Study design
Archived paraffin blocks of known methods of fixation and processing were used in this study. Four fixatives were used: 10% NBF, Bouin's solution, Rossman's solution, and 80% alcohol, at both RT and 4°C. Three oxidizing agents were used: 5% chromic acid for 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes at RT and 10 minutes at 60°C, 10% chromic acid for 20 and 30 minutes at RT, 2% FeCl3 for 5, 10, and 15 minutes, and 1% periodic acid for 5 minutes. The current study used known archived rabbit liver paraffin blocks with known methods of preparation. These archived blocks remained from another group at the department of histopathology and cytology at the faculty of medical laboratory sciences–University of Khartoum, Sudan, and the archived blocks were prepared from the rabbit:
Sampling
The rabbit’s liver was rinsed with normal saline, sliced into 8 pieces approximately 5×3×3 mm, and transmitted to the appropriate fixative.
Fixation
Each piece was fixed in one of four fixatives: 80% alcohol, 10% NBF, Bouin’s and Rossman’s solution at RT and 4°C in a refrigerator for 24 h. Each piece was placed in a labeled cassette according to the fixative type and fixation temperature. Subsequently, they were transferred to the processing machine.
Post-fixation Treatment
Following Rossman's solution, samples were moved to 95% alcohol for 2 h, and after Bouin's fixation they were treated with 75% alcohol for 2 h [7]. Subsequently, samples were transferred to labeled cassettes according to the type and temperature of fixation.
Tissue Processing
For dehydration, 80% alcohol fixed samples were treated with one change of 80% alcohol and 4 changes of absolute alcohol for 1 h each. Bouin’s solution fixed samples were dehydrated in one change of 75% and 90% alcohol, then four changes of absolute alcohol 1 h each. Rossman’s solution fixed samples treated in one change of 95% alcohol, then by four changes of absolute alcohol 1 h each. 10% NBF fixed samples treated with one change of 70% and 90% alcohol, then by 4 changes of absolute alcohol 1 h each.
For clearing, all samples were treated with two changes of xylene 2 h each. For impregnation, samples were treated with two changes of melted paraffin wax for 2 h each. For embedding, samples were embedded in paraffin wax using metal molds. Finally, they were left to harden at RT, then in a refrigerator.
Sectioning
340 labeled slides were prepared and 4 µm sections were cut by a rotary microtome, 11 sections from each block (3 tests and 1 control for each variable).
Staining
All sections were treated with 2 changes of xylene for 3 minutes each, absolute alcohol, 90% alcohol, 70% alcohol, and distilled water for 2 minutes each. Subsequently, they were stained using the following techniques.
Regarding the PAS reaction, sections were placed in1% periodic acid for five minutes, rinsed in distilled water (DW), treated with Schiff's reagent for 15 minutes, washed in running tap water for 10 minutes, stained with Harris's hematoxylin for 3 minutes, differentiated in 1% acid alcohol, blued in running tap water for 10 minutes, dehydrated in absolute ethanol, cleared in xylene and mounted in D.P.X [8].
For the chromic acid-Schiff method, sections were treated with 5% chromic acid for 10, 20, and 30 minutes, 1 hour at RT, 10 minutes at 60o C, and 10% chromic acid for 20 and 30 min. Sections washed well in three changes of DW, treated with Schiff's reagent for 15 minutes, washed in running tap water for 10 minutes, stained with Harris's hematoxylin for 3 minutes, differentiated in 1% acid alcohol, blued in running tap water for 10 minutes, dehydrated in absolute ethanol, cleared in xylene and mounted in D.P.X [9].
For the Ferric chloride-Schiff reaction, sections were treated with 2% ferric chloride acid for 5, 10, and 15 minutes, washed well in DW, treated with Schiff's reagent for 15 minutes, washed in running tap water for 10 minutes, stained with Harris's hematoxylin for 3 minutes, differentiated in 1% acid alcohol, blued in running tap water for 10 minutes, dehydrated in absolute ethanol, cleared in xylene and mounted in D.P.X [8].
For negative controls, sections were treated with saliva for1hour at 37°C and washed in tap and distilled water, then stained according to the requested technique [10].
Scoring System
Two examiners did a subjective evaluation of the staining results. Slides with technical errors that render them difficult to be evaluated were excluded, and the average of the scores was calculated for each test slide. Finally, the quality of glycogen staining results was written as follows:
Poor: 0 - < 5: Weakly stained glycogen, granules are small and indistinct, and recognizing glycogen is difficult.
Satisfactory: 5 - < 7: Visible glycogen but stained faintly.
Good: 7- < 9: Glycogen is fairly distributed evenly throughout the stained section and visible.
Excellent: 9–10: Visible glycogen which has well-stained large granules which are fairly evenly distributed throughout the stained section.
Ethics Approval
We used archived paraffin blocks in this study. Department of histopathology and Cytology, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Sciences, University of Khartoum, accepted the study and no ethical approval was required.