GDC are a particular type of gastrointestinal tract cyst that occurs mostly in infants and young children [8]. GDC can be divided into tubular cysts (20%) and cystic cysts (80%) based on their morphological features. Tubular cysts are connected to the gastric cavity, while cystic cysts are not [9]. GDC can occur anywhere in the stomach but are mainly found in the pylorus near the greater curvature of the stomach[10]. Because GDC are often found in the left adrenal region and lack specific symptoms and auxiliary examinations, GDC patients are often admitted to the hospital for an AC and incorrectly undergo surgical AC treatment [11–12].
The clinical symptoms of GDC vary according to their size and location [13]. When the cyst is located in the greater curvature of the stomach near the pylorus, epigastric discomfort, nausea, and vomiting may occur. If it interacts with the gastrointestinal tract, symptoms such as gastrointestinal bleeding may also occur [14]. Vomiting and epigastric discomfort are the most common symptoms [15]. The GDC symptoms in this study were only intermittent abdominal pain in the upper abdomen, which often does not attract parental attention, leading to delayed treatment and complicating surgery. Notably, most of Adrenal cysts are clinically asymptomatic and are found accidentally, a few larger adrenal cysts can produce compression symptoms, such as distension and pain in the lower back and abdomen and gastrointestinal discomfort, which is only detected during surgical exploration[16]. Therefore, the clinical presentation of both diseases is atypical, which makes them extremely easy to misdiagnose clinically.
Abdominal ultrasonography is an important method for early GDC detection but lacks specificity for GDC [17]. Recent studies have shown that endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and fine needle biopsy are more sensitive for preoperative GDC diagnosis [18]. However, therapeutic EUS uses in pediatrics focus on endoluminal therapy for pancreaticobiliary disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, inflammatory bowel disease, and liver disease. In addition, the complexity of the surrounding tissues of cysts requires sedation or even anesthesia for routine puncture examination. Therefore, this approach can only be qualitative and cannot remove cysts, limiting its clinical application [19].
CT examination can determine the cyst’s location, size, and relationship to surrounding tissue but cannot be qualitative. Some studies have found that under enhanced CT, lesions with thicker cyst walls can appear as “halo signs.” The capsule wall mucous membrane forms the inner low-density ring, and smooth muscle forms the outer high-density ring. However, this typical “halo sign” can only be seen with high-definition equipment, limiting its application [10, 20].
After a detailed analysis of the patients’ preoperative ultrasound and CT results, we found that the cyst’s location was significantly abnormal in those with GDC or AC. Ultrasound showed that the distance between the cyst wall and the upper pole of the left kidney was significantly greater in GDC than in AC patients. In addition, in the CT results, while the GDC wall was close to the stomach wall, the distance between the AC wall and the stomach was significantly greater. Moreover, the GDC was closer to the greater curvature of the stomach and farther from the upper pole of the kidney. Given that the relationship between probe and body position will cause errors in the results, the patient was placed in the supine position, and the analyses are based on the horizontal position data of the CT scan. Ultrasound has changes in probe direction and position and is only used to supplement CT results. However, based on the results, ultrasound observations were completely consistent with CT observations. Therefore, ultrasound and CT examinations can show the positional changes of the cyst, the gastric wall, and the upper pole of the left kidney, allowing the surgeon to distinguish between GDC and AC before surgery.
Currently, transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approaches can be used in surgery for masses in the adrenal region [21]. Since the surgical sites of GDC are in the abdominal cavity near the greater curvature of the stomach, a retroperitoneal approach is not conducive to exposing the cyst. The transabdominal approach can better expose the upper renal pole and the greater curvature of the stomach and avoid injury to surrounding tissues or peripheral organs, such as the pancreas and spleen. Therefore, the transabdominal approach is more suitable for GDC resection. However, the retroperitoneal approach is recommended for patients with ACs since it interferences less with the intraperitoneal bowel and better exposes the adrenal gland than the intraperitoneal approach.
In this study, one AC case chose the retroperitoneal approach instead of the transabdominal approach. Notably, compared with the transperitoneal approach, the operation time, oral feeding time and hospital stay length were shorter in the retroperitoneal approach. Therefore, if GDC is considered before surgery, we recommend the transperitoneal approach, which can obtain better space and field of vision and reduce surgery risk and operative time. If AC is considered before surgery, the retroperitoneal approach is also suitable.