3.2 Characterization of filler and its dispersion in NR matrix
The filler structures and distributions in the NR matrix had a great influence on the crack propagation resistance and fatigue life properties. As shown in Fig. 2 (a), raw GO had the transparently lamellar structures and wrinkled edges with a micrometer size. Figure 2 (b) showed that CB particles were spherical and easily stick together to form dendritic chains. Figure 2 (c) was the curve of energy storage modulus (G’) to the strain, where the similar tendency of G' in different three vulcanized systems indicated the basically same strength of filler networks and the dispersion properties. Figure 2 (d, e, f) represented fractured surface SEM images of CB/GO/NR composites with CV, SEV and EV system, respectively. It observed that both GO and CB were uniformly dispersed without obvious agglomeration, demonstrating that the vulcanized systems had little influence on the dispersion of fillers. As shown in Fig. 2 (g, h, i), CB dispersion level of CB/GO/NR composites was further investigated to verify the filler dispersion ability. According to the distribution of CB, it could be seen that the size distribution was about 0–30 µm and the largest was about 8.6 µm, which were accounted for 18.2%, 17.2% and 19.4% in CV, SEV and EV systems, respectively. The result verified that the dispersion degree of reinforcing fillers in the three vulcanization systems was similar. According to these basic data, it can be concluded that the dispersion ability of composites with different vulcanized systems is similar. And the determinants affecting the crack propagation resistance and fatigue life of composites with different curing systems still need to be explored.
3.3 Vulcanization parameters of CB/GO/NR composites
In order to explore the vulcanized properties in different vulcanized systems, characteristic parameters of CB/GO/NR composites were studied by the torque rheometer. As shown in Fig. 3 (a, b, c), compared with SEV and EV systems, the positive vulcanization with CV system was the shortest and its corresponding vulcanized efficiency was the fastest as well, which could be ascribed to the large amount of sulfur obviously increased the available sites and thus accelerated the vulcanized rate. In addition, the highest ΔM of composites (the difference between the maximum and minimum torque) belong to CV system, reflecting its the highest crosslink density. Figure 3 (d) displayed the exactly crosslink density and crosslink structure distribution through using the equilibrium swelling method. It could be obtained that crosslink density of CB/GO/NR composites with CV system reached 3.72×10− 4mol/cm3, which was higher than that of the SEV (3.61×10− 4mol/cm3) and EV (3.35×10− 4mol/cm3) system. Meanwhile, the crosslink structure was dominated by polysulfide instead of monosulfide (EV) as well as three crosslinks evenly distributed (SEV). Furthermore, the relaxation of CB/GO/NR composites was investigated to test crosslink density, where the crosslinked and un-crosslinked composites were corresponded to short and long relaxation time, respectively[40–42]. From Fig. 3 (e), it could be seen that the crosslinked proportion of CV system was the largest, indicating that a large number of crosslinks were generated during the vulcanization process. Also, the glass transition temperature (Tg) of CB/GO/NR composites was measured by DSC. As shown in Fig. 3 (f), the Tg of CV system increased to 60.7 ℃, which resulted from the enhanced fragment restriction caused by the higher crosslink density in CV system. Thus, it could be inferred that the highest crosslink density and structure dominated by polysulfide were existed in CV system.
3.4 Static mechanical properties of CB/GO/NR composites
Figure 4 showed the static mechanical properties of CB/GO/NR composites with different three vulcanized systems. From Fig. 4 (a, b and c), it could be seen that CB/GO/NR composites with CV system owned the highest tensile strength (27.5 MPa), elongation at break (362.5%), modulus at 100% and 300% elongation (4.2, 19.5 MPa), tear strength (71.6 KN/m) and hardness (69 A) because of the developed crosslink networks. And the high tear strength of CV system indicates that the developed crosslink networks was beneficial to prevent crack propagation and improve the tear resistance of rubber composites. Meanwhile, as for NR-based composites, the high strain-induced crystallization ability was helpful to improve the crack deflection, passivation, branching and fatigue resistance, which could be evaluated by Mooney-Rivlin equation from stress-strain curves as follows:[43, 44]
σ*=σ/2(λ-λ−2)=C1 + C2λ−1
where σ represented the stress, λ was the tensile ratio, C1 and C2 were Mooney-Rivlin constants respectively. As shown in Fig. 4 (e), the upturn point of tensile ratio gradually shifts to the right of X-axis from EV to CV system, where the larger X, the greater strain-induced crystallization ability. The largest upturn point and elastic modulus were CV system, which mainly because the large number of polysulfide crosslinks with low bond energy, thus, in the stretching process, the early fracture could make molecular chains stretch and lead to the easy orientation as well as crystallization.
