This preprint is under consideration at Environmental Science and Pollution Research. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research Article
Sen Wang
Beijing Union University
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9853-4072
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
The impact of institutional pressure on the environmental strategy was analyzed and the heterogeneous choices available for corporate environmental strategy. A total of 597 publicly listed companies in heavily polluting industries were selected using multiple Logit models for empirical research. The results show that more companies choose environmental leadership strategies when the policy pressure is greatest; however, more companies choose pollution prevention strategies when the regulatory and public pressures are greatest; finally, organizations with more redundant resources and strong asset specificity are more inclined to choose environmental leadership strategies as institutional pressures increase. The findings provide a decision-making framework to promote environmental protection measures related to policy formulation, government supervision and public participation. Our study also provides empirical evidence to guide environmental strategic choices for heavily polluting enterprises.
Keywords
environmental strategy, policy pressure, regulatory pressure, public pressure, organizational slack, asset specificity
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 15 Mar, 2021
No community comments so far
Review #? received
Received 12 Mar, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 12 Mar, 2021
Editor invited
On 10 Mar, 2021
Editor assigned
On 24 Feb, 2021
First submitted
On 17 Feb, 2021
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at Environmental Science and Pollution Research. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research Article
Sen Wang
Beijing Union University
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9853-4072
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 15 Mar, 2021
No community comments so far
Review #? received
Received 12 Mar, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 12 Mar, 2021
Editor invited
On 10 Mar, 2021
Editor assigned
On 24 Feb, 2021
First submitted
On 17 Feb, 2021
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
The impact of institutional pressure on the environmental strategy was analyzed and the heterogeneous choices available for corporate environmental strategy. A total of 597 publicly listed companies in heavily polluting industries were selected using multiple Logit models for empirical research. The results show that more companies choose environmental leadership strategies when the policy pressure is greatest; however, more companies choose pollution prevention strategies when the regulatory and public pressures are greatest; finally, organizations with more redundant resources and strong asset specificity are more inclined to choose environmental leadership strategies as institutional pressures increase. The findings provide a decision-making framework to promote environmental protection measures related to policy formulation, government supervision and public participation. Our study also provides empirical evidence to guide environmental strategic choices for heavily polluting enterprises.
Loading...