This study was conducted to investigate the effect of behavioural model-guided nutritional counselling on the nutritional status of the community-dwelling old age population in Bahir Dar City, Northwestern Ethiopia.
Only 32.1% and 34.7% of study participants had normal nutritional status based on MNA before and after the intervention, respectively. The results are less than those of the studies in Egypt (33) and Lithuania (18), where 46% and 51.5% versus 88% and 53.7% of the studied population had normal nutrition before and after the intervention, respectively. While the nutritional status measured by BMI revealed that 40.2% and 41.6% of old age people in this study had normal weight before and after the intervention, respectively. This is more than the findings from Egypt, where 29% of participants had normal weight prior to the intervention and 34% after three months (33).
The socioeconomic disparities and differences in health literacy among the study population could be one explanation for this variance.
On the other hand, the mean body weight and the BMI in this study did not change significantly, while the mean score of MNA significantly increased after the programme. This is consistent with earlier research from Vietnam (34), Netherlands (35), Norway (36), and Finland (37), which found an increase in MNA scores but no appreciable change in body weights or BMI. This discrepancy may be due to the nature of the MNA tool, which measures many factors and is more sensitive to change than just body weight or BMI.
The overall nutritional knowledge level also increased from pre-intervention to post-intervention, consistent with earlier studies (8, 33, 38, 39). Additionally, the mean score of the perceived susceptibility, benefits, and intentions significantly increased after the nutrition counselling compared to before the intervention. On the other hand, the mean score of perceived barriers significantly decreased after the intervention. These results are in line with the study from Iran, which found that older women's perceptions, beliefs, and behaviors around nutrition were significantly improved after HBM-based nutritional counselling (8).
Moreover, the majority of study participants had regular breakfast, lunch, and dinner practices before and after the intervention. In a similar fashion, two-thirds of older adults in the United States consumed three meals on a day of intake (40). However, lunch was the most often skipped meal in the United States (40), in contrast to the current study, where breakfast was the meal that most study participants frequently skipped. The discrepancies might be due to cultural and health literacy differences.
Although only 2.3% of the study participants in the current study took the recommended five meals every day after the intervention, they reported changes in the number of meals and snacks they consumed per day after nutritional counselling. The results are consistent with the studies from Europe (17), Finland (37), and Vietnam (34), where study groups reported a positive change in dietary intake across all nations after receiving individualized nutritional guidance, despite the fact that participants in the various study locations had differing baseline dietary intakes.
The present study also discovered a positive effect of the implementation of the nutritional counselling program on the self-reported consumption of the majority of food categories, such as dairy products, fruits, and meat or egg intake. However, no changes were observed in the starchy staples, legumes, fats, or sweet foods. Similar findings from Egypt (38, 39) revealed statistically significant increases in the intake of dairy products, vegetables, and fruits, while statistically significant decreases in the frequency of cereal and fluid intakes were observed before and after the study intervention, but no significant changes in protein intake. Whereas, study participants in Finland reported increasing their intake of protein-rich foods after receiving individualized dietary counselling (37). Moreover, interventional studies revealed that eating more frequent and smaller meals with protein-rich breakfast and lunch improved diet quality, lowered BMI, and preserved lean tissue mass in older adults (41, 42).
Overall, the majority of the study participants had adequate DDS and the change is also statistically significant. Yet, there was a low intake of animal products and fruits, while there was a high consumption of oils, fats, sweets, spices, coffee, and alcoholic beverages. This is comparable to the poor dietary habits of Ethiopians (43) and other African populations (39), which have a low intake of animal-source foods, vegetables, and fruits and a high intake of cereals, salt, and a rising trend in the consumption of saturated fat and oil.
Strengths and limitations of the study
To our knowledge, this is the first study that estimates the effects of behavioural model-guided nutritional counselling on community-dwelling old age people’s nutritional status. This study has strengths, as the data collection and the counselling intervention were conducted by separate people, which could have decreased some bias.
However, the following are some limitations of the current study: First, the reliability of self-reported data and a single 24-hour dietary intake recall in the study population must be considered, as well as other factors including low educational levels and the decline of sensory abilities with ageing. Second, since this is a pre-post quasi-experimental design, the study's ability to draw a causal relationship between the intervention and outcomes is limited.