3.1. Daily (REE) identification and its relation with the SSW (1981–2022) at the NG hydrographic basin
For the study of the daily REE and SSW at the NG hydrographic basin, we analyzed the data by HU (Table 1), using the daily rainfall data obtained, free of charge, from the Power Project. Daily rainfall temporal patterns and REE has statistically studied over the study area for 41 years (1981–2022) as shown in Fig. 3.
A total of 15065 daily rainfall (DR) and SSW data were considered for the period 1981–2022. As a result, 10779 events of DR surpassed the normal value and 49459 events of DR were below than normal value, which on average was 1.9 mm in the 4 HU analyzed. It was observed that of the total DR data, 82.1% did not surpass the normal value, and 17.9% of events surpassed that value. This first analysis allows us to identify the extreme events that were located within those values that surpassed the normal value (Fig. 3).
One of the extreme events that we found in all the HU, during the study period, was the one that occurred on May, 7th, 1994 (101.89 mm/day in rocky outcrop; 89.44 mm/day in paleodrains and sedimentary fills and 74.79 mm/day in the urban area). Another REE that can be mentioned in all HU, was that occurred on November 26th, 2018 (90.7 mm/day in rocky outcrop; 113.33 mm/day in paleodrains and sedimentary fills, and 123,51 mm/day in the urban area) (Fig. 3).
In relation to the extreme events that were located between 50 and 100 mm, the number of 22 events were determined in rocky outcrops (17% of the total REE); 38 events in paleodrains (29%); 39 in sedimentary fills (30%); and 32 in the urban area (24%) Regarding this distribution, it is important to mention that the sedimentary fills and paleodrains HU represent the largest area (km2) of the basin (Fig. 4, near here). Considering the REE that became relevant in each HU, it is important to mention those that occurred on October, 14th, 2002 (77.35 mm/day) in rocky outcrop; on September 27th, 2019 (89.30 mm/day) in paleodrains and sedimentary fills respectively; on October 14th, 2002 (74.59 mm/day); on September 27th, 2019 (98.7 mm/day); and on March 5th, 2021 (80.63 mm/day) in the urban area (Fig. 3).
Table 1 is presented below, which summarizes the average, maximum, minimum, and data higher and lower than the normal Rainfall data collected for the studied period.
Social effects of REE at the NG hydrographic basin (2002–2022)
Regarding the evolution of DR and SSW data, during the years which contain the most relevant REE (2002–2022), 7396 data were analyzed (Fig. 5). Of this total, 15.3% of DR surpassed the normal value (1.75 mm) and the 84.7% was below. Although a less representative percentage of DR was the one that exceeded the normal value, extreme events were detected within that range that had important social effects on the residents of the urban area.
According to the analysis carried out on the basis of the modeled data of DR and SSW, we can distinguish the following days with rainfall > 50 mm, which means that they are REE, Category I: first of all, the registered rainfall in the urban area of September 27th, 2019 (R = 98.75 mm/day); then, March 5th, 2021 (R = 80.63 mm/day); October 14th, 2002 (R = 74.59 mm/day); February, 3rd 2010 (R = 66.67 mm/day); May 14th, 2011 (R = 65.36 mm/day); October 12th, 2012 (R = 64.5 mm/day), April 20th, 2007 (R = 62.82 mm/day), August, 29th, 2002 (R = 52,71 mm), as the most representative of the period studied. In all cases, those days correspond to the maximum rainfall of a short period, which is developed along 3, 4–5 days. On this way, for example, the REE cited for October 14th, 2002 involved a total of 5 pluvious days: from 12th to 16th October, 2002 (Table 2); the event of April 20th, 2007 involved a total of 4 pluvious days: form 17th to 20th April, 2007, etc. The totality of the aforementioned events was found in the press and the description of their social-physical effects is shown at Table 2.
