3.1 Climatic ENSO effects on global LST
To examine overall impact of ENSO on global LST, we diagnose the climatological seasonal-mean regression of global LST onto boreal-winter ENSO for the average of all 13 ensembles during 850-2005AD. The teleconnection patterns in the developing summer (MJJAS-1), boreal winter (NDJFM), and decaying summer (MJJAS + 1) are quite distinct (Figs. 1a-c), for both the sign and intensity. In MJJAS-1 (Fig. 1a), the impact of El Niño on LST manifests as cooling in middle latitude of Asia, central Asia, East Asia, the Maritime Continent, northern Australia, eastern and southwestern North America, while it triggers warming in Africa, Alaska, South America, and the West Antarctica near the Amundsen Sea. The ENSO-LST teleconnections intensify significantly during NJDFM when the ENSO is at its peak (Fig. 1b). The strongest cooling occurs in the northern Eurasian continent associated with an El Niño. In addition, cooling strengthens over the Tibet Plateau and mid-latitude North America, while the other parts of the world exhibit notable warming, especially West Asia, high-latitude North America, South America, Greenland, Australia, and the Antarctic. A key feature of the ENSO-LST teleconnections in the mid-to-high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, is the strong wintertime cooling in Eurasia along with a warming Arctic over northern Canada and Greenland, known as the warm Arctic-cold Eurasia (WACE) pattern on the interannual timescale (Cohen et al. 2012; Mori et al. 2014; Overland et al. 2015; Sun et al. 2016; Feng et al. 2021). Following the peak phase of El Niño, the intensity of the ENSO-LST teleconnections in MJJAS + 1 is weaker than that in the boreal winter, except for the persist stronger warming in South America and West Antarctic near the Amundsen Sea (Fig. 1c), whereas the signs of regression coefficients over Europe and India transit from negative to positive, indicating an opposite ENSO-LST teleconnections between boreal winter and decaying summer of the ENSO.
3.2 Decadal changes of ENSO teleconnections
Based on the above climatic regressions of three consecutive seasons, we conduct 11-year-sliding EOF analysis to examine the decadal-to-centennial changes of ENSO teleconnections on global LST, all of which are named decadal changes below. EOF1 explains about 7.7% of the total variance, which can be significantly separated from the other higher modes. For an El Niño, EOF1 mainly exhibits prominent cooling, exceeding − 0.4ºC, in the northern Eurasian continent during boreal winter (Fig. 1e), against the warming exceeding 0.3ºC in western North America from Alaska to Idaho and Greenland. Meanwhile, notable cooling exceeding − 0.2ºC distributes over the West Antarctic near the Amundsen Sea in both MJJAS-1 and MJJAS + 1. The results indicate that the pronounced decadal changes of ENSO teleconnections on global LST are located in the mid-to-high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere in the boreal winter, and in the West Antarctic in both developing and decaying summers of the ENSO.
To identify the features of decadal non-stationary teleconnections, we employ composite analyses based on the two opposite phases of the normalized PC1, when the amplitudes are greater than + 1.0σ and less than − 1.0σ (where σ is the standard deviation of PC1), respectively. As we discussed above, the significant differences between the two opposite phases are located in the Eurasian continent during the boreal winter. When the amplitude is greater than + 1.0σ, extremely cold temperature dominates the northern Eurasia and extends to East Asia associated with an El Niño, which corresponds to the extreme warm temperature in Greenland (Fig. 2b). On the contrary, when the amplitude is smaller than − 1.0σ, cold temperature weakens over the high latitudes of Eurasia, and LST response to the El Niño over South Siberia is even reversed to show warming. At the same time, warming in Greenland is also slowing down, and the eastern part of this island even shows cooling (Fig. 2e). Since there are significant differences in the response of LST to ENSO in Eurasia, accordingly, we hereafter refer the two phases PC1 > + 1.0σ and PC1 < -1.0σ to as the “EA-cold phase” and “EA-warm phase,” respectively. In the EA-cold phase, the WACE pattern associated with an El Niño is enhanced. Meanwhile, remarkable decadal change of teleconnections also occurs in the Antarctic during MJJAS-1 and MJJAS + 1; and the warming of Antarctic LST during the EA-warm phase is much stronger than that during the EA-cold phase associated with El Niño, especially in the West Antarctic.
