We found that above-knee amputations have a shorter survival than below-knee amputations. When we compared the demographic, comorbid and hematological values of both groups, it was revealed that age, gender, side, number of comorbid diseases, time to surgery and CCI and hmg, wbc, % lymphocyte, % neutrophil, creatinine and Na values at the time of first admission did not make a significant predictive difference in the mortality criterion. It was revealed that high ASA score, preference for general anesthesia, high total hospital stay, low albumin level at first admission and high Crp level resulted in higher mortality. Although the HbA1c value was low, its occurrence in the group with high mortality meant that it was not associated with mortality.
Some publications state that older age and male gender are more mortal (6, 7). In our study, the mean age of the patients was 70.9 in Group 1, 74 in Group 2, and male gender was dominant in both groups. Although the age and gender distribution of both groups were similar, Group 2 had a more mortal course.
While there are publications stating that mortality increases as the number of comorbid diseases increases (8, 9), our study also revealed that although the number of comorbid diseases in both groups was equal, those who underwent above-knee amputation were more mortal. Although mortality was high in both groups, the reason why Group 2 was more mortal than Group 1 may be related to the stage of the diseases rather than the number of comorbid diseases.
The ASA score is a parameter that indicates the perioperatif anesthetic risk of the patients, and they routinely evaluate the patients' cardiological (echocardiogram), pulmonary (respiratory function test and blood gas) and internal medicine (liver and kidney function tests, electrolyte, hormone) evaluations and give scores in a transparent way. We have revealed that an increase in this score is an important factor that determines the survival of the patient. When we look at the literature, we see that the survival relationship with ASA is also established in other diseases (10). Considering the type of anesthesia, we see that as the ASA score increases, the preference of general anesthesia over regional anesthesia increases. We believe that general anesthesia is preferred for stabilization of patients who are likely to need intensive care after the operation.
After the operation, patients are discharged after consultation with the relevant clinics and stabilization of their chronic diseases. We see that mortality is higher in patients with increased duration. We are of the opinion that the risk of mortality will increase as the stabilization of the problems caused by hemodynamic and comorbid diseases is prolonged.
If the CCI is > 5, the mortality risk is stated as 22.3% in some publication (11). While the CCI was 6.2 in Group 1, it had a mean of 6 in Group 2. Group 1 resulted in a mortality of approximately 2 years on average, and Group 2 with an average mortality of approximately 1 year. It can be said that a high mortality rate of 5 or more is predicted, but although both groups were similar in our study, the more mortal course of Group 2 alone could not constitute a high predictive factor.
Hemogram, wbc, % lymphocyte, % neutrophil, Na and creatinine were similar in 2 groups suggesting that they are not predictors of high mortality. Although low hemogram level was also shown as a mortality indicator (9), it did not make a significant difference in our study. However, the mean hemogram value in both groups (Group 1 hmg:10/Group 2 hmg:9.5) was under normal values. Many publications have suggested that high creatinine level and dialysis dependence are associated with higher mortality (6–9). In our study, while the mean creatinine level in Group 1 was 1.6, it was 1.4 in Group 2. While 15 patients in Group 1 were receiving dialysis, 5 patients in Group 2 were receiving dialysis. It seems very difficult to claim that creatinine level has an effect on mortality. Although we cannot claim that it did not contribute to mortality, as our CCI result was similar in both groups, we can only say that it is not the main factor that makes a difference in mortality.
According to our study, low albumin value causes a more mortal course. If we consider low albumin as a sign of liver failure, it can be argued that liver problems cause a more mortal course than kidney diseases (high creatinine level). There are publications in the literature supporting that low albumin increases mortality (12, 13).
We have seen that the high level of crp also causes a more mortal course. It can be easily said that the extent of septicemia of the process and the strength of the patient's immune system affect mortality. In the literature, it has been stated that resistant bacteria cause a more mortal course (8). It has been stated that crp may also be a predictor of high mortality in terms of mortality (12). The etiology of high crp can be evaluated as septicemia.
Although the HbA1c level was low in Group 2, the high mortality rate indicates that systemic organ damage caused by chronic glucose elevation is more important than HbA1c. However, although there are publications in the literature (14, 15) stating that high HbA1c increases mortality, it is a parameter that can provide a low course of HbA1c with a good treatment and diet.
When we look at some mortality predictive studies, many parameters such as functional status, steroid use, delirium, thrombocythemia, insulin use, and heart diseases were evaluated and they claimed that these parameters also contributed to mortality (6–9). We did not evaluate these parameters in our study, but we consider these parameters as parameters that can be stabilized, since we have shown the necessary care to obtain support from related branches for the stabilization of additional diseases.
There are some limitations of our study. First of all, it is not known that it is retrospective and how much regular care some neurological, personal care and chronic diseases receive in the postoperative period. The standardization of the stability of chronic diseases of patients after discharge period will yield clearer results. Again, these patients could have been included in the study by controlling their hematological evaluations at certain periods.