In this study, we demonstrated that V.riukiuensis accumulates starch granules that bind Na, which could be the second evidence of Na-binding starch granules in plants. The only report before this study was of common reed, which forms Na-binding starch granules in the shoot base in response to salt stress (Kanai et al., 2007). Kanai et al. have demonstrated co-localization of Na with starch granules and the isolated starch granules contained higher amounts of Na than other parts of the shoot base did (Kanai et al., 2007). Although V. riukiuensis forms Na-binding starch granules in the leaves not in the shoot base (Figs. 1–6), these facts suggest that the Na-trapping system by starch granules had independently evolved in multiple salt-tolerant species.
Since we previously revealed that V. riukiuensis allocate relatively higher amount of Na to the leaves, we have considered it has an includer-type mechanism, which sequesters excess Na+ into vacuoles (Yoshida et al., 2016, Noda et al., 2022). However, recent studies argue that vacuole is not an ideal organelle for Na+ sequestration, as tonoplast is permeable to Na+ and thus allows back-leak to cytosol (Shabala et al., 2019). Thus, for halophytic species including V. riukiuensis, it would be better to have a mechanism other than, or in addition to, the one using vacuole.
What is complicating in our results is in that V. nakashimae also accumulates lots of starch granules in the chloroplasts but does not allocate Na to the leaves. One possibility is that V. nakashimae have supreme ability to exclude Na+ out of the leaves. If Na+ does not enter leaf cells, it can never reach chloroplasts where starch granules are formed. The other possibility is that the starch granules in V. nakashimae lacks Na-binding ability. Although pure amylose chains do not have any ability to bind cations including Na+, modification of hydroxyl groups such as phosphorylation turns them into cation exchangers (Matsumoto et al., 1998). Given amylose chains are extended from the surface of starch granules (Goren et al., 2018), V. riukiuensis and common reed may have higher enzymatic activity in modifying those chains.
It should be noted that V. riukiuensis may also have ability to exclude Na out of the leaves, at least when the leaves have run out of starch granules (Fig. 5). One may argue that the shading leads to stomatal closure and reduces xylem flow that transports Na to the leaves. However, the results of the control plants do not support such arguments. We also covered the leaflets of the control plants with transparent film to minimize the effect of transpiration, but sodium allocation did not seem to be reduced compared to other leaves or leaflets (Fig. 5). In addition, as observed in Fig. 5, 22Na have entered into veins of the shaded leaves but not into the mesophylls. Thus, there should be a mechanism to suppress Na+ transport from xylem to mesophyll cells.
One limitation in this study is that we do not know how much the starch granules contribute to salt tolerance in V. riukiuensis. However, this is a testable issue because V. riukiuensis can be crossed with V. angularis. We have already crossed them and will perform genetic analyses to see if there is any correlation between starch content in leaves and salt tolerance.
To conclude, we have demonstrated common reed is not the only species that have evolved Na-binding starch granules. As it is effective in multiple plant taxa, we are intrigued to apply this system for developing salt-tolerant crops. By combining other mechanisms of salt tolerance, it would bring synergistic effects on salt tolerance.