Figure 3 shows composite ENSO-related precipitation anomalies during the above two opposite phases. In MJJAS-1, differences of precipitation anomalies associated with two different phases are located in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River in East China, with less rainfall in the EA-cold phase and more rainfall in the EA-warm phase (Figs. 3a and 3d). Meanwhile, the opposite east-west distribution of precipitation anomalies in Greenland is reversed in terms of different phases. During the boreal winter, northern Eurasia tends to experience less rainfall in the EA-cold phase and more rainfall in the EA-warm phase (Figs. 3b and 3e), and opposite rainfall responses also occur in eastern Greenland. During the El Niño decaying summer, the difference of precipitation responses to different phases is relatively weak. Over southwest North America, precipitation responses to El Niño for the EA-cold and warm phases are similar, indicating a stable wet response to El Niño from its developing summer to decaying summer during the last millennium.
To understand why there are significant decadal changes in ENSO-LST teleconnections, we examine composite El Niño SST structure and its 200-hPa teleconnections for the two phases (Fig. 4). The SST anomalies exhibit the well-known El Niño evolution, the Indian Ocean dipole (IOD) (Klein et al. 1999; Meyers et al. 2007; Du et al. 2009; Chowdary et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2015; Stuecker et al. 2017) and the North Atlantic Tripole (NAT) anomalies (Sutton and Hodson 2003; Rodríguez-Fonseca et al. 2016; Jiménez‐Esteve and Domeisen 2018) from MJJAS-1 to MJJAS + 1. The most substantial difference between the EA-cold and warm phases is the location of the maximum SST warming in the tropical Pacific during the boreal winter. In the EA-cold phase, the maximum SST warming associated with the El Niño is located closer to the dateline, more like the Central-Pacific (CP) El Niño (Ashok et al. 2007). This westward shift of the maximum SST warming is also observed during the boreal summer. In the EA-warm phase, the maximum SST warming is located in the eastern Pacific, as the Eastern-Pacific (EP) El Niño.
Associated with the central-to-eastern equatorial Pacific warming, a PNA-like wave train, represented by 200-hPa high + low + high + low pressure anomalies from central equatorial Pacific to North America, appears in the Northern Hemisphere during the boreal winter (Figs. 4b and 4e). A PSA-like wave train, represented by southward high + low + high pressure anomalies from the equatorial Pacific to the Antarctic along 120oW, is observed in the Southern Hemisphere during the austral winter for both ENSO developing (Figs. 4a and 4d) and decaying (Figs. 4c and 4f) years.
Atmospheric teleconnections associated with these different types of El Niño are quite different. For the EA-cold phase related to CP-like El Niño, the PNA teleconnection shows a zonal-type teleconnection from the North Pacific through Greenland to the North Atlantic (Fig. 4b); thus, the polar vortex is enhanced over Greenland while it is weakened over northern Eurasia, resulting in strong northerly wind and cooling over northern Eurasia. The PNA teleconnection for the EA-warm phase (Fig. 4e), however, exhibits a meridional-type teleconnection from the North Pacific through Canada to northern Eurasia. The strengthened polar vortex over northern Eurasia tends to weaken the northerly wind there, resulting in weak northern Eurasian cooling.
During MJJAS-1 and MJJAS + 1, a robust PSA-like wave train pattern characterized by a low-pressure system over the middle latitudes of the South Pacific, a high-pressure system near the Amundsen Sea of the West Antarctic and a low-pressure system over South America and the South Atlantic are emanated from the tropical Pacific in both phases. The Amundsen Sea low (ASL) weakening related to West Antarctic high-pressure anomalies induces a substantial warming in the West Antarctic. The PSA-like wave train is stronger for EP-like El Niño (Figs. 4d and 4f) than for CP-like El Niño (Figs. 4a and 4c), resulting in greater ASL weakening and western Antarctic warming for the EP-like El Niño.
3.3 IPO-determined decadal changes in ENSO teleconnections
To understand what contributes to the decadal variation of ENSO teleconnections, we conduct regression analysis of global SST anomalies against PC1. Figure 5a exhibits typical negative phase of the IPO, with significant negative SST anomalies in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific and positive SST anomalies in the North and South Pacific. Accompanying this simulated negative IPO, the North Atlantic exhibits negative SST anomalies. The SST patterns of the IPO usually last for 20–30 years, with dominated oscillation peaks at 30, 34, and around 20 years in the spectrum analysis of PC1 (Fig. 5b).