Based on DR data, various news of regional and local journalism had been consulted. Most of them included physical and social effects, especially for the most populated areas, where intense rainfall produced relevant impact related to the concentration of the population and of socioeconomic and cultural activities. One of the potentialities of working with the regional and local journalism is the description of what happened by mentioning the characteristics and effects on the population as well as obtaining a type of information that cannot be obtained from official sources (Table 2).
According to the previous analysis, during the months of August and October, 2002, high relevant events of heavy rainfall occurred. The first of them, which was cited on August 27th, had important repercussions, generating the evacuation of 300 affected people in the upper sub-basin (in the rock outcrop HU) and in the lower sub-basin (in the urban HU). The second event, which was cited on October 12th of that same year, involved (according to the rainfall modeled data) a total of 5 days with rainfall register (Fig. 6). It also had important effects generating the evacuation of 150 people and serious problems related to the generation of floods and waterlogging. In this way, 2002 has already been approached as a very wet year in various studies (Bohn et al., 2011; Campo de Ferreras et al., 2011; García & Piccolo, 2006).
It is important to note that, according to the analysis of climatic data, the maximum value of DR corresponds to October 14th, 2002 (74.59 mm/day). Regarding the behavior of the SWW, an upward trend is observed from the month of April, with a relevant increase from September, considering that the maximum value of the year was registered on August 29th (0.92).
Then, in an event cited by the press on April 18th, 2007, problems related to the flooding of access and rural roads, especially in the upper sub-basin (rocky outcrop HU) were described (Fig. 7). According to the analysis of climatic data, it can be observed that the maximum value of DR corresponds to April 20th, 2007 (62.82 mm/day) and that day was involved in a short period of 4 pluvious days (from 17 to 20th April, 2007. The maximum value of SSW also occurred on 20th April.
The event of DR > 50 mm occurred on 1st April 2017 (R = 61.05 mm), cited by the press on March 31st, 2017, and involved a pluvious period of 8 days (according to modeled data). For this event, according to the press (Table 2), problems related to flooding and overflows in the neighborhoods located in the lower sub-basin (Bahía Blanca district) and in the upper sub-basin (Tornquist district), were described (Fig. 8).
Considering the statistical climate data analysis, on March 25th the maximum value of rainfall (77.45 mm/day) and SSW (0.9) was recorded. This event, which involved 5 days (from 22 to 26th March, 2022) caused, according to the press, adverse environmental consequences such as: evacuation of 111 people, destruction, falling trees, flooding, overflow of the homonymous stream, water ingress into homes and commercial and sports enterprises, among others. Given this situation, the local authorities implemented a series of measures aimed at mitigating these consequences derived from the heavy DR. Among them, assistance to the most vulnerable groups through evacuation systems, the interruption of public activities during the day after the maximum DR, continuous monitoring of the situation by the local authorities and continuous communication with authorities at the regional level due to the floods that occurred in the upper sub-basin (Fig. 9).
3.2. Discussion
During the last few decades, REE have increased in a global as well as regional scale in frequency and intensity (Sridhar et al., 2019; Bahtla et al., 2019). An increase in the air temperature has caused changes in the hydrologic cycle, which have been followed by several emergencies of natural extreme events around the world (Petpongpan et al., 2021). Rainfall is one of the most important climate variables that vary both in space and time (Venkata Rao et al., 2020), and, for this reason, it is important to consider the study of REE, in the context of climate change for water resources management in a river basin.
In the regional context of the study area, extreme events have been determined using climatic data, in a similar way as Campo de Ferreras et al, (2011); Gentili et al., (2013); Moretto (2018) & Ortuño Cano et al. (2019) whose identified them, for a portion of the studied basin, based on press revision. In those works, databases were designed and articles were inventoried in relation to extreme events that occurred in locations of the Buenos Aires province (Argentina). News revision becomes an important tool to analyze the genesis, evolution, and characteristics of extreme events, as well as their effects on society (Campo de Ferreras et al., 2011). Unlike what has been done in these works, in our case, the press review was used to characterize the social effects of REE, but also, this information was complemented with the statistical analysis of climatic modeled data, just like Casado & Campo (2019) and Ferrelli (2020) have done to determinate physical effects of extreme events in the southwest region of Buenos Aires province. Other works have focused on applying grid data for the spatiotemporal analysis of precipitation in areas subject to a marked discontinuity of climatic records in space and time (Casado & Piccone, 2018).
