To make clear how C6H12O6 shaped the development of the V2O5/C combination, The development of the morphology of V2O5/C composite was shown using SEM characterization. The V2O5 (Fig. 1a) sample exhibits the glossy structure as regular blocks, with these sheets’ average size of around 200 nm. The V2O5/C (Fig. 1c) product shows a flake-like structure and the sample has a sheet structure with a few small pieces. The layer is smooth, and many of the fragments formed from sheet packing around 80 nm. After a little quantity of C6H12O6 is added, the crystal development of V2O5 is altered[29], resulting in the surface structure of V2O5/C being rather rough. It is obvious that the particle size of V2O5/C is smaller than that of V2O5.
The microstructures of V2O5 and V2O5/C were then analyzed by TEM (Fig. 1b, f). It can be seen that V2O5 and V2O5/C show a stacked sheet structure. The d-spacing of the lattice fringes is 0.34 nm, the same as the (110) plane of V2O5/C (Fig. 1d). Besides, SAED depicts the single-crystal structure of the compound V2O5/C (Fig. 1e), as (-10-1, -101, 002) diffraction points of V2O5/C can be observed. EDS mappings reveal a homogeneous distribution of V, O, and C throughout the structure of V2O5/C (Fig. 1g–i), demonstrating the successful carbon mix of V2O5.
Figure 2a shows the XRD patterns of the V2O5 and V2O5/C samples. All diffraction peaks correspond well to those of the layered structure V2O5 with lattice constants a = 11.516 nm and c = 4.3727 nm, which accords with the literature values (PDF#41-1426), and no obvious peaks of additional contaminants are seen. The results show that the two samples are crystalline-phase V2O5. However, the diffraction peak of (110) and (310) planes of V2O5/C gradually weaken together with the C6H12O6 content. This implies that the addition of C6H12O6 surfactant would significantly hinder the favored development of (l10) planes, which indicated a decreasing degree of crystallinity.
Figure 2c depicts the Raman spectra of various V2O5 samples.The α-V2O5 is responsible for the characteristic peaks found at 144, 198, 286, 306, 407, 473, 524, 693 and 995 cm− 1[30]. The peaks at 995 and 693 cm− 1 are the stretching modes of the V = O1 bonds and V-O3 bonds, and stretching vibration of the V–O4 bond corresponds to 524 cm− 1 (Fig. 2b), while the peaks at 473 and 306 cm− 1 can be attributed to the bending vibrations of V-O2 and V-O4 bonds. In contrast, the vibrations at 407 and 286 cm− 1 are attributable to the bending of the V = O1 bonds. [VO5]–[VO5] vibrations correspond to the two Raman bands at 194 and 141 cm− 1. After adding C6H12O6, the majority of the vibrations of V-O2 (473 cm− 1) and V-O4 (524 cm− 1) stay intact. The Raman peak at 693 cm− 1 decreases by 32%, indicating that the oxygen vacancy site is primarily at the V-O3 bridge sites[31, 32]. The vanadium oxide matrix containing C6H12O6 as carbon sources exhibits two major Raman scatting peaks at around 1350 and 1580 cm− 1. The imperfection and disorder of carbon is the cause of the 1350 cm− 1 Raman scattering peak (D-band)[13]. In addition, the SP2 atomic motion of stretching in the carbon ring or long chain results in the 1580 cm− 1 Raman scattering peak (G-band). This illustrates the degree of graphitization of carbon-based materials[33, 34], which indicates the existence of carbon.
Through the use of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), the samples' chemical composition was identified, as shown in Fig. 3a. It is important to estimate the sample obtained by XPS has the vanadium valance seen in Fig. 3b. The V 2p3/2 peaks of V2O5 were located at 516.3 eV (V4+) and 517.5 eV (V5+) (V4+/V5+ =0.05:1). The 2p3/2 peaks of V5+ become faint, as seen by the XPS spectrum of V2O5/C of V, while the peaks for V4+ increase (V4+/V5+=0.1:1). The increase in V4+ ratio may be due to the introduction of oxygen vacancies in V2O5/C, which is consistent with the Raman speculation. To investigate further, The O1s spectra of the V2O5/C and V2O5 samples are displayed in Fig. 3c, and two distinct peaks can be seen there. The lattice oxygen of V2O5/C (V2O5), also known as the OI peak, has a binding energy of 527.3 eV, and the oxygen vacancies in the metal oxide matrix are responsible for the peak at 528.4 eV. (named OII peak)[35, 36]. V2O5/C has 7.5% more oxygen vacancies than V2O5. The oxygen defects concentration could encourage the V2O5/C electrode to possess superior electrochemical characteristics[35].
