For a detailed description of the method section see our previous study(Ge et.al, 2022; Zhang et.al, 2022).
Study Design
The research data came from China Family Health Index-2021 (CFHI-2021) 2021 China Family Health Index Survey General Report, 2021). The investigation conducted multi-stage sampling in mainland China. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Jinan University (Approval number: JNUKY-2021-018).
Participants
Sample size
In the cross-sectional investigation, the bilateral test's sample size formula (Formula 1) was used to calculate the minimum sample size. The test level was set as α=0.05, p referring to the proportion of adolescents who had self-medicated behaviour reported in Taiwan, China in 2019, which was 33.9%(Miaoet.al, 2019), and the allowable error δ was set as 0.1. According to the sample size formula, the required sample size of N=780 was calculated for this study. Considering 15% of questionnaire inefficiency, the sample size was 918. In this study, 1065 questionnaires were collected, which was more than the minimum sample size.
Inclusion criteria
(1) Age ≥12 years old and ≤18 years old. Considering that the respondents may fill in nominal age (the age filled in was greater than their actual age) when filling in the age, the 18-year-old respondents were included in this study; (2) Have purchased and used OTC drugs on their own (answer "yes" to the question whether you have purchased and used OTC drugs on your own); (3) Participate in the study and fill in the informed consent form voluntarily; (4) Participants can complete the network questionnaire by themselves or with the help of investigators.
Exclusion criteria
(1) People with unconsciousness or mental disorders; (2) Those who were participating in other similar research projects.
In this study, 1065 questionnaires were collected, and logic checks were carried out on the questionnaires. 62 questionnaires with logic inconsistency and less than 240 seconds of filling time were excluded, and 34 questionnaires with no self-medication behaviour were excluded. Finally, 969 respondents were included, and the effective recovery rate of questionnaires was 90.99%.
Instruments
The questionnaire consists of three parts. The first part investigated the demographic and sociological characteristics of respondents, such as gender, age, province, nationality, permanent residence (urban and rural), education level, number of siblings, per capita monthly family income(RMB to the USD exchange rate is the average rate for August 2021) etc. The second part investigated the status quo and essential considerations of adolescents' self-medication behaviour, consisting of 3 questions (1 single-choice and 2 multiple-choice questions). The third part is a series of standard scales, including the Short Form Health Literacy Instrument (HLS-SF12), Family Health Scale-Short Form (FHS-SF), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the General Anxiety Disorder-7(GAD-7).
The status quo and important considerations of residents' self-medication behaviour
The first single-choice question was "Have you ever purchased and used OTC drugs by yourself?" , which was designed to ask whether the respondents had self-medicated. Those who answered "no" were excluded from the study. The first multiple-choice question was, "What kinds of OTC drugs have you purchased and used on your own?" It was designed to investigate the types of OTC drugs the respondents had purchased and used by themselves. The second multiple-choice question was "Which of the following factors do you think are the important factors for you to consider when you purchase OTC drugs by yourself?" to investigate the essential factors for the subjects to purchase OTC drugs by themselves. For each respondent, the order of the two multiple-choice questions was set as random to minimize bias in the study.
Health Literacy Scale Short Form 12 Items
The Health Literacy Scale Short Form 12 Items (HLS-SF12) was used to study the respondents' Health Literacy (HL). The scale includes 3 dimensions of health care, disease prevention and health promotion, with 12 items. Each item is scored at 4 levels (1= very difficult, 2= difficult, 3= easy, 4= very easy). The standardized HL index is calculated using the formula. The index range is 0-50, and its score positively correlates with the respondents' health literacy. The calculation formula is index = (x−1) × (50/3), and x is the average score of the items in one dimension or the whole scale of one respondent. 1 is the lowest possible value of the average (at this time, the minimum value of the index is 0), 3 is the range of the average score, and 50 is the maximum value of the index(Duonget.al, 2019). The higher the index, the higher the health literacy level of the respondents. In this study, the Cronbach's coefficient of HLS-SF12 was 0.937, and the Cronbach's coefficient of health care, disease prevention and health promotion subscales were 0.850, 0.856 and 0.871, respectively, indicating good reliability. Concerning relevant literature, the health literacy of the respondents was divided into the high group (more than 33 points) and the low group (33 points or less). The grouping rules of each subscale were consistent with those of the full scale(Cheong et.al, 2021).