3.5 Crack propagation resistance growth under cyclic loading
Crack growth rate of composites was the most important method to monitor the dynamic crack propagation resistance and fatigue life performance, which was mainly influenced by the tear energy[45]. As shown in Fig. 5 (a), it could be seen that composites with CV system required the highest tear energy under the same displacement and deformation. Figure 5 (b) reflected that the lowest crack growth rate (64.1 nm/cycle) in CV system and also showed an upward trend with the increase of tear energy, which was obviously lower than that of EV (101 nm/cycle, 57.6%) and SEV (83.7 nm/cycle, 30.6%) system at 2000 J/m2. As shown in Fig. 5 (c, d), it could be seen that composites with CV system owned the highest storage modulus (E') in the whole testing range, indicating the improved interactions among the NR chains[46]. Figure 5 (e) showed the relationship between loss factor (tanδ) and temperature, where the tanδ value was significantly reduced in CV system, demonstrating that the developed crosslink networks restricted the movement ability of NR molecular chains. In addition, the relationship between crack propagation behavior and viscoelasticity could be obtained according to the theory proposed by Persson and Brener, which expressed as follows:[47, 48]
$$G\left(v\right)={G}_{0}+{G}_{0}f(v,T)$$
1
$$G\left(v\right)={G}_{0}[1+\frac{2}{\pi }{E}_{0}{\int }_{0}^{2\pi v/a}d\omega \frac{F\left(\omega \right)}{\omega }{J}^{{\prime }{\prime }}{]}^{-1}$$
2
$${J}^{{\prime }{\prime }}=\frac{\text{tan}\delta }{{E}^{{\prime }}+{E}^{{\prime }}{tan}^{2}\delta }$$
3
where G (v) was tear energy at a certain crack growth rate (v), G0 represented the threshold energy to crack growth at the crack tip, G0f (v, T) expressed as the bulk dissipation in the linear viscoelastic region and mainly contributed G(v)[49]. According to the time-temperature equivalence principle, G (v) could be also expressed as formular (2), F(ω) was a function of frequency (ω), crack-tip diameter (a), and crack velocity (v). J" was loss compliance modulus relating to the viscoelastic parameter and could be measured as formular (3). Figure 5 (f) displayed the change of loss compliance modulus various temperature[50]; it could be seen that the CB/GO/NR composites with CV system had the lowest J", according to the relationship between crack growth behavior and viscoelastic formula in Fig. 5 (g), J" decreases, leading to G0f (v, T) increases, indicating that the crack tip of CV system has higher energy dissipation (hysteretic loss) during dynamic crack growth. When the tearing energy is fixed, the increase of G0f (v, T) will cause the decrease of G0, and the energy applied to crack growth will be reduced. Therefore, the crack growth rate of CV system will be reduced.
The energy dissipation value can be obtained by calculating the area of the strength-strain curve[51, 52].The energy consumed (Ediss) per unit crack propagation length could more intuitively study the viscoelastic behavior at the tip of rubber composites, which was established as follows:
$${E}_{diss}=\frac{E}{dc/dN}$$
From Fig. 6 (a-d), the cyclically stress-strain curves and hysteresis loss of CB/GO/NR composites with different vulcanized systems under various tear energy was characterized. It could be found that composites with CV system had the little hysteresis loss at the same tear energy. As shown in Fig. 6 (f), it observed that the Ediss of CV system was the largest, indicating that more energy was consumed in the dynamic process of crack propagation and finally improved the crack propagation resistance and fatigue life.
The crack growth path could further help understand the influence on the dynamic fatigue life and crack propagation resistance property[53]. It could be seen that CB/GO/NR composite exhibited the different paths in the crack propagation process from the same initial crack length. As shown in Fig. 7 (a-a2), the crack propagation path of CV system had obvious migration phenomenon and passivation as well as branching also appeared at the crack tip. Meanwhile, the SEM images of fatigue tear sections in Fig. 7 (a3) were the rough and had a deeper sense of hierarchy complex, which demonstrated that the more energy was dissipated and reduced the stress concentration, thus delaying the crack growth rate and improving the dynamic fatigue life of composites. While for the SEV (b-b3) and EV (c-c3) system, the crack growth path was basically obvious deviation and consistent with the initial crack. Also, the SEM images of fatigue tear sections were relatively simple and smooth, which made the crack subjected to less resistance and had an adverse effect on crack propagation and fatigue life.
Additionally, AFM was also used to characterize the change of interface morphology of CB/GO/NR composites after crack propagation. Figure 8 (a, d, g) was the AFM scan of cross-section of CV, SEV and EV vulcanization system after 20000 cyclic tests, respectively. It could be seen that the roughness was distinctly different. From Fig. 8 (b, e, h), it found that the composites with CV system owned large surface variation and the maximum height difference was about 300 nm, which was higher than that of SEV (184 nm) and EV (120 nm) system. As shown in Fig. 8 (c, f, i), 3D maps of the surface roughness verified that the CV system had the great surface fluctuation when compared with SEV and EV system. The results demonstrated that the rearrangement of polysulfide bonds and stress dredging characteristics in the CV system made its surface roughness larger, which effectively diffused the external strength during the crack propagation process and improved the crack propagation resistance.
Figure 9 was the typically schematic of crack propagation for CB/GO/NR composites with CV system. Herein, according to the above results, it could be known that CV system mainly contained polysulfide crosslinks with low bond energy, which led to the stress release and the crosslinks exchange rearrangement reaction to improve the crack propagation resistance and fatigue life property of CB/GO/NR composites. The specific procedures were as follows[54]: (1) the fracture of polysulfides made the molecular chain stretch easily, improving the strain induced crystallization and the passivation of crack tip ability. (2) The polysulfides had the function of exchange rearrangement, which made it form a new crosslink and change the uneven degree in the initial vulcanization network to a certain extent, reducing the crack growth rate and improving the crack growth resistance. Therefore, CB/GO/NR composites with CV system had the excellent crack propagation resistance and fatigue life property.