The CV curves of V2O5/C and V2O5 at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s− 1 and voltage range of 0.2 − 1.6 V are shown in Fig. 4a. The redox reactions of vanadium in the various valence states led to the appearance of multiple pairs of redox peaks on the quasi-rectangular curve of the V2O5/C and V2O5 electrode. Compared to V2O5, V2O5/C exhibited a greater current density, which might be attributable to its increased surface area. It was concluded that the former had a greater electrochemical reactivity and capacity than the latter.[37]. Figure 4b illustrates the first three cycles of CV plots for the V2O5/C electrode within a voltage window of 0.2 − 1.6 V at a scan speed of 0.1 mV s− 1. In the forward scan, a slight shoulder (0.93 V) is detected, followed by two strong peaks (0.87 V and 0.59 V) that demonstrate the electrochemical intercalation of Zn2+ into the layered structure. In the reverse scan, three peaks at 0.76, 1.05, and 1.14 V correspond to the deintercalation of Zn2+ ions from the multilayer framework. In the forward scan, the peaks may have been caused by continual decreases from V5+ to lower oxidation states, whereas the reverse may have occurred in the reverse scan. It is seen that the sweep of the first cycle in the CV profile has a little different peak location than the other cycles. The displacement of peaks of the first cycle can be attributed to the slow activation of the new electrode[17]. In addition, following the first cycle, the subsequent CV curves exhibit strong repeatability and similarity, confirming the excellent electrochemical reversibility of the electrode. As seen in Fig. 4c, the CV curves exhibit comparable forms at various scan speeds, indicating that the as-obtained V2O5/C electrode material has an outstanding pseudo-capacitive response.
Table 1
EIS fitting parameters and ion diffusion coefficients for the pristine V2O5/C and V2O5 electrodes.
|
Rs [Ω]
|
Rct [Ω]
|
DZn2+ [cm2 s− 1]
|
V2O5/C
|
0.72
|
11. 27
|
3.85×10− 13
|
V2O5
|
10. 69
|
29. 04
|
1.19×10− 13
|
To comprehend the dynamics of interfacial transport in the V2O5/C nanosheets, electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) are performed. As shown in Fig. 5a, Nyquist plots of both pristine V2O5 and V2O5/C nanosheets consist of a depressed semicircle in the high-to-medium frequency range and an angled line in the low-frequency range. The Nyquist charts presented in the inset of Fig. 5a are analyzed using an analogous circuit. It is possible to compute the diffusion coefficient of Zn2+ using the equation
$$\text{D=}{\text{R}}^{\text{2}}{\text{T}}^{\text{2}}/\text{2}{\text{A}}^{\text{2}}{\text{n}}^{\text{4}}{\text{F}}^{\text{4}}{\text{C}}^{\text{2}}{\text{δ}}^{\text{2}}$$
1
where A represents the surface area, n is the valence of ions, C is the zinc ion concentration in the electrolyte, F represents the Faraday constant, R is the gas constant, T is the experimental temperature, and δ is the slope determined from the fitting lines between Zim and ω−1/2. Table 1 shows the resistance of these electrodes. V2O5/C has a smaller Rs and Rct than the pristine V2O5 because the oxygen vacancies in the V2O5/C electrode increase the carrier concentration and enhance the electrical conductivity of V2O5/C[38]. The Zn-ion diffusion coefficients may be computed using the connection between low frequencies and the real component of impedance (Fig. 5b). The Zn2+ diffusion coefficient of V2O5/C (3.85×10− 13 cm2 s− 1) is larger than that of the pristine V2O5 (1.19×10− 13 cm2 s− 1). The quicker Zn2+ diffusion following hydrogenation, as seen by the enhanced conductivity and smooth Zn2+ tunnels brought forth by oxygen vacancies[39, 40].
Comparisons of rate capability and cycle stability are illustrated in Fig. 5c and 5d. Figure 5c displays the rate performances of the V2O5/C and V2O5, the V2O5/C demonstrated higher rate capability with average specific discharge capacities of 287, 270, 248, and 221 mAh g− 1 at current densities of 1, 2, 4 and 8 A g− 1. Figure 5d shows that the efficiency of V2O5/C electrode and the V2O5 electrode arrived by more than 100 percent during the first few dozens of cycles. This is due to the activation of drainage zinc ion batteries at the beginning. The activation procedure may be broken down into the two steps listed below. Along with the charge and discharge operation, the electrolyte will enter the interior space of V2O5, on the one hand[41]. On the other hand, the insertion/extraction of Zn2+ and the phase transition of V2O5 produce additional new active sites[41, 42]. It can also be found that the V2O5/C electrode also performs better cycling capability than the V2O5 electrode. The specific capacity of V2O5/C is maintained around 220 mAh g− 1 at 4 A g− 1. It gradually decreased to 188 mAh g− 1 (85.5%) after 500 cycles with nearly 100% coulomb efficiency. However, the specific capacity of V2O5 is maintained around 180 mAh g− 1 at 4 A g− 1, and it exhibits the capacity of 139 mAh g− 1 (77.2%) at 4 A g− 1 after 500 cycles. Hence, the enhancement of V2O5/C composite rate capacity and cycle stability is credited to the large specified surface area and the well better electrical conductivity because of the carbon addition. The oxygen defects concentration could enhance the electrochemical characteristics of the V2O5/C electrode.