, NaOH-Pi and NaOH-Po were strongly and negatively correlated with Feox, Alox and PSC. This could be an indication for reduction in free metallic oxyhydroxides (Alox, Feox) and PSC with increasing amount of P added through inorganic P and vermicompost application as well as lime.
Table 6 Correlation matrix obtained from soil properties in SC1 sampling site
|
M-3
|
NH4Cl-P
|
NaHCO3-Pi
|
NaHCO3-Po
|
NaOH-pi
|
NaOH-po
|
HCl-p
|
Alox
|
Feox
|
Pox
|
PSC
|
pH
|
0.19*
|
0.09ns
|
0.38**
|
0.26**
|
0.07ns
|
0.13ns
|
0.75**
|
-0.54**
|
-0.27**
|
0.46**
|
-0.48**
|
M-3
|
|
0.94**
|
0.91**
|
0.59**
|
0.95**
|
0.78**
|
0.35**
|
-0.61**
|
-0.69**
|
0.82**
|
-0.73**
|
NH4Cl-P
|
|
|
0.91**
|
0.49**
|
0.96**
|
0.83**
|
0.29**
|
-0.54**
|
-0.61**
|
0.79**
|
-0.64**
|
NaHCO3-Pi
|
|
|
|
0.56**
|
0.88**
|
0.77**
|
0.53**
|
-0.59**
|
-0.63**
|
0.82**
|
-0.69**
|
NaHCO3-Po
|
|
|
|
|
0.64**
|
0.73**
|
0.44**
|
-0.35**
|
-0.59**
|
0.66**
|
-0.51**
|
NaOH-pi
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.85**
|
0.27**
|
-0.49**
|
-0.63**
|
0.79**
|
-0.62**
|
NaOH-po
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.33**
|
-0.37**
|
-0.60**
|
0.77**
|
-0.53**
|
HCl-p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.39**
|
-0.39**
|
0.66**
|
-0.44**
|
Alox
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.56**
|
-0.60**
|
0.92**
|
Feox
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.69**
|
0.84**
|
Pox
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.72**
|