ENSO teleconnections are usually triggered by its associated convection anomaly over the tropical Pacific. Compared to the EP-like El Niño during the EA-warm phase and positive IPO phase, the positive convection anomaly associated with CP-like El Niño during the EA-cold phase and negative IPO phase moves westward (Fig. 5a), which may contribute to different ENSO teleconnections during these positive and negative IPO phases.
In a linear theory (Hoskins and Karoly 1981; Liu et al. 2013), the upper-troposphere teleconnections are usually determined by the background wind and Rossby-wave source associated with convection. To understand why the westward shift of CP-like El Niño convection can produce zonal-type teleconnection while EP-like El Niño favors a meridional one, we use the wave ray theory, which has been widely used to depict the propagation of Rossby-wave energy based on zonal flow or wave theory (Hoskins and Karoly 1981; Hoskins and Ambrizzi 1993; Li and Li 2012; Li et al. 2015; Zhao et al. 2015), to investigate these two terms. In the CESM-LME, differences in the zonal wind between EA-cold and EA-warm phases are quite small (Fig. 6); and wave rays starting from the same location did not show significant difference in the trajectory (not shown). Since the shift of convection in different El Niños, the wave ray in the EA-cold phase related to CP-like El Niño is set to start at 163°W to the west of Hawaii, and that in the EA-warm phase related to EP-like El Niño starts at 145°W to the east of Hawaii. The wave rays with initial zonal wavenumber 1 show different propagation patterns during these two phases, although both display “great circle”-like trajectory. For the EA-cold phase, the ray becomes more zonally approach to the Greenland, while for the EA-warm phase, it exhibits more meridionally propagating pattern (Fig. 6), consistent with the CESM simulations. This result means that the shift of the wave source location rather than the background flow that determines different ENSO teleconnections pattern between the two phases.
To investigate whether this decadal variation of ENSO teleconnections is attributed to internal variability or to external forcing, we use the average of the 13 ensembles to remove internal variability; then, remained significant signals can be attributed to external forcing (Zanchettin et al. 2013). During the last millennium from 850 to 2005AD, global temperature experienced Medieval warm period around 1000AD, cold Little Ice Age from the 14th century to 19th century, and current modern warm period (Chai et al. 2018). The average of these PC1s of all 13 ensembles, however, does not show significant signals except for significant negative-to-positive transition around 1258 Samalas eruption, and negative signals around 1710AD and 1975AD (Fig. 7a). The latter two periods were not close to famous large eruptions at 1695 and 1982AD (Liu et al. 2022). From 850 to 2005AD, there were more than 40 large tropical eruptions, while significant signals in ensemble average only appeared three times, which means that the significant ensemble average was due to the small ensemble size of 13. The interannual variability maybe cannot be totally removed by the average of only 13 ensembles. To check whether the long-term forcing from solar radiation and anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentration, we perform EOF analysis on the 50- and 100-year-sliding regression, and still no signals can be simulated in the 13-ensemble average (Figs. 7b and 7c). These results suggest that the decadal variation of ENSO teleconnections in the CESM-LME is mainly attributed to interannual variability rather than to external natural or anthropogenic forcing.
3.4 Observed decadal changes of ENSO teleconnections
To explore whether the simulated decadal changes of ENSO teleconnections exist in the observations, we perform the same analyses based on the NASA Goddard's Global Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP) and the Hadley Centre Global Sea Ice and Sea Surface Temperature (HadISST) spanning the period 1880–2021. As shown in Figs. 8a-8c, the ENSO-LST teleconnections in the observations are similar to that in the simulations (Figs. 1a-c), presenting strong wintertime cooling trend in Eurasia along with a warming Arctic over northern Canada and Greenland, i.e., the WACE pattern (Cohen et al. 2012; Mori et al. 2014; Overland et al. 2015; Sun et al. 2016; Feng et al. 2021). In the observations, EOF1 of 11-year-sliding regression, explaining about 19.7% of the total variance, also exhibits prominent wintertime cooling over northern Eurasia, consistent with the simulations, although North America displays an opposite pattern to that of the simulations (Fig. 8e). The IPO-like pattern can be also detected as a decadal modulator for ENSO teleconnections in the observations (Fig. 9). These results mean that the simulated decadal ENSO teleconnections on LST mimics the observations very well, although the tropical North Atlantic exhibits significant warming related to cold IPO in the observations against cooling in the simulations.