This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research Article
Cui yu Jia
Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University
Corresponding Author
Da wei Zhao
Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University
Corresponding Author
Hong jun Li
Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Objective
To retrospectively analyze the clinical and imaging manifestations differential points between hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) and Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS).
Material
The clinical symptoms, laboratory examination and imaging findings of 15 cases of hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and 33 cases of Budd-Chiari syndrome were statistically analyzed, find the identification points. The study used the Fisher test, P values of 0.05 or less were considered to indicate significant differences. The retrospective study was approved by the hospital's ethics committee.
Results
Laboratory tests: There were significant differences in total protein reduction rate (66.7% vs 9.1%, p༜0.01), albumin reduction rate (66.7% vs 9.1%, p༜0.01), Gamma-glutamyltransferase elevation rate (100% vs 6.1%, P༜0.01), alkaline phosphatase elevation rate (60% vs 6.1%, p༜0.01), and abnormal rate of prothrombin time (100% vs 21.2%, p༜0.01) between the two groups (BCS vs SOS). It also indicates that the liver function of SOS patients is more seriously impaired. Image findings: The following image findings were observed significant more frequently in SOS than in BCS and were statistically significant: gallbladder wall thickening (66.7% vs 78.2%, p༜0.01), ascites (80% vs 27.3%, p༜0.01), cloverleaf or claw-like shapes (80% vs 0%, p༜0.01). The following images appeared more frequently in BCS than in BCS and were statistically significant: caudate lobe enlargement (33.3% vs 75.8%, p༜0.01), collateral circulation (46.7% vs 93.9%, p༜0.01), diffuse patchy enhancement (20% vs 93.9%, p༜0.01), homogeneous in delayed phase (13.3% vs 90.1%, p༜0.01).
Conclusion
To Identification of SOS and BCS should be based on the patient's laboratory examination and imaging findings to improve diagnostic accuracy.
Keywords
liver, Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, Budd-Chiari syndrome, Computed tomography, Magnetic resonance imaging
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
No competing interests reported.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 17 Mar, 2021
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Learn more about our company.
This is a preprint. It has not completed peer review.
Research Article
Cui yu Jia
Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University
Corresponding Author
Da wei Zhao
Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University
Corresponding Author
Hong jun Li
Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 17 Mar, 2021
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Objective
To retrospectively analyze the clinical and imaging manifestations differential points between hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) and Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS).
Material
The clinical symptoms, laboratory examination and imaging findings of 15 cases of hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and 33 cases of Budd-Chiari syndrome were statistically analyzed, find the identification points. The study used the Fisher test, P values of 0.05 or less were considered to indicate significant differences. The retrospective study was approved by the hospital's ethics committee.
Results
Laboratory tests: There were significant differences in total protein reduction rate (66.7% vs 9.1%, p༜0.01), albumin reduction rate (66.7% vs 9.1%, p༜0.01), Gamma-glutamyltransferase elevation rate (100% vs 6.1%, P༜0.01), alkaline phosphatase elevation rate (60% vs 6.1%, p༜0.01), and abnormal rate of prothrombin time (100% vs 21.2%, p༜0.01) between the two groups (BCS vs SOS). It also indicates that the liver function of SOS patients is more seriously impaired. Image findings: The following image findings were observed significant more frequently in SOS than in BCS and were statistically significant: gallbladder wall thickening (66.7% vs 78.2%, p༜0.01), ascites (80% vs 27.3%, p༜0.01), cloverleaf or claw-like shapes (80% vs 0%, p༜0.01). The following images appeared more frequently in BCS than in BCS and were statistically significant: caudate lobe enlargement (33.3% vs 75.8%, p༜0.01), collateral circulation (46.7% vs 93.9%, p༜0.01), diffuse patchy enhancement (20% vs 93.9%, p༜0.01), homogeneous in delayed phase (13.3% vs 90.1%, p༜0.01).
Conclusion
To Identification of SOS and BCS should be based on the patient's laboratory examination and imaging findings to improve diagnostic accuracy.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Loading...