Family Health Scale-Short Form
The Family Health Scale-Short Form (FHS-SF) was developed by Crandall and Weiss-Laxer et al. and translated into Chinese by Wang Fei et al. according to the standard translation process of the Scale. FHS-SF includes 10 items, 4 dimensions. Each dimension comprises 2-3 items with higher factor loading and weight extracted from the 4 dimensions of the Family Health Scale-long Form(FHS-LF). The 4 dimensions are Family/social/emotional health processes, Family healthy lifestyle, Family health resources, and external social supports. Each item adopts the Likert 5-level scoring method, among which the sixth, ninth and tenth adopt reverse scoring; the higher the score is, the higher the family health level is(Wanget.al, 2022). In this study, the Cronbach's coefficient of the FHS-SF scale was 0.851, and the Cronbach's coefficient of the family/social/emotional health process, healthy family lifestyle, family health resources and family external social support subscales were 0.911, 0.874, 0.784 and 0.760, respectively, indicating good reliability. Each dimension of the scale was included in this study for analysis. The respondents were divided into the high group (greater than or equal to the median) and low group (less than the median) according to the score of each dimension of FHS-SF.
Mental health status
In this study, the Patient Health Questionision-9(PHQ-9) and the General Anxiety Disorder-7(GAD-7) were used to measure the mental health status of the respondents. In this study, the Cronbach's coefficient of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)and the General Anxiety Disorder-7(GAD-7) were 0.926 and 0.953, respectively, indicating good reliability.
PHQ-9 was developed by Spitzer et al.(Spitzeret.al, 1999), which was used to measure the actual feelings of the respondents over nearly two weeks. The likert four-point scoring method was adopted to evaluate the following 9 aspects: decreased interest, low mood, sleep disturbance, fatigue, eating disorder, inferiority complex, difficulty concentrating, psychomotor delay, and suicidal symptoms. The main statistical index of this scale is the total score, and the total value of PHQ ranges from 0 to 27 points. The higher the score, the higher the degree of depression. In this study, according to the scoring rules, the respondents were divided into two groups: no depression (4 points or less) and possible depression (more than 4 points).
GAD-7 was developed by Spitzer et al. (2006)(Spitzeret.al, 2006) to measure the degree of anxiety. It uses the number of days with related symptoms in the last two weeks as the evaluation standard. The degree of tension and anxiety, uncontrollable worry, excessive worry, inability to relax, inability to sit still, irritability, anger, and fear were respectively assessed. The main statistical index of this scale is the total score, which is scored by Likert four points. The total score ranges from 0 to 21, mainly used to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms; the higher the score, the higher the degree of anxiety. In this study, according to the scoring rules, the respondents were divided into two groups: no anxiety (score 4 or less) and possible anxiety (score more than 4).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA Network Version from Peking University, Address: 162.105.134.153). In this study, all scale scores were transformed into binary variables (high and low groups) by referring to relevant literature(Ferketich, 1991). The classification variables were represented by frequency (component ratio), and univariate binary logistic regression was used for univariate analysis. Multivariate binary stepwise Logistic regression was used (α=0.05 and α=0.10 were the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria of variables, respectively) to analyse the factors related to the consideration of drug efficacy and safety among respondents. The test level was α=0.05. Finally, the respondents were divided into different subgroups according to gender and permanent residence, and multivariate binary stepwise Logistic regression was carried out for different subgroups to do a subgroup analysis.
Quality control
Two rounds of preliminary investigations were conducted before the formal investigation. Based on the results of the preliminary investigations, we modified the content of the questionnaire. Trained investigators distributed questionnaires and registered respondents’ codes one on one. Every Sunday night, the research staff communicated with the investigators and summarized, evaluated and gave feedback on the questionnaires they collected. After the questionnaire was collected, the logic check and data screening were carried out by two people back to back. When analysing the data, if an outlier was found, the research team would find the original questionnaire and check it with the investigator before proceeding to the next step.