Nowadays, deep frying in which food is submerged in edible oil at 176.7 ÷ 190.6°C is one of the common cooking methods (FreshFry 2022) because it can enhance the sensorial properties including crispy texture, golden brown color, and of course fried flavor. It is known that forced oxidation of edible oil could occur even at a moderate temperature (∼ 58°C) (Russin et al 2004). It is obvious that the two oil adulterants, in our study, definitely contain thermally degraded products. It may be evidenced by the growth of the absorption band and/or band shift as the oxidative processes take place. To quantify adulterant(s) in SFO mixtures, we thus search for infrared spectral characteristics to reliably indicate the presence of TDO A and TDO B. Herein, our quantification method for TDOs in SFO mixtures was proposed using simple linear regression analysis. It means that IR signal intensity (peak height or peak area) at a specific wavenumber between TDO-SFO mixtures and pure SFO was regressed on the percentage of either adulterant. The proposed method was validated in terms of linearity, accuracy, precision, specificity, limit of detection and limit of quantification (Michael et al 2002).
Figure 1 displays the FTIR spectra of representative samples for sunflower oil (SFO) and two adulterants (TDO A and TDO B) under study. For the sake of better visualization, they are all scaled vertically.
In the first spectral region, 3600-3200cm− 1, the peak at around 3472 cm− 1 is assigned to the ROOH absorption band (Russin et al 2004). In the second spectral region, 3000-2800cm− 1, there are peaks due to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibration of the aliphatic CH2 functional group observed at around 2921 and 2852 cm− 1 (Guillén and Cabo, 2000). It is interesting to note that the oils with a high proportion of linolenic or linoleic acyl groups show higher frequency data for the peak characteristic for a cis-double bond (Guillén and Cabo, 1999) at around 3005 cm− 1 than those with a high proportion of oleic acyl groups. Upon thermal oxidation, these peaks of TDOs exhibit only a slight increase in intensity (at around 3472 cm− 1) or a significant increase in intensity (at around 2921 and 2852 cm− 1). However, they are not used for the quantification of TDOs in SFO-TDO binary mixtures since there is no marked difference in their intensity when a spectral comparison is done for pure SFO and TDOs samples.
In contrast, in our study, the band at 1746 cm− 1 was used to quantify TDOs in SFO mixtures. The peak area for the band at 1746 cm− 1, was calculated using 1800 cm− 1 and 1682.84 cm− 1 as points on the baseline. This peak is due to the ester carbonyl functional group of the triglycerides (Guillén and Cabo, 2000), and it shows a significant increase in intensity as well as absorption band widening for TDOs. This is in agreement with our previous findings (Bunaciu et al., 2022a). Table 1 displays the IR spectral data obtained for the band around 1746 cm− 1 used for the first quantification method. In Fig. 2A and B are presented the ATR – FTIR spectra for SFO-TDO binary mixtures. Statistical evaluation of the calibration curves for the measurements performed at 1743.60 cm− 1 for either adulterant was summarized in Table 2, together with LOD and LOQ values calculated based on the parameters (standard deviation of the residuals and regression slope) of the best-fitting lines. The coefficient of determination (R2) for all the methods is greater than 0.990, suggesting a strong association between two variables (i.e., IR signal intensity (peak height or peak area) as the dependent variable, Y, and percentage of adulterant in SFO-TDO binary mixtures as the independent variable, X). It is noteworthy that the quantification methods based on IR peak area are more sensitive than those based on IR peak height as evidenced by their higher values of the regression slope. The accuracy and precision of all the methods were also accessed by the quantification of TDOs as adulterants in the range of 3.5 ÷ 7.5% (v/v). Basically, the presence of TDOs in laboratory-made SFO-TDO binary mixtures is invisible to the naked eye at this concentration range. The results displayed in Table 3 show that all the methods are precise (RSD < 2.7%) and accurate (percent recovery in the range of 98.0 ÷ 101.1%). It is reasonably acceptable; in other words, the quantification of TDOs in SFO-TDO binary mixtures is considered to be specific (no significant influence of sample matrix existed). In comparison with chromatographic methods reported for identifying edible oil adulterants (Priyankar et al 2005; Chia-Ding et al 2017; Changrui et al 2019), our proposed methods proved to be more suitable as a reliable screening test for SFO adulterants because they are time-saving (the quantification could be performed in only about 5–10 minutes, taking into account from sample preparation to data acquisition) and cost-effective (solvent-free analysis and no sophisticated equipment requirement).
Table 1
Spectral data (peak height and peak area) of the band around 1746 cm− 1
TDO (%) | TDO A | TDO B |
Peak Height | Peak Area | Peak Height | Peak Area |
0 | 1.16 | 28.14 | 1.159 | 27.2 |
1 | 1.177 | 28.53 | 1.172 | 27.5 |
2 | 1.19 | 28.92 | 1.18 | 27.73 |
3 | 1.2034 | 29.31 | 1.1898 | 27.97 |
4 | 1.2161 | 29.71 | 1.195 | 28.21 |
5 | 1.2288 | 30.01 | 1.2086 | 28.44 |
6 | 1.2415 | 30.49 | 1.22 | 28.68 |
7 | 1.2543 | 30.88 | 1.2275 | 28.92 |
8 | 1.267 | 31.27 | 1.237 | 29.15 |
9 | 1.28 | 31.66 | 1.2465 | 29.39 |
10 | 1.294 | 32.06 | 1.258 | 29.63 |
Table 2
Statistical evaluation of the regression analysis, LOD and LOQ values of the proposed quantification methods
Parameter | TDO A | TDO B |
Peak measurements |
Area | Height | Area | Height |
Slope (a) | 0.3917 | 0.0131 | 0.2394 | 0.0097 |
Intercept (b) | 28.13 | 1.1629 | 27.24 | 1.1601 |
Coefficient of determination (R2) | 0.9995 | 0.9991 | 0.9995 | 0.9974 |
Standard error of the slope (Sa) | 26.5×10–4 | 1.18×10–4 | 16.0×10–4 | 1.65×10–4 |
Standard error of the intercept (Sb) | 156.8×10–4 | 6.95×10–4 | 94.5×10–4 | 9.76×10–4 |
Standard deviation of the residuals (Sy.x) | 278.1×10–4 | 12.3×10–4 | 168.0×10–4 | 17.3×10–4 |
LOD = 3.3 × Sy.x/a (%) | 0.23 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.59 |
LOQ = 10 × Sy.x/a (%) | 0.71 | 0.94 | 0.70 | 1.79 |
Table 3
Quantitative determination of TDOs in SFO-TDO binary mixtures
| Found (%) (mean ± SD, n = 5) |
Taken (%) | peak area method | peak high method |
TDO A | TDO B | TDO A | TDO B |
3.50 | 3.46 ± 0.01 | 3.43±0.05 | 3.52 ± 0.09 | 3.55± 0.06 |
5.50 | 5.52 ± 0.03 | 5.49± 0.04 | 5.49 ± 0.02 | 5.51± 0.04 |
7.50 | 7.57 ± 0.10 | 7.59± 0.12 | 7.57 ± 0.03 | 7.58± 0.06 |