DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-255665/v1
Introduction
The diagnosis of bilateral varicocele and sub-acute appendicitis co-existing in the same patient is rare and we report the management of a patient who presented to Lily Hospitals Limited, Warri, Delta State, Nigeria with both recurrent right iliac fossa pain and scrotal pain.
Case presentation
A 27 year old male who presented with recurrent scrotal pain of 3 years duration and recurrent right iliac fossa pain of 2 years duration. Following evaluation, the diagnosis of bilateral varicocele and sub-acute appendicitis was made and he subsequently had open bilateral inguinal varicocelectomy and open appendicectomy at the same sitting under regional anaesthesia. He had uneventful post-operative recovery and was subsequently discharged.
Conclusion
A thorough evaluation of patients presenting with scrotal and right iliac fossa pains is invaluable to avoid missing the diagnosis of both bilateral varicocele and appendicitis when they co-exist in the same patient.
The presentation of recurrent scrotal pain and right iliac fossa pain resulting from two different pathologies and occurring in the same patient at similar time is uncommon with the report of such rare in the literature. Commonly seen are patients presenting with either scrotal pains or right iliac fossa pains resulting from either varicocele or appendicitis respectively.
Varicocele is the dilation of veins of the pampiniform plexus draining the testis. Appendicitis is the inflammation of the appendix, symptoms include right lower abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and decreased appetite [1]. Sub-acute appendicitis is part of the non-acute variants of appendicitis.
The presentation of distinct scrotal pains and right iliac fossa pains occurring in the same patient at the same time is not common with paucity of data reporting such findings. Varicoceles may begin with the onset of puberty at around the age of 15 years [2], most are left sided and left sided predominance is explained by turbulent venous flow related to the right angle insertion of the left testicular vein into the left renal vein [3]. Varicocele is a physical abnormality present in 11.7% of men with normal semen analysis and 25.4% of men with abnormal semen [4]. Varicocele can lead to male infertility, scrotal swelling or pain and progressive ipsilateral testicular atrophy as complications. Our index patient presented with the complication of scrotal pain and had treatment for that. The exact relationship between reduced male fertility and varicocele is unknown but a meta-analysis showed that semen improvement is usually observed after surgical correction [5]. Varicoceles are graded according to the Dublin grading system from grades 1 to 3[6]. Our patient had bilateral grade 2 varicoceles. The surgical correction of varicocele was first described by Tulloch in 1952[7]. The surgical treatment for varicocele can be done open or laparoscopically and our index patient had an open surgical treatment.
Appendicitis is the most common acute surgical condition of the abdomen [8], with a lifetime occurrence of 7% [9]. The diagnosis of appendicitis is mainly clinical but when unclear, close observation, medical imaging and laboratory tests can be helpful [10]. The two most common imaging modalities used for the diagnosis of appendicitis are abdominal ultrasound scan and abdominal computerized tomography scan [10] .Our index patient had abdominal ultrasound scan during the initial evaluation although the diagnosis was clear earlier from the clinical evaluation. In 1889, Mc Burney published a series of reports on appendicitis and the therapeutic management and since then, appendicectomy has been the standard treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis [11]. Appendicectomy can be done open or laparoscopically and our index patient had open appendicectomy.
A 27 year old male who presented to the Urology Clinic, Lily Hospitals Limited, Warri, Delta State, Nigeria with complaints of recurrent scrotal pains of 3 years duration and right iliac fossa pain of 2 years duration. Scrotal pain was insidious in onset, dull aching, does not radiate to any part of the body, not worse at any time of the day, no known aggravating or relieving factors, not associated with scrotal swelling, lower urinary tract symptoms, urethral discharge or haematuria. The right iliac fossa pain was insidious in onset, colicky, does not radiate to any part of the body, aggravated by strenuous activities and cough, no known relieving factors, not associated with fever, anorexia, nausea, vomiting or abdominal distension. There was no past history of surgery and he was not allergic to any medications.
Physical examination revealed right iliac fossa tenderness with positive Rovsing’s sign and bilateral grade 2 varicoceles.
Investigations requested were Scrotal Doppler ultrasound scan that revealed bilateral dilated pampiniform plexus of veins above 3millimeters in keeping with varicoceles(Fig. 1) Abdominal ultrasound scan that revealed sub-acute appendicitis(Fig. 2) Urinalysis that was normal with normal Full blood count, Serum electrolytes, urea and creatinine. The diagnosis of bilateral varicocele with subacute appendicitis was made.
He subsequently had bilateral Open Inguinal Varicocelectomy and Open Appendicectomy done by the Consultant Urologist and General Surgeon respectively at the same sitting under regional anaesthesia.
Intraoperative findings were bilateral dilated pampiniform plexus of veins and retroileal inflamed appendix measuring about 12 centimeters (Fig. 3) He had uneventful post-operative recovery and was discharged home 3 days after surgery. He is currently on follow up visit with complete resolution of both right iliac fossa pain and scrotal pain.
Histopathology report of the resected appendix revealed lymphoid follicular hyperplasia with no evidence of malignancy while that of the resected varicocele segment revealed features consistent with varicocele
The diagnosis of both bilateral varicoceles and appendicitis in the same patient occurring around the same time is rare. Thorough clinical evaluation is thus pertinent during evaluation of patients presenting with right iliac fossa pain and scrotal pain to avoid missing such pathologies when they co-exist in the same patient.
Ethical approval
Not applicable
Consent to participate
A written consent was signed by the patient
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Availability of data and material
Not applicable
Competing interests
The author declares that he has no competing interests
Funding
None
Authors’ contributions
Not applicable
Acknowledgements
Not applicable
Code Availability
Not applicable