The NG hydrographic basin is characterized by presenting an alternation between dry and humid periods (Mastrandrea, 2021). In this work, extreme events were determined including the analysis of climatic data (rainfall, mm/day). Daily REE have been defined and classified into two categories depending on rainfall received in a day, as Bhatla et al. (2019) did. In other works, extreme events have been determined according to their duration including a methodology based on different methods and techniques (hydrographic, geomorphologic, biogeographic) (Volonté & Gil, 2019). According to the IPCC (2014), an extreme weather event is an average of a series of weather events in a particular period. In our case, daily REE and SSW (1981–2022) were statistically analyzed in relation to average values and previous works to determine and characterize the extreme rainfall events occurrence and their physical and social effects.
The study area has been studied from different points of view. Carrica & Lexow (2004) analyzed the natural recharge to the aquifer of the upper sub-basin of the NG stream, concluding that the pluvial recharge, located in the mountain foothills, is the main source of aquifer feeding.
Fernández et al. (2017) studied the water quality of the NG stream and determined a decrease in the surface water quality downstream. For this reason, we consider it a priority to continue deepening the analysis of the processes that manifest themselves in the lower sub-basin, corresponding to the urban space, totally modified by the urbanization process (Zapperi, 2014). Other authors identified the urban ecosystem services of Bahía Blanca city to analyze its potential in recognizing the aspects associated with water security (Montico et al., 2019). In addition, Mastrandrea & Ángeles (2021) determined areas exposed to the danger of floods due to the intensity of rainfall, using Multicriteria Evaluation (MCE) techniques and map algebra. They determined that the areas that present high and very high danger levels are located mostly in sectors near the stream, in the middle and lower sub-basin. There are studies that have focused on the analysis of the social perception of water risk, especially in the urban area of the lower sub-basin. In the southern sector of the urban space, residents perceive with greater intensity those socio-environmental problems that occur as a consequence of the occurrence of floods and waterlogging, due to the generation of intense rains in short periods of time (Mastrandrea, 2019). In this way, we agree that the social effects reported by the press are recorded mostly in the south and southeast of the urban space of the lower sub-basin.
Given the latest REE, it is important to consider that, in the urban fluvial environment the lower sub-basin, the local authorities decided to carry out mechanical cleaning of the NG stream. This intervention had already been considered and, faced with the resistance of different social organizations, it had not come to fruition. Among the headlines of the local digital press that reported on this intervention, the controversies generated by the sudden decision of the local municipality can be recognized: "The cleaning of the Napostá stream began to relieve the Maldonado Canal" (Telefé Bahía Blanca, 2022); “Despite the controversy, the cleaning of the Napostá stream continues” (Channel 7 Bahía Blanca, 2022); Controversy over the cleaning of the Napostá: "It was the best option and the only one" (Telefé Bahía Blanca, 2022) and "Discomfort among environmentalists over the intervention in the Arroyo Napostá” (Telefé Bahía Blanca, 2022), among others. In this way, the occurrence of an extreme event exposes the environmental conflicts that manifest in the study area, which are communicated by the press according to the social effects that they cause for the residents.
Finally, we consider that the present work constitutes a contribution regarding the combination of quantitative and qualitative techniques for the knowledge of the physical and social effects of the daily REE on an intermediate-sized hydrographic basin. The results presented in this work can constitute an important diagnosis and starting point for the knowledge of the physical and social dynamics of the study area.